Guest guest Posted March 12, 2004 Report Share Posted March 12, 2004 Kenna, I have heard Sally respond to the breast-feeding questions several times. As I read her, she is probably most offended in general by " diet dictocrats " as well as all nutritional dogma that is not rooted in tradition or good science. She would probably challenge anyone who states that ALL mothers should breastfeed, she would probably react against a set length of " politically correct " years of nursing to get a A rating. I don't know. I bet it will come up though in Wisconsin and I do hope people ask nicely. Additionally, like all " gurus " in any and all movements, the guru will not be ALL THINGS TO ALL PEOPLE. No matter how hard they try, brilliant and much-needed leaders will have " flaws " , " blind-spots " as well as their own idiosyncracies. Frustrating but true, not everyone can be a god. What I would hope is that EVEN IF SHE'S WRONG on this point, and I am not saying she is at all, that people won't throw away her or the entire message. I have seen this happen so often and it is always lose-lose. Additionally, I have read Price's main book wherein the Traditional Nutrition principles were derived and found his approach to be very HOLISTIC. He took into consideration not only nutrition but lifestyle issues such as exercise, nursing, hygiene, mental health, climate, and others (the word STRESS hadn't been invented yet). As I recall, the main factors in jaw formation was about getting adequate nutrition for bones, teeth and full manifestation of the genetics. Will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 Will, Good point about not expecting anyone to be perfect (even ourselves-isn't that reassuring!). I agree that no one person has ALL of the answers. We have to use our intelligence and intuition to discern what is right for us. But we still can learn ALOT from each other. Kathy > Kenna, I have heard Sally respond to the breast-feeding questions several > times. As I read her, she is probably most offended in general by " diet > dictocrats " as well as all nutritional dogma that is not rooted in tradition or > good science. > > She would probably challenge anyone who states that ALL mothers should > breastfeed, she would probably react against a set length of " politically > correct " years of nursing to get a A rating. I don't know. I bet it will come up > though in Wisconsin and I do hope people ask nicely. > > Additionally, like all " gurus " in any and all movements, the guru will not be ALL > THINGS TO ALL PEOPLE. No matter how hard they try, brilliant and > much-needed leaders will have " flaws " , " blind-spots " as well as their own > idiosyncracies. Frustrating but true, not everyone can be a god. > > What I would hope is that EVEN IF SHE'S WRONG on this point, and I am not > saying she is at all, that people won't throw away her or the entire message. I > have seen this happen so often and it is always lose-lose. > > Additionally, I have read Price's main book wherein the Traditional Nutrition > principles were derived and found his approach to be very HOLISTIC. He > took into consideration not only nutrition but lifestyle issues such as exercise, > nursing, hygiene, mental health, climate, and others (the word STRESS > hadn't been invented yet). As I recall, the main factors in jaw formation was > about getting adequate nutrition for bones, teeth and full manifestation of the > genetics. > > Will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 Here's an article from Mothering.com which addresses breastmilk toxins if anyone is interested. I'm not promoting or criticizing it. Just putting it out there: http://www.mothering.com/12-0-0/html/12-1-0/dont-trash.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 Thanks Will. I am glad you said this. I was also getting worried that Sally's wisdom was getting thrown out due to a disagreement on one issue. You said it well. Whether she is right or wrong, we all have blind spots and none of us can be a god. Re: Sally Fallon and breastfeeding > Kenna, I have heard Sally respond to the breast-feeding questions several > times. As I read her, she is probably most offended in general by " diet > dictocrats " as well as all nutritional dogma that is not rooted in tradition or > good science. > > She would probably challenge anyone who states that ALL mothers should > breastfeed, she would probably react against a set length of " politically > correct " years of nursing to get a A rating. I don't know. I bet it will come up > though in Wisconsin and I do hope people ask nicely. > > Additionally, like all " gurus " in any and all movements, the guru will not be ALL > THINGS TO ALL PEOPLE. No matter how hard they try, brilliant and > much-needed leaders will have " flaws " , " blind-spots " as well as their own > idiosyncracies. Frustrating but true, not everyone can be a god. > > What I would hope is that EVEN IF SHE'S WRONG on this point, and I am not > saying she is at all, that people won't throw away her or the entire message. I > have seen this happen so often and it is always lose-lose. > > Additionally, I have read Price's main book wherein the Traditional Nutrition > principles were derived and found his approach to be very HOLISTIC. He > took into consideration not only nutrition but lifestyle issues such as exercise, > nursing, hygiene, mental health, climate, and others (the word STRESS > hadn't been invented yet). As I recall, the main factors in jaw formation was > about getting adequate nutrition for bones, teeth and full manifestation of the > genetics. > > Will > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 Greetings! I have been on this list for several weeks. Just reading and learning and enjoying the dialogue. This thread has inspired me to speak up and to ask a couple questions. I found NT to be sorely lacking in the feeding of babies. All babies must begin to eat solids at some point. And aside from formula and egg yolks I didn't find much information in NT. I know it can not be the " be all end all " book for all people. I, however, am wondering about feeding my baby who is finally showing interest in food and wants to feed himself. What would be good food choices for a baby that doesn't want to be spoon fed? Most of the options I have come up with are toast, bagel, pancakes, french toast. Seems a little overboard in the grain department. When can little ones start eating meat? Dairy? How is it prepared? I think I was raised on jar baby food. My first child was primarily vegetarian as a baby. He has eaten more tofu than I care to admit. I would like to avoid that with son#2. Any ideas and feedback would be much appreciated. As far as breast-feeding goes, I would like to put in my two cents. My second son was born prematurely. No one has been able to tell me why. He was under three pounds and was fed through an NG tube in his nose for 6 weeks. I expressed breast milk and then we fed it to him through this tube. I was allowed to hold him for one hour a day in the beginning. Then two hours. Then three, etc. I was doing skin to skin holding, called " kangaroo care " with him. I would always do the holding during the feeding times so that he would associate full belly with my smell and touch. As he gained weight and strength I would cradle hold him and let him smell and mouth my nipple. As he gained more strength he was able to suck. But he had to work on the suck-swallow-breath method of nursing. Meanwhile he is being fed through his NG tube. I called this his " free lunch " . Who said there is no such thing? Well, to make a long story short, he finally caught on. I will never forget that moment when he nursed for one solid minute without stopping. The sound of a nursing newborn, it is the most beautiful sound I have ever heard. That wasn't the end of the NG. He had to build up stamina and learn to nurse long enough for it to be nutritional. In the hospital there is a lot of bottling going on. This is because a lot of Mom's aren't there with their babies enough to get the babies to learn how to nurse. Also, if the mother is not there for every feeding then the baby either needs an NG tube or to be bottled. Once introduced to the bottle babies often prefer them, because they are easier. More milk, less work. The hospital staff, does encourage Mom's to pump so that the babies are fed breast milk. Science has proven the benefits of breast milk over formula. However, apparently, breast over bottle has not been proven. In any case I just wanted to put our story out there. I really think babies and mom's need a lot of support postpartum. If my preemie had been my first child and I had never nursed before I may not have been as driven to nurse him. It may be natural but it can be very challenging, even for full term babies with natural births. Most other cultures have A LOT of support for new mothers. The women of the community are there for one another and young girls are witnessing births and nursing all there lives. We are lacking in our society. Thanks for this list and all that participate. -k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.