Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Freeman has been extolling the virtues of side airbags for years. Here is some current information which supports 's position. DeSiena Airbags make a difference in side crash tests By Ken , Associated Press 3-6-2006 WASHINGTON — The 2006 Ford Fusion received poor marks in offering motorists' protection in side crashes, according to test results released Sunday by the insurance industry. Without side air bags, the Ford Fusion performed poorly. IIHS The Fusion, a midsize sedan starting at $17,795, received the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's lowest mark on side-impact tests conducted on a model without optional side air bags. On frontal crash tests, the Fusion received the institute's second-best mark of acceptable. (Related: On Deadline blog) " Nearly every car now earns good ratings in our frontal test, " says Lund, the institute's president. He says the Fusion was not competitive with other cars in its class and was the " lowest-rated moderately priced midsize car we've evaluated. " The test results also apply to the 2006 Mercury Milan, the Fusion's corporate twin. Ford spokesman Dan Jarvis said side air bags and side curtain bags would be standard on 2007 models, built after September. The automaker has requested additional front and side-impact testing for a model with the air-bag option, which costs an additional $595. " We expect it will earn higher side-impact test ratings with that standard equipment, " Jarvis said. The institute released test ratings for eight new or redesigned midsize and luxury cars. The 2006 BMW 3 series and Lexus IS were considered the best overall performers in the group, receiving top ratings in both front and side testing. Test results for the 2006 Pontiac G6 showed the importance of side air bags. A G6 model with optional front and rear curtain air bags and front seat-mounted torso air bags received the second-highest score of acceptable. A G6 version tested without the side air bag package, an option that costs $695, received the lowest mark of poor. Both versions received top scores in frontal tests. Bob Lange, GM's executive director of vehicle structure and safety integration, said the performance of the G6 sedan without side air bags " is competitive with other midsize sedans without side-impact protection. " Lund said the performance of the G6 was " dramatically better " than its predecessor, the Pontiac Grand Am. In past testing, a 1999 Grand Am received the lowest mark on frontal tests. The institute said the 2006 Hyundai Sonata showed improvement over previous versions, receiving the top score in frontal tests and the second-highest mark for side-impact tests. Sonata models built from 1995-1998 had received a poor rating in frontal protection and the 1999-2005 models received poor ratings in side crash protection. Among other newly tested vehicles, the 2006 Acura TSX and Infiniti G35 received the second-highest mark of acceptable in the side tests. Both had received top marks in previous frontal tests. In the institute's frontal-crash test, vehicles strike a barrier on the driver's side at 40 mph. In the side-impact test, vehicles are struck with a barrier moving at 31 mph to reflect the force of a pickup or sport-utility vehicle. Dr. DeSiena, D.C. Washington Street Chiropractic Center, L.L.C. 771 Washington Street Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 686-BACK (2225) __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.