Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 Dear Fellow Docs, Recently I became aware of a nuance in our scope of practice that disturbs me. A friend of mine who is a paramedic told me DC's in Oregon are not allowed to administer oxygen even in a emergency situation. Although I have only been practicing in Oregon for a few years (previously 18 in another state) I told him this couldn't be correct. The next day I called the board and asked the question. I clarified I was not asking to write a prescription of oxygen for a patient but if we could administer oxygen in an emergency situation, if we are adequately trained. They stated no. I am not faulting the board if it is in fact law and not some select DC's interpretation of the law. So fellow Docs, if you are sitting next to someone at an event or you are a CCSP at a game and the person exhibits signs of inadequate breathing you can monitor and do the things we all know as other standard protocals but you cannot provide supplemental oxygen even if the equipment is sitting right in front of you! Thats protecting and helping the public-- eh? EMT-basics in this state can perform oxygen administration but after all we are only called chiropractic " physicians " or " doctors " (Sorry for the sarcasm). For those of you who are dual licensed RN's, EMT's, or ND's this is a moot point. For those of us who are not dual licensed in this state I have some ideas but would like to hear your comments, opinions and whether this something worth trying to change or even a concern to the profession at large. Thank-you for your feedback. Bill Hartje, D.C. email: billhartje@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.