Guest guest Posted December 9, 2006 Report Share Posted December 9, 2006 Two interesting topics posted today - the one below where Al points out that a low-calorie, low-protein diet may help stave off cancer, and where Tony said: " High carbohydrate, low-fat diets increase cholesterol because carbohydrates get metabolized to palmitate (C16:0) which is a saturated fatty acid that can increase cholesterol. When the diet does not have enough omega-6, i.e., linoleic acid (C18:2), your cholesterol will be high. " So the message here (besides eating fewer calories) is: low protein and low carbohydrates...and high fat?? What percentages of protein/carbo/fat should I be striving for? I know Jeff recommends keeping fat at <= 20%. But that would boost the percentages of fat and carbos. I'm confused. Diane =============================================== > > They could (may) be CRONers. The pdf of the paper is > availed. > > Low-protein, low-calorie dieters show lower levels of > hormone linked to cancer > Last Updated: Wednesday, December 6, 2006 | 11:56 PM > ET > CBC News > > > People who eat a low-protein, low-calorie diet have > lower levels of a hormone linked to cancer compared to > those who eat other diets, researchers have found. > > Overweight people are at higher risk of developing > post-menopausal breast cancer, endometrial cancer, > colon cancer, kidney cancer and a type of esophageal > cancer. > > Now a study suggests eating less protein may help > protect against cancers not directly linked to excess > eight. > > Dr. Luigi Fontana, a medical professor at Washington > University, and his team compared participants in > three groups: > > a.. Lean men and women who ate a low-protein, > low-calorie, raw food vegetarian diet. > b.. Lean men and women who did regular endurance > running of about 77 kilometres per week and ate a > standard Western diet. > c.. Sedentary people who consumed a standard Western > diet high in sugars, processed refined grains and > animal products. > > " People on a low-protein, low-calorie diet had > considerably lower levels of a particular plasma > growth factor called IGF-1 than equally lean endurance > runners, " Fontana said. > > " That suggests to us that a diet lower in protein may > have a greater protective effect against cancer than > endurance exercise, independently of body fat mass. " > > Each group included 21 people, who were matched for > age, sex and other demographic factors. None were > smokers or had diabetes, heart disease or other > chronic illnesses. > > Both the runners and the sedentary participants ate > about 50 per cent more protein than recommended, the > researchers report in the December issue of the > American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. > > While consuming 50 per cent more calories than > recommended will likely lead to obesity, no one knows > whether chronic over-consumption of protein also has a > harmful effect, Fontana said. > > The study is a " hypothesis-generating " paper pointing > to a connection between dietary protein and population > studies that suggest a link between blood levels of > insulin-like growth factor and cancer risk, he added. > > The team is planning more research to clarify what > happens to cancer risk from eating more protein than > recommended in the long term. > > > Dr. Fontana et al have been busy. The first of the > two pdf-availed papers appear to be from his Italian > earlier studies. > > Dennis T Villareal, Bernard V , III, n > Banks, Luigi Fontana, > R Sinacore, and Klein > Effect of lifestyle intervention on metabolic coronary > heart disease risk factors in obese older adults > Am J Clin Nutr 2006 84: 1317-1323. > > Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors > increase with age and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2). > However, whether lifestyle intervention ameliorates > metabolic CHD risk factors in obese older adults is > unknown. > > Objective: The objective was to determine whether > lifestyle intervention improves metabolic CHD risk > factors in obese older adults. > > Design: A 6-mo outpatient randomized controlled trial > was conducted in obese (=/>BMI 30) older (=/>65 y) > adults randomly assigned to diet and exercise therapy > (treatment group; n = 17) or no therapy (control > group; n = 10). The main outcomes were CHD risk > factors. > > Results: Body weight decreased by 8.4% (8.2 kg) in the > treatment group; weight did not change significantly > (0.7 kg) in the control group (P < 0.001 between > groups). Changes between the control and treatment > groups, respectively, in waist circumference (1 and > -10 cm), plasma glucose (4 and -4 mg/dL), serum > triacylglycerols (0 and -45 mg/dL), and systolic (-2 > and -10 mm Hg) and diastolic (0 and -8 mm Hg) blood > pressure were different (P < 0.05 for all). The number > of subjects with the metabolic syndrome decreased by > 59% in the treatment group but did not change > significantly in the control group (P < 0.05). Serum > free fatty acids increased by 10 µmol/L in the control > group and decreased by 99 µmol/L in the treatment > group (P < 0.05). Changes between the control and > treatment groups, respectively, in C-reactive protein > (0.8 and -2.5 mg/L) and interleukin 6 (1.6 and -2.4 > pg/mL) were different (P < 0.05 for both). > > Conclusions: Lifestyle intervention decreases multiple > metabolic CHD risk factors simultaneously in obese > older adults. > > Luigi Fontana, Klein, and O Holloszy > Long-term low-protein, low-calorie diet and endurance > exercise modulate metabolic factors associated with > cancer risk > Am J Clin Nutr 2006 84: 1456-1462. > > Background: Western diets, obesity, and sedentary > lifestyles are associated with increased cancer risk. > The mechanisms responsible for this increased risk, > however, are not clear. > > Objective: We hypothesized that long-term low protein, > low calorie intake and endurance exercise are > associated with low concentrations of plasma growth > factors and hormones that are linked to an increased > risk of cancer. > > Design: Plasma growth factors and hormones were > evaluated in 21 sedentary subjects, who had been > eating a low-protein, low-calorie diet for 4.4±2.8 y > (±SD age: 53.0±11 y); 21 endurance runners matched by > body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2); and 21 age- and > sex-matched sedentary subjects eating Western diets. > > Results: BMI was lower in the low-protein, low-calorie > diet (21.3±3.1) and runner (21.6±1.6) groups than in > the Western diet (26.5±2.7; P < 0.005) group. Plasma > concentrations of insulin, free sex hormones, leptin, > and C-reactive protein were lower and sex > hormone-binding globulin was higher in the > low-protein, low-calorie diet and runner groups than > in the sedentary Western diet group (all P < 0.05). > Plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and the > concentration ratio of IGF-I to IGF binding protein 3 > were lower in the low-protein, low-calorie diet group > (139±37 ng/mL and 0.033±0.01, respectively) than in > the runner (177±37 ng/mL and 0.044±0.01, respectively) > and sedentary Western (201±42 ng/mL and 0.046±0.01, > respectively) diet groups (P < 0.005). > > Conclusions: Exercise training, decreased adiposity, > and long-term consumption of a low-protein, > low-calorie diet are associated with low plasma growth > factors and hormones that are linked to an increased > risk of cancer. Low protein intake may have additional > protective effects because it is associated with a > decrease in circulating IGF-I independent of body fat mass. > > -- Al Pater, PhD; email: Alpater@... > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ > Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.. Try it now. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2006 Report Share Posted December 10, 2006 Even the highest protein group, the Western diet eaters, only got 14-20% of their calories from that macronutrient. Not exceedingly high. My take on this study is that the findings of benefit for the low-protein group was more due to their CR and lower saturated fat intake than their low protein, 6(!)-12%. - > > > Two interesting topics posted today - the one below > > where Al points > > out that a low-calorie, low-protein diet may help > > stave off cancer, > > and where Tony said: > > > > " High carbohydrate, low-fat diets increase > > cholesterol because > > carbohydrates get metabolized to palmitate (C16:0) > > which is a > > saturated fatty acid that can increase cholesterol. > > When the diet > > does not have enough omega-6, i.e., linoleic acid > > (C18:2), your > > cholesterol will be high. " > > > > So the message here (besides eating fewer calories) > > is: low protein > > and low carbohydrates...and high fat?? > > > > What percentages of protein/carbo/fat should I be > > striving for? I > > know Jeff recommends keeping fat at <= 20%. But > > that would boost the > > percentages of fat and carbos. I'm confused. > > -- Al Pater, PhD; email: Alpater@... > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ ______________ > Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. > Ask your question on www.Answers. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.