Guest guest Posted December 9, 2006 Report Posted December 9, 2006 Two interesting topics posted today - the one below where Al points out that a low-calorie, low-protein diet may help stave off cancer, and where Tony said: " High carbohydrate, low-fat diets increase cholesterol because carbohydrates get metabolized to palmitate (C16:0) which is a saturated fatty acid that can increase cholesterol. When the diet does not have enough omega-6, i.e., linoleic acid (C18:2), your cholesterol will be high. " So the message here (besides eating fewer calories) is: low protein and low carbohydrates...and high fat?? What percentages of protein/carbo/fat should I be striving for? I know Jeff recommends keeping fat at <= 20%. But that would boost the percentages of fat and carbos. I'm confused. Diane =============================================== > > They could (may) be CRONers. The pdf of the paper is > availed. > > Low-protein, low-calorie dieters show lower levels of > hormone linked to cancer > Last Updated: Wednesday, December 6, 2006 | 11:56 PM > ET > CBC News > > > People who eat a low-protein, low-calorie diet have > lower levels of a hormone linked to cancer compared to > those who eat other diets, researchers have found. > > Overweight people are at higher risk of developing > post-menopausal breast cancer, endometrial cancer, > colon cancer, kidney cancer and a type of esophageal > cancer. > > Now a study suggests eating less protein may help > protect against cancers not directly linked to excess > eight. > > Dr. Luigi Fontana, a medical professor at Washington > University, and his team compared participants in > three groups: > > a.. Lean men and women who ate a low-protein, > low-calorie, raw food vegetarian diet. > b.. Lean men and women who did regular endurance > running of about 77 kilometres per week and ate a > standard Western diet. > c.. Sedentary people who consumed a standard Western > diet high in sugars, processed refined grains and > animal products. > > " People on a low-protein, low-calorie diet had > considerably lower levels of a particular plasma > growth factor called IGF-1 than equally lean endurance > runners, " Fontana said. > > " That suggests to us that a diet lower in protein may > have a greater protective effect against cancer than > endurance exercise, independently of body fat mass. " > > Each group included 21 people, who were matched for > age, sex and other demographic factors. None were > smokers or had diabetes, heart disease or other > chronic illnesses. > > Both the runners and the sedentary participants ate > about 50 per cent more protein than recommended, the > researchers report in the December issue of the > American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. > > While consuming 50 per cent more calories than > recommended will likely lead to obesity, no one knows > whether chronic over-consumption of protein also has a > harmful effect, Fontana said. > > The study is a " hypothesis-generating " paper pointing > to a connection between dietary protein and population > studies that suggest a link between blood levels of > insulin-like growth factor and cancer risk, he added. > > The team is planning more research to clarify what > happens to cancer risk from eating more protein than > recommended in the long term. > > > Dr. Fontana et al have been busy. The first of the > two pdf-availed papers appear to be from his Italian > earlier studies. > > Dennis T Villareal, Bernard V , III, n > Banks, Luigi Fontana, > R Sinacore, and Klein > Effect of lifestyle intervention on metabolic coronary > heart disease risk factors in obese older adults > Am J Clin Nutr 2006 84: 1317-1323. > > Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors > increase with age and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2). > However, whether lifestyle intervention ameliorates > metabolic CHD risk factors in obese older adults is > unknown. > > Objective: The objective was to determine whether > lifestyle intervention improves metabolic CHD risk > factors in obese older adults. > > Design: A 6-mo outpatient randomized controlled trial > was conducted in obese (=/>BMI 30) older (=/>65 y) > adults randomly assigned to diet and exercise therapy > (treatment group; n = 17) or no therapy (control > group; n = 10). The main outcomes were CHD risk > factors. > > Results: Body weight decreased by 8.4% (8.2 kg) in the > treatment group; weight did not change significantly > (0.7 kg) in the control group (P < 0.001 between > groups). Changes between the control and treatment > groups, respectively, in waist circumference (1 and > -10 cm), plasma glucose (4 and -4 mg/dL), serum > triacylglycerols (0 and -45 mg/dL), and systolic (-2 > and -10 mm Hg) and diastolic (0 and -8 mm Hg) blood > pressure were different (P < 0.05 for all). The number > of subjects with the metabolic syndrome decreased by > 59% in the treatment group but did not change > significantly in the control group (P < 0.05). Serum > free fatty acids increased by 10 µmol/L in the control > group and decreased by 99 µmol/L in the treatment > group (P < 0.05). Changes between the control and > treatment groups, respectively, in C-reactive protein > (0.8 and -2.5 mg/L) and interleukin 6 (1.6 and -2.4 > pg/mL) were different (P < 0.05 for both). > > Conclusions: Lifestyle intervention decreases multiple > metabolic CHD risk factors simultaneously in obese > older adults. > > Luigi Fontana, Klein, and O Holloszy > Long-term low-protein, low-calorie diet and endurance > exercise modulate metabolic factors associated with > cancer risk > Am J Clin Nutr 2006 84: 1456-1462. > > Background: Western diets, obesity, and sedentary > lifestyles are associated with increased cancer risk. > The mechanisms responsible for this increased risk, > however, are not clear. > > Objective: We hypothesized that long-term low protein, > low calorie intake and endurance exercise are > associated with low concentrations of plasma growth > factors and hormones that are linked to an increased > risk of cancer. > > Design: Plasma growth factors and hormones were > evaluated in 21 sedentary subjects, who had been > eating a low-protein, low-calorie diet for 4.4±2.8 y > (±SD age: 53.0±11 y); 21 endurance runners matched by > body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2); and 21 age- and > sex-matched sedentary subjects eating Western diets. > > Results: BMI was lower in the low-protein, low-calorie > diet (21.3±3.1) and runner (21.6±1.6) groups than in > the Western diet (26.5±2.7; P < 0.005) group. Plasma > concentrations of insulin, free sex hormones, leptin, > and C-reactive protein were lower and sex > hormone-binding globulin was higher in the > low-protein, low-calorie diet and runner groups than > in the sedentary Western diet group (all P < 0.05). > Plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and the > concentration ratio of IGF-I to IGF binding protein 3 > were lower in the low-protein, low-calorie diet group > (139±37 ng/mL and 0.033±0.01, respectively) than in > the runner (177±37 ng/mL and 0.044±0.01, respectively) > and sedentary Western (201±42 ng/mL and 0.046±0.01, > respectively) diet groups (P < 0.005). > > Conclusions: Exercise training, decreased adiposity, > and long-term consumption of a low-protein, > low-calorie diet are associated with low plasma growth > factors and hormones that are linked to an increased > risk of cancer. Low protein intake may have additional > protective effects because it is associated with a > decrease in circulating IGF-I independent of body fat mass. > > -- Al Pater, PhD; email: Alpater@... > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ > Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.. Try it now. > Quote
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2006 Report Posted December 10, 2006 Even the highest protein group, the Western diet eaters, only got 14-20% of their calories from that macronutrient. Not exceedingly high. My take on this study is that the findings of benefit for the low-protein group was more due to their CR and lower saturated fat intake than their low protein, 6(!)-12%. - > > > Two interesting topics posted today - the one below > > where Al points > > out that a low-calorie, low-protein diet may help > > stave off cancer, > > and where Tony said: > > > > " High carbohydrate, low-fat diets increase > > cholesterol because > > carbohydrates get metabolized to palmitate (C16:0) > > which is a > > saturated fatty acid that can increase cholesterol. > > When the diet > > does not have enough omega-6, i.e., linoleic acid > > (C18:2), your > > cholesterol will be high. " > > > > So the message here (besides eating fewer calories) > > is: low protein > > and low carbohydrates...and high fat?? > > > > What percentages of protein/carbo/fat should I be > > striving for? I > > know Jeff recommends keeping fat at <= 20%. But > > that would boost the > > percentages of fat and carbos. I'm confused. > > -- Al Pater, PhD; email: Alpater@... > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ ______________ > Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. > Ask your question on www.Answers. > Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.