Guest guest Posted July 25, 2006 Report Share Posted July 25, 2006 Elderly subjects are thought to require greater energy intakes to have less weight to be able to respond to the extra health risks of lower energy levels. The below paper appears to carefully analyze actual data with discerning criteria and find the opposite result. In the pdf-available below paper, the four comorbidities in Table 4 may be: " [1] functional status, falls, hospital admissions, weight loss, use of medication, [2] reported chronic illness (hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] and/or asthma, heart disease, and stroke), [3] lifestyle habits (physical activity, smoking history, and use of alcohol) and [4] socioeconomic status (education, housing, and monthly expenditure). " Obesity, Physical Activity, and Mortality in a Prospective Chinese Elderly Cohort In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1437. http://tinyurl.com/fevbe ... Obesity is usually associated with increased mortality in young and middle-aged people. However, in older people, higher body mass index (BMI) ... is apparently protective ... A possible explanation for the observed relationship between BMI and mortality in older people is reverse causality, because BMI in this age group is the result, not the cause, of underlying illness. In this case, BMI in older people would be a predictor of mortality as a marker of aging and health status, and the association of BMI with mortality would be expected to differ with health status. In a prospective study of 54,088 older people, Schooling et al showed that the association between BMI and mortality varied with health status. In the small minority (9%) of healthy older people who have never smoked, higher BMI (>25) was associated with higher mortality compared with normal BMI; however, in unhealthy older people, higher BMI was associated with lower mortality. Obesity, Physical Activity, and Mortality in a Prospective Chinese Elderly Cohort C. Schooling; Tai Hing Lam; Zhi Bin Li; Sai Yin Ho; Wai Man Chan; Kin Sang Ho; May Ked Tham; J. Cowling; M. Leung Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1498-1504. ... a prospective cohort study of Chinese people 65 years or older enrolled from 1998 to 2000 ... The effect of BMI on mortality varied with baseline health status (P<.001). In the healthiest group, obese people (BMI 25) had higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio , 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.33), but in the unhealthiest group they had lower mortality (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49-0.63) compared with subjects of normal weight. Daily physical activity was associated with lower mortality compared with inactivity in the unhealthiest group (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61- 0.81) but not in the healthiest group. ... In the elderly, the relationship between obesity and mortality varies according to the underlying health status. In those with poor health status, obesity is associated with better outcome, whereas in those with initially good health status, obesity is associated with worse outcome. Table 3. Risk for All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality by Body Mass Index and Physical Activity of Elderly Health Center Clients in Hong Kong^* ============================================ Cause of death Deaths, no. Age at death, Mean (SD), y---BMI---Physical activity ---<18.5 18.5-<23 =/>25 P^§---None </=30 m/d >30 m/d P^§ ============================================ All causes 3819 78.7 (6.9)---1.78^§§ (1.61-1.97) 1.00 0.84^§§ (0.77-0.92) 0.75^§§ (0.70-0.82) <.001---1.00 0.83^§§ (0.76-0.91) 0.73^§§ (0.67-0.80) <.001 All causes at >2 y 2354 79.5 (6.74)---1.72^§ (1.51-1.97) 1.00 0.87^## (0.78-0.97) 0.83^§§ (0.75-0.92) <.001---1.00 0.87^## (0.77-0.98) 0.77^§§ (0.69-0.87) <.001 Cancer 1503 77.1 (6.3)---1.60^§§ (1.35-1.91) 1.00 0.81^### (0.70-0.93) 0.82^### (0.72-0.92) <.001---1.00 0.87 (0.75-1.01) 0.86^## (0.74-0.99) .06 Cardiovascular 1041 79.2 (6.6)---1.13 (0.90-1.42) 1.00 0.97 (0.83-1.14) 0.81^## (0.70-0.94) .01---1.00 0.79^## (0.67-0.94) 0.63^§§ (0.53-0.74) <.001 Respiratory 563 81.1 (7.0)---3.71^§§ (3.02-4.54) 1.00 0.62^§§ (0.48-0.81) 0.52^§§ (0.41-0.66) <.001---1.00 0.84 (0.67-1.05) 0.66^### (0.53-0.84) <.001 Other and unknown 712 79.1 (7.1)---1.48^### (1.15-1.89) 1.00 0.86 (0.70-1.05) 0.70^## (0.58-0.84) <.001---1.00 0.82 (0.66-1.01) 0.70^### (0.57-0.86) .001 ============================================ Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters). ^ *Unless otherwise indicated, data are reported hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) mutually adjusted for age, sex, education, ever-drinking alcohol, ever smoking, monthly personal expenditure, housing and the other category (ie, BMI or physical activity). ^§ For linear trend. ^§§ P<.001. ^## P<.05. ^### P<.005. Table 4. Risk for All-Cause Mortality by Body Mass Index and Physical Activity of Elderly Health Center Clients in Hong Kong^* ============================================ Comorbidities, no. Deaths, no.---BMI---Physical activity ---<18.5 18.5-<23 23-<25 =/>25 P^§---None </=30 min/d >30 min/d P^§ ============================================ 4-12 1481---1.76^** (1.51-2.07) 1.00 0.72^** (0.63-0.83) 0.55^** (0.49-0.63) <.001---1.00 0.81^## (0.70-0.93) 0.70^** (0.61-0.81) <.001 3 894---1.81^** (1.45-2.26) 1.00 0.70^** (0.58-0.84) 0.64^** (0.55-0.75) <.001---1.00 0.85 (0.70-1.03) 0.77^### (0.64-0.93) .01 2 864 2.22^** (1.81-2.73) 1.00 0.82^### (0.68-0.99) 0.72^** (0.61-0.85) <.001---1.00 0.74^## (0.61-0.90) 0.70^** (0.58-0.84) .001 1 446---1.41^### (1.01-1.97) 1.00 1.04 (0.81-1.33) 0.98 (0.78-1.23) ..68---1.00 0.92 (0.70-1.21) 0.83 (0.63-1.08) .14 0 134---1.76^### (1.00-3.08) 1.00 0.96 (0.58-1.59) 1.54^### (1.02-2.33) ..16---1.00 1.24 (0.71-2.19) 1.15 (0.66-1.99) .83 ============================================ Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters). ^* Unless otherwise indicated, data are reported hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) mutually adjusted for age, sex, education, ever drinking alcohol, ever smoking, monthly personal expenditure, housing and the other category (ie, BMI or physical activity). ^§ For linear trend. ^** <.001. ^*** <.005. ^### <.05. -- Al Pater, alpater@... __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2006 Report Share Posted July 25, 2006 Hi folks: This study Al has posted looks to me to be enormously significant. In case anyone failed to notice what seems to be the key paragraph, here it is: " ..... (among) people 65 years or older ... in the healthiest group, obese people (BMI 25) had higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio , 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.33), but in the unhealthiest group they had lower mortality (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49- 0.63) compared with subjects of normal weight " . And ........ " Daily physical activity was associated with lower mortality compared with inactivity in the unhealthiest group (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61- 0.81) but not in the healthiest group. ... " So ........ the conclusion for us from this study seems to be that if you are fundamentally healthy (as people on CRON should be) you **DO** need a low BMI, and you **DO NOT** need daily physical activity. Presumably the logic behind the above associations is that in fundamentally unhealthy people a low BMI may often result from wasting caused by the underlying disease - the more the wasting (and lower the BMI) the worse the disease, so a lower BMI indicates more serious problems. However, as we know, a low BMI associated with restriction of calories in fundamentally healthy people can extend lifespan dramatically. As for exercise, it may go some way to ameliorating the problems of unhealthy people. But additional exercise is not required for healthy people, because they do not have problems that need to be ameliorated. (Not forgetting, as noted here many times, there is a basic threshold level of exercise that is vital for preservation of health for everyone. Bed-ridden people do not survive for long.) Rodney. > > Elderly subjects are thought to require greater energy intakes to have less weight > to be able to respond to the extra health risks of lower energy levels. The below > paper appears to carefully analyze actual data with discerning criteria and find the > opposite result. In the pdf-available below paper, the four comorbidities in Table > 4 may be: > " [1] functional status, falls, hospital admissions, weight loss, use of > medication, [2] reported chronic illness (hypertension, diabetes, chronic > obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] and/or asthma, heart disease, and stroke), [3] > lifestyle habits (physical activity, smoking history, and use of alcohol) and [4] > socioeconomic status (education, housing, and monthly expenditure). " > > Obesity, Physical Activity, and Mortality in a Prospective Chinese Elderly Cohort > In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine > Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1437. http://tinyurl.com/fevbe > ... Obesity is usually associated with increased mortality in young and > middle-aged people. However, in older people, higher body mass index (BMI) ... is > apparently protective ... A possible explanation for the observed relationship > between BMI and mortality in older people is reverse causality, because BMI in this > age group is the result, not the cause, of underlying illness. In this case, BMI in > older people would be a predictor of mortality as a marker of aging and health > status, and the association of BMI with mortality would be expected to differ with > health status. In a prospective study of 54,088 older people, Schooling et al showed > that the association between BMI and mortality varied with health status. In the > small minority (9%) of healthy older people who have never smoked, higher BMI (>25) > was associated with higher mortality compared with normal BMI; however, in unhealthy > older people, higher BMI was associated with lower mortality. > > Obesity, Physical Activity, and Mortality in a Prospective Chinese Elderly Cohort > C. Schooling; Tai Hing Lam; Zhi Bin Li; Sai Yin Ho; Wai Man Chan; Kin Sang Ho; > May Ked Tham; J. Cowling; M. Leung > Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1498-1504. > ... a prospective cohort study of Chinese people 65 years or older enrolled > from 1998 to 2000 ... The effect of BMI on mortality varied with baseline health > status (P<.001). In the healthiest group, obese people (BMI 25) had higher mortality > (adjusted hazard ratio , 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.33), but in > the unhealthiest group they had lower mortality (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49-0.63) > compared with subjects of normal weight. Daily physical activity was associated with > lower mortality compared with inactivity in the unhealthiest group (HR, 0.70; 95% > CI, 0.61- 0.81) but not in the healthiest group. ... In the elderly, the > relationship between obesity and mortality varies according to the underlying health > status. In those with poor health status, obesity is associated with better outcome, > whereas in those with initially good health status, obesity is associated with worse > outcome. > > Table 3. Risk for All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality by Body Mass Index and > Physical Activity of Elderly Health Center Clients in Hong Kong^* > ============================================ > Cause of death Deaths, no. Age at death, Mean (SD), y---BMI--- Physical activity > ---<18.5 18.5-<23 =/>25 P^§---None </=30 m/d >30 m/d P^§ > ============================================ > All causes 3819 78.7 (6.9)---1.78^§§ (1.61-1.97) 1.00 0.84^§§ (0.77-0.92) 0.75^§§ > (0.70-0.82) <.001---1.00 0.83^§§ (0.76-0.91) 0.73^§§ (0.67-0.80) <.001 > All causes at >2 y 2354 79.5 (6.74)---1.72^§ (1.51-1.97) 1.00 0.87^## (0.78-0.97) > 0.83^§§ (0.75-0.92) <.001---1.00 0.87^## (0.77-0.98) 0.77^§§ (0.69- 0.87) <.001 > Cancer 1503 77.1 (6.3)---1.60^§§ (1.35-1.91) 1.00 0.81^### (0.70- 0.93) 0.82^### > (0.72-0.92) <.001---1.00 0.87 (0.75-1.01) 0.86^## (0.74-0.99) .06 > Cardiovascular 1041 79.2 (6.6)---1.13 (0.90-1.42) 1.00 0.97 (0.83-1.14) 0.81^## > (0.70-0.94) .01---1.00 0.79^## (0.67-0.94) 0.63^§§ (0.53-0.74) <.001 > Respiratory 563 81.1 (7.0)---3.71^§§ (3.02-4.54) 1.00 0.62^§§ (0.48-0.81) 0.52^§§ > (0.41-0.66) <.001---1.00 0.84 (0.67-1.05) 0.66^### (0.53-0.84) <.001 > Other and unknown 712 79.1 (7.1)---1.48^### (1.15-1.89) 1.00 0.86 (0.70-1.05) > 0.70^## (0.58-0.84) <.001---1.00 0.82 (0.66-1.01) 0.70^### (0.57- 0.86) .001 > ============================================ > Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by > the square of height in meters). > ^ *Unless otherwise indicated, data are reported hazard ratios (95% confidence > intervals) mutually adjusted for age, sex, education, ever-drinking alcohol, ever > smoking, monthly personal expenditure, housing and the other category (ie, BMI or > physical activity). > ^§ For linear trend. > ^§§ P<.001. > ^## P<.05. > ^### P<.005. > > Table 4. Risk for All-Cause Mortality by Body Mass Index and Physical Activity of > Elderly Health Center Clients in Hong Kong^* > ============================================ > Comorbidities, no. Deaths, no.---BMI---Physical activity > ---<18.5 18.5-<23 23-<25 =/>25 P^§---None </=30 min/d >30 min/d P^§ > ============================================ > 4-12 1481---1.76^** (1.51-2.07) 1.00 0.72^** (0.63-0.83) 0.55^** (0.49-0.63) > <.001---1.00 0.81^## (0.70-0.93) 0.70^** (0.61-0.81) <.001 > 3 894---1.81^** (1.45-2.26) 1.00 0.70^** (0.58-0.84) 0.64^** (0.55-0.75) > <.001---1.00 0.85 (0.70-1.03) 0.77^### (0.64-0.93) .01 > 2 864 2.22^** (1.81-2.73) 1.00 0.82^### (0.68-0.99) 0.72^** (0.61-0.85) > <.001---1.00 0.74^## (0.61-0.90) 0.70^** (0.58-0.84) .001 > 1 446---1.41^### (1.01-1.97) 1.00 1.04 (0.81-1.33) 0.98 (0.78- 1.23) .68---1.00 > 0.92 (0.70-1.21) 0.83 (0.63-1.08) .14 > 0 134---1.76^### (1.00-3.08) 1.00 0.96 (0.58-1.59) 1.54^### (1.02-2.33) > .16---1.00 1.24 (0.71-2.19) 1.15 (0.66-1.99) .83 > ============================================ > Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by > the square of height in meters). > ^* Unless otherwise indicated, data are reported hazard ratios (95% confidence > intervals) mutually adjusted for age, sex, education, ever drinking alcohol, ever > smoking, monthly personal expenditure, housing and the other category (ie, BMI or > physical activity). > ^§ For linear trend. > ^** <.001. > ^*** <.005. > ^### <.05. > > -- Al Pater, alpater@... > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.