Guest guest Posted August 14, 2006 Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 Hi JW: That is an interesting new perspective on things. Thank you. But if true, would it not imply that each time anyone took oral antibiotics they should suddenly start losing weight? The reason of course being that microbes in the gut, which had previously been making otherwise indigestible nutrients absorbable, will have been killed off by the antibiotics, so that those nutrients would now be excreted undigested? Is anyone aware of evidence weight loss occurs after antibiotics are taken? If so then antibiotics are a cure for obesity. Rodney. > > fyi. > http://mednews.wustl.edu/sb/page/normal/182.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2006 Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 From the article: >>...that two common organisms collude and collaborate to increase the amount of calories harvested from a class of carbohydrates found in food sweeteners.... Ah, the glories of high fructose corn syrup make it into the news, but my take on it: Are they going to listen and just STOP eating the stuff, or will they try to find a nice little pill to help you eat the junk and lose the weight? .......To be or not to be..... Diane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2006 Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 > > If so then antibiotics are a cure for obesity. OOOO, and lookie at all the nice little super buggies that will become ATB resistant......and the nice little profits for the Pharmaceutical business developing new ATBs due to everyone taking current ATBs on the market to help them lose weight because those current ATBs can no longer fight the germs that are out there......and people have to have their over 2000 calorie burgers with fries....... ..............instead of just taking that spoon or fork out of the mouth, take the easy road, a pill....... Diane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2006 Report Share Posted August 14, 2006 A couple of points before responding to JW's question about the 40 year delay. 1. It's stupid and mechanistic (dare I say Newtonian or Ptolomeic?) to assume that there are not substantial differences among individuals in the actual amount of caloric intake that is accumulated by the body. Maybe even the same person when he's thin or fat. I'm speaking here of a typical chemical engineering energy balance: accumulation = input-output. As JW has argued eloquently, we need to account for all of the outputs. The first law of thermodynamics remains fully intact, but there are more things in Heaven and Earth...than are dreamt of in your philosophy. 2. There seem to be some among us with a sense of superiority to those who are addicted (maybe physically) to the crap pushed relentlessly by Big Food (owned in certain instances by Big Tobacco, experts at hooking people by tainting their products). I find this unseemly. According to this paper (full text here: http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/reprint/84/2/274 ) the real upsurge in high fructose sweetners has occured in the last two decades. Here's an excerpt: Current estimates are that the mean intake of added sugar by Americans accounts for 15.8% of total energy and that the largest source of these added sugars is nondiet soft drinks, which account for 47% of total added sugars in the diet (14). The term soft drink encompasses sodas along with other sugar-sweetened beverages such as fruit drinks, lemonade, and iced tea. The term soda encompasses sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages such as colas. Consumption of these beverages was shown to increase by 135% between 1977 and 2001 (15). It is estimated that, during this time, daily caloric sweetener consumption in the United States increased by 83 kcal per person, of which 54 kcal/d is from soda (10). In the United States, on average, a 12-oz serving [12 oz1 can of soda (or 1 soda)1 serving] of soda provides 150 kcal and 40–50 g sugar in the form of high-fructose corn syrup [(HFCS) 45% glucose and 55% fructose], which is equivalent to 10 teaspoons of table sugar. If these calories are added to the typical US diet without reducing intake from other sources, 1 soda/d could lead to a weight gain of 15 lb or 6.75 kg in 1 y (16). Paralleling the pattern of soda consumption is that of the consumption of fruit drinks and fruitades (drinks made by adding water to powder or crystals), which are similarly sweetened and are often consumed in large amounts by toddlers and young children. Of the total 83 kcal/d increase in the consumption of caloric sweetener, 13 kcal/d is estimated to have come from fruit drinks (10). Consumption of these fruit drinks and soda represents nearly 81% of the increase in caloric sweetener intake across 2 recent decades in the United States (10). --- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@...> wrote: > > I recall that corn sweetener came about after the sugar price went up. That was 40 yrs ago. What's taken so long? > regards. > > > [ ] Re: Bacteria can make you gain weight > > > From the article: > > >>...that two common organisms collude and collaborate to increase the > amount of calories harvested from a class of carbohydrates found in > food sweeteners.... > > Ah, the glories of high fructose corn syrup make it into the news, but > my take on it: > > Are they going to listen and just STOP eating the stuff, or will they > try to find a nice little pill to help you eat the junk and lose the > weight? > > ......To be or not to be..... > > > > Diane > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.