Guest guest Posted April 23, 2003 Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 Hello, I have done a lot of researching regarding dental work--not so much on root canals, though, as I don't have any. I am still in the midst of having many problems corrected--amalgams replaced, crowns replaced and re-replaced. The websites that I have looked at are: www.bioprobe.com www.iaomt.org (this one has become less accessible since I used it) and check www.mercola.com using his google search for root canals. There should be plenty of links as I recall. Did you know there is a test for biocompatiblity for dental materials? I had it done after replacing all my fillings and crowns. Turned out I had a " not suitable " material used for the crowns and had to have them re-done. (I did the test after the replacement and was still having trouble--obviously, the backwards way of going about things.) Hope there is some help in here for you! Sonya Original Message ----- From: mushimushi12003 Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: New Root Canal thread Hi, I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are free of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may need another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal and told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals were sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was needed it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after 1990 they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if a rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other alternative is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a bunch of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me links. Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4-24-03 for him to access what needs to be done. Thanks a bunch, Del Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2003 Report Share Posted April 24, 2003 Hello Sonya, Thanks for answering! I am also replacing. So fer have only done fillings. Next is crowns. No, I have not heard about a test for biocompatiblity for dental materials. Do you have to have a " special " dentist to that? Hope I find something about that on those web sites you gave. Were you having problems are did you just want it done after all that you had read? Thanks, Del > Hello, > > I have done a lot of researching regarding dental work--not so much on root canals, though, as I don't have any. I am still in the midst of having many problems corrected--amalgams replaced, crowns replaced and re-replaced. The websites that I have looked at are: www.bioprobe.com www.iaomt.org (this one has become less accessible since I used it) and check www.mercola.com using his google search for root canals. There should be plenty of links as I recall. Did you know there is a test for biocompatiblity for dental materials? I had it done after replacing all my fillings and crowns. Turned out I had a " not suitable " material used for the crowns and had to have them re-done. (I did the test after the replacement and was still having trouble--obviously, the backwards way of going about things.) Hope there is some help in here for you! > > Sonya > > > Original Message ----- > From: mushimushi12003 > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 1:10 PM > Subject: New Root Canal thread > > > Hi, > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are free > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may need > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal and > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals were > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was needed > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after 1990 > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if a > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other alternative > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a bunch > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me links. > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4-24-03 for > him to access what needs to be done. > > Thanks a bunch, > Del > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2003 Report Share Posted April 24, 2003 I'm back and I didn't find anything about the biocompatiblity for dental materials except the name " Clifford " . Nothing elde came up. Please tell me a little more. Thanks, Del -- In , gsd <gsd03@c...> wrote: > Hello, > > I have done a lot of researching regarding dental work--not so much on root canals, though, as I don't have any. I am still in the midst of having many problems corrected--amalgams replaced, crowns replaced and re-replaced. The websites that I have looked at are: www.bioprobe.com www.iaomt.org (this one has become less accessible since I used it) and check www.mercola.com using his google search for root canals. There should be plenty of links as I recall. Did you know there is a test for biocompatiblity for dental materials? I had it done after replacing all my fillings and crowns. Turned out I had a " not suitable " material used for the crowns and had to have them re-done. (I did the test after the replacement and was still having trouble--obviously, the backwards way of going about things.) Hope there is some help in here for you! > > Sonya > > > Original Message ----- > From: mushimushi12003 > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 1:10 PM > Subject: New Root Canal thread > > > Hi, > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are free > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may need > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal and > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals were > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was needed > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after 1990 > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if a > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other alternative > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a bunch > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me links. > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4-24-03 for > him to access what needs to be done. > > Thanks a bunch, > Del > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2003 Report Share Posted April 24, 2003 Hello, Yes, Clifford Consulting and Research, www.ccrlab.com is who I went through for my test. My regular dentist does not use any testing like this, so even though I knew of this type of testing I did my dental work without it. Big mistake. My symptoms did not change and seemed to get worse. Six months of this and I decided to see another dentist (got a referral from IAOMT), all his work is done after biocompatibility testing. Anyway, I did the test and the materials used for my crowns were unsuitable for me. So, now I see this new dentist and I am re-evaluating all my work. So--I guess a " biological " dentist will have this test, it is a kit given to you--you take it to a lab and have a blood test and send it in yourself (directions are in there for all this). I would think any dentist could order it from the lab, the test kit itself is free I think, but to do the test I paid $225.00--not covered by my insurance. The doctor gets a copy of the test and the patient does too. It is a very extensive and impressive report. Root canal materials are included in the testing. Wish I could say more, but gotta run right now. Feel free to ask more questions and I'll answer tonight if I'm able. Incidentally, the reason for all my problems stems from allergies of all sorts--including metals, so I am learning that everything matters in this area. Sonya New Root Canal thread > > > Hi, > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are free > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may need > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal and > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals were > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was needed > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after 1990 > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if a > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other alternative > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a bunch > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me links. > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4-24-03 for > him to access what needs to be done. > > Thanks a bunch, > Del > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2003 Report Share Posted April 24, 2003 That was a great help! Thanks. Just one question. Are you now seeing a biological dentist? The closest one to me was 4 hours away and of course insurance does not cover. I think I will try to do the test. I may turn out like you and have do do everything all over again because I got 3 replaced fillings today! I must say they feel so right! They are the white composite fillings. Dentist told me that mercury fillings expand over time and can crack your teeth! That is exactly what happened to one of my teeth! That's the one I may have to have a root canal on. I searched on " root canal " gutta percha and got some (what looks like) good news about root canal. I wish someone with some knowledge about the " new " root canals would post... Thanks, Del > > Hello, > > > > I have done a lot of researching regarding dental work--not so much > on root canals, though, as I don't have any. I am still in the midst > of having many problems corrected--amalgams replaced, crowns replaced > and re-replaced. The websites that I have looked at are: > www.bioprobe.com www.iaomt.org (this one has become less accessible > since I used it) and check www.mercola.com using his google search > for root canals. There should be plenty of links as I recall. Did > you know there is a test for biocompatiblity for dental materials? I > had it done after replacing all my fillings and crowns. Turned out I > had a " not suitable " material used for the crowns and had to have > them re-done. (I did the test after the replacement and was still > having trouble--obviously, the backwards way of going about things.) > Hope there is some help in here for you! > > > > Sonya > > > > > > Original Message ----- > > From: mushimushi12003 > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 1:10 PM > > Subject: New Root Canal thread > > > > > > Hi, > > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are > free > > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may > need > > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal > and > > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals > were > > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was > needed > > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after > 1990 > > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if > a > > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other > alternative > > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a > bunch > > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me > links. > > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4- 24-03 > for > > him to access what needs to be done. > > > > Thanks a bunch, > > Del > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2003 Report Share Posted April 24, 2003 Hi again, I do consider my dentist a biological dentist-one who does not work with mercury and who cares about the person's overall health, with a " natural " approach and understanding, including how allergies effect a person, especially dental materials. My regular dentist is down the street, my new dentist I drive close to an hour. I know gutta percha seems to be the standard filling for root canals. I don't know what my new dentist would say, I think he would have to refer me to an endodontist and I would have to check with him. I have read that biocalex is the new one, or now even newer (I just checked the website) is biodent. Did you see the mercola article mentioning biocalex? I know I would be confused about this issue, hopefully your doctor allows questioning and inquiry, and time to figure out what's best for -you-. Sonya New Root Canal thread > > > > > > Hi, > > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are > free > > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may > need > > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal > and > > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals > were > > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was > needed > > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after > 1990 > > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if > a > > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other > alternative > > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a > bunch > > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me > links. > > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4- 24-03 > for > > him to access what needs to be done. > > > > Thanks a bunch, > > Del > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2003 Report Share Posted April 24, 2003 > I wish someone > with some knowledge about the " new " root canals would post... > Del, I don't have knowledge of the new root canals, or of the old root canals, for that matter! However, this thread was the impetus for me trying to find a new dentist in the Wash DC area. I found this site: www.nihadc.com This is for a holistic medical and dental practice in DC. If you click on staff, you can then click on the individual names to find out which are dentists (they are 3-4 of them). There are no mercury fillings allowed, and I pretty sure one mentioned something about the problems w/root canals. However, they each have their email address listed. They might be a great source for finding out about the new root canals, or for helping you find someone in your area. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2003 Report Share Posted April 24, 2003 > The other alternative is an implant. What do you guys say to that? > Del Is a bridge an option for you instead of a root canal or implant? I'm having a bridge done instead of a root canal. (I already have one infected root canal - not taking a change on another.) Implants are a lengthy, involved process. I was reading a brochure on it at the oral surgeon's office a few weeks ago. I can't even imagine having to consider that procedure. I'd be curious to know how your appointment went today. I'm going through all of this stuff now, so it's interesting to hear what others are experiencing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2003 Report Share Posted April 25, 2003 Hi, I apologize if someone else has made this point... Gutta percha has been used for close to a century now. It was the dominant material used when Price made his experiments. Your dentist is probably examining the root canal for bacteria... the chance is about nil that the dentin is free of bacteria. Your dentist may not even know bacteria inhabit the dentin (or maybe he does know), but Meinig has electron microscope pictures to prove it. Not everyone develops a focal infection from root canals, but if your immune system is compromised in any way whatseover it is not worth the risk. If you are in great health, and neither you nor anyone in your family history have problems with any degenerative diseases or immune system problems, it might be worth it to get the root canal, since you can always have it removed later in life if you believe some stressor has caused your immune system to succumb to it. However, for the majority of people, root canals are highly inadvisable. I would not trust any dentist claiming your root canaled tooth is bacteria free. He is probably doing a routine check for the lateral canals that sometimes get infected after root canals. Chris > Hi, > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are free > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may need > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal and > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals were > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was needed > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after 1990 > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if a > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other alternative > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a bunch > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me links. > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4-24-03 for > him to access what needs to be done. > > Thanks a bunch, > Del Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2003 Report Share Posted April 25, 2003 I can stop sweating now, I don't need a root canal! Instead I now have a temp filling that will get a crown in the next 2 weeks. Wouldn't you know it, I am in a waiting period for insurance to cover crowns! Acturally, a bridge would not have been an option in this case. One thing that has to be done in prep for a bridge is they have to grind down the teeth on either side of the space and I don't want to do that to 2 good teeth. I would rather have the implant. However, I have not read up on implants! My sister-in-law has a few of them by this dentist. He is a new dentist for me but she has been going to him for 20 years. She has very bad, soft teeth and for years had severe pain. Now she is free of pain with almost all of her teeth as implants! Back to root canals, this dentist has almost talked me into root canals being okay now if you use the right materials. , Good luck with your work. I like hearing also what others are doing. Thanks, Del > > The other alternative is an implant. What do you guys say to that? > > > Del > > Is a bridge an option for you instead of a root canal or implant? > I'm having a bridge done instead of a root canal. (I already have > one infected root canal - not taking a change on another.) Implants > are a lengthy, involved process. I was reading a brochure on it at > the oral surgeon's office a few weeks ago. I can't even imagine > having to consider that procedure. I'd be curious to know how your > appointment went today. I'm going through all of this stuff now, so > it's interesting to hear what others are experiencing. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2003 Report Share Posted April 25, 2003 Thanks for answering You have made some interesting points that no one else has made! I have 3 root canals that I have had for over 15 years. This dentist is examining them by x-ray and his looking at the teeth. From the x- ray everything looks fine and he says that is about 98% proof that all is okay but what he sees when he is looking in my mouth tells him 100% that no bacteria is present (so he says). The x-ray shows that a stainless steel rod was put in these teeth. They cannot be reversed they would have to be extracted. So he says to leave them along until they are a problem. 2 of these teeth are on the bottom right and are part of a bridge. I have had a bridge there for 40 years. The last time it was put on, another dentist put the stainless steel rods in it! I am not sure if these root canals are the reason for any problems that I have. I am not totally free of degenerative disease. Don't know about immune disease. I don't visit a doctor on a regular basis and I take no medications. Can you give me a link to pictures that Meinig has of bacteria in the dentin? I have not read Price's book. Only read about him through WAPF so I appreciate your telling me that Gutta percha was the dominant material used by him. How do I prove one way or another if there is bacteria or would you just assume that it is and have them extracted? I await your answer, Thanks, Del > > Hi, > > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are > free > > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may need > > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal > and > > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals > were > > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was > needed > > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after > 1990 > > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if a > > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other > alternative > > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a > bunch > > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me links. > > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4-24-03 > for > > him to access what needs to be done. > > > > Thanks a bunch, > > Del Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2003 Report Share Posted April 25, 2003 Del, If you were to have your root canals extracted, make sure they are aware of the extraction protocol outlined by Price/Meinig in which the periodontal ligament is removed and the unhealthy bone underneath the tooth is removed down to the healthy bone with a slow-speed drill. I would opt to read Meinig's book on Price's reasearch, rather than the two-volume 1200 page book that Price wrote on root canals. As far as I know, I don't think Meinig's pictures are online. They are in his book, which you can get at www.price-pottenger.org (they ship it faster than Amazon.) If you've developed any kind of degenerative diseases or chronic health problems *after* you had your root canals, they are a likely candidate. Unfortunately, the only way, as far as I know, to have your teeth analyzed for pathogenic bacteria/toxins from the dentin is to have them taken out and analyzed. There is at least one lab that specializes in this. Mercola mentioned some supposed test kit, but the email link to the researcher is dead. If you have no chronic problems that you *didn't* have before your root canals, I would not worry about them right now. It's not worth the stress-- that'll just cause more problems And there are serious benefits to having your natural teeth in terms of chewing food, etc. Problems do not have to occur immediately after root canal to be caused. Often they take a certain stressor to suppress the immmune system which then loses its ability to hold back the infection and it can leave the tooth. Good luck. If you have any more specific question please write me a personal email as I am headed for a very busy weekend and will likely miss replies to this on the list. (you can just cc the email to my address if you want) Chris > > > Hi, > > > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > > > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are > > free > > > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may > need > > > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal > > and > > > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals > > were > > > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was > > needed > > > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after > > 1990 > > > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if > a > > > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > > > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other > > alternative > > > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a > > bunch > > > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me > links. > > > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4-24- 03 > > for > > > him to access what needs to be done. > > > > > > Thanks a bunch, > > > Del Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2003 Report Share Posted April 25, 2003 Hello, Another link on the root canal thread: www.bioray2000.com the link to heavy metals looks very helpful. The DAMS link is one I called today to get an info packet and current newsletter. Sonya Re: New Root Canal thread Thanks for answering You have made some interesting points that no one else has made! I have 3 root canals that I have had for over 15 years. This dentist is examining them by x-ray and his looking at the teeth. From the x- ray everything looks fine and he says that is about 98% proof that all is okay but what he sees when he is looking in my mouth tells him 100% that no bacteria is present (so he says). The x-ray shows that a stainless steel rod was put in these teeth. They cannot be reversed they would have to be extracted. So he says to leave them along until they are a problem. 2 of these teeth are on the bottom right and are part of a bridge. I have had a bridge there for 40 years. The last time it was put on, another dentist put the stainless steel rods in it! I am not sure if these root canals are the reason for any problems that I have. I am not totally free of degenerative disease. Don't know about immune disease. I don't visit a doctor on a regular basis and I take no medications. Can you give me a link to pictures that Meinig has of bacteria in the dentin? I have not read Price's book. Only read about him through WAPF so I appreciate your telling me that Gutta percha was the dominant material used by him. How do I prove one way or another if there is bacteria or would you just assume that it is and have them extracted? I await your answer, Thanks, Del > > Hi, > > I went to the dentist today. X-rays from an earlier appointment > > showed that all 3 of my root canals (I got them before 1990) are > free > > of bacteria! Can he tell 100% with an x-ray? Now he says I may need > > another root canal. I told him that I did not want the root canal > and > > told him why. His answer was this : Before 1990 all root canals > were > > sealed with Sargenti Paste(a form of arsenic) and if a rod was > needed > > it was stainless steel. Mine are SS. At some point in time after > 1990 > > they started using gutta percha (a placticized zinc oxide) and if a > > rod is needed it would be titanium. He says that the new way is > > getting good results with no bacteria forming. The other > alternative > > is an implant. What do you guys say to that? Is he feeding me a > bunch > > of bull! Does anyone have any experience with this? Send me links. > > Please answer right away if you can as I go back tomorrow 4-24-03 > for > > him to access what needs to be done. > > > > Thanks a bunch, > > Del Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.