Re: fever - julia

[Guest guest]

did the ped. test for the swine flu? our ped did a nose swab and it came back negative. however, he did say that it is only 65% accurate. i did hear that the swine flu attacks the lungs first, who knows!! On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Sheri Nakken wrote: At 07:07 AM 12/31/2009, you wrote: That sounds like swine flu. My kids all had it and it was exactly like that. One of them didn't even get a fever. The distinguishing factor is that it starts with the bad cough (swine flu attacks the lungs first) while a cold and most types of flu will develop into a cough later on. I encourage all NOT to buy into swine flu and what they say the symptoms are things come and go all the time in our bodies and those same symptoms existed long before a label of swine flu. anything that is told to us about so-called swine flu is suspect, including anything about it attacking the lungs first. My opinion Sheri

[Guest guest]

Our holistic doctor who I trust completely was certain that we had swine flu. She is not an alarmist at all but she had been seeing many cases and treating with homeopathic and herbal meds. Also, I had the same symptoms as the kids and I can say that this illness was VERY different from other illnesses that we have had before. It just felt different. My case was extremely mild. I do believe this is a different strain of flu but I also felt like we were all capable of fighting it.

[Guest guest]

At 07:50 AM 12/31/2009, you wrote:

Our holistic doctor who I trust

completely was certain that we had swine flu. She is not an

alarmist at all but she had been seeing many cases and treating with

homeopathic and herbal meds.

Again - doctors holistic or not have to label things.

Also, I had the same

symptoms as the kids and I can say that this illness was VERY different

from other illnesses that we have had before. It just felt

different. My case was extremely mild. I do believe this is a

different strain of flu but I also felt like we were all capable of

fighting it.

It just doesn't matter what the label is.

they don't have a clue about the cause of illness

A virus is not even alive but they certainly try to make all think that

they are.

What if a virus is doing a job - communicating between cells as it looks

like they are.

Kill the messenger.

They made viruses bad so they could sell drugs and vaccines and keep

their research labs after they were goingt to lose them when they

couldn't prove that viruses caused cancer (same situation with saying HIV

causes AIDS).

Illness is just a sign of toxins in the body & trying to purge

them. If it were contagious why

http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/swineflu/news/dec3009household.html

In 72% of the 216 households, no one caught flu from a family member

Sheri

listowner

That sounds like swine flu. My kids all had it and it was

exactly like that. One of them didn't even get a fever. The

distinguishing factor is that it starts with the bad cough (swine flu

attacks the lungs first) while a cold and most types of flu will develop

into a cough later on.

I encourage all NOT to buy into swine flu and what they say the

symptoms are

things come and go all the time in our bodies and those same symptoms

existed long before a label of swine flu.

anything that is told to us about so-called swine flu is suspect,

including anything about it attacking the lungs first.

My opinion

Sheri