Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 1) Indoor relative humidity. Reducing indoor relative humidity can significantly reduce dust mite density. However, I suggest 40% is more effective than 50%, if it can be achieved in your location. The attached graph is rather dated but shows direct correlation between indoor relative humidity and dust mite density through three seasons. 2) Vacuum everything. My suggestion is to try minimising not just the dust mites but the feces and body parts. Don't believe you have dust mites? Vacuum your bed or the floor in your bedroom and place the dust under a microscope. You will likely see shiny body parts of dust mites and fecal matter. Dust mits spread everywhere. Thus brush vacuum all surfaces in the bedroom, furniture, contents, etc. Unfortunately the portable vacuum cleaners discharge the dust mite feces and small body parts into the air. 3) HEPA vacuums not regulated. We tested HEPA vacuum cleaners and found several who are not true HEPA. There is no government regulation who can claim to manufacture HEPA vacuum cleaners - just like no gov't qualifications for IAQ/mould consultant. In some " HEPA " vacuum cleaners, you must replace the filter if it is opened. The gasket does not seal properly afterwards. That is costly and most people do not replace it. 4) Central vacuum is most effective. The best vacuum is a central vacuum with an outdoor discharge. However, the gasket in the canister often leaks (see dust around the canister lid). An easy fix is to duct tape the lid. The best option is to install the canister in the garage or an outside porche or shed. This keeps the dust out of the house during operation and cleaning, and the noise. Hope this helps with the discussion. Tang -- Professor Tang G. Lee Environmental Design University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4 CANADA Tel: 403-220-6608 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 > Elyse, > > The suggestions you've received so far are simple and cheap to > accomplish and they will work -- IF YOU HAVE DUST MITES. I don't know > if you do or not and I'm not suggesting you are wrong in how you are > going about this. It's just that your e-mail is similar to a report > I'm writing (and I'd rather continue my procrastination!) I have allergy to dust mites. If that is it, then damp dusting every surface, and washing everything in hot water above 140 deg F will kill them and rinse them out. I read a report that warm water with bleach also kills them (+borax is a well known bug killer.) I have covers on the mattress and pillows. I think that dollar for dollar, covering the mattress with polyethylene film over the top and duct taping it to the underside is as/more effective than some of the expensive covers. But, getting the room squeeky clean (think window sills, tops of windows, doors, moulding, any surface that holds dust) and the bedding done does wonders for us. I also have come to have allergies to many other insects, like Asian Ladybugs, or what ever happens to cohabit with us, I get allergic to it. I am beginning to wonder if I have some kind of insectoid parasite that is causing these types of allergies? I may wonder for a long time. > > Something we don't emphasize enough is that if the several known > remedies aren't successful, perhaps we are focusing on the wrong > cause, the wrong location or the wrong techniques. Or a combination. This is so true. If the whole dust free routine doesn't work for you, then it may be something else, like a spike in the ragweed pollen count locally, or spike in some new kind of mold, like I ran into yesterday. > > A client is reacting to the ammonia in the water the restoration > company used on her kitchen floor. She told them to not use ammonia > but they " forgot. " Kind of like the car accidents where the driver > runs into the vehicle they see stopped on the side of the rode. They > had to deviate from their intended path to cause the harm they had > just noticed or been warned about. I REALLY hate it when this happens, and it happens far too often. > Mopping the surface would remove a slight amount of dirt in the > cracks so it would eventually reduce a noticeable amount of odor. > Scraping the dirt out of the cracks removed the ammonia that had > soaked into the dirt. THEN we mopped the floor. Once. > > The agony is in the details. But so can be the solution. This is a very good reminder about the details...... thanks, Carl. > ----- > > iI, > > I'd > > really appreciate the neame of a brand that has helped > > people. I just saw a dust free pillow at National Allergy. It is synthetic, though, and new. You can just wash your pillow in hot water, like I used to do every 2 weeks. Just make sure you have time to get it really dry, it takes a long time. I used to do 2 pillows at a time, in a top loader, to balance the spin cycle. I put the hot water in, and a little soap (not much) and then stopped the machine and added the pillows, making sure they were under water. Then I let them soak for at least 20 minutes; next, spun them out, then put in a rinse load of cold water, and let them soak again for as long as I felt like it. Agitated them by hand, carefully, then spun them dry again. It kinda ruins the pillows if you let the machine agitate them. They just get lumpy, I use them anyway, as they are at least clean. If you have a front loader, it is less work, or if you can do them at a laundromat with front loaders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2005 Report Share Posted September 12, 2005 Tang, Your suggestion for keeping relative humidity low is correct, but most dust mite infestations are in mattresses, pillows and frequently used cushioned items such as sofas, easy chairs and computer chairs. Since these infestations subsist on moisture from human bodies and NOT moisture from the air, the colonizations are independent of indoor relative humidity. I have looked at thousands of dust samples and it is not easy for a non-microscopist to see mites or their leavings. Dust mites are not everywhere and do not have to be anywhere. The only way to control house dust mites is through the use of proper encasings: those that are not porous. The newer cotton covers are expensive and not necessarily effective. The holes allow body moisture into the mattress (thus " feeding " the colony) and allow some of the allergens out (some of which are smaller than the holes in the cotton weave). Due to the danger of aerosolizing allergens, bare, contaminated mattresses should NOT be vacuumed (HEPA or otherwise), since, as you correctly noted, most so-called HEPA vacuums are leaky. Encasings, once placed on a mite-infested mattress, should NEVER be removed for cleaning, as disturbing the uncovered mattress aerosolizes allergens. For children, a second cover can be used and removed for washing. (For families in which encasings are a financial hardship, polyethylene moving covers, about $5 at Budget Rental, can be used; but they must be covered with a mattress pad that MUST washed every other week.) Futons with encasings can be used instead of couches; leather computer chairs instead of cushioned ones, as leather never develops a mite problem. Treatment of rugs or carpets with " dry steam " (steam vapor, NOT steam cleaning, which uses hot water) is 100% effective in killing mites. DeLonghi, Fogacci and Jiffy manufacture steam vapor machines.Unfortunately, no one provides this service and equiment has to be purchased. If you think that a particular piece of cushioned furniture is a problem, cover the cushions temporarily with Pro-Tect (www.pro-tect.com) adhesive polyethylene film; this will seal in allergens. (This is a great test for carpets also.) May www.myhouseiskillingme.com May Indoor Air Investigaitons LLC Cambridge, MA >Message: 1 >Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:45:16 -0600 (MDT) >From: " Prof. Tang Lee " <lee@...> >Subject: Reducing/eliminating Dust Mites >1) Indoor relative humidity. Reducing indoor relative humidity can significantly reduce dust mite density. However, I suggest 40% is more effective than 50%, if it can be achieved in your location. The attached graph is rather dated but shows direct correlation between indoor relative humidity and dust mite density through three seasons. >2) Vacuum everything. My suggestion is to try minimising not just the dust mites but the feces and body parts. Don't believe you have dust mites? Vacuum your bed or the floor in your bedroom and place the dust under a microscope. You will likely see shiny body parts of dust mites and fecal matter. Dust mits spread everywhere. Thus brush vacuum all surfaces in the bedroom, furniture, contents, etc. Unfortunately the portable vacuum cleaners discharge the dust mite feces and small body parts into the air. >3) HEPA vacuums not regulated. We tested HEPA vacuum cleaners and found several who are not true HEPA. There is no government regulation who can claim to manufacture HEPA vacuum cleaners - just like no gov't qualifications for IAQ/mould consultant. In some " HEPA " vacuum cleaners, you must replace the filter if it is opened. The gasket does not seal properly afterwards. That is costly and most people do not replace it. >4) Central vacuum is most effective. The best vacuum is a central vacuum with an outdoor discharge. However, the gasket in the canister often leaks (see dust around the canister lid). An easy fix is to duct tape the lid. The best option is to install the canister in the garage or an outside porche or shed. This keeps the dust out of the house during operation and cleaning, and the noise. Hope this helps with the discussion. >Professor Tang G. Lee >Environmental Design >University of Calgary >Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4 >CANADA >Tel: 403-220-6608 -- Reply to: Jeff@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.