Guest guest Posted May 31, 2007 Report Share Posted May 31, 2007 > That's because I do know healthy vaxed children (as well as > unhealthy ones) and so I didn't think we could really generalise > about this. Of course, these kids may be unhealthy down the track, > too. > > Hope that makes sense, > Carly. > My daughter has never been vaxed, or given antibiotics or fever reducers, but she has been sick plenty in her 11 months. Whether or not a child gets a cold, flu, or even chickenpox, does not tell you whether they are healthy or unhealthy inside. How their body responds to the illness can tell you some of this information. She has never had a complication from anything including the flu and the chickenpox, which she just got over recently. Never even had an ear infection, like my son did. So, the fact that she got over her illnesses rather easily without complications tells me that she is pretty healthy inside and her immune system is behaving properly. There are definetly vaxed kids out there with healthy immune systems, but that does not discount the ones who are damaged by vaccines. Everyone's body is different and will respond differently to vaccines. It is almost impossible to prove that a vaccine damaged a child, but I have to assume that injecting foreign substances into the body is a likely cause if that child gets sick after a vaccine. Many vaccine damaged kids are unhealthy deep down (chronically). But, this is not only happening to some vaccinated kids, it also happens to unvaxed kids for other reasons. There are many ways to get to a state of chronic bad health. Vaccines are only one way for some kids. Many kids who have been given vaccines were already sick inside before the vaccine and the vaccines would likely only do more damage to their immune system. You are right that you can not generalise about how a vaccine is going to affect any particular child, but what is being done is saying that this is what happens to some children who receive a vaccine. Like I said, just because one child does not get sick from a vaccine does not discount that that is what has happened to another child. Of course, you really don't know who is chronically sick or not in some cases. I have heard many people saying how they are not chronically ill. I would like to say the same, but I know that chronic illness lives in you and you may not exhibit symptoms till years down the road. There may be little signs here and there. For me, I get styes and other little symptoms. I feel that I probably have some underlying condition that is just lerking under the surface, as my body is attempting to return to a state of balance. Tara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2007 Report Share Posted May 31, 2007 HI Tara, Yes, I have seen how these things can pan out unpredicably. My eldest dd (7) was vaxed up to 18months. My youngest dd (5) only had the HepB shot as a newborn (before I had researched). My eldest had slight eczema, febrile convulsions (not after a vax) and apart from that no health worries. My youngest has had nothing wrong at all - until this year when I found out she has coeliac disease (which I have). SO just when I was feeling good about her good health and patting myself on the back (and as well as her being almost unvaxed, I breastfed her for 2.5 years) she throws me for a loop! That's what kids are for, I guess! I think my eldest has been one of the lucky ones. All around me seem to be kids with asthma or other health problems. She has been lucky so far. I also put this down to her amazing zest for life - I think emotional health is also a big part of the equation...though not the only part. So, in conclusion...do you think it would be more accurate to say - " a *good portion* of people who are vaccinated have latent viral activity that prevents them from contracting the acute disease. This explains, in part, why vaccines appear to prevent disease. " ? Carly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2007 Report Share Posted May 31, 2007 > > So, in conclusion...do you think it would be more accurate to say - > > " a *good portion* of people who are vaccinated have latent viral > activity that prevents them from contracting the acute disease. This > explains, in part, why vaccines appear to prevent disease. " ? > > Carly. > Yes, Carly. I would agree to this statement. Tara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2007 Report Share Posted May 31, 2007 What an excellent post. Tara. You have summarised the entire issue so well. The only addition I would make to your commentary is that I consider that all vaccines damage. Certainly the degree differs from person to person, and the nature of the damage and its manifestations may not be apparent immediately, but the damage is there, imnsho. And when conditions are right, it will come to the surface. Sue Tara said: > My daughter has never been vaxed, or given antibiotics or fever > reducers, but she has been sick plenty in her 11 months. Whether or > not a child gets a cold, flu, or even chickenpox, does not tell you > whether they are healthy or unhealthy inside. How their body responds > to the illness can tell you some of this information. She has never > had a complication from anything including the flu and the chickenpox, > which she just got over recently. Never even had an ear infection, > like my son did. So, the fact that she got over her illnesses rather > easily without complications tells me that she is pretty healthy > inside and her immune system is behaving properly. > > There are definetly vaxed kids out there with healthy immune systems, > but that does not discount the ones who are damaged by vaccines. > Everyone's body is different and will respond differently to > vaccines. It is almost impossible to prove that a vaccine damaged a > child, but I have to assume that injecting foreign substances into the > body is a likely cause if that child gets sick after a vaccine. > > Many vaccine damaged kids are unhealthy deep down (chronically). But, > this is not only happening to some vaccinated kids, it also happens to > unvaxed kids for other reasons. There are many ways to get to a state > of chronic bad health. Vaccines are only one way for some kids. Many > kids who have been given vaccines were already sick inside before the > vaccine and the vaccines would likely only do more damage to their > immune system. > > You are right that you can not generalise about how a vaccine is going > to affect any particular child, but what is being done is saying that > this is what happens to some children who receive a vaccine. Like I > said, just because one child does not get sick from a vaccine does not > discount that that is what has happened to another child. Of course, > you really don't know who is chronically sick or not in some cases. > > I have heard many people saying how they are not chronically ill. I > would like to say the same, but I know that chronic illness lives in > you and you may not exhibit symptoms till years down the road. There > may be little signs here and there. For me, I get styes and other > little symptoms. I feel that I probably have some underlying > condition that is just lerking under the surface, as my body is > attempting to return to a state of balance. > > Tara > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2007 Report Share Posted June 2, 2007 Vaccines have never prevented any disease! They only make the receiver more likely to get the disease if they are exposed to it. The so called protective ingredient in the vaccine isn't the real thing. In other words, it is attenuated or modified in some other way so as to not cause the receiver to get the disease immediately. When they gave the real thing, as in the polio disaster in the 1950's, over 50,000 people got polio from the vaccine. I know a man in Georgia that was and still is one of the victims. His left leg is like a bean poll and about six inches shorter than his right leg. Check this out. In every outbreak of illness that a population has been vaccinated for, the ones most likely to get the illness are the vaccinated population. I have read of dozens of outbreaks and this is always the case. Vaccines only harm and maim and kill people. Tara Maue <orrin_reilly@...> wrote: > > So, in conclusion...do you think it would be more accurate to say - > > " a *good portion* of people who are vaccinated have latent viral > activity that prevents them from contracting the acute disease. This > explains, in part, why vaccines appear to prevent disease. " ? > > Carly. > Yes, Carly. I would agree to this statement. Tara For some truth in jurnalism go to: http://www.thenewamerican.com Also visit:http://www.moosewoodart.com/pages/1/index.htm --------------------------------- Get the free toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 " The truth is often we just have to plant a seed and leave it at that. Tough to do. Angie " Yes, I have gone through many stages since my research beginnings, the fanatic stage, and the " have to tell everyone " stage, and at this point, I couldn't agree more....planting a seed is as far as I go. I try hard to emote love while I'm mentioning a seed, I can only hope.... If then, there is more questions, I am HAPPY to discuss! Always keeping in mind, that there will be a hard time for that parent, if they have already vaxxed, so again, I try hard to remember to emote love. I also agree about turning the term " fanatic " into " passionate " THAT is much more correct!!! PASSIONATE!!!! Cassie in Idaho " Peace on Earth begins at birth! " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 > > I always wonder with this argument though, isn't most of the population vaxed? So obviously there would be more of them to get it? Not sure, and I agree vax are bad, but I'm just curious about that. > > Yes, I've always wondered if that argument is legit. If 50 people get measles and 45 of them are vaxed; then is makes it sound like the vax doesn't work. But in most populations the vaxed significantly outweigh the unvaxed, so the percentage will be higher. I guess the pro-vaxers would say there would be many more who would've gotten the disease if not for being vaxed. And they say the vaccines are only 90% effective, most of them anyway. So those 45 people could've made up that other 10%. Carly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2007 Report Share Posted June 4, 2007 Take that 1,000 vaxed and 1,000 unvaxed people are exposed to the chicken pox. A lot more of the 1,000 vaxed will get it than the 1,000 unvaxed. In various countries in Europe where it was mandated that all people receive a particular vax (and up to 98% did), they were always followed by a serious outbreak of the disease vaxed for. If you don't get the vax, it doesn't mean that you are immune to the disease. It just means you are less likely to get it and, if you do get it, it will probably be a mild case. When a doctor says that a vaccine is safe and effective, ask him to DRINK one! I remember some one who offered a group of pediatric doctors $1,000.00 to drink a MMR vaccine. NO takers! Gee, SAFE and effective? :-) It goes on and on. This American population has been exposed to vaccine propaganda all of it's life. Most people just can't or won't realize that they have been coned. That's the problem but thanks to chat groups like this and others around the world, more and more people are beginning to realize they have been conned. Just like the party line about global warming is a fraud. Most people believe it because of the medias' constant blitz of propaganda about it. We live in a world of lies. Lucas <rachellucas6@...> wrote: I always wonder with this argument though, isn't most of the population vaxed? So obviously there would be more of them to get it? Not sure, and I agree vax are bad, but I'm just curious about that. ) ~ Mommy To Gavin (07/05) & New Year baby on the way ~ ~ KUSTOMIZED KIDS ~ http://www.cafepress.com/kustomizedkids Baby & Kids, Pregnancy, Natural Parenting, Wedding, & Personalized Clothing Designs " Families Eating Healthy " - recipes & more FamiliesEatingHealthy Vaccines have never prevented any disease! They only make the receiver more likely to get the disease if they are exposed to it. The so called protective ingredient in the vaccine isn't the real thing. In other words, it is attenuated or modified in some other way so as to not cause the receiver to get the disease immediately. When they gave the real thing, as in the polio disaster in the 1950's, over 50,000 people got polio from the vaccine. I know a man in Georgia that was and still is one of the victims. His left leg is like a bean poll and about six inches shorter than his right leg. Check this out. In every outbreak of illness that a population has been vaccinated for, the ones most likely to get the illness are the vaccinated population. I have read of dozens of outbreaks and this is always the case. Vaccines only harm and maim and kill people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2007 Report Share Posted June 4, 2007 It's funny, I mentioned the drinking offer to someone who is so pro vaxx she makes us look like church mice and her comment was, " It's not safe to drink a lot of things, but you can still use them for vaccines. " Uh, yeah, much safer to inject it right into your blood stream than to drink it and let your kidneys and liver do the work.............what freaking ever................ ph McGuire <kingcop@...> wrote: Take that 1,000 vaxed and 1,000 unvaxed people are exposed to the chicken pox. A lot more of the 1,000 vaxed will get it than the 1,000 unvaxed. In various countries in Europe where it was mandated that all people receive a particular vax (and up to 98% did), they were always followed by a serious outbreak of the disease vaxed for. If you don't get the vax, it doesn't mean that you are immune to the disease. It just means you are less likely to get it and, if you do get it, it will probably be a mild case. When a doctor says that a vaccine is safe and effective, ask him to DRINK one! I remember some one who offered a group of pediatric doctors $1,000.00 to drink a MMR vaccine. NO takers! Gee, SAFE and effective? :-) It goes on and on. This American population has been exposed to vaccine propaganda all of it's life. Most people just can't or won't realize that they have been coned. That's the problem but thanks to chat groups like this and others around the world, more and more people are beginning to realize they have been conned. Just like the party line about global warming is a fraud. Most people believe it because of the medias' constant blitz of propaganda about it. We live in a world of lies. Lucas <rachellucas6@...> wrote: I always wonder with this argument though, isn't most of the population vaxed? So obviously there would be more of them to get it? Not sure, and I agree vax are bad, but I'm just curious about that. ) ~ Mommy To Gavin (07/05) & New Year baby on the way ~ ~ KUSTOMIZED KIDS ~ http://www.cafepress.com/kustomizedkids Baby & Kids, Pregnancy, Natural Parenting, Wedding, & Personalized Clothing Designs " Families Eating Healthy " - recipes & more FamiliesEatingHealthy Vaccines have never prevented any disease! They only make the receiver more likely to get the disease if they are exposed to it. The so called protective ingredient in the vaccine isn't the real thing. In other words, it is attenuated or modified in some other way so as to not cause the receiver to get the disease immediately. When they gave the real thing, as in the polio disaster in the 1950's, over 50,000 people got polio from the vaccine. I know a man in Georgia that was and still is one of the victims. His left leg is like a bean poll and about six inches shorter than his right leg. Check this out. In every outbreak of illness that a population has been vaccinated for, the ones most likely to get the illness are the vaccinated population. I have read of dozens of outbreaks and this is always the case. Vaccines only harm and maim and kill people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2007 Report Share Posted June 5, 2007 As I read this all I can think is that I was not vaxed for measles, nor was my brother nor any other kid where I grew up (NYC) -- the vax did not exist. I can also tell you, we got measles (I was in my late teens, my brother was much younger) and we survived. I can't recall anyone in the neighborhood getting pneumonia or brain inflammation, let alone dying. Moms back then actually exposed their kids to others kids with certain diseases (measles, mumps, chicken pox, etc.) in the hopes that they would get it as a child and have immunity for life. That said, my heart goes out to the families of those that died, but I wonder how healthy they were to start with and what kind of medical attention they received after contracting the measles. Health & blessings, See what Oprah said about our non-toxic products. http://www.shaklee.net/pws/library/flash/getclean-tv2.html http://www.shaklee.net/ExcitingHealth/getclean/index On 5/27/07, carly10475 <poppetspaws@...> wrote: > > Would be interested in any thoughts on this one? Do you think this > means that our double vaxing for measles means we have far less > mealses; as opposed to Japan? > > ***************************************************************** > > Japanese measles epidemic brings campuses to standstill > > Norrie in Tokyo > May 27, 2007 - 4:54PM > > > A rampant measles epidemic has infected hundreds of Japanese > students and frightened Tokyo universities and schools into sending > more than 160,000 students home. > > In just a few days the highly contagious illness has spread > virulently from Tokyo to outlying areas, affecting potentially > thousands of people in their late teens and 20s. > > The epidemic, believed to be Japan's worst in at least five years, > has brought campuses to a standstill for more than a week. An > unknown number of people have been hospitalised. > > On Sunday, Tokyo's Hosei University announced it was closing a > second of its three campuses for eight days after 14 students were > confirmed to have the illness. The university closed another campus > last Thursday. > > About a dozen universities in the Tokyo area, together with a > handful of other schools around the country, have suspended classes > since mid-April because of measles outbreaks, according to media > reports. > > The National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) said 623 people > are known to have contracted the illness between February 27 and May > 27, compared to only 18 during the same period last year. > > The reasons why this year's outbreak has been so severe were not > immediately clear. The Asahi Shimbun newspaper, citing unidentified > experts, said a previous decline in the number of measles outbreaks > may have lessened the efficacy of childhood vaccinations among the > students, as exposure to the virus strengthens their effect. > > NIID said April to June were likely to be peak months for the virus > to spread because of the concentration of graduation and > matriculation ceremonies during that time. > > The Japanese school year ends in March and resumes in April. > > Health authorities are stunned at the rapid spread of the illness, > which usually affects infants and only rarely strikes people in > their 20s and older. Most Japanese in that age group have only been > vaccinated once. > > Yoshinori Yasui, chief researcher at the NIID, said the problem was > that " young people are considerably active during the incubation > period between infection and the appearance of the rash, helping the > virus to spread widely " . > > Measles is passed on by coughing and sneezing. It causes pneumonia > in one out of 20 cases, and brain inflammation and death in one out > of every 1000. > > Japan is the only developed country to still experience large > measles epidemics. The US, which introduced a double vaccination > program in 1989, and Australia, which phased in a booster shot for > measles from 1994, have largely eradicated the disease. > > In Japan, however, the government bowed to strong public pressure in > 1994 by repealing laws that made childhood immunisations mandatory. > In 2000 there were an estimated 200,000 cases of measles and 88 > deaths. > > It was only last April that the National Institute of Infectious > Diseases introduced a double vaccination program. But it would take > at least a decade before the results of that could be seen, > predicted Tatsuo Kato, president at the National Centre for Child > Health and Development. > > The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has described > Japan as a " measles exporter " , because it brings the illness into > the US more frequently than any other country. > > In an editorial this week, The Asahi Shimbun called on the > government " to show that it is committed to eliminating measles from > this country " and " ridding Japan of the 'measles exporter' status as > soon as possible " . > > " In a survey conducted last autumn, the inoculation rate for 1-year- > olds was adequate, but the rate for the second shot was quite poor. > It is necessary to make people, particularly parents, aware of the > necessity and importance of double vaccinations. " > > In Tokyo, Waseda University suspended almost all classes for more > than a week and sent home 55,000 undergraduate and graduate students > when 30 people were diagnosed with measles. Nihon University ordered > 27,000 students home until the end of next week after 91 students > contracted the disease. More than 10 other campuses have also shut > their doors. > > By last Friday almost 300 students at 104 Tokyo schools were > diagnosed with measles, forcing the closure of nine schools. The > number of students affected is now believed to be considerably > higher. > > The illness is spreading to outer areas, such as Chiba, where at > least 350 university and school students have contracted it, and > Saitama, where a university has reported cases among its candidature. > > The World Health Organisation aims to eliminate measles from the > Western Pacific area, including Japan, by 2012. > > - with AP > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2007 Report Share Posted June 5, 2007 Hi Anne, Sorry I haven't been back on here to respond to your question. My son was born 6weeks early but was a wonderful baby. almost too easy. So happy. That all ended suddenly and we never knew why. He started to not beable to breath at night. We had to use a nebulizer with him. And the non-stop crying was awful. Night and day. Health problems galore. We never tied it to the vaccines because I was convinced that I had not started vaccines till 9 months.(we started them in the 9th month, September) I had my second son when he was 13 months old so with all his crying, me working full time and a new baby I was overwhelmed. My son was so hard to live with. Life was hard. I was not vacced as a child so my concern was for me and if vaccines could be bad for me if my kids were vacced. The Dr told me that he couldn't get thge MMR so I knew that I was going to stop with that one. I did get the chicken pox for him and that day I came home and heared a report that wasn't so good about the chicken pox. That scared me and I knew I was done. No one in my family had been vaccinated up till this point. My son was the first.(almost everyone in my husban's family had been vacced) We had to then get them in school so I contacted Carley.(I hope i spelled her name right.) She told me that my son was going to have sever learning disabilities. she said I needed to detox him, but not understanding I let it go. She had recognized all she sighns and symptoms. We hired a lawer to get the kids into school. All was well till we realized my son was not learning. We were told over and over 'He's young' We finnally were able to get him diagnosed as dyslexic. He is so sever they don't know if he will ever learn the alphabit. He is 6 years old now and can't even write his name. He knows only a few letters. He will repeat Kindergarden. He also suffers from sever anxity. I only stumbled accross the reasoning behind his problems because his teacher wanted info on how bad vaccines are. I found an artical about Barbra Fishers son and the DTP shot. I didn't think that it could be the same as my sons because I didn't think that he had any combo shots. I checked his records after a week of pondering it. He had 3 DTP shots in less than 6 months. I then found a peice of paper that I had cut out from a magazine when he was born and had taken into the Dr's. It was on the DTP vaccine and stated 'Any child with a brain injury thats getting worse should not get the DTP.' At 5 months of age how were we to know if the brain injury was getting worse?? The brain injury we were told would only affect his walking which we were lucky it didn't. The Dr totally dismissed the paper. So I contacted Carley again and she said she could detox him but just for her to tell us how was 1800.00 that didn't include what you had to buy to do the detox. I called my up line with Young living. He told me to use Detoxzyme, Mineral Essence, pD 80/20 super B, Chelex, and oils to use GLF, Juniper, Ledum, and juva cleanse. He said to drink distilled water to pull all toxins out. I have also started reiki with him. His attitude and outlook on life has gotten much better since that. Just wish me luck with all of this. I will be starting this in the next week as they will be out of school this week. It will be a lot of work but well worth it if it helps. If not he will be a lot healthier. We have changed his eating too. Trying to do organic. Well hope this answers your questions. Sorry this got sooooo long. I also left so much out. Please contact me privatly if you want more info. cattails3@... Elissa Young Living member #808190 > > > Would be interested in any thoughts on this one? Do you > > think this > > > means that our double vaxing for measles means we have far less > > > mealses; as opposed to Japan? > > > > > > ***************************************************************** > > > > > > Japanese measles epidemic brings campuses to standstill > > > > > > Norrie in Tokyo > > > May 27, 2007 - 4:54PM > > > > > > A rampant measles epidemic has infected hundreds of Japanese > > > students and frightened Tokyo universities and schools into > sending > > > more than 160,000 students home. > > > > > > In just a few days the highly contagious illness has spread > > > virulently from Tokyo to outlying areas, affecting potentially > > > thousands of people in their late teens and 20s. > > > > > > The epidemic, believed to be Japan's worst in at least five > years, > > > has brought campuses to a standstill for more than a week. An > > > unknown number of people have been hospitalised. > > > > > > On Sunday, Tokyo's Hosei University announced it was closing a > > > second of its three campuses for eight days after 14 students > were > > > confirmed to have the illness. The university closed another > campus > > > last Thursday. > > > > > > About a dozen universities in the Tokyo area, together with a > > > handful of other schools around the country, have suspended > classes > > > since mid-April because of measles outbreaks, according to media > > > reports. > > > > > > The National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) said 623 > > people > > > are known to have contracted the illness between February 27 and > > May > > > 27, compared to only 18 during the same period last year. > > > > > > The reasons why this year's outbreak has been so severe were not > > > immediately clear. The Asahi Shimbun newspaper, citing > unidentified > > > experts, said a previous decline in the number of measles > outbreaks > > > may have lessened the efficacy of childhood vaccinations among > the > > > students, as exposure to the virus strengthens their effect. > > > > > > NIID said April to June were likely to be peak months for the > virus > > > to spread because of the concentration of graduation and > > > matriculation ceremonies during that time. > > > > > > The Japanese school year ends in March and resumes in April. > > > > > > Health authorities are stunned at the rapid spread of the > illness, > > > which usually affects infants and only rarely strikes people in > > > their 20s and older. Most Japanese in that age group have only > been > > > vaccinated once. > > > > > > Yoshinori Yasui, chief researcher at the NIID, said the problem > was > > > that " young people are considerably active during the incubation > > > period between infection and the appearance of the rash, helping > > the > > > virus to spread widely " . > > > > > > Measles is passed on by coughing and sneezing. It causes > pneumonia > > > in one out of 20 cases, and brain inflammation and death in one > out > > > of every 1000. > > > > > > Japan is the only developed country to still experience large > > > measles epidemics. The US, which introduced a double vaccination > > > program in 1989, and Australia, which phased in a booster shot > for > > > measles from 1994, have largely eradicated the disease. > > > > > > In Japan, however, the government bowed to strong public pressure > > in > > > 1994 by repealing laws that made childhood immunisations > mandatory. > > > In 2000 there were an estimated 200,000 cases of measles and 88 > > > deaths. > > > > > > It was only last April that the National Institute of Infectious > > > Diseases introduced a double vaccination program. But it would > take > > > at least a decade before the results of that could be seen, > > > predicted Tatsuo Kato, president at the National Centre for Child > > > Health and Development. > > > > > > The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has described > > > Japan as a " measles exporter " , because it brings the illness into > > > the US more frequently than any other country. > > > > > > In an editorial this week, The Asahi Shimbun called on the > > > government " to show that it is committed to eliminating measles > > from > > > this country " and " ridding Japan of the 'measles exporter' status > > as > > > soon as possible " . > > > > > > " In a survey conducted last autumn, the inoculation rate for 1- > year- > > > olds was adequate, but the rate for the second shot was quite > poor. > > > It is necessary to make people, particularly parents, aware of > the > > > necessity and importance of double vaccinations. " > > > > > > In Tokyo, Waseda University suspended almost all classes for more > > > than a week and sent home 55,000 undergraduate and graduate > > students > > > when 30 people were diagnosed with measles. Nihon University > > ordered > > > 27,000 students home until the end of next week after 91 students > > > contracted the disease. More than 10 other campuses have also > shut > > > their doors. > > > > > > By last Friday almost 300 students at 104 Tokyo schools were > > > diagnosed with measles, forcing the closure of nine schools. The > > > number of students affected is now believed to be considerably > > > higher. > > > > > > The illness is spreading to outer areas, such as Chiba, where at > > > least 350 university and school students have contracted it, and > > > Saitama, where a university has reported cases among its > > candidature. > > > > > > The World Health Organisation aims to eliminate measles from the > > > Western Pacific area, including Japan, by 2012. > > > > > > - with AP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2007 Report Share Posted June 7, 2007 They use many reasons why the vax didn't work. The 90% effective reason is brilliant. If their is an outbreak in a vaxed population then, no matter how many of the vaxed get the ailment, they can claim it is part of the 10%. If it's really, say, 30% they will still say it's part of the 10%. They ain't good at math. :-) Carly <poppetspaws@...> wrote: --- In Vaccinations , " Lucas " <rachellucas6@...> wrote: > > I always wonder with this argument though, isn't most of the population vaxed? So obviously there would be more of them to get it? Not sure, and I agree vax are bad, but I'm just curious about that. > > Yes, I've always wondered if that argument is legit. If 50 people get measles and 45 of them are vaxed; then is makes it sound like the vax doesn't work. But in most populations the vaxed significantly outweigh the unvaxed, so the percentage will be higher. I guess the pro-vaxers would say there would be many more who would've gotten the disease if not for being vaxed. And they say the vaccines are only 90% effective, most of them anyway. So those 45 people could've made up that other 10%. Carly. For some truth in jurnalism go to: http://www.thenewamerican.com Also visit:http://www.moosewoodart.com/pages/1/index.htm --------------------------------- It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Toolbar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2007 Report Share Posted June 8, 2007 Yeah, , I am not particularly freaked out about measles either. Though I personally I have not had them. I was just more or less commenting on the extreme dichotomy between the camps of " vaccines don't work " and " vaccines are great " . I figure the truth must be somewhere in the middle. Though it doesn't mean I am a fan of them, for most people, either. Carly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2007 Report Share Posted June 10, 2007 Oh man I couldn't agree with you more! I always wonder with this argument though, isn't most of the population vaxed? So obviously there would be more of them to get it? Not sure, and I agree vax are bad, but I'm just curious about that. > > ) ~ Mommy To Gavin (07/05) & New Year baby on the way ~ > > ~ KUSTOMIZED KIDS ~ http://www.cafepress.com/kustomizedkids > Baby & Kids, Pregnancy, Natural Parenting, Wedding, & Personalized Clothing Designs > > " Families Eating Healthy " - recipes & more FamiliesEatingHealthy > > Vaccines have never prevented any disease! They only make the receiver more likely to get the disease if they are exposed to it. The so called protective ingredient in the vaccine isn't the real thing. In other words, it is attenuated or modified in some other way so as to not cause the receiver to get the disease immediately. When they gave the real thing, as in the polio disaster in the 1950's, over 50,000 people got polio from the vaccine. I know a man in Georgia that was and still is one of the victims. His left leg is like a bean poll and about six inches shorter than his right leg. Check this out. In every outbreak of illness that a population has been vaccinated for, the ones most likely to get the illness are the vaccinated population. I have read of dozens of outbreaks and this is always the case. Vaccines only harm and maim and kill people. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.