Guest guest Posted January 1, 2004 Report Share Posted January 1, 2004 The part of this i find particularly interesting is the last paragraph which states the success of the preliminary testing of the MMR vaccine to treat the recurring repiratory papillomas in trial patients as young as age 2. I have a personal interest in this due to the fact my nephew was born with papillomas on his vocal cords and has repeated laser surgeries at UCLA since the age of 1yr. He is now 4y.just a little fyi i guess, but it is remarkable to me that with all of the controversy surrounding the vaccine they not only disregard those concerns and have the gall test it for other medical problems as well. Rather discouraging as far as " our " progress, at least to me. Sorry for the rambling. http://www.rrpf.org/rrpf/news/RRP_Newsletter_Spring03.html HPV Vaccine Update  Positive results from Phase II Clinical Research Study in Pediatric RRP using the HspE7 Vaccine for HPV  [The following article is based on a press release and subsequent conference call. More details may be found at: www.stressgen.com] On 10 June 2003, Stressgen Biotechnologies Corporation announced that results from its Phase II trial with HspE7 showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of surgeries for a group of 27 moderate to severe RRP patients. Top line data from this trial involved the interval between surgeries following treatment with HspE7 compared to the pretreatment surgical interval, the primary endpoint of the trial. In the study population as a whole, there was a mean increase of 78.6 percent in the interval between surgeries (p=0.015) following treatment with HspE7 compared to the pretreatment surgical interval, resulting in fewer surgeries for these patients. Longer-term follow-up continues in this trial out to 60 weeks beyond the initiation of treatment with HspE7. Preliminary projections of the number of surgeries per year have been made. Among the patients estimated to have a reduction of at least one surgery per year as compared with the pretreatment period, it is projected that more than 50 surgeries will have been avoided during the year after treatment. HspE7 was given to 27 patients age from 2-18 through a 500 mcg subcutaneous injection administered three times over a 60-day period. Prior to study initiation, all of the children required frequent surgeries under anesthesia in order to reduce the size of warts to unblock their airways. Approximately one-half of the children enrolled in this trial had severe disease defined by a clinical score considered by experts to correspond to severe disease. In addition, seven of the children in this study were known to have had papillomas in the lungs, which is the most serious manifestation of RRP. By both of these measures, the children in this study presented a difficult challenge for HspE7 treatment. This HspE7 study, Stressgen’s first for its investigational immunotherapeutic therapy for RRP, had two objectives. The first objective & emdash; standard for a Phase II trial & emdash; was to assess the clinical effectiveness of HspE7 in children with RRP, through the primary endpoint of the length of post-treatment inter-surgical interval compared to median pretreatment inter-surgical interval. The first objective was achieved and leads to a Phase III confirming trial. The second objective involved the establishment of a very high hurdle of a doubling of the first inter-surgical interval, which, if achieved, might have further accelerated the clinical program. The second objective was almost made, thereby providing further support for a Phase III RRP program. Based on these results and the recommendations of the expert panel that reviewed the data, Stressgen is planning to develop a Phase III RRP program moving towards a goal of a Biologics License Application submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. Stressgen has entered into a collaborative agreement with Roche for the co-development and global commercialization of HspE7. Roche is producing commercial grade HspE7 to be used in the proposed Phase III RRP trial. The Phase III trial is anticipated to start during the second half of 2004. HspE7 is produced by Stressgen Biotechnologies Corporation   www.stressgen.com Canadian Office: #350 - 4243 Glanford Avenue , BC Canada V8Z 4B9 Phone: (250) 744-2811 Toll Free: (800) 661-4978 Fax: (250) 744-2877 Principal Executive Office: 10241 Wateridge Circle, C200 San Diego, CA 92121 USA Telephone: (858) 202-4900 Fax: (858) 450-6849 Merck and some other companies are also developing, primarily prophylactic, HPV vaccines, the objective being to target a large population that are likely to be exposed to genital HPV. We are following this work with much interest. Since there has been therapeutic success using Mumps and MMR vaccines designed to be preventative, it is felt that some of these HPV vaccines that target HPV 6 & 11, could be at least as effective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 In a message dated 1/2/2004 2:09:19 AM Eastern Standard Time, erinrmos@... writes: > It would be interesting to find out where papillomas originate. Maybe > another monkey virus? does any one know? Its also interesting to think they are > injecting kids with mumps to cure it. Maybe if the child was allowed to get > mumps they would never happen in the first place? All the best, " Parents should decide through informed choice, which vaccines if any should be given to their children " Vaccine Information Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.