31 NORM/DANGEROUS AND UNTRUE

[Guest guest]

a,

So good to hear from such a talent like you a.

_________________________

Dr. Schaller, do you think this WA doc meant this more the way I took

it - that there is an epidemic of undiagnosed Lyme?

**We know that in the state of GA that only 1/40 cases is reported and most

of these are tested with junk labs. We know it is top vector disease. We do

not know if 1/15 or 1/35 cases are caught. At least I have no idea. In one

town near where I used to live, they asked 900 homes-- " Anyone have Lyme

here " 45% said yes, and this is with mostly junk labs or bulls eye rashes

which are not routine at all. Lyme has up to 11 acute marks, and many are

trivial.

**I do not know how many million have it.

As you know, our family is looking at borrelia infection of 30 years with

symptoms

only getting bad in the last 10 years.

**Yes, I am diagnosing folks missed 20, 30, 40 and 50 years after the

initial infection.

With this reality band 31 may well be positive for 80% of the population.

**I read as not a concern if a 31. The 31 gets my attention and requires

other inflammation and autoimmune treatments. I do not think most pure city

dwellers have it. I would be surprised if that high. But I do think the

millions might be higher than we even imagined. As someone whose training

included neurocognitive reading, I meet massive numbers of folks with

neurocognitive signs. Very freaky. And the first thing to go for all of us

is insight with both Borrelia (Lyme) and mycotoxins.

Then the next question is " Should we be using long-term multiple antibiotics

on symptomatic patients? "

**I feel we have different treatment approaches. I feel this is a serious

organism. I do feel like we know more in 2006 than even 2 years ago. I go as

aggressive as the genetic biotoxin removal allows, and as much as the person

wants in a way that is causing no discomfort. Inflammation and other key

hormones I feel have to be tracked closely to determine pace. We have never

treated two pateints the same twice. And we also see many who have mycotoxin

exposure, including smart Lyme pateints and experts who live in moldy homes.

And ignore it.

Good to hear from you my friend,

J Schaller, MD

www.personalconsult.com

Re: BAND 31 NORM/DANGEROUS AND UNTRUE

> Dr. Schaller, do you think this WA doc meant this more the way I took

> it - that there is an epidemic of undiagnosed Lyme? As you know, our

> family is looking at borrelia infection of 30 years with symptoms

> only getting bad in the last 10 years. With this reality band 31 may

> well be positive for 80% of the population. Then the next question

> is " Should we be using longterm multiple antibiotics on symptomatic

> patients? "

>

> a Carnes

>

>

>>

>> A Lyme specialist in WA told me 80% of the population would test

> positive

>> and have Lyme.

>> __________________

>>

>> I was not aware that Washington had a Lyme specialist. This is

> fantastic and

>> dangerous nonsense. Not you. Not you. But that a physician would

> call a

>> protein only found due to exposure to the Lyme bacteria as being

> omnipresent

>> in " 80% " of the population.

>>

>> I looked up Washington State Lyme expert and the third listing was

> me. The

>> 9-11 physicians listed as Lyme literate or friendly [tolerant-not

> experts],

>> I have never heard of nationally. I hope this was a

> misunderstanding. But

>> you seen so sharp and smart, I doubt it.

>>

>> First off, this is not true with ANY LAB from the massive numbers

> of tests

>> we run. And EVEN THE 41 BAND WHICH IS the most likely to be

> positive due to

>> it being part of the many flagella Lyme has is only positive 50% of

> the time

>> and is found with other organisms.

>>

>> I would not bet my worst enemies life on the false and dangerous

> notion that

>> the band 31 is common. It is a protein common only in Lyme.

>>

>> I find that many of the autoimmune, metabolic problems, and

> inflammatory

>> issues are worse with this SPECIFIC highly reactive Lyme protein.

>>

>> Sorry to be firm. This is not anything to do with any sincere

> person on this

>> list. Please understand, THIS COMMENT OF FROM THIS MEDICAL

> INDIVIDUAL IS

>> TERRIFYING TO ME.

>>

>> In my upcoming textbook with the pediatrician with the world's

> largest

>> collection of pateints with tick-borne infections, 9 000, he calls

> 31

>> perfectly specific and highly reactive in the body in many ways.

>>

>> I agree.

>>

>> Fond regards,

>>

>> Having buried loved ones with a " single " specific band, I have some

> passion

>> here. Hope not too tough.

>>

>> Schaller. MD

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each

> other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment

> discussed here, please consult your doctor.

>