Guest guest Posted November 2, 2004 Report Share Posted November 2, 2004 Dear All, I've read the files on Dr Shoemaker, and I was wondering if anyone had any experience good/bad of his protocol. If there has been a previous discussion on this can someone point me in the right direction of where the messages are, please. Also I read Patti Schmidt's story of seeing Dr Shoemaker on the immunesupport site, what was the outcome of the story? Did she stay well? Many thanks, health and happiness to all, Jo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2004 Report Share Posted November 3, 2004 Shoemaker's an interesting cat. Very brilliant. Talk is a little bigger than his results though. If one asks me should they see him, I suggest if they have good insurance and don't mind flying in or travelling to see him, then sure. But don't expect miracles. I liked getting different perspective from him and seeing test results that other docs don't give, like VEGF and MSH, both of which were low in me. He will give you his VCS test which you will most likely fail and then prescribe cholestyramine (CSM) to get rid of them, and it may do a decent job of making you feel a little better after using it many weeks first though, and then you have to decide if you like using CSM the rest of your life. I found I did just as well doing heavy sauna rather than CSM. If you have staph infection in nose, Shoe will try to find this too and treat it, although now he can't use his staphage lysate any more, so that is one less reason I'd have to go to him if I could do it over again. He did not find the toxic forming coag neg staph in my nose for instance, which surprised him. He's a good guy and we could all use more docs like him. Definitely not greedy like too many other big name CFS guru and so for that he has my respect. I am not sure about the Patti who wrote that article on Shoe. I know I spoke to one who saw him and did better at first as he treated her for misdiagnosed lyme, but then needed more aggressive lyme treatment and this seems to be all too common stories from those who have seen him is he is in denial about prevalence of lyme and in fact ignored my IGeneX IgM which was pos, and made no comments on it which I think was him trying to blame my illness on mold only. In a message dated 11/3/2004 3:42:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, writes: I've read the files on Dr Shoemaker, and I was wondering if anyone had any experience good/bad of his protocol. If there has been a previous discussion on this can someone point me in the right direction of where the messages are, please. Also I read Patti Schmidt's story of seeing Dr Shoemaker on the immunesupport site, what was the outcome of the story? Did she stay well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2004 Report Share Posted November 3, 2004 -- > I am not sure about the Patti who wrote that article on Shoe. I >know I spoke to one who saw him and did better at first as he >treated her for misdiagnosed lyme, but then needed more aggressive >lyme treatment and this seems to be all too common stories from >those who have seen him is he is in denial about prevalence of lyme >and in fact ignored my IGeneX IgM which was pos, and made > no comments on it which I think was him trying to blame my illness > on mold only. > I don't get the impression that he is in denial about Lyme. Just that mold is a bigger mediator of peoples illnesses than they think. I'm not a patient and I'm not doing Dr Shoemakers protocols but he's the only doctor and one of the very few people that understands what I'm talking about when I say " mycotoxin avoidance " . - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2004 Report Share Posted November 3, 2004 I agree, he's way ahead of the curve when it comes to mycotoxins and any other toxins for that matter. When I say in denial of lyme I mean giving a long term chronically ill patient 3 weeks of doxy and acting like that is the lyme cure. If that's not denial then we understand the word a little differently. I understand that undertreating for lyme may be the best thing to do in comparison to loading a patient up with IV abx that have a terrible record of curing and waste money not to mention not being healthy to do those large amounts of abx, but to act like 3 weeks really kills all the lyme, ignoring IGeneX WB's and even doing 3 weeks doxy on himself when he has had bouts of lyme is denial if you ask me. In a message dated 11/3/2004 4:44:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, writes: I don't get the impression that he is in denial about Lyme. Just that mold is a bigger mediator of peoples illnesses than they think. I'm not a patient and I'm not doing Dr Shoemakers protocols but he's the only doctor and one of the very few people that understands what I'm talking about when I say " mycotoxin avoidance " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.