Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Digest Number 89

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

  • 8 months later...
Guest guest

Dear All:

This is just my opinion, and I know many physicians feel they are

" G-D " , and you are suppose to follow blindly, but, my philosophy is that

any patient accepted by any provider, must be allowed to question, and

the provider owes the patient a reasonable explanation. Some providers

get upset if you suggest something that they are not using.

ly, if this provider will not explain their idea about

deviating from the protocol, I would first force the issue to them for

an answer. If that is not met to YOUR satisfaction, I would first pose

the question in written form, and send it Certified/Return receipt.

If your provider ignores your reasonable requests, I would not only

transfer to another GI/Hepatologist, but, probably make a complaint to

the Investigatory Board, because he is deviating from the protocols, and

he refuses to address your questions. That can also translate into a

" malpractice " issue.

In any event, if a provider refuses to take the time to explain what

the disease is, and answer any questions during therapy you may have,

and have established a good working rapport that is based on trust, then

they are not the person for you. But, again, you are owed an

explanation, and one you can understand, and if the provider will never

take the time to give you the attention you are paying for, as well as

morally, and ethics, then I am not sure I would trust that provider. It

is common courtesy, if nothing else, and, especially when it comes to

HCV, you will have obvious questions, and that mandate, should is owed,

period. Marty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear All:

This is just my opinion, and I know many physicians feel they are

" G-D " , and you are suppose to follow blindly, but, my philosophy is that

any patient accepted by any provider, must be allowed to question, and

the provider owes the patient a reasonable explanation. Some providers

get upset if you suggest something that they are not using.

ly, if this provider will not explain their idea about

deviating from the protocol, I would first force the issue to them for

an answer. If that is not met to YOUR satisfaction, I would first pose

the question in written form, and send it Certified/Return receipt.

If your provider ignores your reasonable requests, I would not only

transfer to another GI/Hepatologist, but, probably make a complaint to

the Investigatory Board, because he is deviating from the protocols, and

he refuses to address your questions. That can also translate into a

" malpractice " issue.

In any event, if a provider refuses to take the time to explain what

the disease is, and answer any questions during therapy you may have,

and have established a good working rapport that is based on trust, then

they are not the person for you. But, again, you are owed an

explanation, and one you can understand, and if the provider will never

take the time to give you the attention you are paying for, as well as

morally, and ethics, then I am not sure I would trust that provider. It

is common courtesy, if nothing else, and, especially when it comes to

HCV, you will have obvious questions, and that mandate, should is owed,

period. Marty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Marty,

I was taken off combo at 6 months when my blood work showed negative viral

load and ALT and AST were normal. I questioned at that time why I was being

taken off and was told that I didn't need anymore as I had cleared the

virus. When tested 6 months later my viral load was triple what it was when

originally diagnosed and enzyme levels were elevated. (No testing had been

done at 3 months) My GI said at that time that there was nothing further I

could do. I just went to a new doctor who said that she felt I was taken

off too soon and she suggested I go back on the medication. I went to my

PCP to get referrals and was refused. He assured me that he was convinced

that the first GI did everything he could and told me I should " accept the

fact that I was one of the people who could not be cured and deal with

that " . Needless to say he is no longer my PCP. I immediately switched my

family to a new PCP. I think one of the biggest problems we have to deal

with is ignorance about this disease. I don't necessarily think my first GI

thought he was infallible I just don't think he had enough knowledge about

the protocal. I am not excusing him. I also won't return to him. I am

angry and do not look forward to going back on the combo. I definitely feel

that if a doctor cannot convince me he/she knows what they are doing they

are not good enough to be my doctor. We need to move on rather than waste

time with a doctor who isn't open to learning what is the latest thinking on

a particular disease.

Beth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Marty,

I was taken off combo at 6 months when my blood work showed negative viral

load and ALT and AST were normal. I questioned at that time why I was being

taken off and was told that I didn't need anymore as I had cleared the

virus. When tested 6 months later my viral load was triple what it was when

originally diagnosed and enzyme levels were elevated. (No testing had been

done at 3 months) My GI said at that time that there was nothing further I

could do. I just went to a new doctor who said that she felt I was taken

off too soon and she suggested I go back on the medication. I went to my

PCP to get referrals and was refused. He assured me that he was convinced

that the first GI did everything he could and told me I should " accept the

fact that I was one of the people who could not be cured and deal with

that " . Needless to say he is no longer my PCP. I immediately switched my

family to a new PCP. I think one of the biggest problems we have to deal

with is ignorance about this disease. I don't necessarily think my first GI

thought he was infallible I just don't think he had enough knowledge about

the protocal. I am not excusing him. I also won't return to him. I am

angry and do not look forward to going back on the combo. I definitely feel

that if a doctor cannot convince me he/she knows what they are doing they

are not good enough to be my doctor. We need to move on rather than waste

time with a doctor who isn't open to learning what is the latest thinking on

a particular disease.

Beth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Marty,

I Marty, thanks for replying back to me, The doctor was total

new to this, and thought he knew everything there was to know, when my RNA

came back 0 after 3 months, he told me I was in remission, could be for 2

years could be longer. Yes is was ignorant, and when I got retested 3 months

later and my viral load doubled, I found a new doctor. Are you saying the

therapy should be 4 years? I have 6 more months to go, and I would have been

on the combo for 2 years. Yes, the longer on treatment the better the

response, but I never heard of 4 years of treatment. I do blame him, for his

ignorance, and for not listening to his patients. He has a mind of his own,

and you could not change it. If I knew now, what I knew then, things

hopefully would have turned out differently. Please let me know about the 48

week treatment. I have never heard of being on it that long, I have been RNA

0 now for about 4 or 5 months, can't remember. I do have to say, now I have

found a very good hepo.doc. who will listen to you, and take your

suggestions. He has reduced my meds. since I am at 0, only because of the bad

side effects I have, Better to do that, then to take me off, I have been on

to long, and suffered to much to quit now.

Thank You

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Marty,

I Marty, thanks for replying back to me, The doctor was total

new to this, and thought he knew everything there was to know, when my RNA

came back 0 after 3 months, he told me I was in remission, could be for 2

years could be longer. Yes is was ignorant, and when I got retested 3 months

later and my viral load doubled, I found a new doctor. Are you saying the

therapy should be 4 years? I have 6 more months to go, and I would have been

on the combo for 2 years. Yes, the longer on treatment the better the

response, but I never heard of 4 years of treatment. I do blame him, for his

ignorance, and for not listening to his patients. He has a mind of his own,

and you could not change it. If I knew now, what I knew then, things

hopefully would have turned out differently. Please let me know about the 48

week treatment. I have never heard of being on it that long, I have been RNA

0 now for about 4 or 5 months, can't remember. I do have to say, now I have

found a very good hepo.doc. who will listen to you, and take your

suggestions. He has reduced my meds. since I am at 0, only because of the bad

side effects I have, Better to do that, then to take me off, I have been on

to long, and suffered to much to quit now.

Thank You

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

People use RNA and PCR and I do not want to sound

ignorant but I am not sure what they stand

for.....maybe once someone tells me I will know by

full name. It is like my congenital ITP (Idiopathic

or Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura). People don't

know that either.....Connie

I know what DNA stands for....smile

--- CCampb3234@... wrote:

> Hi Marty,

> I Marty, thanks for replying back to

> me, The doctor was total

> new to this, and thought he knew everything there

> was to know, when my RNA

> came back 0 after 3 months, he told me I was in

> remission, could be for 2

> years could be longer. Yes is was ignorant, and when

> I got retested 3 months

> later and my viral load doubled, I found a new

> doctor. Are you saying the

> therapy should be 4 years? I have 6 more months to

> go, and I would have been

> on the combo for 2 years. Yes, the longer on

> treatment the better the

> response, but I never heard of 4 years of treatment.

> I do blame him, for his

> ignorance, and for not listening to his patients. He

> has a mind of his own,

> and you could not change it. If I knew now, what I

> knew then, things

> hopefully would have turned out differently. Please

> let me know about the 48

> week treatment. I have never heard of being on it

> that long, I have been RNA

> 0 now for about 4 or 5 months, can't remember. I do

> have to say, now I have

> found a very good hepo.doc. who will listen to you,

> and take your

> suggestions. He has reduced my meds. since I am at

> 0, only because of the bad

> side effects I have, Better to do that, then to take

> me off, I have been on

> to long, and suffered to much to quit now.

>

> Thank You

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

People use RNA and PCR and I do not want to sound

ignorant but I am not sure what they stand

for.....maybe once someone tells me I will know by

full name. It is like my congenital ITP (Idiopathic

or Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura). People don't

know that either.....Connie

I know what DNA stands for....smile

--- CCampb3234@... wrote:

> Hi Marty,

> I Marty, thanks for replying back to

> me, The doctor was total

> new to this, and thought he knew everything there

> was to know, when my RNA

> came back 0 after 3 months, he told me I was in

> remission, could be for 2

> years could be longer. Yes is was ignorant, and when

> I got retested 3 months

> later and my viral load doubled, I found a new

> doctor. Are you saying the

> therapy should be 4 years? I have 6 more months to

> go, and I would have been

> on the combo for 2 years. Yes, the longer on

> treatment the better the

> response, but I never heard of 4 years of treatment.

> I do blame him, for his

> ignorance, and for not listening to his patients. He

> has a mind of his own,

> and you could not change it. If I knew now, what I

> knew then, things

> hopefully would have turned out differently. Please

> let me know about the 48

> week treatment. I have never heard of being on it

> that long, I have been RNA

> 0 now for about 4 or 5 months, can't remember. I do

> have to say, now I have

> found a very good hepo.doc. who will listen to you,

> and take your

> suggestions. He has reduced my meds. since I am at

> 0, only because of the bad

> side effects I have, Better to do that, then to take

> me off, I have been on

> to long, and suffered to much to quit now.

>

> Thank You

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

the PCR is an RNA test. sometimes they write it PCR-RNA and other ways. I

don't want to get real technical... but if you remember from science class..

DNA and RNA... i think the RNA was the messenger for the DNA or something

like that don't quote me I just woke up ahha. No one has seen an HCV virus.

Even the strongest microscopes cannot see ONE virus cell. What they can see

are the results and byproducts and doohickeys of the virus. Maybe that's why

even the best PCR tests can only test down to 200 parts/mil or something

like that.

Anyway.... pretend the scientists are aliens and they are looking for life

on earth... Now we as humans are too small for them to see like the hcv

virus... But... they can see our highways because they stretch all over the

continent (pretend they are the blood vessels). So they can do tests on the

highways to see the habits and actions of us the humans. They can test for

exhaust fumes from our vehicles, wear and tear on the roadways, that sort of

thing. That's a silly analogy but about what scientists sometimes have to go

thru to study really small things.

alley/

ICQ 12631861

alleypat@...

http://micromagic.net/~alleypat

<center>

<a

href= " /subscribe/DFW_Liver_Disease " >

<img src= " /images/join.gif "

border=0><br>

Click to subscribe to DFW_Liver_Disease</a>

</center>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

the PCR is an RNA test. sometimes they write it PCR-RNA and other ways. I

don't want to get real technical... but if you remember from science class..

DNA and RNA... i think the RNA was the messenger for the DNA or something

like that don't quote me I just woke up ahha. No one has seen an HCV virus.

Even the strongest microscopes cannot see ONE virus cell. What they can see

are the results and byproducts and doohickeys of the virus. Maybe that's why

even the best PCR tests can only test down to 200 parts/mil or something

like that.

Anyway.... pretend the scientists are aliens and they are looking for life

on earth... Now we as humans are too small for them to see like the hcv

virus... But... they can see our highways because they stretch all over the

continent (pretend they are the blood vessels). So they can do tests on the

highways to see the habits and actions of us the humans. They can test for

exhaust fumes from our vehicles, wear and tear on the roadways, that sort of

thing. That's a silly analogy but about what scientists sometimes have to go

thru to study really small things.

alley/

ICQ 12631861

alleypat@...

http://micromagic.net/~alleypat

<center>

<a

href= " /subscribe/DFW_Liver_Disease " >

<img src= " /images/join.gif "

border=0><br>

Click to subscribe to DFW_Liver_Disease</a>

</center>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Smile.....I like your description. Perchance were or

are you a grade school teacher? If not you would be a

good one......Thanks, Connie

--- alley/ <alleypat@...> wrote:

> the PCR is an RNA test. sometimes they write it

> PCR-RNA and other ways. I

> don't want to get real technical... but if you

> remember from science class..

> DNA and RNA... i think the RNA was the messenger for

> the DNA or something

> like that don't quote me I just woke up ahha. No one

> has seen an HCV virus.

> Even the strongest microscopes cannot see ONE virus

> cell. What they can see

> are the results and byproducts and doohickeys of the

> virus. Maybe that's why

> even the best PCR tests can only test down to 200

> parts/mil or something

> like that.

>

> Anyway.... pretend the scientists are aliens and

> they are looking for life

> on earth... Now we as humans are too small for them

> to see like the hcv

> virus... But... they can see our highways because

> they stretch all over the

> continent (pretend they are the blood vessels). So

> they can do tests on the

> highways to see the habits and actions of us the

> humans. They can test for

> exhaust fumes from our vehicles, wear and tear on

> the roadways, that sort of

> thing. That's a silly analogy but about what

> scientists sometimes have to go

> thru to study really small things.

>

> alley/

> ICQ 12631861

> alleypat@...

> http://micromagic.net/~alleypat

>

> <center>

> <a

>

href= " /subscribe/DFW_Liver_Disease " >

> <img

> src= " /images/join.gif "

> border=0><br>

> Click to subscribe to

> DFW_Liver_Disease</a>

> </center>

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Smile.....I like your description. Perchance were or

are you a grade school teacher? If not you would be a

good one......Thanks, Connie

--- alley/ <alleypat@...> wrote:

> the PCR is an RNA test. sometimes they write it

> PCR-RNA and other ways. I

> don't want to get real technical... but if you

> remember from science class..

> DNA and RNA... i think the RNA was the messenger for

> the DNA or something

> like that don't quote me I just woke up ahha. No one

> has seen an HCV virus.

> Even the strongest microscopes cannot see ONE virus

> cell. What they can see

> are the results and byproducts and doohickeys of the

> virus. Maybe that's why

> even the best PCR tests can only test down to 200

> parts/mil or something

> like that.

>

> Anyway.... pretend the scientists are aliens and

> they are looking for life

> on earth... Now we as humans are too small for them

> to see like the hcv

> virus... But... they can see our highways because

> they stretch all over the

> continent (pretend they are the blood vessels). So

> they can do tests on the

> highways to see the habits and actions of us the

> humans. They can test for

> exhaust fumes from our vehicles, wear and tear on

> the roadways, that sort of

> thing. That's a silly analogy but about what

> scientists sometimes have to go

> thru to study really small things.

>

> alley/

> ICQ 12631861

> alleypat@...

> http://micromagic.net/~alleypat

>

> <center>

> <a

>

href= " /subscribe/DFW_Liver_Disease " >

> <img

> src= " /images/join.gif "

> border=0><br>

> Click to subscribe to

> DFW_Liver_Disease</a>

> </center>

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...