Guest guest Posted April 20, 2004 Report Posted April 20, 2004 In one way Ziagen is the worst. Testing proved that it did nothing even by HIV psywar standards. Testing proved that it killed one out of ten or twenty people. That's nothing negative, just give a disclaimer, but testing did not prove that it even " killed HIV in a petri dish " , not even a hope of a hype. Even skewed testing could not give it a hint of relevence even to imaginary HIV. Nothing. But it would kill one out of ten or twenty test subjects. Ziagen is like 200,000 dead indians in Guatemala in the 1980's. Somebody is either evil on purpose or insane or both. I have a friend who was given ziagen as part of a cocktail. She had the violent reaction, she was a lucky winner, only there was no warning label. I looked up the names on the internet and found out there is nothing even claimed for ziagen other than killing one out of ten or twenty. It is legally required to have a warning label, but there was none, and my friend can't read without glasses and was a homeless street person without glasses. That hearkens back to the MD test of ddi, azt, and ddc. The results came back as azt not having anything to offer but it would kill babies and prevent broken bones from healing. AZT was the obvious choice for Draper Fund(USAID). Same story with targeted advertising for hepatitis vaccine testing. Small pox blankets at trading posts for indians. The term Final Solution was not coined by Hitler, but by Canadian missionaries killing off indians by kidnapping them and confining them in cold drafty boarding houses, making them share beds with others dying of tuberculosis. http://www.google.com/search?q=final+solution+indian+tuberculosis http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/intro2.html -Bob Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.