Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Hi guys! I just wanted to share this wonderful article I found on Karhie Snow's website. It's about people first language. our kids are not DS kids. They are kids first, regardless of any diagnosis. ( & it's not about being politically correct.) If we don't use language in this way, why would others? Just thoughts to ponder. http://disabilityisnatural.com/pdf/PFL.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 I like the people first language, the other "DS kid" grates on my ears a little bit but I wouldn't correct (or judge) anyone for saying it that way (now the "R" word is another story!). In the grand scheme of things it's really only a small difference. Which is exactly the point about spending that kind of $ on a small issue like that. That REALLY grates on me and I've had less respect for that organization ever since. I'm sure we can all think of a bazillion better ways that $ could have been spent to help our kids! Kathy Re: People First Language I'm sorry. I got turned off to this campaign way back when one ofthe main DS organizations spent $1,000,000 just to try to geteveryone to say "kid with DS" instead of "DS kid". There were manymany other better ways to help our kids than spending money andeffort on this nonsense in my opinion. I personally see no differencein "kid with DS" or "DS kid" and feeling somewhat rebellious aboutthe whole thing I say it either way. I figure being the parent of aDS kid gives me the right to say it any old way. I just fail to seethe significance. The whole list they gave of better ways to saystuff --I don't see much difference either way. It's politicalcorrectness gone wild and I just don't see it. Just say it the wayit is and don't obsess over how to tell the truth. And especiallydon't spend money on it. JMHO.Priscilla K--- spritelyslp <spritelyslp > wrote:> Hi guys!> > I just wanted to share this wonderful article I found on Karhie> Snow's website. It's about > people first language. our kids are not DS kids. They are kids> first, regardless of any > diagnosis. ( & it's not about being politically correct.) If we> don't use language in this way, why > would others? Just thoughts to ponder.> > > > > http://disabilityisnatural.com/pdf/PFL.pdf> > > > Priscilla Kendrick, married 28 years to Darrel and parents of 9 kids including Evan, 10, born with Down Syndrome and Spina Bifida"My strength is made perfect in weakness." "My grace is sufficient." II Corinthians 12:9 KJV__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Priscilla, I agree to some extent with you that this isn't something that we should obsess about, but we should at least use the more respectable terms ourselves. Remember our children born several years ago used to be referred to as "Mongoloid Idiots" but their disability was the same as it is now and good people worked hard to first get the "idiot" part dropped and then fought for the more respected term of Ds. I'm sure you agree that that wasn't just another way to tell the truth. We're the ones to set examples for people that really don't understand and don't want to offend so will take our lead. Bonnie from Ohio Richbmom@... SAHM to 23 now living on her own, 10 and 6 Ds, CHD, Bronchial Tube defects, gastroesophageal reflux with silent aspiration, slight Nystagmus, Alopecia Areata, and AAI, excellent gross motor skills. . . bet you can't catch her!! http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/a/amr/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 I agree. I think the terminology WE, as parents and advocates for our kids, use does have an impact on others and sets the tone for our children. Politically correct or not, I want my children to be known as kids who have Down syndrome, not Down syndrome kids. Jill Mom to Mac (8 yrs, 3rd grade, Ds) and Kit (almost 5, preschool, Ds) Re: People First Language Priscilla, I agree to some extent with you that this isn't something that we should obsess about, but we should at least use the more respectable terms ourselves. Remember our children born several years ago used to be referred to as "Mongoloid Idiots" but their disability was the same as it is now and good people worked hard to first get the "idiot" part dropped and then fought for the more respected term of Ds. I'm sure you agree that that wasn't just another way to tell the truth. We're the ones to set examples for people that really don't understand and don't want to offend so will take our lead. Bonnie from Ohio Richbmom@... SAHM to 23 now living on her own, 10 and Aman da 6 Ds, CHD, Bronchial Tube defects, gastroesophageal reflux with silent aspiration, slight Nystagmus, Alopecia Areata, and AAI, excellent gross motor skills. . . bet you can't catch her!! http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/a/amr/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 I used to think the same as Priscilla, but since has been in PS I have really changed my mine big time. The problem with using the terms 'DS kid' or 'retarded kids' is that is puts them in a box with so many people. Now it may not do that with US, and it doesn't for me at all. In private or in my own mind, I have no issues with refering to as retarded or *gasp* saying something like - that makes her look very Downi when she does that. I don't really have a bad conotation to the terms 'retarded' or Downs. I only think of and have good vibes when using those terms. BUT!! Others don't see it that way. When you use those types of terms they are grouping all the kids and not seeing individuals. It limits their expectations of the kids when you let them get away with those terms. It's deaming because the people who tend to use those terms most MAKE it deaming. I'll never forget walking into preschool with and the teacher proudly proclaiming that 'she once taught a down syndrome to swim'...... sigh..... I guess she considers DS to be a different breed of people or something. Anyway- by the time we ( another parent and I ) were done with her, she had stopped thinking that way and it was reflected in her use of terms too. ;-) She was honestly surprised that our two dd's were exact opposites in just about every way. She really thought that all kids with DS were the SAME. Hence the terms 'DS kids'. It simply seems to reflect a way of thinking that really needs to be stopped and sometimes the way people speak, can begin to alter how they THINK about something too. When you stop and make them say 'kid WITH DS' it forces them to think differently and that is the important issue. Carol in IL Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 No offense taken here and also didn't mean to imply at all that you were correcting or judging anyone either. So hard to get our exact meanings across in email sometimes! Kathy Re: People First Language > > > Hi guys!> > > > I just wanted to share this wonderful article I found on Karhie> > Snow's website. It's about > > people first language. our kids are not DS kids. They are kids> > first, regardless of any > > diagnosis. ( & it's not about being politically correct.) If we> > don't use language in this way, why > > would others? Just thoughts to ponder.> > > > > > > > > > http://disabilityisnatural.com/pdf/PFL.pdf> > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Kendrick, married 28 years to Darrel and parents of 9 kids including Evan, 10, born with Down Syndrome and Spina Bifida> > "My strength is made perfect in weakness." > "My grace is sufficient." II Corinthians 12:9 KJV> > __________________________________________________> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 This was outstanding! What great information for us to take back into our communities! Ellen Ellen Garber Bronfeld egskb@... People First Language Christiansen received this press release and asked that I share it with the group as a reminder about People First language. It's interesting to me that while there's been much progress toward 'people first' language, there are still MANY parts of the community where no one knows about it. It's a good reminder for us all in our awareness efforts. Thanks, . Laurie FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Schleider 212-763-4369/sschleider@... Governor Palin of Alaska has been selected as McCain's choice for Vice Presidential nominee of the Republican Party. Governor Palin recently gave birth to her son who has Down syndrome. The Palins knew before their son's birth that he would have Down syndrome. Below are tips for the proper use of language for `Down syndrome'. The National Down Syndrome Society and the National Down Syndrome Congress encourages all media to use the below language: · Down vs. Down's. NDSS and NDSC use the preferred spelling, Down syndrome, rather than Down's syndrome. While Down syndrome is listed in many dictionaries with both popular spellings (with or without an apostrophe s), the preferred usage in the United States is Down syndrome. This is because an " apostrophe s " connotes ownership or possession. Down syndrome is named for the English physician Langdon Down, who characterized the condition, but did not have it. The AP Stylebook recommends using " Down syndrome " as well. · People with Down syndrome should always be referred to as people first. Instead of " a Down syndrome child, " it should be " a child with Down syndrome. " Also avoid " Down's child " and describing the condition as " Down's, " as in, " He has Down's. " · Down syndrome is a condition or a syndrome, not a disease. · People " have " Down syndrome, they do not " suffer from " it and are not " afflicted by " it. · It is clinically acceptable to say " mental retardation, " but you may want to use the more socially acceptable " cognitive disability " or " cognitive impairment. " Down Syndrome Myths and Truths Myth: Down syndrome is a rare genetic disorder. Truth: Down syndrome is the most commonly occurring genetic condition. One in every 733 live births is a child with Down syndrome, representing approximately 5,000 births per year in the United States alone. Today, more than 400,000 people in the United States have Down syndrome. Myth: People with Down syndrome have a short life span. Truth: Life expectancy for individuals with Down syndrome has increased dramatically in recent years, with the average life expectancy approaching that of peers without Down syndrome. Myth: Most children with Down syndrome are born to older parents. Truth: Most children with Down syndrome are born to women younger than 35-years-old simply because younger women have more children. However, the incidence of births of children with Down syndrome increases with the age of the mother. Myth: People with Down syndrome are severely " retarded. " Truth: Most people with Down syndrome have IQs that fall in the mild to moderate range of intellectual disability (formerly known as " retardation " ). Children with Down syndrome fully participate in public and private educational programs. Educators and researchers are still discovering the full educational potential of people with Down syndrome. Myth: Most people with Down syndrome are institutionalized. Truth: Today people with Down syndrome live at home with their families and are active participants in the educational, vocational, social, and recreational activities of the community. They are integrated into the regular education system and take part in sports, camping, music, art programs and all the other activities of their communities. People with Down syndrome are valued members of their families and their communities, contributing to society in a variety of ways. Myth: Parents will not find community support in bringing up their child with Down syndrome. Truth: In almost every community of the United States there are parent support groups and other community organizations directly involved in providing services to families of individuals with Down syndrome. Myth: Children with Down syndrome must be placed in segregated special education programs. Truth: Children with Down syndrome have been included in regular academic classrooms in schools across the country. In some instances they are integrated into specific courses, while in other situations students are fully included in the regular classroom for all subjects. The current trend in education is for full inclusion in the social and educational life of the community. Increasingly, individuals with Down syndrome graduate from high school with regular diplomas, participate in post-secondary academic and college experiences and, in some cases, receive college degrees. Myth: Adults with Down syndrome are unemployable. Truth: Businesses are seeking young adults with Down syndrome for a variety of positions. They are being employed in small- and medium- sized offices: by banks, corporations, nursing homes, hotels and restaurants. They work in the music and entertainment industry, in clerical positions, childcare, the sports field and in the computer industry. People with Down syndrome bring to their jobs enthusiasm, reliability and dedication. Myth: People with Down syndrome are always happy. Truth: People with Down syndrome have feelings just like everyone else in the population. They experience the full range of emotions. They respond to positive expressions of friendship and they are hurt and upset by inconsiderate behavior. Myth: Adults with Down syndrome are unable to form close interpersonal relationships leading to marriage. Truth: People with Down syndrome date, socialize, form ongoing relationships and marry. Myth: Down syndrome can never be cured. Truth: Research on Down syndrome is making great strides in identifying the genes on chromosome 21 that cause the characteristics of Down syndrome. Scientists now feel strongly that it will be possible to improve, correct or prevent many of the problems associated with Down syndrome in the future. For more information visit: www.ndss.org or www.ndsccenter.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.