Guest guest Posted September 23, 2000 Report Share Posted September 23, 2000 , Do you think it would cost them more to provide segregated education for children with disabilities since your school system is so small? Do you think they are supported all because of philosophy or is there some financial benefit to them when they practice inclusion? Cheryl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2000 Report Share Posted September 23, 2000 Cheryl, Money is a motivating factor. To send Sheila out of the district for a 6 week ESY program the cost was $5000. To run an in district program (that was much better!!!) the cost was about the same--but covered 10-12 children. Out of district placements cost between $20-30K per year. Sheila's in district cost is not nearly as high even though she has a one-on-one para ($7-8K/year). The biggest motivating factor was the superintendent did not want the district taken to court, because legal fees would break our district. He told me he would support a parents wishes in order to stay out of court. But I put him on the Aim High mailing list when I was editing the newsletter and several years later he told me that reading my articles really helped him to understand why we wanted inclusion and this made him want to do it because it was right for children. nancy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2000 Report Share Posted September 23, 2000 Thank you for the explanation , the price comparisons go along with our discussions about whether it cost more for inclusion. So much better when they do it for the right reasons and save money too! ;-) Cheryl in VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2000 Report Share Posted September 23, 2000 In a message dated 9/23/00 10:26:08 AM Central Daylight Time, JTesmer799@... writes: > Oh we're a small rural district to, class sizes under 50. usualy about 45. > classrooms have about 20 or so kids per class. > > Joy > HI I wouldn't say we were rural, really a suburb with many elementary schools and they are still building more. The Max in classes here are 24 kids, Sara's have always been 21, and 6 for Resource. Isn't Clinton enforcing lower class ratios? something titled ahhhhhhhh " Basic Education Program " well our area is enforcing it this year (it was the last year for them to file an extensions of time) Copied from : <A HREF= " http://www.state.tn.us/education/glstime.htm " >TN:Educ:G oals 2000: Timeline</A> The Education Improvement Act calls for reductions in class sizes by an average of five students at every grade level by the school year 2001-02, which is four years after the new funding formula was fully funded. In addition to the lower school-wide class-size averages, the EIA also established maximum sizes for individual classes. 1992............Class size maximums are established through the legislature. Timelines are set for meeting the maximums with no waivers allowed. 2001........... Maximum class size mandates are met in all schools. This is why new schools are popping up everywhere now lolol Im searching this now ........The Education Improvement Act Kathy mom to Sara 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.