Re: Asthma - an extraordinary disease and an extraordinary scie...

[Guest guest]

Lori:

I for one agree with you 100 per cent.

I still don't understand how people have changed their breathing habits over the last 50 years and caused an increase in asthma. Gee if we just hadn't all started breathing wrong we would never have developed asthma. Which means we never would have gotten Samters. Sounds too good to be true........Oh yeah it is!

Marcus

PS. This approach to asthma sound like something a Homeopath would like. The old Law of Similars. "If poor breathing technique has cause my asthma I will practice breathing poorly to cure my asthma.

[Guest guest]

>

> Lori:

> I for one agree with you 100 per cent.

> I still don't understand how people have changed their breathing

habits over

> the last 50 years and caused an increase in asthma. Gee if we just

hadn't all

> started breathing wrong we would never have developed asthma. Which

means we

> never would have gotten Samters. Sounds too good to be

true........Oh yeah it

> is!

> Marcus

> PS. This approach to asthma sound like something a Homeopath would

like. The

> old Law of Similars. " If poor breathing technique has cause my

asthma I will

> practice breathing poorly to cure my asthma.

>

I can only stick to my original point of view that the apparent

ignorance of asthma professionals about any breathing-in being

dependent on suction is disqualifying for them across the board.

Consequently a new strategy is needed to find an effective so-called

alternative, but really more scientific, treatment while of course

tactically sticking to asthma drugs as prescribed for safety.

Some would say that this apparent ignorance means quackery or a

conspiracy, but it rather seems to be just one of those things which

your have to accept and take the consequences.

My pollen asthma has disappeared just by breathing in with more

suction (ujjayi technique), which I guess is about as difficult or as

easy as training to touch your toes and then place your hands flat on

the floor.

As for damaged lung tissue in asthma being in a different category to

breathing effects and therfore such damage not being possibly caused

by wrong breathing, research on husky dogs in the Alaska sled races

shows that the dogs may develop asthma or something akin to it, i.e.

with lung damage. Regards, Friedel

[Guest guest]

richard,

i am respectful of your opinion. however. i still dont think you have

any concept that samters is different from asthma. perhaps your

breathing technique will help with asthma symptoms. perhapst they will

not. however, i am sure that it cannot do anything for the massive

amounts of nasal polyps or the very thick nasal mucus that samterites

deal with. in my honest opinion, you can treat asthma with drugs,

alternative herbs, alternative breathing methods, etc. but the BIG

difference with samters is that it won't make a drop of improvement if

you dont clear up the sinuses, polyps and mucus first. therefore, i am

highly suspect that your technique would help anyone with samters.

and i also find it most offensive that you think anyone who uses an

inhaler has gotten into a bad habit. smoking? overeating? not

exercising? these are bad habits. perhaps your suggestions would be

more welcomed by an asthma only group.

sincerely,

jennifer

> >

> > Lori:

> > I for one agree with you 100 per cent.

> > I still don't understand how people have changed their breathing

> habits over

> > the last 50 years and caused an increase in asthma. Gee if we just

> hadn't all

> > started breathing wrong we would never have developed asthma. Which

> means we

> > never would have gotten Samters. Sounds too good to be

> true........Oh yeah it

> > is!

> > Marcus

> > PS. This approach to asthma sound like something a Homeopath would

> like. The

> > old Law of Similars. " If poor breathing technique has cause my

> asthma I will

> > practice breathing poorly to cure my asthma.

> >

> I can only stick to my original point of view that the apparent

> ignorance of asthma professionals about any breathing-in being

> dependent on suction is disqualifying for them across the board.

> Consequently a new strategy is needed to find an effective so-called

> alternative, but really more scientific, treatment while of course

> tactically sticking to asthma drugs as prescribed for safety.

>

> Some would say that this apparent ignorance means quackery or a

> conspiracy, but it rather seems to be just one of those things which

> your have to accept and take the consequences.

>

> My pollen asthma has disappeared just by breathing in with more

> suction (ujjayi technique), which I guess is about as difficult or as

> easy as training to touch your toes and then place your hands flat on

> the floor.

>

> As for damaged lung tissue in asthma being in a different category to

> breathing effects and therfore such damage not being possibly caused

> by wrong breathing, research on husky dogs in the Alaska sled races

> shows that the dogs may develop asthma or something akin to it, i.e.

> with lung damage. Regards, Friedel

>