Guest guest Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 hello,In continuation of my earlier post and the examples given , We will see how those examples should be ideally treated. Treatment of different types of procedures, by IRB When a study involves therapeutic procedures, the REB must ascertain that a state of clinical equipoise exists. We have already had discussion on clinical equipoise. The ethical analysis of therapeutic procedures involves a risk-benefit calculus. Non-therapeutic procedures, by definition, do not offer any prospect of benefit to the research subject and, thus a risk-benefit calculus is inappropriate., the ethical analysis of nontherapeutic procedures does not involve a risk-benefit calculus, rather a risk-knowledge calculus. Let us consider what procedures might be considered therapeutic in the examples quoted in the earlier post _ In study A, a novel antipsychotic drug is compared with placebo. Both of these procedures are therapeutic interventions. The use of psychometric scales may be therapeutic if they are used routinely in clinical practice to guide treatmen. We do not have enough information to make this judgement, so we will assume that they are non therapeutic. _ In study B, a questionnaire related to sexual activity is administered to high school students. Obviously, this is not a therapeutic intervention. _ IHaving determined which procedures are administered with therapeutic warrant, how do we determine whether they are morally acceptable? Only Study A involves the use of therapeutic procedures. The question the IRB must ask itself is -Does a state of clinical equipoise exist among the new antipsychotic, placebo, and alternatives available in clinical practice? Effective treatment exists for the treatment of schizophrenia, and, hence, the use of placebo in this case is impermissible. The IRB must not approve the study unless either an active control is used or the patient population is restricted to those who have no response to standard therapy Non therapeutic procedures and risks associated with them. Study A (trial of new medication in schizophrenia) proposes to test subjects regularly with psychometric scales. Filling out such forms is time consuming, potentially upsetting, and may expose subjects to the risk of discrimination. _ Study B (adolescent sexual practices) again involves only non therapeutic procedures. The questionnaire addresses a number of sensitive areas of inquiry, including sexuality and practices that predispose to HIV transmission. Subjects may find the questions anxiety provoking, and others may learn of deeply private matters, leading to stigmatization. By definition, risks associated with non therapeutic procedures cannot be justified by the prospect of benefits to individual research . The IRB must first ensure that the risks associated with non therapeutic procedures are minimized by using procedures consistent with sound research design. We will next see how to minimize risks. kunda The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.