Mag pulser

[Guest guest]

Hello BG,

Tuesday, 6 June 2006 you wrote:

@...@groups\

..com

Digest Number 1611

\Date: Mon Jun 5, 2006 11:01 am (PDT)

From: " baby_grand " bobluhrs@...

Subject: Re: Viruses: Blood stream or lymph & other tissues?

<quote>

It may not be enough. the mag pulser in particular may not remove it

from anywhere except the stuff hanging onto the dendrites in the

lymph nodes. inside the dendrites where it can multiply, the mag

pulsers, in my opinion, do not have a large enough current for long

enough to affect it. So it can live on. This is even more true in

the gut where it hides in the layers of the intestinal walls. We

have not yet found the solution to that, and it's about 98% of the

volume of the virus. I'm experimenting with electrodes to reach the

areas, as well as induced currents via pulsed DC magnetic coils of

large output.

It is known that an MRI may drop the viral load on HIV cases as much

as 50%, and this is possibly due to the induced currents throughout

the whole body. These are huge magnets, beyond the scope of home

devices.

<end quote>

That's very interesting. When I got MRI'd recently I insisted

that one part of the scan gave me a headache... and the technicians

insisted it couldn't possibly and had to be a tension headache (I

never get headaches). I always suspected the MRI's acted like the Beck

pulser... but this is the first time I've had it confirmed by anyone.

<quote>

Yet it can be approximated by concentrating on one spot at

a time. The order of magnitude is hundreds or thousands of times

higher than the Beck mag pulser, and it has to keep pulsing very

quickly to keep up a current deep inside the tissues.

If anyone is volunteering, check Robb 's group magnetic pulser,

or websites " magpulser.com " I think it is, and it's about 600 bucks

to get one of these " Rife " pulsers. The frequency would not be

relevant, just use it over area of virus. It is pulsed DC, so it

turns on and off many times per second, giving you an intermittent DC

current. That's fine, almost as good as a pure continuous DC

current, just slower to act because it shuts itself off at least half

the time. Rife is another world, and I'm not that much into it,

simply because it takes time and mine is used up with the simpler

ideas at the moment and it's plenty to keep me busy.

BG

<end quote>

An interesting summary.

> @...

> Digest Number 1608

>

>

> Bbe> Date: Fri Jun 2, 2006 1:03 pm (PDT)

> Bbe> From: " baby_grand " bobluhrs@...

> Bbe> Subject: Re: Early HIV infections

> Bbe>

>

> Bbe> 2. Beck and his blood idea isn't bad, it's just not based on

the latest

> Bbe> HIV/AIDS pathology findings. It assumes the HIV is in the

bloodstream

> Bbe> mostly, and does its damage to Tcells in blood. It ignores

where most

> Bbe> of the virus is located, and only applies electricity to the

> Bbe> bloodstream. 2% of HIV is in blood. You are leaving out 98%

of it if

> Bbe> you only treat the bloodstream, and of course the numbers will

not

> Bbe> improve greatly, since it can re-enter the blood from numerous

points

> Bbe> at any time.

>

> Bbe> bG

> Bbe> 3.

> Bbe> 3.

>

>

> :-)

>

> http://xcelplus.com.au

:-)

http://xcelplus.com.au