Guest guest Posted December 27, 2001 Report Share Posted December 27, 2001 Hi , Welcome back! Hope u had a nice holiday. Regarding the discrepancies listed below re: WALNUTS for Os; do you have the encyclopedia? Did you notice the mistake too? Apparently, BANANAS, which I eat a lot, were also listed as an AVOID for Os. Giving up walnuts, I can do . . but bananas - no way! Best wishes, karenb walnuts ARE beneficial it seems :-) > > In Response O and Walnuts - ency pg 348 (a B+) > > > needs a re-write. That one paragraph. So, use the values in the food lists > in the book (and at TYPEbase3, linked at the top of this page) in lieu of > the errors in that paragraph. :-) > > in response to: > Whoa, contradiction in LR and Encyc > Posted By: CB A1o+ NS a-b- NN <cbehrman@...> > Date: Friday, 21 December 2001, at 10:41 a.m. > > Help! In LR it says walnuts are bennies for O's. In the back of the > encyclopedia on the food lists it says walnuts are bennies for O's. In the > text in the Encyclopedia, it says O's should avoid walnuts. Help. I don't > want my spouse eating walnuts if they are truly avoids. Thx. CB. > > and > > O and Walnuts - ency pg 348 > Posted By: a B+ <roberta.j.ball@...> > Date: Monday, 24 December 2001, at 9:53 p.m. > > In Response Whoa, contradiction in LR and Encyc (CB A1o+ NS a-b- > NN) > > In the same paragraph with the walnuts avoid for O, the encyclopedia states > " Rh-positive group O individuals should avoid blueberries, bananas, and > papayas. " In the back of the book these are beneficial, beneficial, and > neutral, respectively. How can this be correct? > > > > ++++++++++++++++ > > So it seems that the second paragraph on pg 348 about Group O-Specific > Lectins needs a re-write. > > Enjoy walnuts! > Taz > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.