Guest guest Posted July 21, 2004 Report Share Posted July 21, 2004 http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/80/1/1 isn't that interesting? so this whole liver/gallbladder thing is pretty serious. yeah, there's always the curezone place to provide us with the up-close-and-personal views to what may lurk within our tortured bodies. i heard someone say that they didn't approve of the extreme nature of these " cleanses " . well, i didn't like the cleanses either, and i remember i was very productive as an insane vegetarian out of control falling to the majesty of my higher self (who had to retreat into inhabiting my physical body, the coarsest, lowest level fo existence). it was those huge intakes of tahini (sesame nut paste) after the apples... those 2-3 granny smith apples. yes. smith changed me, i learned something from them. i used those fun, cleansing indian herbs and all that, the cloves, cardamom, coriander, the raw ginger and cayenne pepper... they all had some part to play, but it was really all that malic acid and the 5000+ constituents in those raw, blended, sub-acid apple concoctions... those crazy vegetarian cleansing concoctions... followed by all that fat, so much, really, very drastic follow-up meal. god bless my starving body's many cries for methionine... i ended up discharging all sorts of flak during two of those days... weird, messy poopies. but that was life as a planet-saving vegetarian. sure is interesting, eh? to imagine people can hold that much weird s__t in their bodies and not even know it. Cholesterol gallstones: a fellow traveler with metabolic syndrome? M Grundy 1 From the Center for Human Nutrition and Departments of Clinical Nutrition and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas See corresponding article on page 38 2 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to SM Grundy, Center for Human Nutrition, Department of Clinical Nutrition, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Room Y3-206, Dallas, TX 75390-9052. E-mail: scott.grundy@.... INTRODUCTION Obesity is accompanied by many medical complications. Foremost among these is atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The term metabolic syndrome is often used to denote the multiple metabolic risk factors that accompany obesity and increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (1). Risk factors for the metabolic syndrome include atherogenic dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, hyperglycemia, a prothrombotic state, and a proinflammatory state. Persons with the metabolic syndrome are also at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes because most of them have insulin resistance, which is a major risk factor for diabetes. In addition to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and diabetes, persons with the metabolic syndrome are more likely to have fatty liver and its complications, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and cryptogenic cirrhosis. Finally, persons with the metabolic syndrome may be susceptible to yet another complication, namely, cholesterol gallstones. OBESITY AND CHOLESTEROL GALLSTONES A relation between obesity and cholesterol gallstones is well recognized. Obese women are more likely to develop gallstones than are obese men (2). In the past, our laboratory focused on the mechanisms whereby obesity increases the risk of developing gallstones (3, 4). The bile in obese persons is more lithogenic than is that in nonobese persons, ie, the bile of obese persons has a high ratio of cholesterol to solubilizing lipids (bile acids and phospholipids). This high ratio predisposes to crystallization of cholesterol and gallstone formation. The primary reason for lithogenic bile in obese persons is an increase in total body synthesis of cholesterol. The metabolic basis for this increase remains to be elucidated. A likely prime mechanism is overloading of tissues with fatty acids, which provide precursors for cholesterol synthesis. Other adipose tissue-derived substances, which are produced in excess in obesity, may further contribute to overproduction of cholesterol. As a result of this overproduction, cholesterol secretion into bile increases. In many obese persons, the amounts of cholesterol entering the bile exceed the solubilizing capacity of the bile acids and phospholipids. Both obese women and obese men synthesize increased amounts of cholesterol and secrete more cholesterol into bile than do nonobese persons (5). Obese men generally secrete more bile acids and phospholipids into bile than do obese women; consequently, the bile of obese men is less lithogenic, and they have fewer gallstones. INDICATORS OF OBESITY The precise relation between obesity and gallstones, however, remains undefined. To understand the relation, an important question must be answered: what is obesity? A simple definition is an excess of total body fat. One proposed simple definition is a body fat content of >25% in men and >33% in women (6). Because the measurement of percentage of body fat requires special methodology, both clinical evaluation and epidemiologic studies use surrogate indicators (7). One such indicator is body mass index (BMI), which is weight (in kg) divided by height (in m) squared. The correlation between BMI and percentage of body fat is positive but by no means perfect. The correlation is higher in women than in men. In men, waist circumference appears to be a better indicator of total body fat than is BMI (7), because waist circumference is strongly determined by fat in the upper body and because men have a tendency to deposit fat in the upper body. BODY FAT DISTRIBUTION IN OBESE PERSONS Two commonly identified patterns of obesity are lower body obesity and upper body obesity. In the former, excess fat predominantly accumulates subcutaneously in the gluteofemoral region; in the latter, fat accumulates predominantly in the trunk. The adipose tissue in the trunk occurs in several compartments: truncal subcutaneous, intraperitoneal (visceral), and retroperitoneal (8). When women first become obese, they generally show the pattern of lower body obesity; as obesity increases, excess fat also begins to accumulate in the trunk. Less commonly, women have upper body obesity without excess lower body fat. Most, but not all, obese men show the pattern of upper body obesity from the start. In most cases of upper body obesity, excess fat is located predominantly in the subcutaneous region. In some obese men, however, there can be a disproportionate accumulation of fat intraperitoneally. The latter has been called visceral obesity. This term is often misapplied because persons with predominant upper body subcutaneous obesity are mistakenly said to have visceral obesity (9). The term upper body obesity, which refers to all the fat in the trunk, is preferable. An alternative name for upper body obesity is abdominal obesity (7). The latter name has 2 practical advantages: 1) the presence of excess truncal fat is more noticeable around the waist than around the chest, and 2) simple measurement of waist circumference is a good indicator of upper body fat. UPPER BODY OBESITY AND METABOLIC DISORDERS Abdominal obesity is a characteristic feature of the metabolic syndrome (1). Because the presence of abdominal obesity indicates an increase in total body fat in men and in very obese women, some investigators believe that BMI, which is another measure of total body fat, provides the same predictive information for the metabolic complications of obesity that measures of abdominal obesity provide (10). The consensus view, however, is that waist circumference, which is an indicator of abdominal fat, provides predictive power for metabolic complications beyond that provided by BMI (1, 7). Some investigators hypothesize that the visceral component of abdominal obesity is the major determinant of metabolic complications. Others contend that total abdominal fat is more telling than is visceral fat alone (9). Regardless of which view is correct, the literature seems to suggest that upper body fat is more bioactive than is lower body fat. This bioactivity includes increased production of nonesterified fatty acids, inflammatory cytokines, leptin, and prothrombotic factors and decreased production of adiponectin, a putative protective adipokine. Thus, if upper body adipose tissue is the predominant source of these bioactive products, then it may be the major cause of the higher prevalence of metabolic complications in obese persons than in nonobese persons. The report by Tsai et al (11) in this issue of the Journal that abdominal obesity is a stronger predictor of gallstones in men than is BMI is consistent with the concept that upper body adipose tissue is a major cause of metabolic complications. Still, whether the greater predictive power of upper body fat relates to unique metabolic features of this type of adipose tissue or just to the fact that waist circumference in men is a better indictor of total body fat than is BMI is unclear. In any case, the association between abdominal obesity and gallstone formation represents an additional complication that appears to be associated with the metabolic syndrome. It would be interesting to know how well the incidence of gallstone disease correlates with other components of the metabolic syndrome. REFERENCES 1.. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143-421.[Free Full Text] 2.. Kern F Jr, Erfling W, Braverman D. Why more women than men have cholesterol gallstones: studies of biliary lipids in pregnancy. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 1979;90:71-5.[Medline] 3.. Grundy SM, Metzger AL, Adler RD. Mechanisms of lithogenic bile formation in American Indian women with cholesterol gallstones. J Clin Invest 1972;51:3026-43.[Medline] 4.. Grundy SM, Duane WC, Adler RD, Aron JM, Metzger AL. Biliary lipid outputs in young women with cholesterol gallstones. Metabolism 1974;23:67-73.[Medline] 5.. Bennion LJ, Grundy SM. Effects of obesity and caloric intake on biliary lipid metabolism in man. J Clin Invest 1975;56:996-1011.[Medline] 6.. Bray GA. Contemporary diagnosis and management of obesity. Newton, PA: Handbooks in Healthcare, 1998. 7.. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults-The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res 1998;6(suppl):51S-209S. (Published erratum appears in Obes Res 1998;6:464.)[Medline] 8.. Abate N, Burns D, Peshock RM, Garg A, Grundy SM. Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers. J Lipid Res 1994;35:1490-6.[Abstract] 9.. Abate N, Garg A, Peshock RM, Stray-Gundersen J, Grundy SM. Relationships of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men. J Clin Invest 1995;96:88-98.[Medline] 10.. Abbasi F, Brown BW Jr, Lamendola C, McLaughlin T, Reaven GM. Relationship between obesity, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:937-43.[Medline] 11.. Tsai C-J, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL. Prospective study of abdominal adiposity and gallstone disease in US men. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:38-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2004 Report Share Posted July 22, 2004 I was probably the chicken about extreme cleanses. I don't know if I meant approve, I just won't do them myself. If I had serious digestive issues I'd probably change my mind. I actually finished a mini 3-day detox yesterday. I can't say I feel incredibly better, but I was surprised that I wasn't hungry with the reduction in normal food intake. I only had 2 tbsp. of oil per day, still much more than I normally consume. > http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/80/1/1 > > isn't that interesting? so this whole liver/gallbladder thing is pretty serious. yeah, there's always the curezone place to provide us with the up-close-and-personal views to what may lurk within our tortured bodies. > > i heard someone say that they didn't approve of the extreme nature of these " cleanses " . well, i didn't like the cleanses either, and i remember i was very productive as an insane vegetarian out of control falling to the majesty of my higher self (who had to retreat into inhabiting my physical body, the coarsest, lowest level fo existence). it was those huge intakes of tahini (sesame nut paste) after the apples... those 2-3 granny smith apples. yes. smith changed me, i learned something from them. i used those fun, cleansing indian herbs and all that, the cloves, cardamom, coriander, the raw ginger and cayenne pepper... they all had some part to play, but it was really all that malic acid and the 5000+ constituents in those raw, blended, sub-acid apple concoctions... those crazy vegetarian cleansing concoctions... followed by all that fat, so much, really, very drastic follow-up meal. god bless my starving body's many cries for methionine... i ended up discharging all sorts of flak during two of those days... weird, messy poopies. but that was life as a planet- saving vegetarian. > > sure is interesting, eh? to imagine people can hold that much weird s__t in their bodies and not even know it. > > Cholesterol gallstones: a fellow traveler with metabolic syndrome? > M Grundy > 1 From the Center for Human Nutrition and Departments of Clinical Nutrition and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas > > See corresponding article on page 38 > > 2 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to SM Grundy, Center for Human Nutrition, Department of Clinical Nutrition, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Room Y3-206, Dallas, TX 75390-9052. E-mail: scott.grundy@u... > > > INTRODUCTION > > Obesity is accompanied by many medical complications. Foremost among these is atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The term metabolic syndrome is often used to denote the multiple metabolic risk factors that accompany obesity and increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (1). Risk factors for the metabolic syndrome include atherogenic dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, hyperglycemia, a prothrombotic state, and a proinflammatory state. Persons with the metabolic syndrome are also at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes because most of them have insulin resistance, which is a major risk factor for diabetes. In addition to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and diabetes, persons with the metabolic syndrome are more likely to have fatty liver and its complications, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and cryptogenic cirrhosis. Finally, persons with the metabolic syndrome may be susceptible to yet another complication, namely, cholesterol gallstones. > > OBESITY AND CHOLESTEROL GALLSTONES > > A relation between obesity and cholesterol gallstones is well recognized. Obese women are more likely to develop gallstones than are obese men (2). In the past, our laboratory focused on the mechanisms whereby obesity increases the risk of developing gallstones (3, 4). The bile in obese persons is more lithogenic than is that in nonobese persons, ie, the bile of obese persons has a high ratio of cholesterol to solubilizing lipids (bile acids and phospholipids). This high ratio predisposes to crystallization of cholesterol and gallstone formation. The primary reason for lithogenic bile in obese persons is an increase in total body synthesis of cholesterol. The metabolic basis for this increase remains to be elucidated. A likely prime mechanism is overloading of tissues with fatty acids, which provide precursors for cholesterol synthesis. Other adipose tissue-derived substances, which are produced in excess in obesity, may further contribute to overproduction of cholesterol. As a result of this overproduction, cholesterol secretion into bile increases. In many obese persons, the amounts of cholesterol entering the bile exceed the solubilizing capacity of the bile acids and phospholipids. Both obese women and obese men synthesize increased amounts of cholesterol and secrete more cholesterol into bile than do nonobese persons (5). Obese men generally secrete more bile acids and phospholipids into bile than do obese women; consequently, the bile of obese men is less lithogenic, and they have fewer gallstones. > > INDICATORS OF OBESITY > > The precise relation between obesity and gallstones, however, remains undefined. To understand the relation, an important question must be answered: what is obesity? A simple definition is an excess of total body fat. One proposed simple definition is a body fat content of >25% in men and >33% in women (6). Because the measurement of percentage of body fat requires special methodology, both clinical evaluation and epidemiologic studies use surrogate indicators (7). One such indicator is body mass index (BMI), which is weight (in kg) divided by height (in m) squared. The correlation between BMI and percentage of body fat is positive but by no means perfect. The correlation is higher in women than in men. In men, waist circumference appears to be a better indicator of total body fat than is BMI (7), because waist circumference is strongly determined by fat in the upper body and because men have a tendency to deposit fat in the upper body. > > BODY FAT DISTRIBUTION IN OBESE PERSONS > > Two commonly identified patterns of obesity are lower body obesity and upper body obesity. In the former, excess fat predominantly accumulates subcutaneously in the gluteofemoral region; in the latter, fat accumulates predominantly in the trunk. The adipose tissue in the trunk occurs in several compartments: truncal subcutaneous, intraperitoneal (visceral), and retroperitoneal (8). When women first become obese, they generally show the pattern of lower body obesity; as obesity increases, excess fat also begins to accumulate in the trunk. Less commonly, women have upper body obesity without excess lower body fat. Most, but not all, obese men show the pattern of upper body obesity from the start. In most cases of upper body obesity, excess fat is located predominantly in the subcutaneous region. In some obese men, however, there can be a disproportionate accumulation of fat intraperitoneally. The latter has been called visceral obesity. This term is often misapplied because persons with predominant upper body subcutaneous obesity are mistakenly said to have visceral obesity (9). The term upper body obesity, which refers to all the fat in the trunk, is preferable. An alternative name for upper body obesity is abdominal obesity (7). The latter name has 2 practical advantages: 1) the presence of excess truncal fat is more noticeable around the waist than around the chest, and 2) simple measurement of waist circumference is a good indicator of upper body fat. > > UPPER BODY OBESITY AND METABOLIC DISORDERS > > Abdominal obesity is a characteristic feature of the metabolic syndrome (1). Because the presence of abdominal obesity indicates an increase in total body fat in men and in very obese women, some investigators believe that BMI, which is another measure of total body fat, provides the same predictive information for the metabolic complications of obesity that measures of abdominal obesity provide (10). The consensus view, however, is that waist circumference, which is an indicator of abdominal fat, provides predictive power for metabolic complications beyond that provided by BMI (1, 7). Some investigators hypothesize that the visceral component of abdominal obesity is the major determinant of metabolic complications. Others contend that total abdominal fat is more telling than is visceral fat alone (9). Regardless of which view is correct, the literature seems to suggest that upper body fat is more bioactive than is lower body fat. This bioactivity includes increased production of nonesterified fatty acids, inflammatory cytokines, leptin, and prothrombotic factors and decreased production of adiponectin, a putative protective adipokine. Thus, if upper body adipose tissue is the predominant source of these bioactive products, then it may be the major cause of the higher prevalence of metabolic complications in obese persons than in nonobese persons. The report by Tsai et al (11) in this issue of the Journal that abdominal obesity is a stronger predictor of gallstones in men than is BMI is consistent with the concept that upper body adipose tissue is a major cause of metabolic complications. Still, whether the greater predictive power of upper body fat relates to unique metabolic features of this type of adipose tissue or just to the fact that waist circumference in men is a better indictor of total body fat than is BMI is unclear. In any case, the association between abdominal obesity and gallstone formation represents an additional complication that appears to be associated with the metabolic syndrome. It would be interesting to know how well the incidence of gallstone disease correlates with other components of the metabolic syndrome. > > REFERENCES > > > 1.. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143-421. [Free Full Text] > 2.. Kern F Jr, Erfling W, Braverman D. Why more women than men have cholesterol gallstones: studies of biliary lipids in pregnancy. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 1979;90:71-5.[Medline] > 3.. Grundy SM, Metzger AL, Adler RD. Mechanisms of lithogenic bile formation in American Indian women with cholesterol gallstones. J Clin Invest 1972;51:3026-43.[Medline] > 4.. Grundy SM, Duane WC, Adler RD, Aron JM, Metzger AL. Biliary lipid outputs in young women with cholesterol gallstones. Metabolism 1974;23:67-73.[Medline] > 5.. Bennion LJ, Grundy SM. Effects of obesity and caloric intake on biliary lipid metabolism in man. J Clin Invest 1975;56:996-1011. [Medline] > 6.. Bray GA. Contemporary diagnosis and management of obesity. Newton, PA: Handbooks in Healthcare, 1998. > 7.. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults-The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res 1998;6(suppl):51S-209S. (Published erratum appears in Obes Res 1998;6:464.)[Medline] > 8.. Abate N, Burns D, Peshock RM, Garg A, Grundy SM. Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers. J Lipid Res 1994;35:1490-6. [Abstract] > 9.. Abate N, Garg A, Peshock RM, Stray-Gundersen J, Grundy SM. Relationships of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men. J Clin Invest 1995;96:88-98.[Medline] > 10.. Abbasi F, Brown BW Jr, Lamendola C, McLaughlin T, Reaven GM. Relationship between obesity, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:937-43.[Medline] > 11.. Tsai C-J, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL. Prospective study of abdominal adiposity and gallstone disease in US men. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:38-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text] > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2004 Report Share Posted July 22, 2004 In a message dated 7/22/2004 11:17:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, cherylhcmba@... writes: I was probably the chicken about extreme cleanses. I don't know if I meant approve, I just won't do them myself. I'm leaning the same way. I've taken an expensive naturopath's cleanse that turned my intestines into an open sore (better that TV. It had all of my attention!) and I've done the liver cleanse that resulted in very few stones. I actually didn't feel better either and it took me a couple of days to recover in each case. Strict adherence to the BTD will cleanse the body slowly and naturally. I think cleanses are good for people who are really sick and need to immediately flush their systems but as a preventative I feel like they do nothing for me. Your thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2004 Report Share Posted July 22, 2004 I at least agree. I mainly did this baby detox to get myself back on track. I modified it so there was nothing incompatible with BTD. With all the controversy around the Gittleman books, I did her 3-day summer detox for women. No harm done, but I spent $16 for pure organic cranberry juice alone, which is only a neutral for me. 2 glasses a day with some kind of green powder, I used Kyo-green and a fiber supplement, I used Konsyl. In the future I'd use harmonia and larch, but this was kind of an impulse thing so couldn't get those in a hurry. 1 tbsp. each of flaxseed oil and olive oil per day, 8 0z. lean protein, some protein powder or eggs with breakfast, I used O protein, 3 fruit servings, veggies fill out most of the food. 8 cups of filtered water, rose hips tea, hawthorn berry tea and licorice tea filled out the plan. I had one green tea per day, not on her plan, but OK. She's big on sauerkraut which I didn't use. It was supposed to be a source of L. plantarum which is not even beneficial for O's. I think it's in the A probiotic. I would probably use the O probiotic instead if I did this again. This particular detox was supposed to target the heart and small intestines which she said are stressed during the summer, based on traditional chinese medicine. The summer detox emphasizes " cooling " foods which we also do not really need. I missed out on many of the beneficials that I would normally have. I did drop a lot of fluid from my recent wheat indulgences, but just getting back to BTD would have done the same thing. I only did this because it was conservative with a good amount of food and protein. I was so glad to have back my ghee, salt, green teas and nuts today. It was however probably the cleanest I've eaten, so maybe it will improve my BTD compliance. I will try the D'Adamo detox sometime, supplements and saunas, wouldn't that be great. > In a message dated 7/22/2004 11:17:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > cherylhcmba@y... writes: > I was probably the chicken about extreme cleanses. I don't know if I > meant approve, I just won't do them myself. > > I'm leaning the same way. I've taken an expensive naturopath's cleanse that > turned my intestines into an open sore (better that TV. It had all of my > attention!) and I've done the liver cleanse that resulted in very few stones. I > actually didn't feel better either and it took me a couple of days to recover > in each case. Strict adherence to the BTD will cleanse the body slowly and > naturally. I think cleanses are good for people who are really sick and need to > immediately flush their systems but as a preventative I feel like they do > nothing for me. Your thoughts? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.