Guest guest Posted November 15, 2006 Report Share Posted November 15, 2006 First let me say that I do believe people should try and keep their gallbladders. However, I don't think it's always possible. If you are just having attacks from time to time and associated with certain foods, then I think these attacks can easily be handled with diet and cleansing. I think what concerns me about your story is the pancreatitis. I mean has anyone here ever had pancreatitis? I know that is not something to play around with, and this can be caused by gallstones. Jaundice can also be caused by gallstones. In my case I tried to keep my gallbladder for 2 years, I know that's not very long and I would've tried for many years to come. However, my liver was failing - I was completely jaundiced. The ducts to my liver were blocked. My pancreas was not doing well either, I couldn't maintain my blood sugar levels. In cases where your other organs are suffering - should we just continue to let them fail for the sake of keeping our gallbladder? My opinion is we should not let everything else fail just to save our gallbladder. Do I feel the gb is important? YES! However, come on - no one is being a wimp by removing their gb especially in instances where it's killing them. Should I have just let my gb remain blocked and risk losing my baby as well? Believe me, I am an advocate of keeping the gallbladder but we've got to remember everyone is in a different situation. If we're just having attacks, and if they can be controlled by diet and we can flush that's great - that's what we should do..but in instances of it affecting our other organs, I think I'd rather save the other organs. I would be curious to know why you got pancreatitis and also why you were jaundiced? Have those things now cleared? I'm not saying remove your gallbladder - I'm just wondering have these things now cleared and do you know why those things happened to you? I would not want to remove the gb for the sake of investigating the other organs, is that the reason they want to do it? Alison Orr <alison@...> wrote: Some of you may remember my story. Having been hospitalised twice, first with pancreatitis and secondly with jaundice, due to gravel and sludge in my gallbladder, I was sent for an MRCP, which I couldn't go through with - it made me realise just how claustrophobic I am! I was told I'd be sent for a telescopic inspection of my bile ducts and have been waiting for 2 months for that. Today I got a letter from the surgeon telling me they've decided to go ahead with the gallbladder removal and THEN do the telescopic investigation, down to my pancreas and duodenum, and that I'm on the urgent waiting list. I've been too scared after the very nasty time I had with the jaundice to try any of the flushes and confess I've not been eating well - just pretty low fat to avoid an attack. Recently I've been eating more fat without any problems (hope I'm not speaking too soon!). I am not convinced that removing my gallbladder is the right way to go. I've not had an attack since June, after having had about 6 of varying degrees over the previous 8 months. I'm also 20 stone and not happy about being operated on. I'd prefer to put it off unless it's really really essential. Does anyone have any advice for me?! Alison UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.