Guest guest Posted August 9, 2004 Report Share Posted August 9, 2004 Sorry about that. The actual new address is: sabrenar00@... Sorry about the inconvenience. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2005 Report Share Posted April 22, 2005 In a message dated 4/22/2005 3:15:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, rdill@... writes: Inclusion is a good thing, but it isn't education. Most of our kids need both and I take offense at people telling me that Jan wasn't and isn't included in life. I get upset with parents who think that inclusion is perhaps more important than education. Both are important and there are a variety of delivery methods for both. -- I beg to differ that " Inclusion " is not " education " - it all depends on how the services are delivered in the Inclusion setting and on the teacher. We've had (and still have) some Inclusion classes that are more along the " socialization and role modelling " model because the teacher doesn't buy into the fact is HER student. In those situations I push hard for getting the curriculum so that I can adapt materials and can learn and contribute. For example her Social Studies teacher this year - I'm up early this AM because the class is studying the Western states of the US so I'm making flash cards that can use to practice recognizing the shapes of the states and memorizing facts. The teacher is Science class " gets it " - The class is studying life sciences. is also learning parts of the body and systems - not in the same depth as the rest of the class but she is learning those things too. She is learning to read related vocabulary. She brings in materials and books to share (DK has the wonderful Eyewitness series - the pictures and illustrations are great for and the text is great for her 7th grade classmates). participates in group activities (they did an exercise, for example, on how diseases are passed). was part of a team for the frog dissection lab and LOVED it (much to the teacher's astonishment since there are many squeamish kids in the class who opted for the virtual dissection on the computer). Her favorite part is when they found eggs inside the frog they were dissecting. - Becky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2005 Report Share Posted April 22, 2005 In a message dated 4/22/2005 3:15:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time, rdill@... writes: Inclusion is a good thing, but it isn't education. I would argue that point. Inclusion in school is also about curriculum access and teaching strategies, it is not just social benefits of being with non disabled peers. It is about non-segregation in school. You are right that various forms of inclusion can take place in environments other than the classroom. Cheryl in VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2005 Report Share Posted April 22, 2005 Inclusion is a good thing, but it isn't education. Sorry, I am getting into this debate - but I really do feel that statement is very incorrect. We are all being educated by the mere fact of being included. A prime example being - as I am included in this forum I have been educated in many ways in regards to people with DS and in someway the American school system (although I still find it very confusing!). The fact is - Cheryl kindly shared a story about a young person with DS who is attending college and is achieving very good results in a couple of subjects. Did the article say he was a high achiever in all areas - I don't think so. No doubt as his parents are academics through genetics this has helped him along with the fact that they have spent many hours working with him in these areas. I know a few older kids with DS, who give the appearance that they are functioning at 'normal' levels - but every now and then you see the younger and much younger side of them. Balance out the high functioning areas of this persons ability with the low areas and it is very possible they would not test anywhere near what we would call 'normal' abilities, thus giving the necessary labels to get the required assistance. (Your testing and labels is another very foreign area for me) Personally I love hearing of such positive stories, for me Trent will never be amongst the high educational achievers, he has to see the point behind the learning. 1 + 1 = 2 so what - now 10cents + 10 cents = 20 cents which will buy xyz, is the reason behind his learning, along with achieving independence. He can be very stubborn, determine, moody, friendly, an attention seeker, helpful when he wants, shows great understanding and knowledge of things that interest him. All these words could describe any other member of my family - he has not achieved greatly academically then again he hasn't always been motivated to do so - give up on this kid work harder on another who shows greater ability making the teacher look better! Just keep in mind, our kids with DS as with their average peers all learn at different levels - some will be good academically, some will be good at sport, others will not be able to cope with the education system but will have success in other areas. Life isn't about being the best and have the most - it should be about being happy and content. Keep smiling Jan, mother of Trent 20yo with DS from the LandDownUnder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2005 Report Share Posted April 22, 2005 Ya' know I have to agree with Rick on this one. I really feel that inclusion should be encompassed into the society as a whole not just school. My daughter, Emma goes to a special day class and is not included in any typical classrooms because that would not meet any of herneeds right now. She is however given time to interact with her typical developing peers on the playground and at lunch time in the school setting. Just this week as Emma's IEP it was mentioned that Emma would be transitioning soon to the next level at a school that my husband and I do not care for. We objected and asked if there were any other schools that contained the classroom she needed and the IEP team respended with a yes but they are further away, I then let them know I did not care aboutt he distance BUT rather than the quality of the education instead. I really feel that inclusion happens over a lifetime in all situations and not just at school. JMHO Colleen _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Rick Dill Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 12:13 AM KathyEverett@...; Subject: Small correction Kathy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Society viewed people with a disability different when Rick had Jan. Years ago anyone who was labeled as MR, they were put " away " and forgotten about. <<<<<<<<<<<<<< The big change the world for our kids came from a single newspaper reporter who reported on the situation in one institution .. Willowbrook. That and subsequent lawsuits (not particularly by parents) changed things. There were others before Jan and Willowbrook who got educations but they are few and I applaud their parents.. The education Jan got was excellent in that for 15 years of public education it challenged her to her limits. The teachers never gave up and Jan responded by learning and being rewarding to teach.. Jan's peers like Kingsley, Mitch Levitz, and many others got equivalent educations and it was in this era that parent activiism really got started. Yes, there was bad education all around when Jan went to school. We networked with other parents and our IEP committees to find the best teachers and environments for our particular children. We didn't accept the third grade teacher because she was where all third graders went. We went across school district lines to find the best at educating kids with special needs. Yes, in our era, those inspired teachers were in SPED environments, not surprisingly since our child had special needs. Inclusion today is not about education, but rather about the classroom and social environment in which it is delivered. Inclusion for Jan was always in the neighborhood, in the community, and in life where there are a whole lot more hours at school. For Jan .. and I won't talk about it .. inclusion included some dark side of abuse as well as benefit. Inclusion is a good thing, but it isn't education. Most of our kids need both and I take offense at people telling me that Jan wasn't and isn't included in life. I get upset with parents who think that inclusion is perhaps more important than education. Both are important and there are a variety of delivery methods for both. You may well have different opinions. Rick Click reply to all for messages to go to the list. Just hit reply for messages to go to the sender of the message. _____ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.