Guest guest Posted March 23, 2004 Report Share Posted March 23, 2004 > I am as usual asking for scientific proofs, in this case concerning > " Both Rife and Lakhovsky were successful in curing cancer and other > diseases " . I guess there are none! There seems to be a lot of information in books and on the Internet about Rife and Lakhovsky. The consensus among many sources is that they were able to eliminate cancer. So my question is -- what would YOU consider to be scientific proof of events that took place over 50 years ago? Would ANYTHING that we could find be considered " proof " ? I doubt it. I don't have any personal experiences with Rife technology, but I have tried several EMF protection devices which claimed to be based on the work of Lakhovsky. I had a quite strong reaction to some of these. > And by the way, a negative effect of the " ZAPPER " The " Zapper " is one of the many things I tried several years ago. It didn't seem to have any effect on me at all, good or bad. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2004 Report Share Posted March 23, 2004 Hi Marc, if I get things right, Rife- and Lakhovsky-devices are used at daily basis around the world. Then it would be very easy to verify the efficiency of the devices, or have I missed something? greetings, Anders sson Marc wrote: >>I am as usual asking for scientific proofs, in this case concerning >> " Both Rife and Lakhovsky were successful in curing cancer and other >>diseases " . I guess there are none! > > > There seems to be a lot of information in books and on the Internet > about Rife and Lakhovsky. The consensus among many sources is that > they were able to eliminate cancer. So my question is -- what would > YOU consider to be scientific proof of events that took place over > 50 years ago? Would ANYTHING that we could find be considered > " proof " ? I doubt it. > > I don't have any personal experiences with Rife technology, but > I have tried several EMF protection devices which claimed to be > based on the work of Lakhovsky. I had a quite strong reaction > to some of these. > > >>And by the way, a negative effect of the " ZAPPER " > > > The " Zapper " is one of the many things I tried several years ago. > It didn't seem to have any effect on me at all, good or bad. > > Marc > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2004 Report Share Posted March 23, 2004 > if I get things right, Rife- and Lakhovsky-devices are used at daily > basis around the world. Then it would be very easy to verify the > efficiency of the devices, or have I missed something? Yes, but reports from people around the world who are using them is not " scientific proof " . Instead, these are merely testimonials or anecdotal reports. But there do seem to be discussion forums and websites for people using these types of devices, so you could find more information there. The general impression I got was that hospitals don't want to know that such devices exist, because cancer treatments is very profitable, and hospitals would have to be shut down if there was such a thing as a simple, cheap cure for cancer. As I said before, there have been several EMF protection devices which are supposed to be based on the work of Lakhovsky. A couple of years ago I even did searches on " Lakhovsky " and bought every EMF protection device that was based on his work, because I had such good results with one I tried. I have not ever heard of any connection between Rife and EMF protection or ES. By the way, I have been considering buying a " Harmonizer " from Bioharmonics.com, which is a similar type of frequency generator. I was going to try it on my wife, as she claims that she cannot use Springlife Polarizers because she doesn't have pockets and necklaces hurt her neck (!). The person promoting these used to be interested in Rife (I even own a videotape of her presenting at a Rife confernce), but she found that a lot of people did not get better using modern Rife technology, so she looked for something better to cure her of her own problems. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2004 Report Share Posted March 23, 2004 > if I get things right, Rife- and Lakhovsky-devices are used at daily > basis around the world. Then it would be very easy to verify the > efficiency of the devices, or have I missed something? Also, if you do a search for " Rife " or " Lakhovsky " on the main .com page, you will find multiple discussion groups with hundreds of members discussing these sorts of devices. Certainly you may find some answers about their usefulness there. Discussions of such devices here should be limited to their applicability to Electrical Sensitivity. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.