Guest guest Posted January 10, 2002 Report Share Posted January 10, 2002 In fairness I watched the show. A couple of observations. Robyn's portion was very nice. This could be expected, as she seems to be a nice person. As for the rest of the show, no explotation there. Not. Terra, who sells herself out to be an " Evil Elf " . And " Wee Man " , dresses like an Omp Pah and rides a skateboard around. No sir... no explotation there. Now tell me, which of the segments do you think the " MTV Generation " paid the most attention. Don't kid yourself. And let't take a look at the socially redeeming programming just prior to and immediately after the show. Beforehand was their " Top 20 Most Outrageous Moments " . And guess what was number 2. Number 1 was the creation of MTV itself. But number 2... " Spring Break " good ole Jerry Springer. 20 years of televised programming and that is what they feel was worth number 2. Immediately after what did we have. You guessed it, " Jackass " . Just doing something good one percent of the time doesn't make up for the ninety nine percent of the time that is garbage. Maurice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2002 Report Share Posted January 10, 2002 Robyn's portion was very nice. This could be expected, as she seems to be a nice person. As for the rest of the show, no explotation there. Not. Terra, who sells herself out to be an " Evil Elf " . Hi Maurice, *I keep forgetting you guys don't see the pretty purple I have my font in or the script writing...why is that btw?* Must have been good makeup there! I could have sworn that was Robyn. :-) And let't take a look at the socially redeeming programming just prior to and immediately after the show. Beforehand was their " Top 20 Most Outrageous Moments " . And guess what was number 2. Number 1 was the creation of MTV itself. But number 2... " Spring Break " good ole Jerry Springer. 20 years of televised programming and that is what they feel was worth number 2. Immediately after what did we have. You guessed it, " Jackass " . Okay, true, but what about the show itself? We all know that MTV caters to the young, and smartly so being that they show " today's " music...but what about the show? I didn't find it exploitive. The individuals on there chose to do the " work " they do...that was not a programming thing...It just showed what those individuals were doing with their REAL LIVES...No whistles or bells, but more of a documentary...that was my take anyway...And with Jarrod being 10 he is the perfect audience. He was a bit upset at the guy that said he didn't think there was career potential out there so he had ELL surgery...to be a stock boy. That was bothersome to him....but the rest we all loved... Just doing something good one percent of the time doesn't make up for the ninety nine percent of the time that is garbage. Yeah, but that isn't the point of this. We have a lot of bad stations on T.V. I mean the real debate or question was if the program was any good for LP exposure...I think it was a wonderful depiction of real people without all the goofiness that some of the talk shows exhibit and it was the perfect blend of attitudes. I would watch it on any station....and Mr. ....dear, you date yourself....I too was young once...but that is behind me....REALLY BEHIND me...giggle. In a BIG way. :-) Willow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2002 Report Share Posted January 11, 2002 shortbigg wrote: > In fairness I watched the show. > > A couple of observations. > > Robyn's portion was very nice. This could be expected, as > she seems > to be a nice person. > > As for the rest of the show, no explotation there. Not. > Terra, who > sells herself out to be an " Evil Elf " . And " Wee Man " , > dresses like > an Omp Pah and rides a skateboard around. No sir... no > explotation > there. Now tell me, which of the segments do you think the > " MTV > Generation " paid the most attention. Don't kid yourself. > > And let't take a look at the socially redeeming > programming just > prior to and immediately after the show. Beforehand was > their " Top > 20 Most Outrageous Moments " . And guess what was number 2. > Number 1 > was the creation of MTV itself. But number 2... " Spring > Break " good > ole Jerry Springer. 20 years of televised programming and > that is > what they feel was worth number 2. Immediately after what > did we > have. You guessed it, " Jackass " . > > Just doing something good one percent of the time doesn't > make up > for the ninety nine percent of the time that is garbage. > > Maurice Maurice, if I went by your criteria, I wouldn't watch any TV at all! It's not just MTV that is garbage, ninety percent of all TV is garbage. (In my humble opinion). I also disagree with your assessment of the documentary. It did not exploit any of the subjects in any manner. True, some of them may be " exploited " in their choice of work, but the documetary itself did not exploit them. It potrayed them honestly, with a balanced approach, and let the subjects speak for themselves. I would recommend any young LP watch this documentary. -Bill Bradford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.