Guest guest Posted March 24, 2004 Report Share Posted March 24, 2004 Chlorine Dioxide-Generating Gloves Eliminate Broad Spectrum of Pathogens By Will Boggs, MD. MD NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Mar 16 - Gloves that create a " disinfecting microenvironment " by continuously generating chlorine dioxide appear safe for the wearer and effective in reducing the numbers of pathogens on the gloves and on the wearer, according to new a report. Chlorine dioxide is a water-soluble gas with activity against a broad spectrum of potential pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, and bacterial spores, explains Dr. Barza from Caritas Carney Hospital and Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Barza tested the ability of gloves impregnated with microspheres that release chlorine dioxide upon exposure to light or moisture to reduce microbial numbers on the gloves and on the hands of wearers. The numbers of Staph. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes declined by at least 2 logs more in the first 2 minutes on chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves than on control gloves, Dr. Barza reports in the March 15th issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, and continued to decrease at least 3 logs more than on control gloves over the next 15 minutes. The numbers of E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium inoculated directly onto the hands of volunteers also fell significantly more after wearing chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves than after wearing control gloves, the results indicate. There was no difference in dermal tolerance of intact or abraded skin after wearing control or chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves. " These gloves could be a useful adjunct to the standard practices of handwashing or use of alcohol-based lotions to prevent transmission of infections in health care environments (hospitals, outpatient clinics), " Dr. Barza said. " In particular, they can prevent transmission of organisms picked up on the gloves after they are donned. " " It should be stressed that chlorine dioxide has potent activity against all microorganisms studied, including HIV and the SARS virus, a wide variety of bacteria, including spores, and fungi and parasites, " Dr. Barza added. " It should also be emphasized that chlorine dioxide has no tendency to foster or select for resistant strains - unlike antibiotics. " Dr. Barza said that the gloves cost barely more than standard gloves. Also, he concluded, " The technology should not affect the performance or tolerability of the gloves in any way. " Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:857-863 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2004 Report Share Posted March 24, 2004 Chlorine Dioxide-Generating Gloves Eliminate Broad Spectrum of Pathogens By Will Boggs, MD. MD NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Mar 16 - Gloves that create a " disinfecting microenvironment " by continuously generating chlorine dioxide appear safe for the wearer and effective in reducing the numbers of pathogens on the gloves and on the wearer, according to new a report. Chlorine dioxide is a water-soluble gas with activity against a broad spectrum of potential pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, and bacterial spores, explains Dr. Barza from Caritas Carney Hospital and Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Barza tested the ability of gloves impregnated with microspheres that release chlorine dioxide upon exposure to light or moisture to reduce microbial numbers on the gloves and on the hands of wearers. The numbers of Staph. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes declined by at least 2 logs more in the first 2 minutes on chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves than on control gloves, Dr. Barza reports in the March 15th issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, and continued to decrease at least 3 logs more than on control gloves over the next 15 minutes. The numbers of E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium inoculated directly onto the hands of volunteers also fell significantly more after wearing chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves than after wearing control gloves, the results indicate. There was no difference in dermal tolerance of intact or abraded skin after wearing control or chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves. " These gloves could be a useful adjunct to the standard practices of handwashing or use of alcohol-based lotions to prevent transmission of infections in health care environments (hospitals, outpatient clinics), " Dr. Barza said. " In particular, they can prevent transmission of organisms picked up on the gloves after they are donned. " " It should be stressed that chlorine dioxide has potent activity against all microorganisms studied, including HIV and the SARS virus, a wide variety of bacteria, including spores, and fungi and parasites, " Dr. Barza added. " It should also be emphasized that chlorine dioxide has no tendency to foster or select for resistant strains - unlike antibiotics. " Dr. Barza said that the gloves cost barely more than standard gloves. Also, he concluded, " The technology should not affect the performance or tolerability of the gloves in any way. " Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:857-863 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2004 Report Share Posted March 24, 2004 Chlorine Dioxide-Generating Gloves Eliminate Broad Spectrum of Pathogens By Will Boggs, MD. MD NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Mar 16 - Gloves that create a " disinfecting microenvironment " by continuously generating chlorine dioxide appear safe for the wearer and effective in reducing the numbers of pathogens on the gloves and on the wearer, according to new a report. Chlorine dioxide is a water-soluble gas with activity against a broad spectrum of potential pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, and bacterial spores, explains Dr. Barza from Caritas Carney Hospital and Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Barza tested the ability of gloves impregnated with microspheres that release chlorine dioxide upon exposure to light or moisture to reduce microbial numbers on the gloves and on the hands of wearers. The numbers of Staph. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes declined by at least 2 logs more in the first 2 minutes on chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves than on control gloves, Dr. Barza reports in the March 15th issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, and continued to decrease at least 3 logs more than on control gloves over the next 15 minutes. The numbers of E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium inoculated directly onto the hands of volunteers also fell significantly more after wearing chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves than after wearing control gloves, the results indicate. There was no difference in dermal tolerance of intact or abraded skin after wearing control or chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves. " These gloves could be a useful adjunct to the standard practices of handwashing or use of alcohol-based lotions to prevent transmission of infections in health care environments (hospitals, outpatient clinics), " Dr. Barza said. " In particular, they can prevent transmission of organisms picked up on the gloves after they are donned. " " It should be stressed that chlorine dioxide has potent activity against all microorganisms studied, including HIV and the SARS virus, a wide variety of bacteria, including spores, and fungi and parasites, " Dr. Barza added. " It should also be emphasized that chlorine dioxide has no tendency to foster or select for resistant strains - unlike antibiotics. " Dr. Barza said that the gloves cost barely more than standard gloves. Also, he concluded, " The technology should not affect the performance or tolerability of the gloves in any way. " Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:857-863 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2004 Report Share Posted March 24, 2004 Chlorine Dioxide-Generating Gloves Eliminate Broad Spectrum of Pathogens By Will Boggs, MD. MD NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Mar 16 - Gloves that create a " disinfecting microenvironment " by continuously generating chlorine dioxide appear safe for the wearer and effective in reducing the numbers of pathogens on the gloves and on the wearer, according to new a report. Chlorine dioxide is a water-soluble gas with activity against a broad spectrum of potential pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, and bacterial spores, explains Dr. Barza from Caritas Carney Hospital and Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Barza tested the ability of gloves impregnated with microspheres that release chlorine dioxide upon exposure to light or moisture to reduce microbial numbers on the gloves and on the hands of wearers. The numbers of Staph. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes declined by at least 2 logs more in the first 2 minutes on chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves than on control gloves, Dr. Barza reports in the March 15th issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, and continued to decrease at least 3 logs more than on control gloves over the next 15 minutes. The numbers of E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium inoculated directly onto the hands of volunteers also fell significantly more after wearing chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves than after wearing control gloves, the results indicate. There was no difference in dermal tolerance of intact or abraded skin after wearing control or chlorine dioxide-releasing gloves. " These gloves could be a useful adjunct to the standard practices of handwashing or use of alcohol-based lotions to prevent transmission of infections in health care environments (hospitals, outpatient clinics), " Dr. Barza said. " In particular, they can prevent transmission of organisms picked up on the gloves after they are donned. " " It should be stressed that chlorine dioxide has potent activity against all microorganisms studied, including HIV and the SARS virus, a wide variety of bacteria, including spores, and fungi and parasites, " Dr. Barza added. " It should also be emphasized that chlorine dioxide has no tendency to foster or select for resistant strains - unlike antibiotics. " Dr. Barza said that the gloves cost barely more than standard gloves. Also, he concluded, " The technology should not affect the performance or tolerability of the gloves in any way. " Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:857-863 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.