Guest guest Posted February 17, 2004 Report Share Posted February 17, 2004 Dawn Rider <israelswarrior@...> wrote:scap@... From: " Dawn Rider " Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:35 -0700 Subject: [ASPIRE-US] NY ruling could force medications on " mentally ill " It's a sad day for New York.... and, the really sad thing is that most people who support such laws are doing so out of complete ignorance. I had no idea that the majority of states have similar laws... Thanks for sending this, Lana Dawn From: " Lana " " 'Dawn Rider' " <israelswarrior@...> CC: " 'Fred Baughman' " <fredbaughmanmd@...> Subject: NY ruling could force medications on " mentally ill " Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:51:57 -0800 http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/17/mentally.ill.law.ap/index.html Ruling could force treatment on mentally ill Tuesday, February 17, 2004 Posted: 12:35 PM EST (1735 GMT) ALBANY, New York (AP) -- The state's highest court on Tuesday upheld " Kendra's Law, " which allows caseworkers, family members and even roommates to seek a court order to force a mentally ill patient to comply with treatment. At least 40 other states have similar statutes, according to Tuesday's Court of Appeals decision. The law was named for Kendra Webdale, 32, who died in January 1999 after she was pushed in front of a New York City subway train by a schizophrenic who did not take his medicine. Lawyers for another mental patient, identified only as K.L., argued the law, which took effect in 2000, is unconstitutional because it violated patients' due process protections. K.L., who suffers from a bipolar disorder, had a history of hospitalizations and refusal to take medication. Attorneys argued the treatment can't be forced unless the patient is mentally incapacitated. They also argued that it was unconstitutional to detain patients who refuse to take their medication for up to 72 hours without a hearing. State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer intervened in the case and defended the constitutionality of the law. In its 6-0 decision, written by Chief Judge Judith Kaye, the court said the law was an effort to enable mentally ill persons to lead more productive and satisfying lives, " while at the same time reducing the risk of violence. " K.L.'s attorney, Dennis Feld, said he worries the law may go too far at the expense of the mentally ill. " Some of the rights that we felt were involved ... just didn't seem to be recognized by the court, " Feld said. " We felt there was more than just a minimal violation of liberty. " _________________________________________________________________ Dream of owning a home? Find out how in the First-time Home Buying Guide. http://special.msn.com/home/firsthome.armx --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2004 Report Share Posted February 17, 2004 Dawn Rider <israelswarrior@...> wrote:scap@... From: " Dawn Rider " Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:35 -0700 Subject: [ASPIRE-US] NY ruling could force medications on " mentally ill " It's a sad day for New York.... and, the really sad thing is that most people who support such laws are doing so out of complete ignorance. I had no idea that the majority of states have similar laws... Thanks for sending this, Lana Dawn From: " Lana " " 'Dawn Rider' " <israelswarrior@...> CC: " 'Fred Baughman' " <fredbaughmanmd@...> Subject: NY ruling could force medications on " mentally ill " Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:51:57 -0800 http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/17/mentally.ill.law.ap/index.html Ruling could force treatment on mentally ill Tuesday, February 17, 2004 Posted: 12:35 PM EST (1735 GMT) ALBANY, New York (AP) -- The state's highest court on Tuesday upheld " Kendra's Law, " which allows caseworkers, family members and even roommates to seek a court order to force a mentally ill patient to comply with treatment. At least 40 other states have similar statutes, according to Tuesday's Court of Appeals decision. The law was named for Kendra Webdale, 32, who died in January 1999 after she was pushed in front of a New York City subway train by a schizophrenic who did not take his medicine. Lawyers for another mental patient, identified only as K.L., argued the law, which took effect in 2000, is unconstitutional because it violated patients' due process protections. K.L., who suffers from a bipolar disorder, had a history of hospitalizations and refusal to take medication. Attorneys argued the treatment can't be forced unless the patient is mentally incapacitated. They also argued that it was unconstitutional to detain patients who refuse to take their medication for up to 72 hours without a hearing. State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer intervened in the case and defended the constitutionality of the law. In its 6-0 decision, written by Chief Judge Judith Kaye, the court said the law was an effort to enable mentally ill persons to lead more productive and satisfying lives, " while at the same time reducing the risk of violence. " K.L.'s attorney, Dennis Feld, said he worries the law may go too far at the expense of the mentally ill. " Some of the rights that we felt were involved ... just didn't seem to be recognized by the court, " Feld said. " We felt there was more than just a minimal violation of liberty. " _________________________________________________________________ Dream of owning a home? Find out how in the First-time Home Buying Guide. http://special.msn.com/home/firsthome.armx --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2004 Report Share Posted February 17, 2004 Dawn Rider <israelswarrior@...> wrote:scap@... From: " Dawn Rider " Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:35 -0700 Subject: [ASPIRE-US] NY ruling could force medications on " mentally ill " It's a sad day for New York.... and, the really sad thing is that most people who support such laws are doing so out of complete ignorance. I had no idea that the majority of states have similar laws... Thanks for sending this, Lana Dawn From: " Lana " " 'Dawn Rider' " <israelswarrior@...> CC: " 'Fred Baughman' " <fredbaughmanmd@...> Subject: NY ruling could force medications on " mentally ill " Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:51:57 -0800 http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/17/mentally.ill.law.ap/index.html Ruling could force treatment on mentally ill Tuesday, February 17, 2004 Posted: 12:35 PM EST (1735 GMT) ALBANY, New York (AP) -- The state's highest court on Tuesday upheld " Kendra's Law, " which allows caseworkers, family members and even roommates to seek a court order to force a mentally ill patient to comply with treatment. At least 40 other states have similar statutes, according to Tuesday's Court of Appeals decision. The law was named for Kendra Webdale, 32, who died in January 1999 after she was pushed in front of a New York City subway train by a schizophrenic who did not take his medicine. Lawyers for another mental patient, identified only as K.L., argued the law, which took effect in 2000, is unconstitutional because it violated patients' due process protections. K.L., who suffers from a bipolar disorder, had a history of hospitalizations and refusal to take medication. Attorneys argued the treatment can't be forced unless the patient is mentally incapacitated. They also argued that it was unconstitutional to detain patients who refuse to take their medication for up to 72 hours without a hearing. State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer intervened in the case and defended the constitutionality of the law. In its 6-0 decision, written by Chief Judge Judith Kaye, the court said the law was an effort to enable mentally ill persons to lead more productive and satisfying lives, " while at the same time reducing the risk of violence. " K.L.'s attorney, Dennis Feld, said he worries the law may go too far at the expense of the mentally ill. " Some of the rights that we felt were involved ... just didn't seem to be recognized by the court, " Feld said. " We felt there was more than just a minimal violation of liberty. " _________________________________________________________________ Dream of owning a home? Find out how in the First-time Home Buying Guide. http://special.msn.com/home/firsthome.armx --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2004 Report Share Posted February 17, 2004 Dawn Rider <israelswarrior@...> wrote:scap@... From: " Dawn Rider " Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:35 -0700 Subject: [ASPIRE-US] NY ruling could force medications on " mentally ill " It's a sad day for New York.... and, the really sad thing is that most people who support such laws are doing so out of complete ignorance. I had no idea that the majority of states have similar laws... Thanks for sending this, Lana Dawn From: " Lana " " 'Dawn Rider' " <israelswarrior@...> CC: " 'Fred Baughman' " <fredbaughmanmd@...> Subject: NY ruling could force medications on " mentally ill " Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:51:57 -0800 http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/17/mentally.ill.law.ap/index.html Ruling could force treatment on mentally ill Tuesday, February 17, 2004 Posted: 12:35 PM EST (1735 GMT) ALBANY, New York (AP) -- The state's highest court on Tuesday upheld " Kendra's Law, " which allows caseworkers, family members and even roommates to seek a court order to force a mentally ill patient to comply with treatment. At least 40 other states have similar statutes, according to Tuesday's Court of Appeals decision. The law was named for Kendra Webdale, 32, who died in January 1999 after she was pushed in front of a New York City subway train by a schizophrenic who did not take his medicine. Lawyers for another mental patient, identified only as K.L., argued the law, which took effect in 2000, is unconstitutional because it violated patients' due process protections. K.L., who suffers from a bipolar disorder, had a history of hospitalizations and refusal to take medication. Attorneys argued the treatment can't be forced unless the patient is mentally incapacitated. They also argued that it was unconstitutional to detain patients who refuse to take their medication for up to 72 hours without a hearing. State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer intervened in the case and defended the constitutionality of the law. In its 6-0 decision, written by Chief Judge Judith Kaye, the court said the law was an effort to enable mentally ill persons to lead more productive and satisfying lives, " while at the same time reducing the risk of violence. " K.L.'s attorney, Dennis Feld, said he worries the law may go too far at the expense of the mentally ill. " Some of the rights that we felt were involved ... just didn't seem to be recognized by the court, " Feld said. " We felt there was more than just a minimal violation of liberty. " _________________________________________________________________ Dream of owning a home? Find out how in the First-time Home Buying Guide. http://special.msn.com/home/firsthome.armx --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.