Guest guest Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04323/413624.stm Blood testing ordered for patient of a nurse pricked by his needle Thursday, November 18, 2004 By Jim McKinnon, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette A nurse who accidentally was stuck by a needle that had been used on a hepatitis-infected patient won a court order yesterday requiring the patient to submit to tests for the AIDS virus. In a case that some health officials call the first of its kind, the patient had refused to provide blood samples for testing voluntarily. Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge P. Horgos yesterday ordered the patient to submit to the tests and to grant the nurse access to the results. The patient, however, did not attend yesterday's hearing and ignored the court's order to respond to the nurse's initial petition, and it was not known yesterday whether he would be forced to submit if he does not do so voluntarily. " This is kind of a jolt to think that someone can be this callous to a health care worker and her family, " Bill Borwegen, director of occupational health and safety for Service Employees International Union, said in a telephone interview from his Washington, D.C., office yesterday. " I've never heard of it before, " he added. The case, shrouded in confidentiality regulations, involves Pitts, a nurse who has worked for the past two months at Mercy Hospital: North Shore Campus, formerly Mercy Providence, on the North Side. On Oct. 31, after administering an insulin shot to the patient, identified in court papers as Doe, Pitts was accidentally pricked by the needle. The patient, already diagnosed with hepatitis C, also has been a user of illegal intravenous drugs. The man, a mental health patient, had been voluntarily admitted at Mercy. Because of the patient's history, doctors consider him at high risk for having contracted human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, which causes AIDS. Immediately after Pitts was injured, doctors recommended that she begin taking anti-AIDS medications, pending the outcome of tests for HIV on her and her patient. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that health care workers who are exposed as was Pitts should begin the anti-AIDS treatments within hours of the needle stick. The tests for HIV, and in Pitts' case, hepatitis, also should be done immediately. Test results for Pitts and Doe would not be available to them for about six months. On Nov. 5, Pitts filed a petition in Common Pleas Court asking that the patient be ordered to submit to the tests. Borwegen and officials at Mercy Hospital said they are equally concerned about the patient's confidentiality. Usually, he said, at-risk patients are enthusiastic about being tested after a health care worker is exposed to their bodily fluids in a way that could cause infection. " It's incredible that someone could be so insensitive to the needs of the worker, " Borwegen said. K. Ross, spokeswoman for Mercy, said the hospital is concerned for Pitts' health. " The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh is ... appreciative that the court saw the importance in Ms. Pitts' request to compel the respondent to submit to appropriate testing, and to allow Ms. Pitts access to the test results within a timely manner, " Ross said in a written statement yesterday. " We ask the public to please keep Ms. Pitts, her family, and the patient in their thoughts and prayers. " Borwegen said the union also is asking hospitals to invest in retractable needles that would minimize the threat of similar incidents. He said hospitals have resisted the change because the new needles are more costly. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Jim McKinnon can be reached at jmckinnon@... or 412-263-1939.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04323/413624.stm Blood testing ordered for patient of a nurse pricked by his needle Thursday, November 18, 2004 By Jim McKinnon, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette A nurse who accidentally was stuck by a needle that had been used on a hepatitis-infected patient won a court order yesterday requiring the patient to submit to tests for the AIDS virus. In a case that some health officials call the first of its kind, the patient had refused to provide blood samples for testing voluntarily. Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge P. Horgos yesterday ordered the patient to submit to the tests and to grant the nurse access to the results. The patient, however, did not attend yesterday's hearing and ignored the court's order to respond to the nurse's initial petition, and it was not known yesterday whether he would be forced to submit if he does not do so voluntarily. " This is kind of a jolt to think that someone can be this callous to a health care worker and her family, " Bill Borwegen, director of occupational health and safety for Service Employees International Union, said in a telephone interview from his Washington, D.C., office yesterday. " I've never heard of it before, " he added. The case, shrouded in confidentiality regulations, involves Pitts, a nurse who has worked for the past two months at Mercy Hospital: North Shore Campus, formerly Mercy Providence, on the North Side. On Oct. 31, after administering an insulin shot to the patient, identified in court papers as Doe, Pitts was accidentally pricked by the needle. The patient, already diagnosed with hepatitis C, also has been a user of illegal intravenous drugs. The man, a mental health patient, had been voluntarily admitted at Mercy. Because of the patient's history, doctors consider him at high risk for having contracted human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, which causes AIDS. Immediately after Pitts was injured, doctors recommended that she begin taking anti-AIDS medications, pending the outcome of tests for HIV on her and her patient. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that health care workers who are exposed as was Pitts should begin the anti-AIDS treatments within hours of the needle stick. The tests for HIV, and in Pitts' case, hepatitis, also should be done immediately. Test results for Pitts and Doe would not be available to them for about six months. On Nov. 5, Pitts filed a petition in Common Pleas Court asking that the patient be ordered to submit to the tests. Borwegen and officials at Mercy Hospital said they are equally concerned about the patient's confidentiality. Usually, he said, at-risk patients are enthusiastic about being tested after a health care worker is exposed to their bodily fluids in a way that could cause infection. " It's incredible that someone could be so insensitive to the needs of the worker, " Borwegen said. K. Ross, spokeswoman for Mercy, said the hospital is concerned for Pitts' health. " The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh is ... appreciative that the court saw the importance in Ms. Pitts' request to compel the respondent to submit to appropriate testing, and to allow Ms. Pitts access to the test results within a timely manner, " Ross said in a written statement yesterday. " We ask the public to please keep Ms. Pitts, her family, and the patient in their thoughts and prayers. " Borwegen said the union also is asking hospitals to invest in retractable needles that would minimize the threat of similar incidents. He said hospitals have resisted the change because the new needles are more costly. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Jim McKinnon can be reached at jmckinnon@... or 412-263-1939.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04323/413624.stm Blood testing ordered for patient of a nurse pricked by his needle Thursday, November 18, 2004 By Jim McKinnon, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette A nurse who accidentally was stuck by a needle that had been used on a hepatitis-infected patient won a court order yesterday requiring the patient to submit to tests for the AIDS virus. In a case that some health officials call the first of its kind, the patient had refused to provide blood samples for testing voluntarily. Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge P. Horgos yesterday ordered the patient to submit to the tests and to grant the nurse access to the results. The patient, however, did not attend yesterday's hearing and ignored the court's order to respond to the nurse's initial petition, and it was not known yesterday whether he would be forced to submit if he does not do so voluntarily. " This is kind of a jolt to think that someone can be this callous to a health care worker and her family, " Bill Borwegen, director of occupational health and safety for Service Employees International Union, said in a telephone interview from his Washington, D.C., office yesterday. " I've never heard of it before, " he added. The case, shrouded in confidentiality regulations, involves Pitts, a nurse who has worked for the past two months at Mercy Hospital: North Shore Campus, formerly Mercy Providence, on the North Side. On Oct. 31, after administering an insulin shot to the patient, identified in court papers as Doe, Pitts was accidentally pricked by the needle. The patient, already diagnosed with hepatitis C, also has been a user of illegal intravenous drugs. The man, a mental health patient, had been voluntarily admitted at Mercy. Because of the patient's history, doctors consider him at high risk for having contracted human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, which causes AIDS. Immediately after Pitts was injured, doctors recommended that she begin taking anti-AIDS medications, pending the outcome of tests for HIV on her and her patient. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that health care workers who are exposed as was Pitts should begin the anti-AIDS treatments within hours of the needle stick. The tests for HIV, and in Pitts' case, hepatitis, also should be done immediately. Test results for Pitts and Doe would not be available to them for about six months. On Nov. 5, Pitts filed a petition in Common Pleas Court asking that the patient be ordered to submit to the tests. Borwegen and officials at Mercy Hospital said they are equally concerned about the patient's confidentiality. Usually, he said, at-risk patients are enthusiastic about being tested after a health care worker is exposed to their bodily fluids in a way that could cause infection. " It's incredible that someone could be so insensitive to the needs of the worker, " Borwegen said. K. Ross, spokeswoman for Mercy, said the hospital is concerned for Pitts' health. " The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh is ... appreciative that the court saw the importance in Ms. Pitts' request to compel the respondent to submit to appropriate testing, and to allow Ms. Pitts access to the test results within a timely manner, " Ross said in a written statement yesterday. " We ask the public to please keep Ms. Pitts, her family, and the patient in their thoughts and prayers. " Borwegen said the union also is asking hospitals to invest in retractable needles that would minimize the threat of similar incidents. He said hospitals have resisted the change because the new needles are more costly. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Jim McKinnon can be reached at jmckinnon@... or 412-263-1939.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04323/413624.stm Blood testing ordered for patient of a nurse pricked by his needle Thursday, November 18, 2004 By Jim McKinnon, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette A nurse who accidentally was stuck by a needle that had been used on a hepatitis-infected patient won a court order yesterday requiring the patient to submit to tests for the AIDS virus. In a case that some health officials call the first of its kind, the patient had refused to provide blood samples for testing voluntarily. Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge P. Horgos yesterday ordered the patient to submit to the tests and to grant the nurse access to the results. The patient, however, did not attend yesterday's hearing and ignored the court's order to respond to the nurse's initial petition, and it was not known yesterday whether he would be forced to submit if he does not do so voluntarily. " This is kind of a jolt to think that someone can be this callous to a health care worker and her family, " Bill Borwegen, director of occupational health and safety for Service Employees International Union, said in a telephone interview from his Washington, D.C., office yesterday. " I've never heard of it before, " he added. The case, shrouded in confidentiality regulations, involves Pitts, a nurse who has worked for the past two months at Mercy Hospital: North Shore Campus, formerly Mercy Providence, on the North Side. On Oct. 31, after administering an insulin shot to the patient, identified in court papers as Doe, Pitts was accidentally pricked by the needle. The patient, already diagnosed with hepatitis C, also has been a user of illegal intravenous drugs. The man, a mental health patient, had been voluntarily admitted at Mercy. Because of the patient's history, doctors consider him at high risk for having contracted human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, which causes AIDS. Immediately after Pitts was injured, doctors recommended that she begin taking anti-AIDS medications, pending the outcome of tests for HIV on her and her patient. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that health care workers who are exposed as was Pitts should begin the anti-AIDS treatments within hours of the needle stick. The tests for HIV, and in Pitts' case, hepatitis, also should be done immediately. Test results for Pitts and Doe would not be available to them for about six months. On Nov. 5, Pitts filed a petition in Common Pleas Court asking that the patient be ordered to submit to the tests. Borwegen and officials at Mercy Hospital said they are equally concerned about the patient's confidentiality. Usually, he said, at-risk patients are enthusiastic about being tested after a health care worker is exposed to their bodily fluids in a way that could cause infection. " It's incredible that someone could be so insensitive to the needs of the worker, " Borwegen said. K. Ross, spokeswoman for Mercy, said the hospital is concerned for Pitts' health. " The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh is ... appreciative that the court saw the importance in Ms. Pitts' request to compel the respondent to submit to appropriate testing, and to allow Ms. Pitts access to the test results within a timely manner, " Ross said in a written statement yesterday. " We ask the public to please keep Ms. Pitts, her family, and the patient in their thoughts and prayers. " Borwegen said the union also is asking hospitals to invest in retractable needles that would minimize the threat of similar incidents. He said hospitals have resisted the change because the new needles are more costly. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Jim McKinnon can be reached at jmckinnon@... or 412-263-1939.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.