Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 In a message dated 6/17/04 1:46:08 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > > " If [GSK] were sensible, they would sit > down and go, " We don't accept any legal liability but we recognise > that we could improve the information that we give to the patient > and the doctor. " > Did he REALLY say THAT??? No legal liability? Is this bugger out of his freaking mind? Paxil was originally registered as a hypnotic by Boehringer Ingelheim in 1980 -- so how the hell did it go from being a hypnotic to being an anti-depressant? And it's derived from phenylpiperidine, which in itself is suspect, given that the only other drugs that are derived from or contain this substance are narcotics. GSK clearly LIED and defrauded the public, they knowingly tricked ALL OF US into taking this god-awful rat poison and now some shyster lawyer doesn't think they should admit liability? Seeeeeeee, what did I tell you? It's all one great big nest of snakes, and the only people who will come out on top are the lawyers, as usual. GSK's lawyers get paid whether they win or lose. And who knows how many brown bags full of cash are going to be dropped on doorsteps in the middle of the night to get the mad-as-hell plaintiffs to take itty bitty settlements for their trouble? YUK! I think I'm going to be sick. Mr. Harvey needs to take a double dose of Paxhell and then he'll be changing his tune. Blind Reason a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. - Oriental proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 In a message dated 6/17/04 1:46:08 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > > " If [GSK] were sensible, they would sit > down and go, " We don't accept any legal liability but we recognise > that we could improve the information that we give to the patient > and the doctor. " > Did he REALLY say THAT??? No legal liability? Is this bugger out of his freaking mind? Paxil was originally registered as a hypnotic by Boehringer Ingelheim in 1980 -- so how the hell did it go from being a hypnotic to being an anti-depressant? And it's derived from phenylpiperidine, which in itself is suspect, given that the only other drugs that are derived from or contain this substance are narcotics. GSK clearly LIED and defrauded the public, they knowingly tricked ALL OF US into taking this god-awful rat poison and now some shyster lawyer doesn't think they should admit liability? Seeeeeeee, what did I tell you? It's all one great big nest of snakes, and the only people who will come out on top are the lawyers, as usual. GSK's lawyers get paid whether they win or lose. And who knows how many brown bags full of cash are going to be dropped on doorsteps in the middle of the night to get the mad-as-hell plaintiffs to take itty bitty settlements for their trouble? YUK! I think I'm going to be sick. Mr. Harvey needs to take a double dose of Paxhell and then he'll be changing his tune. Blind Reason a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. - Oriental proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 In a message dated 6/17/04 1:46:08 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > > " If [GSK] were sensible, they would sit > down and go, " We don't accept any legal liability but we recognise > that we could improve the information that we give to the patient > and the doctor. " > Did he REALLY say THAT??? No legal liability? Is this bugger out of his freaking mind? Paxil was originally registered as a hypnotic by Boehringer Ingelheim in 1980 -- so how the hell did it go from being a hypnotic to being an anti-depressant? And it's derived from phenylpiperidine, which in itself is suspect, given that the only other drugs that are derived from or contain this substance are narcotics. GSK clearly LIED and defrauded the public, they knowingly tricked ALL OF US into taking this god-awful rat poison and now some shyster lawyer doesn't think they should admit liability? Seeeeeeee, what did I tell you? It's all one great big nest of snakes, and the only people who will come out on top are the lawyers, as usual. GSK's lawyers get paid whether they win or lose. And who knows how many brown bags full of cash are going to be dropped on doorsteps in the middle of the night to get the mad-as-hell plaintiffs to take itty bitty settlements for their trouble? YUK! I think I'm going to be sick. Mr. Harvey needs to take a double dose of Paxhell and then he'll be changing his tune. Blind Reason a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. - Oriental proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 In a message dated 6/17/04 1:46:08 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > > " If [GSK] were sensible, they would sit > down and go, " We don't accept any legal liability but we recognise > that we could improve the information that we give to the patient > and the doctor. " > Did he REALLY say THAT??? No legal liability? Is this bugger out of his freaking mind? Paxil was originally registered as a hypnotic by Boehringer Ingelheim in 1980 -- so how the hell did it go from being a hypnotic to being an anti-depressant? And it's derived from phenylpiperidine, which in itself is suspect, given that the only other drugs that are derived from or contain this substance are narcotics. GSK clearly LIED and defrauded the public, they knowingly tricked ALL OF US into taking this god-awful rat poison and now some shyster lawyer doesn't think they should admit liability? Seeeeeeee, what did I tell you? It's all one great big nest of snakes, and the only people who will come out on top are the lawyers, as usual. GSK's lawyers get paid whether they win or lose. And who knows how many brown bags full of cash are going to be dropped on doorsteps in the middle of the night to get the mad-as-hell plaintiffs to take itty bitty settlements for their trouble? YUK! I think I'm going to be sick. Mr. Harvey needs to take a double dose of Paxhell and then he'll be changing his tune. Blind Reason a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. - Oriental proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.