Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 [Power Hour II] Patients fill Vioxx vacancy Doctors debate value of other treatments http://www.news-journalonline.com/cgi-bin/printme.asp Originally appeared on News-Journal Online at http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/News/Local/03AreaEAST0110170\ 4.htm | Patients fill Vioxx vacancy Doctors debate value of other treatments By RAY WEISS Staff Writer Last update: October 17, 2004 Frey doesn't know what's worse, the pain or the uncertainty. Like millions of arthritis sufferers, she was a long-time user of Vioxx, the popular painkiller that was pulled from the market two weeks ago because of an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. On her doctor's recommendation, Frey, 57, switched in February from Vioxx to Bextra, another in a family of anti-inflammatory drugs that also includes Celebrex. Now she wonders if Bextra is safe. Did you know? Just as a promising new drug can send a stock price soaring, a recall or negative findings in a study can devastate a pharmaceutical company's outlook, especially if the product represents a large part of the company's revenue. Here are three examples of once-popular drugs that fell out of favor: · Lipobay/Baycol, distributed by Bayer, muscle discomfort linked to at least 40 deaths worldwide. The drug represented a 2 percent share of Bayer's total revenue. The company's stock dropped 20 percent in one month after the medication was pulled from shelves in August 2001. · Prempro, manufactured by Wyeth, connected to cancer, strokes and heart attacks. The medication was halted from distribution in July 2002, resulting in a 15 percent stock drop. It had represented 15 percent of Wyeth's sales. · Vioxx, manufactured by Merck, garnered 11 percent of the company's total revenue. Within two days of the September announcement it was being pulled, Merck's stock took a 26 percent drop. SOURCES: The companies, Telerate and The Associated Press For refunds Vioxx users can get reimbursed for unused medication. For refunds, Merck and Co., the manufacturer, is asking users to mail back the unused drug in the original container, along with a pharmacy receipt, to: NNC Group, Merck Returns, 2670 Executive Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46241. A note with the patient's name, address and phone number should be included. The company will reimburse the cost of the full prescription plus regular shipping. More instructions and information are available on the Internet at www.vioxx.com and www.merck.com or by calling (888) 368-4699. Doctors are being asked to send back samples, and pharmacists will be contacted by Merck representatives on returning unsold inventory. SOURCE: The Associated Press " I'm so worried. I'm afraid to take it, " she said, given her family's history of heart disease. " I'm sure in a few weeks, they'll say it's not good either. " Frey decided not to take any kind of -2 inhibitor after the Vioxx announcement on Sept. 30 by the manufacturer, Merck & Co. " But every bone in my body hurt. So I went back on it yesterday, a half dose, " she said of Bextra. " It's a question of pain or this: health concerns. " The Food and Drug Administration approved Vioxx in 1999 to help reduce pain and inflammation caused by osteoarthritis. A current long-term Vioxx study by Merck into the drug's colon cancer-prevention qualities backfired, revealing what past studies also showed -- an increased risk of heart attack or stroke. The FDA in 2002 required that Vioxx labels listed that information. Dr. Fulton, a Daytona Beach orthopedist, said he doesn't recommend the long-term use of any of the -2 inhibitors, prescribing them usually for no more than 10 days. " We work more with exercise intervention, " he said. " We use them as an aid to get back to exercising. " Dr. Offenberg, an Ormond Beach rheumatologist, said he was not a fan of Vioxx, given the medical concerns that arose from past studies. " We just didn't know why, and it's still unclear, " he said. " But this news was not new. It was not a major surprise. " Offenberg said only about 3 percent of his patients were taking Vioxx, usually arthritis sufferers who had been placed on the drug by another doctor and were doing well. He said studies of Celebrex and Bextra, which differed from Vioxx in how they were conducted, did not reveal any heart risk. " It's probably unlikely they'll be taken off the market, " he said. But until the FDA does a controlled study of all -2 inhibitors, Offenberg said the question remains " if it's a one-drug problem or a class problem. " For that reason, the doctor said he prefers prescribing a variety of effective generic drugs for most of his arthritis patients. Those drugs might be harder on the stomach, but he said they are easier on the pocketbook, costing up to three times less than Vioxx. Randy Margrave, a clinical pharmacist at Holly Hill Pharmacy, has a different take on the safety of Vioxx and other -2 inhibitors. He said the earlier drugs of choice for many arthritis sufferers, which included aspirin and ibuprofen, benefited the heart, thinning the blood. Vioxx didn't. " It's not because of the drug, " he said of heart problems being attributed to Vioxx. " It's because of the protection they got from aspirin. If people took a baby aspirin with Vioxx, the studies would never have been skewed. " Meanwhile, 53-year-old Cheryl Gurley, a registered nurse from Flagler Beach, is feeling the pain. " I want my Vioxx back and I want it now, " she said, laughing. Bextra and Advil don't provide the same relief for the arthritis in her hands, neck and lower back. And while older people might be at risk, she says her heart wasn't damaged by Vioxx. " It was a really good medicine for me, " Gurley said. " I still have 10 left. I'm so tempted. " ray.weiss@... .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 [Power Hour II] Patients fill Vioxx vacancy Doctors debate value of other treatments http://www.news-journalonline.com/cgi-bin/printme.asp Originally appeared on News-Journal Online at http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/News/Local/03AreaEAST0110170\ 4.htm | Patients fill Vioxx vacancy Doctors debate value of other treatments By RAY WEISS Staff Writer Last update: October 17, 2004 Frey doesn't know what's worse, the pain or the uncertainty. Like millions of arthritis sufferers, she was a long-time user of Vioxx, the popular painkiller that was pulled from the market two weeks ago because of an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. On her doctor's recommendation, Frey, 57, switched in February from Vioxx to Bextra, another in a family of anti-inflammatory drugs that also includes Celebrex. Now she wonders if Bextra is safe. Did you know? Just as a promising new drug can send a stock price soaring, a recall or negative findings in a study can devastate a pharmaceutical company's outlook, especially if the product represents a large part of the company's revenue. Here are three examples of once-popular drugs that fell out of favor: · Lipobay/Baycol, distributed by Bayer, muscle discomfort linked to at least 40 deaths worldwide. The drug represented a 2 percent share of Bayer's total revenue. The company's stock dropped 20 percent in one month after the medication was pulled from shelves in August 2001. · Prempro, manufactured by Wyeth, connected to cancer, strokes and heart attacks. The medication was halted from distribution in July 2002, resulting in a 15 percent stock drop. It had represented 15 percent of Wyeth's sales. · Vioxx, manufactured by Merck, garnered 11 percent of the company's total revenue. Within two days of the September announcement it was being pulled, Merck's stock took a 26 percent drop. SOURCES: The companies, Telerate and The Associated Press For refunds Vioxx users can get reimbursed for unused medication. For refunds, Merck and Co., the manufacturer, is asking users to mail back the unused drug in the original container, along with a pharmacy receipt, to: NNC Group, Merck Returns, 2670 Executive Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46241. A note with the patient's name, address and phone number should be included. The company will reimburse the cost of the full prescription plus regular shipping. More instructions and information are available on the Internet at www.vioxx.com and www.merck.com or by calling (888) 368-4699. Doctors are being asked to send back samples, and pharmacists will be contacted by Merck representatives on returning unsold inventory. SOURCE: The Associated Press " I'm so worried. I'm afraid to take it, " she said, given her family's history of heart disease. " I'm sure in a few weeks, they'll say it's not good either. " Frey decided not to take any kind of -2 inhibitor after the Vioxx announcement on Sept. 30 by the manufacturer, Merck & Co. " But every bone in my body hurt. So I went back on it yesterday, a half dose, " she said of Bextra. " It's a question of pain or this: health concerns. " The Food and Drug Administration approved Vioxx in 1999 to help reduce pain and inflammation caused by osteoarthritis. A current long-term Vioxx study by Merck into the drug's colon cancer-prevention qualities backfired, revealing what past studies also showed -- an increased risk of heart attack or stroke. The FDA in 2002 required that Vioxx labels listed that information. Dr. Fulton, a Daytona Beach orthopedist, said he doesn't recommend the long-term use of any of the -2 inhibitors, prescribing them usually for no more than 10 days. " We work more with exercise intervention, " he said. " We use them as an aid to get back to exercising. " Dr. Offenberg, an Ormond Beach rheumatologist, said he was not a fan of Vioxx, given the medical concerns that arose from past studies. " We just didn't know why, and it's still unclear, " he said. " But this news was not new. It was not a major surprise. " Offenberg said only about 3 percent of his patients were taking Vioxx, usually arthritis sufferers who had been placed on the drug by another doctor and were doing well. He said studies of Celebrex and Bextra, which differed from Vioxx in how they were conducted, did not reveal any heart risk. " It's probably unlikely they'll be taken off the market, " he said. But until the FDA does a controlled study of all -2 inhibitors, Offenberg said the question remains " if it's a one-drug problem or a class problem. " For that reason, the doctor said he prefers prescribing a variety of effective generic drugs for most of his arthritis patients. Those drugs might be harder on the stomach, but he said they are easier on the pocketbook, costing up to three times less than Vioxx. Randy Margrave, a clinical pharmacist at Holly Hill Pharmacy, has a different take on the safety of Vioxx and other -2 inhibitors. He said the earlier drugs of choice for many arthritis sufferers, which included aspirin and ibuprofen, benefited the heart, thinning the blood. Vioxx didn't. " It's not because of the drug, " he said of heart problems being attributed to Vioxx. " It's because of the protection they got from aspirin. If people took a baby aspirin with Vioxx, the studies would never have been skewed. " Meanwhile, 53-year-old Cheryl Gurley, a registered nurse from Flagler Beach, is feeling the pain. " I want my Vioxx back and I want it now, " she said, laughing. Bextra and Advil don't provide the same relief for the arthritis in her hands, neck and lower back. And while older people might be at risk, she says her heart wasn't damaged by Vioxx. " It was a really good medicine for me, " Gurley said. " I still have 10 left. I'm so tempted. " ray.weiss@... .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 [Power Hour II] Patients fill Vioxx vacancy Doctors debate value of other treatments http://www.news-journalonline.com/cgi-bin/printme.asp Originally appeared on News-Journal Online at http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/News/Local/03AreaEAST0110170\ 4.htm | Patients fill Vioxx vacancy Doctors debate value of other treatments By RAY WEISS Staff Writer Last update: October 17, 2004 Frey doesn't know what's worse, the pain or the uncertainty. Like millions of arthritis sufferers, she was a long-time user of Vioxx, the popular painkiller that was pulled from the market two weeks ago because of an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. On her doctor's recommendation, Frey, 57, switched in February from Vioxx to Bextra, another in a family of anti-inflammatory drugs that also includes Celebrex. Now she wonders if Bextra is safe. Did you know? Just as a promising new drug can send a stock price soaring, a recall or negative findings in a study can devastate a pharmaceutical company's outlook, especially if the product represents a large part of the company's revenue. Here are three examples of once-popular drugs that fell out of favor: · Lipobay/Baycol, distributed by Bayer, muscle discomfort linked to at least 40 deaths worldwide. The drug represented a 2 percent share of Bayer's total revenue. The company's stock dropped 20 percent in one month after the medication was pulled from shelves in August 2001. · Prempro, manufactured by Wyeth, connected to cancer, strokes and heart attacks. The medication was halted from distribution in July 2002, resulting in a 15 percent stock drop. It had represented 15 percent of Wyeth's sales. · Vioxx, manufactured by Merck, garnered 11 percent of the company's total revenue. Within two days of the September announcement it was being pulled, Merck's stock took a 26 percent drop. SOURCES: The companies, Telerate and The Associated Press For refunds Vioxx users can get reimbursed for unused medication. For refunds, Merck and Co., the manufacturer, is asking users to mail back the unused drug in the original container, along with a pharmacy receipt, to: NNC Group, Merck Returns, 2670 Executive Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46241. A note with the patient's name, address and phone number should be included. The company will reimburse the cost of the full prescription plus regular shipping. More instructions and information are available on the Internet at www.vioxx.com and www.merck.com or by calling (888) 368-4699. Doctors are being asked to send back samples, and pharmacists will be contacted by Merck representatives on returning unsold inventory. SOURCE: The Associated Press " I'm so worried. I'm afraid to take it, " she said, given her family's history of heart disease. " I'm sure in a few weeks, they'll say it's not good either. " Frey decided not to take any kind of -2 inhibitor after the Vioxx announcement on Sept. 30 by the manufacturer, Merck & Co. " But every bone in my body hurt. So I went back on it yesterday, a half dose, " she said of Bextra. " It's a question of pain or this: health concerns. " The Food and Drug Administration approved Vioxx in 1999 to help reduce pain and inflammation caused by osteoarthritis. A current long-term Vioxx study by Merck into the drug's colon cancer-prevention qualities backfired, revealing what past studies also showed -- an increased risk of heart attack or stroke. The FDA in 2002 required that Vioxx labels listed that information. Dr. Fulton, a Daytona Beach orthopedist, said he doesn't recommend the long-term use of any of the -2 inhibitors, prescribing them usually for no more than 10 days. " We work more with exercise intervention, " he said. " We use them as an aid to get back to exercising. " Dr. Offenberg, an Ormond Beach rheumatologist, said he was not a fan of Vioxx, given the medical concerns that arose from past studies. " We just didn't know why, and it's still unclear, " he said. " But this news was not new. It was not a major surprise. " Offenberg said only about 3 percent of his patients were taking Vioxx, usually arthritis sufferers who had been placed on the drug by another doctor and were doing well. He said studies of Celebrex and Bextra, which differed from Vioxx in how they were conducted, did not reveal any heart risk. " It's probably unlikely they'll be taken off the market, " he said. But until the FDA does a controlled study of all -2 inhibitors, Offenberg said the question remains " if it's a one-drug problem or a class problem. " For that reason, the doctor said he prefers prescribing a variety of effective generic drugs for most of his arthritis patients. Those drugs might be harder on the stomach, but he said they are easier on the pocketbook, costing up to three times less than Vioxx. Randy Margrave, a clinical pharmacist at Holly Hill Pharmacy, has a different take on the safety of Vioxx and other -2 inhibitors. He said the earlier drugs of choice for many arthritis sufferers, which included aspirin and ibuprofen, benefited the heart, thinning the blood. Vioxx didn't. " It's not because of the drug, " he said of heart problems being attributed to Vioxx. " It's because of the protection they got from aspirin. If people took a baby aspirin with Vioxx, the studies would never have been skewed. " Meanwhile, 53-year-old Cheryl Gurley, a registered nurse from Flagler Beach, is feeling the pain. " I want my Vioxx back and I want it now, " she said, laughing. Bextra and Advil don't provide the same relief for the arthritis in her hands, neck and lower back. And while older people might be at risk, she says her heart wasn't damaged by Vioxx. " It was a really good medicine for me, " Gurley said. " I still have 10 left. I'm so tempted. " ray.weiss@... .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 [Power Hour II] Patients fill Vioxx vacancy Doctors debate value of other treatments http://www.news-journalonline.com/cgi-bin/printme.asp Originally appeared on News-Journal Online at http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/News/Local/03AreaEAST0110170\ 4.htm | Patients fill Vioxx vacancy Doctors debate value of other treatments By RAY WEISS Staff Writer Last update: October 17, 2004 Frey doesn't know what's worse, the pain or the uncertainty. Like millions of arthritis sufferers, she was a long-time user of Vioxx, the popular painkiller that was pulled from the market two weeks ago because of an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. On her doctor's recommendation, Frey, 57, switched in February from Vioxx to Bextra, another in a family of anti-inflammatory drugs that also includes Celebrex. Now she wonders if Bextra is safe. Did you know? Just as a promising new drug can send a stock price soaring, a recall or negative findings in a study can devastate a pharmaceutical company's outlook, especially if the product represents a large part of the company's revenue. Here are three examples of once-popular drugs that fell out of favor: · Lipobay/Baycol, distributed by Bayer, muscle discomfort linked to at least 40 deaths worldwide. The drug represented a 2 percent share of Bayer's total revenue. The company's stock dropped 20 percent in one month after the medication was pulled from shelves in August 2001. · Prempro, manufactured by Wyeth, connected to cancer, strokes and heart attacks. The medication was halted from distribution in July 2002, resulting in a 15 percent stock drop. It had represented 15 percent of Wyeth's sales. · Vioxx, manufactured by Merck, garnered 11 percent of the company's total revenue. Within two days of the September announcement it was being pulled, Merck's stock took a 26 percent drop. SOURCES: The companies, Telerate and The Associated Press For refunds Vioxx users can get reimbursed for unused medication. For refunds, Merck and Co., the manufacturer, is asking users to mail back the unused drug in the original container, along with a pharmacy receipt, to: NNC Group, Merck Returns, 2670 Executive Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46241. A note with the patient's name, address and phone number should be included. The company will reimburse the cost of the full prescription plus regular shipping. More instructions and information are available on the Internet at www.vioxx.com and www.merck.com or by calling (888) 368-4699. Doctors are being asked to send back samples, and pharmacists will be contacted by Merck representatives on returning unsold inventory. SOURCE: The Associated Press " I'm so worried. I'm afraid to take it, " she said, given her family's history of heart disease. " I'm sure in a few weeks, they'll say it's not good either. " Frey decided not to take any kind of -2 inhibitor after the Vioxx announcement on Sept. 30 by the manufacturer, Merck & Co. " But every bone in my body hurt. So I went back on it yesterday, a half dose, " she said of Bextra. " It's a question of pain or this: health concerns. " The Food and Drug Administration approved Vioxx in 1999 to help reduce pain and inflammation caused by osteoarthritis. A current long-term Vioxx study by Merck into the drug's colon cancer-prevention qualities backfired, revealing what past studies also showed -- an increased risk of heart attack or stroke. The FDA in 2002 required that Vioxx labels listed that information. Dr. Fulton, a Daytona Beach orthopedist, said he doesn't recommend the long-term use of any of the -2 inhibitors, prescribing them usually for no more than 10 days. " We work more with exercise intervention, " he said. " We use them as an aid to get back to exercising. " Dr. Offenberg, an Ormond Beach rheumatologist, said he was not a fan of Vioxx, given the medical concerns that arose from past studies. " We just didn't know why, and it's still unclear, " he said. " But this news was not new. It was not a major surprise. " Offenberg said only about 3 percent of his patients were taking Vioxx, usually arthritis sufferers who had been placed on the drug by another doctor and were doing well. He said studies of Celebrex and Bextra, which differed from Vioxx in how they were conducted, did not reveal any heart risk. " It's probably unlikely they'll be taken off the market, " he said. But until the FDA does a controlled study of all -2 inhibitors, Offenberg said the question remains " if it's a one-drug problem or a class problem. " For that reason, the doctor said he prefers prescribing a variety of effective generic drugs for most of his arthritis patients. Those drugs might be harder on the stomach, but he said they are easier on the pocketbook, costing up to three times less than Vioxx. Randy Margrave, a clinical pharmacist at Holly Hill Pharmacy, has a different take on the safety of Vioxx and other -2 inhibitors. He said the earlier drugs of choice for many arthritis sufferers, which included aspirin and ibuprofen, benefited the heart, thinning the blood. Vioxx didn't. " It's not because of the drug, " he said of heart problems being attributed to Vioxx. " It's because of the protection they got from aspirin. If people took a baby aspirin with Vioxx, the studies would never have been skewed. " Meanwhile, 53-year-old Cheryl Gurley, a registered nurse from Flagler Beach, is feeling the pain. " I want my Vioxx back and I want it now, " she said, laughing. Bextra and Advil don't provide the same relief for the arthritis in her hands, neck and lower back. And while older people might be at risk, she says her heart wasn't damaged by Vioxx. " It was a really good medicine for me, " Gurley said. " I still have 10 left. I'm so tempted. " ray.weiss@... .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.