Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 This is not right. The density is the key factor not the current used. 7.7 microamps per sq mm was used to inactivate HIV 93% in three minutes. That is pretty darned fast, too fast for the body. If you put 7.7 microamps into a square inch of skin, you would get: 7.7 x 625 mm/sq inch = 4.8mA on the square inch to produce the effect they did. We use milder current than that, since we aren't interested in reducing it in 3 minutes. You can do math, so I just point out that current density, not total current, is what you should examine as a starting point. The rest will follow. On typical skin using an electrode of almost any size, the max current we find tolerable is about .2mA - .5mA. Any higher and you run the risk of damage to skin. Some people are even more sensitive than that. bG > > >> I chose 0.02 volt & 0.0001 amp for volts/amps because this was used > in the Einstein college study per the " files " section here. The amps > used was 0.0001 amps or 100 microamps and the 0.02 volts was not > mentioned in the study. I calculated the 0.02 volts from the equation: > > volt = amp x ohm > volt = 0.0001 amp x 200 ohm resistance of wet hands > volt = 0.02 volts > > Does this sound OK? > > Thanks for your help, > LM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Hi, You mentioned that 0.2 milliamps is the max current. Well, I was only going to use 0.0001 amps This is only 0.1 milliamps, which is well within the maximum that you suggested. However, this wasn't my question. My question was is the single AA battery setup with 11,800 ohms resistance O.K.? I'm not sure if this setup will give 0.1 milliamps at 0.02 volts. Also, you said that 3-6 minutes is not enough time for treatment. What is the proper time for treatment? Also, is the placement of electrodes that I'm going to use correct? One on the wrist and one just below the elbow on the side of the arm in common with the wrist. Thanks, LM. > > > > > >> I chose 0.02 volt & 0.0001 amp for volts/amps because this was > used > > in the Einstein college study per the " files " section here. The > amps > > used was 0.0001 amps or 100 microamps and the 0.02 volts was not > > mentioned in the study. I calculated the 0.02 volts from the > equation: > > > > volt = amp x ohm > > volt = 0.0001 amp x 200 ohm resistance of wet hands > > volt = 0.02 volts > > > > Does this sound OK? > > > > Thanks for your help, > > LM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 When I tried this, I found 1.5 volt battery didn't work, the current was much too low. 2 AA's, either. you need 4-6 volts to kick it off. It's quicker and easier to try this than to prove it on paper. you can do the math to figure out the current for treatment based on the square area, time and current. connect your meter and measure it, you will see. > > > > > > > > >> I chose 0.02 volt & 0.0001 amp for volts/amps because this was > > used > > > in the Einstein college study per the " files " section here. The > > amps > > > used was 0.0001 amps or 100 microamps and the 0.02 volts was not > > > mentioned in the study. I calculated the 0.02 volts from the > > equation: > > > > > > volt = amp x ohm > > > volt = 0.0001 amp x 200 ohm resistance of wet hands > > > volt = 0.02 volts > > > > > > Does this sound OK? > > > > > > Thanks for your help, > > > LM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Dear latigerlilly: The data that you found is incorrect. Even with conductive paste and abrading the skin, it is difficult to get the skin resistance below 10,000 ohms. Also the skin resistance varies widely as related to stress and the activity of the sympathetic nervous system. A deeply relaxed person such as in a meditative state will have several meg ohms of skin resistance. Yet someone who is highly stressed, will have cold wet hands which is mainly salt water and therefore very conductive. Using a high voltage and a large value current limiting resistor provides a quasi current source that can accommodate variations in load resistance. As a person becomes healthy, their skin resistance will increase and more voltage will appear on the skin interface. As the voltage becomes larger than 1 or 2 volts, itching and burning will make it very uncomfortable. It may be desirable to include a voltage limiting clamp in the circuit to reduce this effect. Jim Meissner www.MeissnerResearch.com EnergyPulser Re: Single AA battery Godzilla? Hi, You mentioned that 0.2 milliamps is the max current. Well, I was only going to use 0.0001 amps This is only 0.1 milliamps, which is well within the maximum that you suggested. However, this wasn't my question. My question was is the single AA battery setup with 11,800 ohms resistance O.K.? I'm not sure if this setup will give 0.1 milliamps at 0.02 volts. Also, you said that 3-6 minutes is not enough time for treatment. What is the proper time for treatment? Also, is the placement of electrodes that I'm going to use correct? One on the wrist and one just below the elbow on the side of the arm in common with the wrist. Thanks, LM. > > > > > >> I chose 0.02 volt & 0.0001 amp for volts/amps because this was > used > > in the Einstein college study per the " files " section here. The > amps > > used was 0.0001 amps or 100 microamps and the 0.02 volts was not > > mentioned in the study. I calculated the 0.02 volts from the > equation: > > > > volt = amp x ohm > > volt = 0.0001 amp x 200 ohm resistance of wet hands > > volt = 0.02 volts > > > > Does this sound OK? > > > > Thanks for your help, > > LM. The group's main page has a menu to the left, with photos of Godzilla devices and info. This is a discussion, free speech forum, not medical advice. All info is free to members. Membership is free, but by joing, you agree to hold harmless the posters, including moderator, from damages from anything you find here whether jointly, severally, or individually. We are interested in your results, but cannot say anything about repeatability, or whether this might have medical benefits. Thanks, for your understanding, good luck researching. --bG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.