Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 I read the file on the difference between the different zappers. I've been wondering what the different settings on it are. Like the Beck setting, I had assumed this would be the same as the Beck device. Perhaps we can add this info to the Files. Thanks, Alice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2010 Report Share Posted September 6, 2010 Hi, Bob the length will not matter, 7 feet is just fine, or 70 feet, no real difference there. no, cutting some strands of the wire will not affect the flow. it could weaken the joint a bit so keep an eye it does not break off, but as long as even one strand is connected your results will be the same. it's not always ON. Only if the sponges touch or are both placed in contact with a common conductive material, like put onto a metal table, etc, will the battery drain. Otherwise if you keep them apart, even a simple as hanging them off a table so they don't touch, no current will flow..battery will last about the same as if you never used it. The current used in this is so small that the shelf life of the battery is the main determinant of its life. bG > > I've just finished making a Godzilla using a 6 volt lantern battery, 14g wire and cello sponges. My question is will the strength of the current be affected due to the length of wire I used... I used 7 feet of wire for each lead. Also, when splicing the end that attaches to the battery I cut some of the wires... will that affect the strength of the current as well? Final question... since this is always " on " how long will it last before the battery needs replacement... I assume it will be used for 10 minutes daily. Thanks! > > Bob > Re: Amount of current for wound healing/ERROR > > > > > > > 3 MILLIAMPS THEN 0.4 MICROAMPS not 0.4 milliamps.... > > > In a message dated 05-09-10 21:08:48 PM GMT Daylight Time, a57ngel@... writes: > > The Antioxidant Effects of Ultra-Low Microcurrents for healing wounds was produced with 3mA for 23 minutes and then the subsequent 8 treatments were with .4mA for 3 hours each time. > The web site for the pdf document is at > http://www.bodihealth.com/articles/Bok%27s%20Book%20chapter%20-%20FULL.pdf > > These levels of current may be a good guide for killing bacteria also. > > The amount used in this study of electrical current killing bacteria was .2mA - .4mA but that was in a glass vial. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 CHECK THIS HORSE WITH WOUND AND TREATMENT WITH PICS.USE INTERNET EXPLORER FOR PICS. Abstract A two-year old mare sustained a large wound from an injury. After one month of recalcitrant surgical and topical intervention, a course of therapy with a new form of electrical stimulation for healing was undertaken. Alpha-Stim® microcurrent electrical therapy (MET) was delivered around the wound site using pulsed, modified square waves of 100 microamperes at 0.5 Hz continuously around the clock for three weeks. The wound exhibited.... http://www.midwestmicrocurrent.com/currentresearch.htm In a message dated 07-09-10 19:23:49 PM GMT Daylight Time, bbanever@... writes: bG,Thanks so much. I forgot to mention this device is for a horse with an infection in it's jaw, the result of a tooth infection. I'll let the board know what happens. Thanks.Bob Re: Amount of current for wound healing/ERROR>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 MILLIAMPS THEN 0.4 MICROAMPS not 0.4 milliamps....>>>>>> In a message dated 05-09-10 21:08:48 PM GMT Daylight Time, a57ngel@... >> writes:>>>> The Antioxidant Effects of Ultra-Low Microcurrents for healing >> wounds was produced with 3mA for 23 minutes and then the subsequent 8 >> treatments were with .4mA for 3 hours each time.>> The web site for the pdf document is at>> >> http://www.bodihealth.com/articles/Bok%27s%20Book%20chapter%20-%20FULL.pdf>>>> These levels of current may be a good guide for killing >> bacteria also.>>>> The amount used in this study of electrical current killing >> bacteria was .2mA - .4mA but that was in a glass vial.>>>>>>> ------------------------------------>> FAQ (frequently asked questions)Please check the following before asking > questions that have already been answered. Our recorded answers are > likely to be better.>> HOW-T0 in PHOTOS menu group webpage.> SPECIFIC methods and TEST RESULTS in FILES menu group webpage>> At this point, our experiment is not a treatment substitute, so do not > abandon your normal medical care, or fail to seek competent medical > treatment from licensed practitioners. We are completely non-commercial. > By joining this group you agree to hold this group, including the > moderator, harmless for real or apparent mishaps or any damages stemming > from application (or misapplication) of the information. Results 8 years > of people using this are in our menu/files section. No serious side > effects have yet been reported, worst being mildly irriated skin from > overuse. But please use the information at your own risk. Our designs > aren't FDA approved or UL listed. TENS units delivering higher voltages > than our designs could ever deliver are already approved by FDA.> Best of luck, Baby_grand (bob luhrs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.