Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Body Balance, original concern

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

From reading all the posts, my main concern with this product has nothing to

do with its origins, be it by sea or by mine. The origins to me are a null

point...the ingredient list is a valid point of concern and I commend Mark for

raising it to our attention to be on the look out for ingredients that

potentially can cause more harm long term, even in miniscule amounts, especially

to a

child's developing brain, nervous system and body.

My concerns are if the product truly contains even small amounts of Aluminum,

Mercury, Arsenic and Cadmium. I definately wouldn't consciously use a product

that potentially has even trace amounts of mercury as my son & I are already

dealing with mercury toxicity.

I have reservations about this product and am leery when it is endorsed by

someone with a vested interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First thing, thanks for not bashing me for seeking an answer to my question.

Secondly, the elements found in the assay are organic, not inorganic, and are

found in nature, they are not " put in " as Mark had assumed.

Commend him all you want, but the fact is he lied about the product and his

research is the point, not mine or ocean, an outright lie is the point. Why I

guess, we will never know, since I have been trying for about 3 weeks now to

find out why. The mine in Emery Utah he mentioned makes Liquid Life not

BodyBalance, and the reason this is now brought up is because he said

BodyBalance was made in a mine in Utah (a lie). You are missing the point. How

can someone say they researched something, and come up with an absolutely wrong

answer, then not even have a care that they lied, and just shrug it off, like

it's a daily practice. I would think that if someone who does real research,

would re-examine their findings when someone tells them they are completely

wrong. That would be someone who really seeks the truth about a subject in

question! The reason for the overworked discussion about this is Mark will not

recant his testimony about his research, instead he just says " whatever " !

That's quite a scientific terminology isn't it? " whatever " It really

impresses me too! Don

---- Original Message -----

From: HollandLM@...

Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:12 PM

Subject: Re: [ ] Body Balance, original concern

From reading all the posts, my main concern with this product has nothing to

do with its origins, be it by sea or by mine. The origins to me are a null

point...the ingredient list is a valid point of concern and I commend Mark for

raising it to our attention to be on the look out for ingredients that

potentially can cause more harm long term, even in miniscule amounts,

especially to a

child's developing brain, nervous system and body.

My concerns are if the product truly contains even small amounts of Aluminum,

Mercury, Arsenic and Cadmium. I definately wouldn't consciously use a product

that potentially has even trace amounts of mercury as my son & I are already

dealing with mercury toxicity.

I have reservations about this product and am leery when it is endorsed by

someone with a vested interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don,

Mark may not be the only one who is skirting a question. So your

product comes by it's " mercury, arsenic, aluminum, antimony, and

lead " naturally... fish also come by some of these poisons naturally -

and we are smart to limit are intake of them - how does

the " natural " ness of these poisons make them helpful to children who

are the victims of seizures? Your co-hort who encouraged you to " get

these guys " (meaning Mark and myself) points out that these things

are " in nature " . Yes, this is true however everything that is in

nature is not good for you. Life Force International might have a

better product if they attempted to remove these elements from their

product.

For example, I have well water in my home - it is natural water from

a natural source, however I use a reverse osmosis unit to take out

the " organic " impurities.

Personally I think you are doing Body Balance more harm than Mark

could ever hope to accomplish by his alleged " lies " . A person full of

light and love might be better served to reveal a lie once for what

it is and let it vanish into it's native nothingness - this is all a

lie is anyway - nothing pretending to be something.

Body Balance, you, and all of us on this list would be better off if

you would realize that you have had your say. You have declared for

everyone here - all 300 and whatever number members there are left at

this point that you are quite certain that Mark purposefully lied.

Can we all agree that you have stated your case emphatically and

begin now the process of moving on? (Pretty please say, " Yes " !)

M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...