Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 From reading all the posts, my main concern with this product has nothing to do with its origins, be it by sea or by mine. The origins to me are a null point...the ingredient list is a valid point of concern and I commend Mark for raising it to our attention to be on the look out for ingredients that potentially can cause more harm long term, even in miniscule amounts, especially to a child's developing brain, nervous system and body. My concerns are if the product truly contains even small amounts of Aluminum, Mercury, Arsenic and Cadmium. I definately wouldn't consciously use a product that potentially has even trace amounts of mercury as my son & I are already dealing with mercury toxicity. I have reservations about this product and am leery when it is endorsed by someone with a vested interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 U go boy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 First thing, thanks for not bashing me for seeking an answer to my question. Secondly, the elements found in the assay are organic, not inorganic, and are found in nature, they are not " put in " as Mark had assumed. Commend him all you want, but the fact is he lied about the product and his research is the point, not mine or ocean, an outright lie is the point. Why I guess, we will never know, since I have been trying for about 3 weeks now to find out why. The mine in Emery Utah he mentioned makes Liquid Life not BodyBalance, and the reason this is now brought up is because he said BodyBalance was made in a mine in Utah (a lie). You are missing the point. How can someone say they researched something, and come up with an absolutely wrong answer, then not even have a care that they lied, and just shrug it off, like it's a daily practice. I would think that if someone who does real research, would re-examine their findings when someone tells them they are completely wrong. That would be someone who really seeks the truth about a subject in question! The reason for the overworked discussion about this is Mark will not recant his testimony about his research, instead he just says " whatever " ! That's quite a scientific terminology isn't it? " whatever " It really impresses me too! Don ---- Original Message ----- From: HollandLM@... Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:12 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Body Balance, original concern From reading all the posts, my main concern with this product has nothing to do with its origins, be it by sea or by mine. The origins to me are a null point...the ingredient list is a valid point of concern and I commend Mark for raising it to our attention to be on the look out for ingredients that potentially can cause more harm long term, even in miniscule amounts, especially to a child's developing brain, nervous system and body. My concerns are if the product truly contains even small amounts of Aluminum, Mercury, Arsenic and Cadmium. I definately wouldn't consciously use a product that potentially has even trace amounts of mercury as my son & I are already dealing with mercury toxicity. I have reservations about this product and am leery when it is endorsed by someone with a vested interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Don, Mark may not be the only one who is skirting a question. So your product comes by it's " mercury, arsenic, aluminum, antimony, and lead " naturally... fish also come by some of these poisons naturally - and we are smart to limit are intake of them - how does the " natural " ness of these poisons make them helpful to children who are the victims of seizures? Your co-hort who encouraged you to " get these guys " (meaning Mark and myself) points out that these things are " in nature " . Yes, this is true however everything that is in nature is not good for you. Life Force International might have a better product if they attempted to remove these elements from their product. For example, I have well water in my home - it is natural water from a natural source, however I use a reverse osmosis unit to take out the " organic " impurities. Personally I think you are doing Body Balance more harm than Mark could ever hope to accomplish by his alleged " lies " . A person full of light and love might be better served to reveal a lie once for what it is and let it vanish into it's native nothingness - this is all a lie is anyway - nothing pretending to be something. Body Balance, you, and all of us on this list would be better off if you would realize that you have had your say. You have declared for everyone here - all 300 and whatever number members there are left at this point that you are quite certain that Mark purposefully lied. Can we all agree that you have stated your case emphatically and begin now the process of moving on? (Pretty please say, " Yes " !) M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Somebody shout Amen! Ohhh, I just did! Amen! and thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.