Guest guest Posted March 8, 2001 Report Share Posted March 8, 2001 FYI Martha Murdock, Director National Silicone Implant Foundation Dallas, Texas Headquarters ----- Original Message ----- From: " Ilena Rose " <ilena@...> " Regush, Nick " <Nick.Regush@...> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 12:16 AM Subject: Extreme Science ~ ABC News Reporter Nicolas Regush > Bravo!!! > Bravo!!! > > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/living/SecondOpinion/secondopinion_115.html > > > > Extreme Science > > - Here's an idea for a let-it-all-hang-out network TV show that would make > the new XFL seem downright boring and tired. Let's simply call it " XS, " for > " Extreme Science. " > > > Mainstream scientists and doctors who cling to cherished beliefs about how > things work would be " screened " and " reviewed " by those on the outer edge > holding new and challenging views. This would be a no-mercy " debate, " > featuring any sort of name-calling and perhaps even kicking and screaming. > > XS would reveal how science is rife with the type of back-stabbing and > conflicts of interest that rule the manner in which so-called " knowledge " > is spread. > > Unlike in the daily world of science where the " Established View " dominates > and works tirelessly with duped media to censor the competition, those on > the outer edge of science would now have the full opportunity to present > their views and stir things up, without fear of immediate retaliation, such > as losing access to research funds and having their academic employment > terminated. > > Of course, those holding mainstream scientific views would also be > encouraged to feel guilt-free in publicly trashing the ideas of their > accusers. > > Each team would have an on-air support/research staff of near-naked > " assistants. " Armed guards would be on hand to prevent extra extreme > encounters. > > XS would focus on a single topic each week. Here are three " debates " that > would head my list: > > > WEEK 1: MAD COW DISEASE > > As fears about mad cow disease spread across continents, including North > America, scientists on the " outer edge " would love to take a strong public > poke at current theory about what causes the disease. > > The conventional wisdom is that the culprit is a rogue protein called a > " prion. " It has been found in brain tissue in people affected by the human > form of the disease. So? > > Have the prion researchers jumped the gun? Being there in tissue doesn't > necessarily mean it does anything. Some " outer edge " scientists think the > scientific world is becoming infused with prion nonsense. Some believe that > a microorganism, possibly bacteria, may trigger the disease process. Others > believe that certain toxic chemicals used in farming may contribute to a > prion attack. > > > Week 2: AIDS DRUGS > > Government scientists who have ferociously championed the prescription of > highly toxic AIDS cocktails to HIV-positive people with relatively intact > immune systems and no sign of symptoms would be " reviewed " by scientists > who have referred to this practice as lacking scientific basis, downright > stupid and, in some cases, murderous. > > The " debate " peg would be the recent flip-flop on AIDS treatments by the > government scientists who now claim that mostly only those whose immune > systems have been damaged should receive these drugs. The " outer edge " > scientists and doctors would hammer home questions to the government > scientists about the near half-decade of unnecessary suffering experienced > by many thousands of people due to the widespread hype surrounding the need > to prescribe these toxic drugs to anyone who solely turned up HIV-positive. > > I see this particular " debate " as possibly requiring an extra unit of armed > guards to prevent extreme hostilities, given the long history of tensions > surrounding this issue. > > WEEK 3: ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE > > Is Alzheimer's disease really triggered by insoluble lumps of amyloid > protein that accumulate on nerve cells in the brain? And does this > accumulation lead to the build-up of thread-like protein, referred to as > " tangles? " Well, that's the hallowed mainstream view that has dominated > research and funding for years. > > This " debate " would feature those well-funded mainstream scientists who > won't budge an iota on this issue. The " outer-edge " scientists and doctors > who have serious questions about this theory would " review " the > conventional science and also point to recent research, including a study > with chimps, gorillas and orangutans - that shows no signs of tangles in > the presence of amyloid deposits in the brain. Furthermore, a study with > 100 patients who died of dementia showed very few had brain plaques. > > Perhaps Alzheimer's causation needs some re-thinking. I'm sure the " debate " > would make this very plain to see. Possible flash points for highly > aggressive behavior on the set include any discussion of why Alzheimer's > drug treatments have mostly been a miserable failure. > > But the real danger of XS is not the possible blood that might be > occasionally spilled, even with tight security; rather, I predict that the > ultra-high ratings to be expected for XS will inevitably lead to mass > public confusion, which will translate into a lack of faith in science and > hence, public despair. > > That, however, could lead to spin-off educational re-programming aimed at > teaching the masses that scientific knowledge is actually forever changing > and that many new " outer-edge " ideas eventually blot out the old > established lines of thought and practice. > > In fact, there could even be a network spin-off that allows the public - > and scientists-to tell their stories of how they got sucker-punched by some > theories in science and then eventually recovered. > > The likelihood of an extreme science television show airing the views of > mavericks and the establishment in science is pretty small. Typically, > change in science takes a long time and it often occurs outside the > public's view. But many ideas, such as cloning, that were once thought > impossible or bizarre, actually get realized. This week, World News Tonight > takes a Closer Look at some of those concepts on the frontiers of medicine > in a three-part series called " Medicine On the Cutting Edge. " > > > Regush produces medical features for ABCNEWS. In his weekly > column, published Mondays, he looks at medical trouble spots, heralds > innovative achievements and analyzes health trends that may greatly > influence our lives. His latest book is The Virus Within. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2001 Report Share Posted March 13, 2001 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Ilena Rose " <ilena@...> " Regush, Nick " <Nick.Regush@...> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:16 PM Subject: Extreme Science ~ ABC News Reporter Nicolas Regush > Bravo!!! > Bravo!!! > > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/living/SecondOpinion/secondopinion_115.html > > > > Extreme Science > > - Here's an idea for a let-it-all-hang-out network TV show that would make > the new XFL seem downright boring and tired. Let's simply call it " XS, " for > " Extreme Science. " > > > Mainstream scientists and doctors who cling to cherished beliefs about how > things work would be " screened " and " reviewed " by those on the outer edge > holding new and challenging views. This would be a no-mercy " debate, " > featuring any sort of name-calling and perhaps even kicking and screaming. > > XS would reveal how science is rife with the type of back-stabbing and > conflicts of interest that rule the manner in which so-called " knowledge " > is spread. > > Unlike in the daily world of science where the " Established View " dominates > and works tirelessly with duped media to censor the competition, those on > the outer edge of science would now have the full opportunity to present > their views and stir things up, without fear of immediate retaliation, such > as losing access to research funds and having their academic employment > terminated. > > Of course, those holding mainstream scientific views would also be > encouraged to feel guilt-free in publicly trashing the ideas of their > accusers. > > Each team would have an on-air support/research staff of near-naked > " assistants. " Armed guards would be on hand to prevent extra extreme > encounters. > > XS would focus on a single topic each week. Here are three " debates " that > would head my list: > > > WEEK 1: MAD COW DISEASE > > As fears about mad cow disease spread across continents, including North > America, scientists on the " outer edge " would love to take a strong public > poke at current theory about what causes the disease. > > The conventional wisdom is that the culprit is a rogue protein called a > " prion. " It has been found in brain tissue in people affected by the human > form of the disease. So? > > Have the prion researchers jumped the gun? Being there in tissue doesn't > necessarily mean it does anything. Some " outer edge " scientists think the > scientific world is becoming infused with prion nonsense. Some believe that > a microorganism, possibly bacteria, may trigger the disease process. Others > believe that certain toxic chemicals used in farming may contribute to a > prion attack. > > > Week 2: AIDS DRUGS > > Government scientists who have ferociously championed the prescription of > highly toxic AIDS cocktails to HIV-positive people with relatively intact > immune systems and no sign of symptoms would be " reviewed " by scientists > who have referred to this practice as lacking scientific basis, downright > stupid and, in some cases, murderous. > > The " debate " peg would be the recent flip-flop on AIDS treatments by the > government scientists who now claim that mostly only those whose immune > systems have been damaged should receive these drugs. The " outer edge " > scientists and doctors would hammer home questions to the government > scientists about the near half-decade of unnecessary suffering experienced > by many thousands of people due to the widespread hype surrounding the need > to prescribe these toxic drugs to anyone who solely turned up HIV-positive. > > I see this particular " debate " as possibly requiring an extra unit of armed > guards to prevent extreme hostilities, given the long history of tensions > surrounding this issue. > > WEEK 3: ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE > > Is Alzheimer's disease really triggered by insoluble lumps of amyloid > protein that accumulate on nerve cells in the brain? And does this > accumulation lead to the build-up of thread-like protein, referred to as > " tangles? " Well, that's the hallowed mainstream view that has dominated > research and funding for years. > > This " debate " would feature those well-funded mainstream scientists who > won't budge an iota on this issue. The " outer-edge " scientists and doctors > who have serious questions about this theory would " review " the > conventional science and also point to recent research, including a study > with chimps, gorillas and orangutans - that shows no signs of tangles in > the presence of amyloid deposits in the brain. Furthermore, a study with > 100 patients who died of dementia showed very few had brain plaques. > > Perhaps Alzheimer's causation needs some re-thinking. I'm sure the " debate " > would make this very plain to see. Possible flash points for highly > aggressive behavior on the set include any discussion of why Alzheimer's > drug treatments have mostly been a miserable failure. > > But the real danger of XS is not the possible blood that might be > occasionally spilled, even with tight security; rather, I predict that the > ultra-high ratings to be expected for XS will inevitably lead to mass > public confusion, which will translate into a lack of faith in science and > hence, public despair. > > That, however, could lead to spin-off educational re-programming aimed at > teaching the masses that scientific knowledge is actually forever changing > and that many new " outer-edge " ideas eventually blot out the old > established lines of thought and practice. > > In fact, there could even be a network spin-off that allows the public - > and scientists-to tell their stories of how they got sucker-punched by some > theories in science and then eventually recovered. > > The likelihood of an extreme science television show airing the views of > mavericks and the establishment in science is pretty small. Typically, > change in science takes a long time and it often occurs outside the > public's view. But many ideas, such as cloning, that were once thought > impossible or bizarre, actually get realized. This week, World News Tonight > takes a Closer Look at some of those concepts on the frontiers of medicine > in a three-part series called " Medicine On the Cutting Edge. " > > > Regush produces medical features for ABCNEWS. In his weekly > column, published Mondays, he looks at medical trouble spots, heralds > innovative achievements and analyzes health trends that may greatly > influence our lives. His latest book is The Virus Within. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.