Guest guest Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 > > So using that approach the people pushing Green Tea to cure cancer that have 100's of people improving on a diet including their product should get reimbursement..? Or maybe the use of laetrile in the past that was the next big thing in cancer along with the coffee enemas that were " proven' to cure cancer.? Of course there was the use of chymopapin in the treatment of bulging discs that was the next big thing until double blind studies proved it useless (except today as the main ingredient in a wound deriding enzyme).? The reason you use the double blind study is to prove the efficiency of your protocol or product. > > > Wayne McHowell, RN, BSN, ONC, CHRNA > Wayne, The scientific evidence has only been produced in 4 of the 13 UHMS indications, including decompression sickness. Source: UHMS Ethics Committee Report. Presented at the UHMS annual meeting in Boston, 1999. DF Freels http://www.davidfreels.com david@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.