Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 This is your personal opinion and no more than that. There isn't any transient soil borne microorganisms responsible to get candida in correct levels. The indegenous human strain colonies which are permanent residents in the gut are resposible to keep candida and other patoghens in a proper level. Lactobasillus and Bifidobacterias create lactic acid which keep the intestine ph slightly low (acid), specially in the small bowel, where the biggest lactobasillus concentration live. When you take prolonged o repited broad spectrum antibiotc rounds, this lactobasillus population decrese or is completely eliminated and the intestinal ph rise. When the intestinal ph become alkaline, candida turn on its genes to mutate to its fungal form. This event only ocurr when the ph rise. It is scientificly demostrated that candida lives in its yeast form in an acid ph, and mutate to its fungal form when the ph is alkaline. Unfurtunately, lactobasillus acidophilus colonies are in low numbers and are very sensitive to antibacterial agents , so when antibiotics destroy them, candida has all it needs to become invasive and fungal. The biggest part of the gut microbiota ecology is formed by bacteroides and bifidobacterias. Proper levels of lactic acid in the gut is which keep candida in an inoffensive state. Botton line, the best thing you can do after an intestinal candida overgrowth is to take candida to very low levels using antifungals and diet and TO FEED those permanent residents which were left alive by the antibiotics. If you are one of the lucky person who still has lactobasillus alive, then, they will multiply and become dominant again. This process needs time and discipline. > > That is all fine and dandy, but the soil borne microorganisms that have the ability to keep the candida in their correct parameters do not colonize. These transient SBO's are the major factor in the immune and health of the GI tract, in my opinion. Just concentrating on the feeding the colonizing microorganisms is not a good idea in the long term which can create an imbalance. Taking isolated elements to feed the microorganisms with out them being in their whole food form is not the way the body works. These methods are fine in short term therapeutic use, but long term use does create potential problems in the long term. > > Wil Spencer VMSP, Naturopath, author, researcher > Vibrational Medical Science Practitioner; working with the body's electrical system which consists of all muscles, connective tissue,nerve sheaths, rod and cone cells of the eyes and the DNA. > > " The doctor of the future will give no medicines, but will interest patients in the care of the human frame, in diet and in the cause and prevention of disease. " Edison > " Whether you believe you can do a thing or not, you are right. " Henry Ford > " Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow. It empties today of its strength. " Corrie Ten Boom > " Discovery consists of seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what no one else has thought. " Albert Szent-Gyvrgyi, Nobel Prize for Medicine 1937 > > http://mbsre-set.com > http://environotics.com > http://beeassist.com > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: dieguez.jorge <dieguez.jorge@...> > candidiasis > Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 11:23:52 PM > Subject: +Re: Prebiotics Other Than Inulin? > > > After my intensive research about candida, dysbiosis, gut microbiota, probiotics, gut ecology, and more... I have to say I totally agree with you Duncan. So far, there isn't any other SIMPLE way to " recover " the gut flora than feed those which were left alive allowing them to multiply and grow. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.