Guest guest Posted January 30, 2007 Report Share Posted January 30, 2007 Since I am new to the candida fighting scene, I've just started to experiment with recipes that contain sugar substitutes. Right now, I do not like stevia, the aftertaste is just too much. This weekend I plan on experimenting with vegetable glycerin. I am wondering what some of the other members' reactions have been to stevia and vegetable glycerin. I'm also curious as to the thoughts on xylitol as a suger substitute, and it's interactions with candida. Thank you! Nora Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2007 Report Share Posted January 30, 2007 Xylitol is great. Tastes just like sugar and does not cause any problems for candida sufferers. Gail > > Since I am new to the candida fighting scene, I've just started to > experiment with recipes that contain sugar substitutes. Right now, I do > not like stevia, the aftertaste is just too much. This weekend I plan > on experimenting with vegetable glycerin. I am wondering what some of > the other members' reactions have been to stevia and vegetable > glycerin. I'm also curious as to the thoughts on xylitol as a suger > substitute, and it's interactions with candida. Thank you! > > Nora > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2007 Report Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hi Nora, I have found the brand of stevia can be a factor. I use " stevita spoonable stevia " which is very affordable and sold by the pound and this for me doesn't have the aftertaste of others. You may want to sample a few brands beofre giving up..... Here is a description of potential problems with xylitol and other alcohol sugars from an article on sugar substitues from the Westonaprice website: " The ADA description hints at more than it actually says. Sugar alcohols are not broken down in the stomach, so they make their way intact into the bowels. It is here in the bowels that the " passive diffusion " mentioned by the ADA takes place, meaning that the presence of the sugar alcohols draws water into the bowels. This leads to the fermentation by undesirable bacteria and a resultant partial degradation or " metabolism " of the sugar alcohols. (This fermentation of intestinal bacteria can lead to or exacerbate problems with candida and other yeast problems.) The direct result of this chain of events is the severe stomach cramping and diarrhea that many people experience after ingesting too much sugar alcohol. So how much is too much? The above quotation lists the official, generally agreed upon thresholds for sorbitol and mannitol, but each sugar alcohol has its own threshold. However, certain individuals have been known to experience reactions at much lower dosages. Lactitol in particular may be problematic in small doses, especially for lactose-sensitive individuals.103,104 " Personally, I tried using alcohol sugars and each time got a massive stomach ache and painful gas so it doesn't work for me. Here is a link to this entire article entitled " Sugar-Free Blues " which covers quite a few options for sweetening without using candida-feeding sugars and which ones can be potentially dangerous: http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/sugarfree_blues.html This article also has a section on inulin and FOS and not only confirms what Duncan writes about but actually uses him as a reference. This is what got me to his website and this group and has helped my digestive health tremendously in a short time since I have implemented the suggested protocol. I hope this is of some help Nora. Rock > > Since I am new to the candida fighting scene, I've just started to > experiment with recipes that contain sugar substitutes. Right now, I do > not like stevia, the aftertaste is just too much. This weekend I plan > on experimenting with vegetable glycerin. I am wondering what some of > the other members' reactions have been to stevia and vegetable > glycerin. I'm also curious as to the thoughts on xylitol as a suger > substitute, and it's interactions with candida. Thank you! > > Nora > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2007 Report Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hi Nora, I have found the brand of stevia can be a factor. I use " stevita spoonable stevia " which is very affordable and sold by the pound and this for me doesn't have the aftertaste of others. You may want to sample a few brands beofre giving up..... Here is a description of potential problems with xylitol and other alcohol sugars from an article on sugar substitues from the Westonaprice website: " The ADA description hints at more than it actually says. Sugar alcohols are not broken down in the stomach, so they make their way intact into the bowels. It is here in the bowels that the " passive diffusion " mentioned by the ADA takes place, meaning that the presence of the sugar alcohols draws water into the bowels. This leads to the fermentation by undesirable bacteria and a resultant partial degradation or " metabolism " of the sugar alcohols. (This fermentation of intestinal bacteria can lead to or exacerbate problems with candida and other yeast problems.) The direct result of this chain of events is the severe stomach cramping and diarrhea that many people experience after ingesting too much sugar alcohol. So how much is too much? The above quotation lists the official, generally agreed upon thresholds for sorbitol and mannitol, but each sugar alcohol has its own threshold. However, certain individuals have been known to experience reactions at much lower dosages. Lactitol in particular may be problematic in small doses, especially for lactose-sensitive individuals.103,104 " Personally, I tried using alcohol sugars and each time got a massive stomach ache and painful gas so it doesn't work for me. Here is a link to this entire article entitled " Sugar-Free Blues " which covers quite a few options for sweetening without using candida-feeding sugars and which ones can be potentially dangerous: http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/sugarfree_blues.html This article also has a section on inulin and FOS and not only confirms what Duncan writes about but actually uses him as a reference. This is what got me to his website and this group and has helped my digestive health tremendously in a short time since I have implemented the suggested protocol. I hope this is of some help Nora. Rock > > Since I am new to the candida fighting scene, I've just started to > experiment with recipes that contain sugar substitutes. Right now, I do > not like stevia, the aftertaste is just too much. This weekend I plan > on experimenting with vegetable glycerin. I am wondering what some of > the other members' reactions have been to stevia and vegetable > glycerin. I'm also curious as to the thoughts on xylitol as a suger > substitute, and it's interactions with candida. Thank you! > > Nora > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2007 Report Share Posted January 31, 2007 We really like Stevia a lot so that's what we use the most. The flavored liquid stevias are a big hit here especially with the kids. From what I understand some brands are very bitter. That or you're using too much and need to use less. We've only just started using vegetable glycerin and we haven't tried xylitol yet. Debbie sweeteners for candida sufferers Since I am new to the candida fighting scene, I've just started to experiment with recipes that contain sugar substitutes. Right now, I do not like stevia, the aftertaste is just too much. This weekend I plan on experimenting with vegetable glycerin. I am wondering what some of the other members' reactions have been to stevia and vegetable glycerin. I'm also curious as to the thoughts on xylitol as a suger substitute, and it's interactions with candida. Thank you! Nora Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2007 Report Share Posted February 1, 2007 So are we looking here at the possibility that passing a lot of wind, at least, might be caused by xylitol? Has anyone experimented or found other research? I had accepted that xylitol was innocuous despite being made from birch trees - or are they making that from corn too, now? Rowena Here is a description of potential problems with xylitol and other alcohol sugars... " The ADA description hints at more than it actually says. Sugar alcohols are not broken down in the stomach, so they make their way intact into the bowels. ... " passive diffusion " ...the sugar alcohols draws water into the bowels. ....fermentation by undesirable bacteria and a resultant partial degradation or " metabolism " of the sugar alcohols. ... can lead to or exacerbate problems with candida and other yeast problems.) The ... severe stomach cramping and diarrhea ... each sugar alcohol has its own threshold.... Personally, I tried using alcohol sugars and each time got a massive stomach ache and painful gas so it doesn't work for me. ..: http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/sugarfree_blues.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2007 Report Share Posted February 1, 2007 Xylitol is almost definitely not the source of your gas problem. Although science has not tested every single bacteria and yeast, the ones tested can't use it. In the studies I saw there was very little fermentation even in a closed and optimized system. This will hold true for most of the alcohols and polyols, which are already waste products so appeal to very few life forms. Xylitol is made by natural fermentation of other substrates, for example xylose and lignin. I think when you look into the science behind the passage below there might be some specific sugar alcohols that undergo some bacterial degradation up to a point, but the dose-related threshold they refer to is rather high; at the doses we use of a tenth to 1/2 gram or so, there won't be a problem for most people. By comparison there's more than 1/2 gram of sugar in a carrot, and we know most bacteria can eat that Duncan > > So are we looking here at the possibility that passing a lot of wind, at > least, might be caused by xylitol? Has anyone experimented or found other > research? > I had accepted that xylitol was innocuous despite being made from birch > trees - or are they making that from corn too, now? > > Rowena > > Here is a description of potential problems with xylitol and other > alcohol sugars... " The ADA description hints at more than it actually says. > Sugar > alcohols are not broken down in the stomach, so they make their way > intact into the bowels. ... " passive > diffusion " ...the sugar alcohols draws water into the bowels. > ...fermentation by undesirable bacteria and a resultant > partial degradation or " metabolism " of the sugar alcohols. ... can lead to > or exacerbate > problems with candida and other yeast problems.) The ... severe stomach > cramping and diarrhea ... each > sugar alcohol has its own threshold.... > Personally, I tried using alcohol sugars and each time got a massive > stomach ache and painful gas so it doesn't work for me. > .: > > http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/sugarfree_blues.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2007 Report Share Posted February 1, 2007 A quick scan of the sugar-free blues article by Jim Earles turned up numerous errors. I doubt I found them all so I'd advise caution. Duncan > > > > So are we looking here at the possibility that passing a lot of > wind, at > > least, might be caused by xylitol? Has anyone experimented or > found other > > research? > > I had accepted that xylitol was innocuous despite being made from > birch > > trees - or are they making that from corn too, now? > > > > Rowena > > > > Here is a description of potential problems with xylitol and other > > alcohol sugars... " The ADA description hints at more than it > actually says. > > Sugar > > alcohols are not broken down in the stomach, so they make their way > > intact into the bowels. ... " passive > > diffusion " ...the sugar alcohols draws water into the bowels. > > ...fermentation by undesirable bacteria and a resultant > > partial degradation or " metabolism " of the sugar alcohols. ... can > lead to > > or exacerbate > > problems with candida and other yeast problems.) The ... severe > stomach > > cramping and diarrhea ... each > > sugar alcohol has its own threshold.... > > Personally, I tried using alcohol sugars and each time got a massive > > stomach ache and painful gas so it doesn't work for me. > > .: > > > > http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/sugarfree_blues.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2007 Report Share Posted February 1, 2007 OK, what it amounts to that I caught in the sugar blues article was: The use of Mercola's Splenda innuendo, which is based on Betty i's innuendo and backed with the same lack of data; using CSPI's innuendo, which no doubt originates from the special-interest groups (agendists) the organization is associated with, on I think Splenda and Acesulfame K. Data is obviously better than quoting the opinion pieces. The use of vagaries that more or less lump the sugar alcohols together and make them look like they are to be avoided because they might upset bowel ecology, I think is detrimental. A more accurate approach would note dissimilarities such as those we use to distinguish between sugar, inulin and FOS. A wide range of 20-50 grams or more of a sugar alcohol in a single dose may or may not not agitate digestion; some of the sugar alcohols aren't fermented, they don't all feed the same bacteria, it's not established that those that are fed are pathogenic, and results produced in the optimal conditions of a laboratory usually can not be duplicated in the competitive environment of the bowel ecology because it would depend heavily on what the state of the bowel ecology is. For some reason inulin in the FOS category in this article even though it quotes my site, which stresses the exact opposite. FOS is really a subset of inulin because inulin has a wider range of chain lengths than FOS. Both are fructans, but not FOS; this is explained in the first section of Tungland's article in my inulin references section. Duncan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.