Guest guest Posted July 18, 2002 Report Share Posted July 18, 2002 Family Leave Medical Act applies to ANYONE that has an occupation whose employer has twenty(20) or more employees. This act allows the person to take time off of work due to taking care of an immediate family member.(e.g. father, mother, husband, wife, son or daughter. Depending on the employer: grandmother or/and grandfather)The duration of time is 12 weeks. If you and your spouse are employed, the time can be split for both of you. (e.g. 4 weeks for the husband and 8 weeks for the wife who has the baby.) To have the benefits of the FLMA, I think you have to be employed by your employer for 6 months. Please check with your Human Resource Representative. Best wishes, Mike mdavis@... FMLA > > > Hey, I have a ? Does anyone know if dwarfism falls > under one of the conditions for FMLA (Family Medical > Leave Act). > > Thanks, > > Matt > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2002 Report Share Posted July 18, 2002 The FMLA allows a person the same amount of time for their own medical situations as well as family members. It also requires the employer to pay for the individual's benefits for 3 months and hold their job for the same amount of time. Rose > Family Leave Medical Act applies to ANYONE that has an occupation whose employer has twenty(20) or more employees. This act allows the person to take time off of work due to taking care of an immediate family member.(e.g. father, mother, husband, wife, son or daughter. Depending on the employer: grandmother or/and grandfather)The duration of time is 12 weeks. If you and your spouse are employed, the time can be split for both of you. (e.g. 4 weeks for the husband and 8 weeks for the wife who has the baby.) To have the benefits of the FLMA, > I think you have to be employed by your employer for 6 months. > Please check with your Human Resource Representative. > Best wishes, > > Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2002 Report Share Posted July 19, 2002 Caution: Depending on how the employer interprets the act, they will first use up all of your advanced vacation first and/or floating holidays then your sick pay. For example: Lets say your wife is going to have a baby and you would like time off to be at home to take care of your wife and new born. Lets say you wanted to take only 2 months off for the time. Well, your employer can decide how they are going to pay you. Lets also say you only get 2 weeks of vacation a year. First they use up the 2 weeks you have leftover then, if you have any sick pay they will then use that. If your sick pay and vacation run out they will give the rest of the time off as NO PAY. so.. 2 weeks vacation then how many sick days you have .. lets say for example 20 days of sick pay, the rest of the time of 14 days would be NO pay although you could still legally have it off. Mike Re: FMLA > The FMLA allows a person the same amount of time for their own > medical situations as well as family members. It also requires the > employer to pay for the individual's benefits for 3 months and hold > their job for the same amount of time. > > Rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2003 Report Share Posted February 24, 2003 Hey Deanna--- You sparked my interest...I saw that you wrote that you've " used a lot of FMLA. " I'm curious to know how SBC works it. Do they require you to apply your sick time to FMLA after a certain number of days? I've been off a few days at a time because of my L5/S1 herniation and treatments and I've been told---after I've already returned to work--- to apply some of my time off to FMLA. I work for a local government and no one else on staff can do my job, so I'm not too worried about being replaced---yet. I ask this because one of my colleagues (who has taken a few days off at a time to have her knee scoped) and I were forced to use FMLA time after the fact---even though we both have several hours of sick time available to use. We were both told to adjust our personnel records-- -after we had returned to work---to apply our time off to FMLA. I guess---after all of this rambling---I want to know at what point can an employer MAKE you use FMLA time?????? And, does it matter if you have sick time to use????? How much FMLA time does one get? Is this regulated by federal law? I guess I could check their website, but I think our HR chick is making it up as she goes along..... If anyone knows, please share.....Thanks!! Margie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2003 Report Share Posted February 24, 2003 No...FMLA is FMLA...if youve worked 1250 hrs in the past 12 mos you get a total of 12 weeks ..( at least with SBC)....we dont use our " sick time " because this is government " Clinton' approved Family Medical Leave A(?) ... I forgot the last word..but anyways...legally your job cant make you use your benefit time...FMLA is for medical time without pay ,off...check it out on the web ...well...yeah..if ya have sick leave they can technically make you use it. SBC is one of the really cool big companies that doesnt try to make us waste our paid or excussed non paid time off... If you have time left you DONT have to do FMLA...thats a way for your company to screw you and not pay you.... girlfriend...go to www.askjeeves.com and put FMLA......or look at any search site...yalls HR must think yall are idiots.... deana FMLA Hey Deanna--- You sparked my interest...I saw that you wrote that you've " used a lot of FMLA. " I'm curious to know how SBC works it. Do they require you to apply your sick time to FMLA after a certain number of days? I've been off a few days at a time because of my L5/S1 herniation and treatments and I've been told---after I've already returned to work--- to apply some of my time off to FMLA. I work for a local government and no one else on staff can do my job, so I'm not too worried about being replaced---yet. I ask this because one of my colleagues (who has taken a few days off at a time to have her knee scoped) and I were forced to use FMLA time after the fact---even though we both have several hours of sick time available to use. We were both told to adjust our personnel records-- -after we had returned to work---to apply our time off to FMLA. I guess---after all of this rambling---I want to know at what point can an employer MAKE you use FMLA time?????? And, does it matter if you have sick time to use????? How much FMLA time does one get? Is this regulated by federal law? I guess I could check their website, but I think our HR chick is making it up as she goes along..... If anyone knows, please share.....Thanks!! Margie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2003 Report Share Posted February 24, 2003 margie..after rereading again what you asked..why would you WANT to use a paid " vacation " day to be sick when you can go unpaid that day , and when youre back up to par take that paid day and enjoy it ? Do yall not get the oppertunity to use yalls " sick days " as paid whatever days ?...just wondering.. deana From: mailto:margie_ok <Spchtch8@... spinaldisorderssupport Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 6:04 PM Subject: FMLA Hey Deanna--- You sparked my interest...I saw that you wrote that you've " used a lot of FMLA. " I'm curious to know how SBC works it. Do they require you to apply your sick time to FMLA after a certain number of days? I've been off a few days at a time because of my L5/S1 herniation and treatments and I've been told---after I've already returned to work--- to apply some of my time off to FMLA. I work for a local government and no one else on staff can do my job, so I'm not too worried about being replaced---yet. I ask this because one of my colleagues (who has taken a few days off at a time to have her knee scoped) and I were forced to use FMLA time after the fact---even though we both have several hours of sick time available to use. We were both told to adjust our personnel records-- -after we had returned to work---to apply our time off to FMLA. I guess---after all of this rambling---I want to know at what point can an employer MAKE you use FMLA time?????? And, does it matter if you have sick time to use????? How much FMLA time does one get? Is this regulated by federal law? I guess I could check their website, but I think our HR chick is making it up as she goes along..... If anyone knows, please share.....Thanks!! Margie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2003 Report Share Posted February 24, 2003 Hi Deana, Thanks for answering. I will check the website; however, our HR manager made both my colleague and I designate our SICK DAYS as FMLA time, for which we were paid. Can you be paid for FMLA time????? I was on my last paycheck. I have worked 1250 hours over the last year---have been with this job for sixteen years now. My colleague is fighting the use of FMLA because she's worried that she might need to use the twelve weeks later in the year, should a family emergency or something else come up. She was upset that they made her designate her sick time---which she had over 200 hours accumulated---for her knee surgery. She's the one who " pulled me into it, " hence my not referring to her as " my friend. " When told to use FMLA time for her knee surgery, she immediately asked, " What about Margie? " when I was already back at work. I was then told if I used more than three consecutive days for the same " injury, " that I had to designate my sick time as FMLA time and note it as such on my time record. Again, I was paid for the time and the sick days were subtracted from the total I get each year. And, I was already back at work again when they told me to designate any time period---more than three consecutive days---as FMLA. When our HR manager told me to designate some of my time as FMLA--- after the fact---my only concern was that I would not be paid. I do not want any unpaid time off---I have lots of vacation, sick and personal time that I can use to be paid when I'm off. I'm not challenging our HR office because it looks like I will be facing surgery and I need the HR manager to work with me for the time that I will be off, which I assume will be designated as short term disability---at 75% of my salary---which I was on for my maternity leave three years ago. It's confusing. I was just curious to see how SBC worked it. I " gave " them five days to designate as FMLA, when in fact, I've been off more than that since the first of the year for my series of epidurals and the nerve block, along with the time off when they released spinal fluid and I had to go back in for a blood patch..... It's a pain in the butt---literally!! Margie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 > I have a question as a dwarf, do we qualify for fmla? Actually, my understanding is that qualification is based on service time, not disability. Or am I misunderstanding the question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.