Guest guest Posted January 25, 2001 Report Share Posted January 25, 2001 From: ilena rose <ilena@...> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 9:23 AM Subject: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome State of the Science Conference -Official Report > http://www.immunesupport.com/library/showarticle.cfm?ID=2948 > > Chronic Fatigue Syndrome State of the Science Conference - Official Report > > > by The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services > ImmuneSupport.com > 01-07-2001 - > > Overview > > Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating and complex disorder > characterized by profound fatigue that is not improved by bed rest and that > may be worsened by physical or mental activity. Persons with CFS must often > function at substantially lower levels of activity than they were capable > of before the onset of illness. In addition to these key defining > characteristics, patients report various nonspecific symptoms, including > weakness, muscle pain, impaired memory and/or mental concentration, > insomnia, and post-exertional fatigue lasting more than 24 hours. In some > cases, CFS can persist for years. The cause or causes of CFS have not been > identified, and no specific diagnostic tests are available. Moreover, since > many illnesses have incapacitating fatigue as a symptom, care must be taken > to exclude other known and often treatable conditions before a diagnosis of > CFS is made. > > The state-of-the-science conference was organized by the U.S. Department of > Health and Human Services (DHHS) Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Coordinating > Committee (CFSCC), with the financial assistance of several DHHS agencies > (listed in Appendix 1). The goals of the meeting were to focus on CFS > research areas in which information is both mature and exciting; summarize > current knowledge and identify important gaps in knowledge; garner the > perspective of expert investigators not currently working on the problem of > CFS; and identify expert investigators who might be attracted to study CFS > as a clinical problem. > > Seven topic areas of medical research were identified: neuroendocrinology; > cognition; chronic pain; sleep; immunology; orthostatic > intolerance/neurally mediated hypotension; and fatigue, functional status, > and disability. For each topic, a clinical scientist studying CFS (CFS > expert) was asked to present the most provocative aspects of current > knowledge; then scientists working in that same research area, but not > studying CFS (subject experts), were asked to provide additional > information and insights from that discipline that could enhance > understanding of CFS. Each session provided time for discussion among the > presenters and comments/questions from the conference attendees. A lay > audience session was also included as part of the agenda. > > The summary of the meeting is organized around the seven scientific topic > areas. The sessions have been summarized without attributing comments to > individual speakers; however, the speakers provided the main content of the > sessions. > > Introduction > > Presentations about CFS from the perspective of the patient and the > community physician laid the groundwork for the scientific presentations. A > CFS patient described her 11 years of living with CFS, and how her previous > highly active professional and personal life style had been restricted and > diminished by the illness. She has had to change jobs to accommodate her > body and her symptoms. Her relationships with her physicians have varied > from supportive to suspicious to suggestions that other patients may be in > more need of medical assistance. She would like to be able to have the > quality of life of her earlier pre-CFS years and for her and her physician > to have tools to manage the illness. She noted that CFS does not exist in a > vacuum, and may be one of a group of chronic diseases with similar and > overlapping symptoms. > > A community physician noted the problems of treating CFS in the current > medical climate, which emphasizes a scientific/mechanistic basis for > medical prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. In the case of CFS, there is > no known underlying disease mechanism around which to design treatment. > Clearly, symptom relief is within the purview of all physicians, even > without an etiology or cure for CFS. However, there is concern among some > physicians that off- label use of medications or use of narcotics to treat > CFS symptoms could cause problems with licensing bodies. There is also a > concern by some members of the medical profession that making a CFS > diagnosis or treating CFS may perpetuate illness. There is no medical > specialty or sub-specialty that is identified with CFS, thus making patient > referrals in the managed care environment difficult. Given that primary > care physicians commonly provide much of the care for chronic illnesses > with unknown etiologies, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and rheumatoid > arthritis (RA), it was suggested that these illnesses might be designated > as the specialty of choice for CFS. While the research case definition of > CFS is helpful for clinical studies, primary care physicians would benefit > from a clinical case definition of CFS. > > Many primary care physicians can " recognize " the CFS symptom constellation > when they see individual patients. Disability determination is also a > problem for primary care physicians. > > Disability claims often focus on objective tests, which are not available > for CFS. Children with CFS are often denied appropriate support (e.g., > tutoring), as local schools do not recognize CFS as an entity and therefore > abjure responsibility for needed services. > > A misperception that causes great problems is that CFS is considered by > some to represent a character flaw in the patient. More education of > primary care physicians about the nature of CFS and its legitimacy as an > illness, the various kinds of coping styles and aggressive symptomatic > treatment, and the need for patient respect and reassurance would greatly > benefit the CFS patient community. More research needs to be done on CFS > pathogenic mechanisms, so that physicians can prescribe treatments with > confidence to patients and so that patients will be confident about the > care they are receiving. > > Neuroendocrinology > > The neuroendocrine system is involved in the body's reaction to stress. It > involves the central nervous system, endocrine glands, and a number of > hormones and other mediators (including cytokines) that act in a variety of > regulatory pathways and feedback loops. The stress system is designed for > survival of the individual when faced with danger. It induces a state of > arousal, alertness, vigilance, and cognition; and shuts down vegetative > body functions, such as eating and sleeping, as well as the neuroendocrine > programs involved in growth and reproduction. The regulatory pathways built > into the neuroendocrine system are designed to stop the system when the > danger is no longer present. It is important to recognize that the stress, > immune, and sleep systems are linked to one another by several common and > multifunctional mediators. > > Investigations of the stress system dysregulation/disorders that are > associated with changes in arousal, mood, and energy levels were undertaken > initially to understand the differences between two forms of > depression-atypical depression and melancholic depression-with later > studies including CFS and fibromyalgia (FMS). Atypical depression is > characterized by increased sleep and appetite, weight gain, and profound > lethargy and fatigue. Affected persons feel out of touch with themselves. > By contrast, melancholic depression is characterized by a state of > hyperarousal, with anxiety, decreased concentration, and a reduction in > sleeping and eating. Persons with melancholic depression feel worthless and > have a sense of hopelessness about the future. > > To investigate the basis for the differences in symptoms, studies focused > on a corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), which is a neurohormone > produced in the hypothalamus region of the brain and is a component of that > portion of the body's stress system called the hypothalamic pituitary > adrenal axis (HPA). Animal studies have shown CRH to recapitulate many of > the physiological and behavioral aspects of the stress system. Studies of > CRH levels have demonstrated that the hormone is down regulated in CFS, in > atypical depression, and in seasonal affective disorder (SAD), but not in > melancholic depression. When CFS patients are stimulated with a cortisol > inducer, they have an exaggerated response to small doses and a reduced > response to high doses. In both FMS and CFS, there are reduced levels of > another stress mediator, norepinephrine. In addition, CRH response to > exercise is blunted in CFS patients. Lower levels of CRH and HPA axis > activity tend to result in hypoarousal, lethargy, decreased plasma volume, > and inflammatory symptoms. > > Another aspect of the body's response to stress is the shift in the type of > the immune response, from cell- mediated immunity to humoral immunity. > Studies in strains of rats that differ in their immune responses have shown > the effect of this shift. rats, which have an enhanced immune > response to multiple stimuli and thus are at risk of autoimmune diseases, > have reduced levels of CRH after stress. By contrast, Fisher rats that have > relatively low or suppressed immune responses responded adversely to > stress, with some animals dying from a particular stressor. Thus, the > immune system as a whole, as well as variations within individuals, can > affect the stress response. Additional studies are needed to better > understand the role of the HPA axis/stress response in CFS. Such studies > would involve direct comparisons of basal levels and challenge responses of > HPA axis in persons with CFS, SAD, and atypical depression. > > In addition to its role in stress, CRH is a modulator of wakefulness. In > animal studies, if CRH is increased, then wakefulness increases; if CRH is > reduced, wakefulness decreases. In addition, interleukin-1 (IL-1), a > cytokine, enhances sleep in animal models and its concentration peaks in > humans at sleep onset. Studies in animal models demonstrate a balance and > regulation of CRH and IL-1 by one another. They also demonstrate genetic > differences between rat strains in their CRH responsiveness to IL-1. Thus, > the immune and stress systems are linked by mediators not only to one > another but also to sleep regulation. > > Although cytokines were named for their immunomodulatory effects, they can > penetrate the blood brain barrier, act as neuromodulators, and produce both > acute and long-term effects in the brain, particularly in regions > associated with cognition and endocrine activity. Two important aspects of > this type of alteration are related to the action of cytokines in concert > with other factors such as environmental stressors. Thus, IL-2 alone has > only a modest effect in stimulating corticosterone in mice. However, in the > presence of a relative ly mild stressor (i.e. novelty stress), IL-2 results > in an increased magnitude and duration of the corticosterone response. > Changes in neurochemical activity as measured by dopamine levels in the > nucleus accumbens (an area of the brain important for motivation) are > higher during a secondary immune response than during a primary response. > In addition, animals initially receiving multiple injections of IL-2 to > replicate the effects of a chronic disorder showed an increased behavioral > response to a highly selective dopamine uptake inhibitor 6 weeks after the > initial multiple doses. There are studies in humans that also suggest that > long-term alterations of the HPA axis can occur in a variety of trauma, > stress, and abuse situations. > > Another important concept about cytokines is that they are potent > modulators of neurotransmission, and that they may induce biphasic effects > on neuronal excitability (e.g., IL-2 is a very potent modulator of the NMDA > (glutamate) receptor in the ventral tegmental area, a brain region > associated with aspects of reward, cognition, and motor activity. Low doses > of IL-2 result in inhibition of NMDA-activated current in this brain > region, whereas high doses of IL-2 have potentiating effects. Other > cytokines may have opposite effects in that low doses potentiate > NMDA-activated current whereas high doses have potentiating effects. Thus, > the individual cytokine as well as its level needs to be taken into account > in the design of studies. > > In the brain, cytokines appear to act principally as neuromodulators rather > than as immunomodulators. Studies of cytokines in humans are limited by the > fact that peripheral (blood) cytokines are the only readily accessible > ones; brain levels can be assessed but would require cerebrospinal fluid > (CSF). Studies in rodents have demonstrated that while peripheral cytokine > levels may influence the levels of cytokines in the brain, they may not > reflect the brain levels, which appear to be very low and difficult to > assay. New information indicates that adipose tissue, which is highly > enervated, may be a significant source of peripheral cytokines that appear > to be proinflammatory. The role of these adipose-tissue-associated > cytokines will need to be considered in the design and analysis of future > studies. > > Cognition > > Problems in cognition represent important impairments in persons with CFS. > Studies of cognition in CFS must consider a number of factors, including > the heterogeneity of the CFS population, the need to identify specific > cognitive problems, the impact of psychiatric factors in cognition, and the > relationship between cognition and cerebral dysfunction. > > Studies of carefully selected CFS subjects, which involved dividing CFS > patients into those not having concurrent or previous psychiatric problems > and those having them, have shown that intellectual functioning (e.g., > global IQ) and simple concentration capacities are intact. Two reproducible > abnormalities have been identified in CFS. They are difficulty with complex > information processing tasks and reduced speed of processing (e.g., as > measured in the PASAT, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test). Studies of > verbal learning and memory demonstrated that the problem in CFS appears to > be in learning rather than recall. Once information is learned, it can be > recalled. Thus, the problem appears to be in encoding information. Persons > without psychiatric co- morbidity appeared to be more impaired in these > studies. > > In studies of the prevalence of neuroimpairment, it appeared that about > one-third of persons with CFS had objective cognitive problems. Depression > and fatigue did not appear to be related to neuropsychological performance. > The PASAT was the best predictor of neuropsychological problems. In studies > trying to distinguish whether CFS represented a medical illness or an > atypical presentation of primary depression, of anxiety, or of a > somatization disorder, comparisons of persons with CFS, MS, or depression > were made by using symptom measures of the Beck Depression scale, such as > self-reproach, somatic features, and mood. The symptomatology of CFS and > depression differed in these studies. > > Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies suggested that about one-third of > persons with CFS and 10 percent of healthy controls had abnormal white > matter, most often in the frontal lobes. If the CFS subjects were divided > into those with and without psychiatric problems, 50 percent of CFS > patients without psychiatric problems had abnormalities. SPECT studies were > more problematic in outcome, but also showed abnormal areas in persons with > CFS; these changes also appeared to be more severe in persons with CFS who > did not have psychiatric problems. > > Functional MRI studies suggested that when presented with a particular > task, persons with CFS seemed to activate more areas of the brain, and > those areas of the brain appeared to be working harder than similar areas > in healthy subjects. This observation might explain the cognitive fatigue > reported in CFS. It should be noted that there is no imaging pattern that > is diagnostic of CFS. > > The cognitive dysfunction observed in CFS was relatively mild when compared > to severe dysfunction, such as Alzheimer's disease, but it was disabling to > the person. The cognitive dysfunction found in CFS does not appear to be > secondary to fatigue or to psychiatric factors, but these factors can > exacerbate it. Future studies need to identify subsets and subtypes of CFS > populations and need to relate cognition with neuroimaging, with medical > factors (e.g., neuroendocrine or immunological findings), and with everyday > activity levels. > > The methods used to study cognitive problems in one disease have the > potential to be translated into studying those in another illness; the > approach used to study cognitive changes across the disease spectrum in > HIV/AIDS patients was described to provide insights for CFS investigations. > > Cognitive changes can be measured as mean differences in scores or as a > deficit score, that is, an aggregation of scores below a baseline cut-off > level. Mean differences assume a common change across most persons with the > illness, but these changes may or may not be clinically significant. > Deficit scores can detect changes that are more sporadic and focus only on > those persons who have changes. > > Results from such neuropsychological studies can be used to characterize or > diagnose a particular entity, to define subtle changes and determine their > impact on function, to use patterns of cognitive changes as clues for > defining underlying pathology, or to define predictors and correlates of > cognitive change. Initial studies may use a large screening battery, and > then as results become available, select tests for specific affected > domains. Subsequent tests may use smaller screening batteries to identify > persons with problems in specific domains for more extensive testing. > However, with this approach, there is the potential to miss some persons > with deficits that are not represented in the narrow screening battery. > > Several investigational issues face researchers both in HIV/AIDS and CFS. > The biological correlates of neuropsychological problems are poorly > defined. Defining and clarifying cognitive complaints and translating these > into specific domains have provided and should continue to provide > additional insights into the underlying pathology. It is important to > understand the impact of cognitive problems on patient function to devise > coping strategies. The potential interaction of neuropsychological problems > with affect or mood disorders needs to be considered. > > Methods used in understanding and analyzing data from studies on brain > function in depression could provide useful approaches in studying a > multicomponent illness such as CFS, as in both cases there is a need to > understand the interrelationship between the clinical syndrome, > physiological changes, and cognitive deficits. Rather than looking at the > results of tests for each component separately, it is possible to use > mathematical and visual approaches to depict the data. > > In studies of patients with depression, data from cognitive scores, mood > scores, and functional brain imaging were combined in a neuroplot. Scores > from the various cognitive and mood instruments were color-coded and then > plotted onto a map of the brain. Thus, changes in speed on the Stroop Test > mapped to a different region of the brain than did the number of errors > made on the Stroop Test. More important, neuroplots prepared after > depressed patients were treated with Prozac changed to a pattern similar to > that in healthy controls. Thus, this approach can be used not only to > visualize the interrelationship between functions but also to assess the > effects of > therapeutic interventions. A neural network approach was also used to map > regions from PET scans and cognitive test results. Combining the results of > the brain imaging and cognitive testing allowed the network model to > identify depression more readily. Thus, these two meta-analytical > approaches may allow for the better understanding of individual disorders > and for comparisons with overlapping disorders. > > Chonic Pain > > Pain is an area that has not been as actively investigated in the context > of CFS. However, when one considers the minor criteria in the CFS Case > Definition, the majority of them are related to pain, thus making pain a > significant feature of CFS. There is also a group of disorders that can be > characterized as " diffuse pain syndromes " , which includes CFS and also FMS, > irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), post- infection pain, and post-operative > pain. Moreover, there is also a high co-morbidity between CFS, FMS, and > IBS, as well as with multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS). > > The particular diagnosis made for this group of disorders may depend upon > the clinical environment in which it is made or on the predominant > symptom(s) at the time of diagnosis. The cluster of symptoms seen in these > disorders could in fact be explained by mechanisms related to pain. The > symptoms also seem to parallel the effects of cytokines; for example, > patients who have been treated with interferons for malignancies have a > variety of diffuse pain syndromes and many of the symptoms of CFS. > > Additionally, there are a number of apparently unrelated medical conditions > that have fatigue, pain, and sleep problems as significant symptoms. For > example, cancer patients who have been successfully treated with radiation > therapy may still have a long term fatiguing state. Infection with > Campylobacter jejuni may also be followed by months of lingering fatigue. > The occurrence of this symptom constellation in diseases with specific > known pathologies validates CFS as a clinical entity. > > Illness behavior is represented by a complex physiological array that > includes fatigue, fever, pain, stress and neuroendocrine abnormalities, > with influences by, cytokines, thus suggesting a sharing of common > mechanisms across diseases. There is suggestive evidence that much of the > symptomatology for diffuse pain symptoms of the type seen in CFS, FMS, and > IBS may be mediated by the subdiaphragmatic portion of the vagus nerve. > Part of the sex differences seen in pain syndromes may be explained by the > structure of the adrenal medulla, which is part of the stress axis and one > of the routes that is involved in vagus nerve feedback to the body. Adult > female adrenal medulla retains sex hormone receptors, whereas adult male > tissue does not. > > The perception of pain is influenced by three factors. These are: (a) the > intensity and character (e.g., heat, pressure) of the external or internal > stimulus that activates nerve receptors; ( the transmission of sensory > information from these receptors to the spinal cord where it is further > processed and then sent by ascending nerve tracts to specific sites in the > brain; and © descending input from the brain to the spinal cord that may > either inhibit or facilitate the ascending sensory transmission. An example > of this involves studies of the nociceptors, or nerve fibers, that respond > to stimuli that are tissue damaging or potentially tissue damaging. > > Nociceptors are innervated by two types of fibers, alpha-delta myelinated > fibers, which transmit very rapidly, and unmyelinated C-fibers, which > conduct more slowly and appear to be related to chronic pain. > > Studies of pain perception using a combination of heat and capsaicin (the > pungent substance of hot peppers) demonstrated how the presence of > capsaicin altered the perception of pain. Capsaicin itself creates a warm > sensation on the skin but does not cause damage. However, when > capsaicin-sensitized skin is subjected to a heat stimulus (43 o C) that > alone is below the heat pain threshold (typically 45 o C) the person feels > a subjective level of pain that is equal to a heat stimulus (47 o C) that > is above the pain threshold on normal skin. Subtractive PET imaging studies > of the two situations (43 o C with capsaicin versus 47 o C on normal skin) > indicated that in situations with abnormal sensitized nociceptive > processing, the limbic areas of the cerebral cortex and thalamus appear to > be involved. Other situations in which pain perception is modified include > damage to nociceptors as a result of diabetes. Initially, the nerve injury > in diabetes results in pain with normal processing of the information in > the spinal cord. However, over time, the processing in the spinal cord > appears to change and abnormal information is sent to the brain. > > Likewise, certain damage to the brain (e.g., the result of a stroke) can > alter nociceptive processing, producing the sensation of pain without > stimulation of nociceptors or damage to the nociceptors. > > Some sex-related differences in pain perception may be explained by > observations from PET scan studies that were combined with psychophysical > studies. These studies showed that in response to noxious stimuli, the same > brain areas were stimulated in men and women, but women have more brain > activity than men do. In addition, women rated the stimulus as more > intense. This difference was not seen with non-noxious stimuli. A critical > area in pain research in general focuses on differentiating sex-related > (i.e. biological) influences on pain from those from gender (i.e. sex-role) > influences. > > Neuroendocrine and imaging studies also suggest that, in FMS, > hyperexcitability of the spinal NMDA receptors increases ascending sensory > transmission to the brain that enhances pain perception. Persons with CFS > usually experience musculoskeletal pain, but they do not show abnormal > sensitivity to pressure stimulation at multiple anatomic sites unless they > also meet the diagnostic criteria for FMS. Accordingly, individuals with > FMS exhibit lower pain threshold levels than persons with CFS who do not > meet criteria for FMS; these FMS subjects are also better than CFS subjects > and controls in discriminating between high and low intensity stimuli that > are presented in random order.Neuroendocrine and imaging studies suggest a > number of similarities and some differences between these syndromes. > > Thus, both CFS and FMS patients have low levels of cortisol and CRH. FMS > patients have low levels of IGF-1 and growth hormone; there is inconsistent > data for CFS for these markers. Persons with FMS have low serum levels of > serotonin and low CSF levels of serotonin metabolites. Persons with CFS > have high plasma levels of serotonin metabolites. FMS is also characterized > by high cerebrospinal fluid levels of two factors promoting pain: nerve > growth factor and substance P. MRI imaging studies of brain structure > suggest that persons with CFS are characterized by a high number of > cortical white matter lesions compared to healthy individuals. There are no > published MRI studies of brain structure in patients with FMS. Resting > state studies of regional cerebral blood flow, using SPECT or PET imaging, > have produced different results for persons with CFS and those with FMS. > The CFS patient studies generally have not produced consistent results, > although two studies found evidence of brainstem hypoperfusion in patients > with CFS. One recent British study found that CFS patients show higher > levels of blood flow in the thalamus compared to healthy individuals. > > In contrast, two studies from the same laboratory in the U.S. reported that > patients with FMS show hypoperfusion of the thalamus and/or caudate nucleus > during resting conditions. > > Preliminary evidence from the same laboratory indicates that during > exposure to painful pressure stimulation on the right side of the body, > healthy individuals display significant increases in blood flow in the > contralateral somatosensory cortex, thalamus, and anterior cingulate > cortex. > > However, persons with FMS, as well as those with CFS who do not meet > criteria for FMS, show bilateral increases in blood flow in the > somatosensory cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex. > > These findings suggest that both FMS and CFS are characterized by > alterations in neural processing of sensory information. Future studies > will examine changes in pain perception and regional cerebral blood flow in > persons with CFS and FMS when they are stressed before exposure to painful > stimulation. > > Overall, the physiological approach to treatment of pain has been to > eliminate the cause in acute illness, and to treat the signs and symptoms > in chronic illness, while trying to understand physiology of the syndrome > that could suggest unique therapies. Alterations in nociceptive information > processing also need to be considered when assessing the origins and the > mechanisms of pain. This type of approach could be carried into > investigations and treatment of CFS. > > Sleep > > The body has a diurnal rhythm of sleep and wake cycles. A pattern of > characteristic brain waves for sleep and waking activities can be obtained > with electroencephalograms (EEG). Sleep itself can be divided into an > orderly series of stages. Aspects of the sleep cycle are described by using > the various brain wave patterns identifying rapid eye movement (REM) and > non-REM stages. > > In addition, mood, or how well one feels, also has a cyclic effect > throughout a 24-hour period. For healthy persons, the changes in mood > throughout the day are relatively modest. However, for persons with CFS, > the level of mood is significantly lower at baseline than for healthy > persons and the best time of the day is from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. or 3 p.m. > and after that CFS patients feel significantly worse. Unrefreshing or > non-restorative sleep is part of both CFS and FMS. Sleep studies have > demonstrated objective evidence for disordered sleep in CFS with the > presence of an alpha-delta EEG anomaly, which accounts for the lightness of > sleep and the unrefreshing quality of sleep. Studies of cortisol levels in > persons with CFS, FMS, and healthy controls demonstrated that cortisol > levels fell earlier in the sleep-wake cycle in CFS and FMS subjects than > those in healthy controls. Thus, cortisol levels in the sleep-wake cycle in > CFS and FMS are lower and shifted in time. Interestingly, the percentage of > natural killer (NK) cells also starts to decrease at about 3 p.m. in CFS > patients. > > As part of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study, a 17- item > sleep questionnaire was administered to persons with CFS and healthy > controls; the results indicated that 10 percent of CFS subjects and > two-thirds of healthy subjects had good sleep. The tests used in > neurocognitive studies are sensitive to sleep deprivation. It was > hypothesized that disordered sleep may lead to altered immune functions, > which can lead to symp toms. Previous studies in healthy subjects have > shown that disruption of deep sleep for as little as a few days leads to > tenderness, aches and pains, and fatigue. > > Persons with CFS may have disturbed sleep, and some may suffer from > depression as well. Antidepressants have been given to CFS patients to > relieve symptoms. Individual antidepressant drug classes have different > degrees of impact on sleep that may also vary with the sex of the > recipient. Information that has been gathered from the study of > antidepressants in persons with depression is important to consider when > these medications are prescribed in CFS. > > Major depression occurs in 10 to 17 percent of the U.S. population; thus, > antidepressants are frequently administered drugs. During their > reproductive years, women have a two-fold risk over men of having > depression. Disturbed sleep increases the risk for depression and, in those > who have suffered from depression, increases the risk of relapse and > recurrence. Persistent insomnia also increases the risk of suicide. Sleep > abnormalities are key symptoms of depression. > > Even after treatment for depression, about one-third of patients have sleep > problems, thus making knowledge of the impact of the various drug classes > on sleep important. > > Tricyclic antidepressants are inexpensive and widely used. They prolong REM > latency, reduce REM sleep and increase total sleep time, but have little > impact on depth or quality of sleep. (I.e. they do not enhance deep sleep). > Although the side-effect profile does include some daytime sedation, > tricyclics do not typically exacerbate sleep disturbances. Selective > serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as paroxitine (Paxil), > sertraline (Zoloft), and fluoxetine (Prozac)) also act as REM sleep > suppressors, although they are not as potent REM suppressors as tricyclics. > > More significantly, however, SSRIs increase arousal, intermittent > wakefulness, and non-restorative light sleep. Their adverse effects include > insomnia, bruxism, and periodic limb movements. Typically, the adverse > effects are more pronounced in women, particularly with fluoxetine. With > regard to other types of antidepressants, trazodone (Deseryl), a 5HT2 > antagonist, decreases wakefulness and increases deep restorative slow-wave > sleep. > > Unfortunately, it is associated with significant daytime sedation. A > related compound, nefazodone (Serazone), a 5HT2 antagonist that also has > some of the properties of SSRIs (serotonin reuptake inhibition), seems to > improve sleep quality (decreased wakefulness and light non-restorative > sleep) without causing extreme sedation or agitation. > > When asked about their sleep, it is clear that patients are aware of the > quality of their sleep, and their subjective reports correlate with > laboratory polysomagraphic results. Thus, the sleep laboratory findings > have strong relevance to clinical practice. There are a number of reasons > for choosing an antidepressant that improves sleep. It not only decreases > the need for concomitant medications, but if patients experience improved > sleep, they may also be more compliant in continuing medication usage until > their depressive symptoms improve. > > Animal models of sleep may provide important insights for designing studies > to elucidate sleep disorders and devise treatments for them. Studies in > mice suggest that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and IL-1, which are > pro-inflammatory cytokines, have a central role in non-REM (NREM) sleep > regulation and sleep pathology. The ability of IL-1 and TNF to increase > growth hormone release (a sleep-related hormo ne) and sleep seems to be > mediated via GHRH. For instance, antibodies to GHRH block IL-1 induced > NREMS responses. A strain of mice (designated lit) lacking the growth > hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor was used to demonstrate that GHRH > also plays a role in modulating NREM sleep In normal mice, acute influenza > virus infection increases NREM sleep and decreases REM sleep. In contrast, > the lit mice have decreased NREMS after viral challenge, thereby > implicating the GHRH-receptor in sleep responses induced by viruses. These > mice also have a higher mortality after viral challenge and abnormal EEGs. > It seems likely that in chronic viral infections, perhaps associated with > chronic sleep disturbances, this mechanism may be important. > > Additional research is needed about sleep and sleep abnormalities in CFS. > There are now technologies that allow sleep to be recorded in the home > rather than in sleep laboratories. > > Treatment trials are also needed to test whether antidepressants do provide > benefit in CFS over placebo. Studies of chronobiological treatments such as > bright- light, phase-shifting and slow-wave sleep enhancement might also be > considered. A new drug that is a TNF-blocking agent has been used for RA > and reduces fatigue in RA patients. This type of drug may have therapeutic > implications for CFS. > > Immunology > > A number of observations suggest a role for the immune system or immune > modulators in CFS. > > Several HLA markers appear to be more commonly present in persons with CFS > than in the population in general, and these markers are associated with > autoimmune diseases. Studies in identical twins also suggest an increased > risk of CFS in identical twins. Acute viral- like illnesses appear to > precede the onset of CFS in 60 to 80 percent of CFS cases. Immune mediators > could directly contribute to the symptoms of CFS (e.g., by allowing > reactivation of infections), or they could indirectly contribute to CFS > symptomatology by the interaction with the HPA axis, impact on sleep, or > interactions with neurotransmitters. > > A broad range of lymphocyte markers has been studied in CFS patients and > compared to those markers found in healthy subjects. Results from some > studies are conflicting, and many studies were hampered by being cross > sectional rather than longitudinal in design. There are some indications > that markers of T-cell activation are increased during CFS patient flaring. > CD3 receptor expression may be reduced; this latter observation might help > to explain the poor response to antigens as CD3 is involved in T-cell > activation. Low levels of the IgG1 and/or IgG3 subclasses in CFS patients > were also seen in several studies. A number of studies also suggest low NK > cell function. Some data suggest that the immune system might be constantly > activated ( " turned on " ) and immune response blunted by the depletion of > necessary cellular enzymes ( " exhausted " ). Cytokine studies suggest a shift > to a TH2 pattern of response in CFS, with expression of the proinflammatory > cytokines TNF-a and IL-1. This type of pattern is associated with the > humoral side of the immune system, and in combination with proinflammatory > cytokines, can be associated with a number of chronic conditions, including > autoimmune disease and chronic infection. > > There are a number of examples in which the immune system does not properly > regulate itself; these include chronic active hepatitis and insulin > dependent diabetes. In most individuals a viral infection will be limited, > with the body suffering some minimal damage. However, in some individuals, > viral infection of islet cells is not limited; the immune system keeps on > attacking the cells and the person develops insulin-dependent diabetes. The > sickness pattern of loss of appetite, lethargy, etc., that is part of a > virus infection is cytokine driven; some of the symptoms of CFS seem to > resemble the perpetuation of the virus infection process that has not been > shut > off. > > There is a need for longitudinal studies and for studies that correlate > patterns of cytokine expression with illness severity and with the > progression of illness over time. Given the heterogeneity of the illness, > it is important to study subsets of patients. Collection of specimens needs > to be standardized and important confounders such as circadian cycles, > menstrual cycle, and patient sex must be taken into consideration. > Hypotheses related to the importance of immune alterations in CFS could be > tested by giving immune-based therapies and measuring patient responses. > > Psychoneuroimmunological models may also provide insight into the > pathogenesis of CFS. During stress, there are changes in the immune system, > in levels of hormones in the blood, and in activation of specific areas of > the brain. However, in chronic stress models, the more the brain is > activated, the more it becomes habituated, and the harder it becomes to > activate. This phenomenon is demonstrated by following HPA pathway > responses to stress. It is known that when humans are subjected to a > stress, the level of cortisol is elevated the first day of the stress; for > most people, cortisol is not elevated if the stress is repeated for the > next four days, a > habituated stress response. However, for some people, cortisol levels will > elevate on each of the five days of the stress and these people have more > illness and more anxiety. Rather than habituation, there appears to be a > sensitization of the brain or a disruption of the regulatory mechanisms of > the brain. Studies are needed of persons who habituate to cortisol versus > persons who do not habituate to cortisol. In CFS, studies need to be done > to determine whether CFS patients' low cortisol levels represent a chronic > habituation of the stress response, or if the HPA abnormalities represent a > different form of stress response. The mechanistic significance of low > cortisol in CFS needs further study. However, the observation of low > cortisol in CFS is consistent with the observed chronic immune activation, > as cortisol would serve to help down regulate immune activation. > > There are a number of concepts from research on multiple sclerosis (MS) > that may be relevant to CFS research. The MS disease process begins long > before clinical attack. The disease pathology is an autoimmune process. > However, the precipitator of attacks/relapse is less clear (e.g., acute > viral but not bacterial infections often appear to precede attacks). Immune > changes can be measured before an attack, such as increases in inflammatory > cytokines, decreases in NK cell numbers, activation of T-cells, and > evidence of blood vessel inflammation. After an attack, an anti- > inflammatory immune profile is seen. In progressive disease, NK and > suppressor cells are defective. In addition, at the time of relapse, immune > changes can be detected in certain very specific precursor cells. > > However, the number of these cells was extremely small; without having the > specific target on myelin basic protein, this level of change could not > have been detected. There are many MRI changes seen in MS, nevertheless, > during many of these times, patients may be asymptomatic. In addition, when > looking at parts of the brain not thought to be involved in MS, metabolic > abnormalities have been observed in " apparently normal " brain tissues, > suggesting that smaller subtle changes could be important. > > Several strategies applicable to CFS can be drawn from research approaches > used in MS. Diagnostic criteria should be constrained for research > purposes. To ensure that patients within a study are uniform, markers > should be added for specific studies and, if necessary, rejected if or when > experimental findings no longer support their inclusion. Studies should > concentrate on > early diagnosis, as causal abnormalities are more likely to be detected at > that time; long established patients may give false leads both in treatment > and in pathogenesis. In terms of therapy, treatment failures in > long-established patients may be discouraging, even for therapies that > might work early in disease. Treatment studies should avoid " treatment > contaminated " patients, that is, persons who have already received > therapies, as alterations in markers may be the result of the therapy > rather than the disease. Interdisciplinary collaborations should be > fostered. > > Orthostatic Intolerance/Neurally Mediated Hypotension > > Although the description of CFS in the CFS Case Definition does not seem to > indicate autonomic system involvement, evidence from the scientific > literature provides several suggestions for its potential involvement. This > includes (1) the description of myalgic encephalomyelitis cases that > suggests autonomic system symptoms; (2) Streeten's description of delayed > orthostatic intolerance in 1992 and his proposal that CFS might result from > a failure to maintain blood pressure in an upright position; and (3) the > studies of Rowe and colleagues in 1995 of neurally mediated hypotension in > CFS cases. > > Orthostatic tolerance is an autonomic nervous system response that allows > people to move from the supine to the upright position without feeling > lightheaded, weak, or fatigued. A rapid baroreceptor- mediated reflex is > involved to counteract the pooling of blood that occurs in the lower part > of the body. This involves vasoconstriction, increases in heart rate, and > an approximately twofold increase in noradrenaline levels; blood pressure > remains about the same. > > There are several types of orthostatic intolerant conditions in which this > system does not properly operate when a person moves from the supine to the > upright position. In orthostatic hypotension, blood pressure decreases, but > the heart rate remains about the same; in neurally mediated syncopy or > hypotension, the heart rate falls and the blood pressure drops; in > orthostatic tachycardia, the heart rate increases, but blood pressure does > not change; blood pressure may increase or decrease slightly. > > Studies of conditions involving orthostatic intolerance have shown a > sharing of features with CFS such as fatigue, female predominance, and > viral- like prodrome. Variations in definition of subjects and in test > implementation may be contributing factors to differences in experimental > findings about the type of orthostatic intolerance in persons with CFS. > Nevertheless, orthostatic intolerance conditions may explain aspects of CFS > symptomatology and may provide opportunities for therapeutic interventions. > > To determine specific cardiovascular changes/deficits that may be > associated with CFS, more studies are needed about blood pressure and heart > rate during normal daily activities. > > Investigations are also needed on exercise and cardiovascular change in > CFS, variation of blood pressure and heart rate during a 24- hour period, > and autonomic outflow during normal daily activities and exercise. Venous > end-organ abnormalities need further study, as do baroreceptor reflexes and > autonomic control of cerebral blood flow. There are also a number of > neurogenic aspects of CFS that need further investigation. These include > determining the nature of reflex tachycardia, the basis of the > hyperactivation of catecholamines, and whether there are appropriate or > blunted vascular responses to them. Animal models in which there is > dysregulation of these systems may also provide additional insights. A > transgenic rat model appears to have some aspects of orthostatic > hypotension and defective baroreceptor reflexes. > > Fatigue, Functional Status, and Disability > > Most chronic illnesses have fatigue as a symptom, and studies of fatigue in > a range of illnesses can provide approaches or insights for CFS research > and therapies. However, fatigue is still a very problematic area in terms > of measurement and clinical approach. The main difficulties in measuring > fatigue are that it is multidimensional, and there is no " gold standard " > against which to compare measures. In addition, there are differences > between acute and chronic fatigue; fatigue may have multiple meanings > (e.g., a sense of effort versus anticipatory fatigue), may be the result of > both physical and mental tasks, is influenced by both physical and > psychological factors, and needs to be distinguished from sleepiness or > drowsiness. Aspects of fatigue that can be assessed include behavior (e.g., > decline in performance); perception (e.g., proportionality of sense of > fatigue to effort); mechanism (e.g., peripheral versus central nervous > system); and context (e.g., influence of environmental factors). Domains of > fatigue that can be measured include physical/level of activity, mental > impairment, functional status/quality of life, and disability. For each of > these, both self- report and objective measures are available. Thus, > functional status can be assessed by self- report on the Standard Form-36 > (SF-36) or measured in the laboratory by the ability of a person to perform > specific physical activities (e.g., walking and squatting). > > Ideally, measurements of fatigue should be internally consistent and > reproducible, should correlate with other measurements of fatigue, and > should be sensitive to treatment effects. Self-report measures have > limitations in that there is rater bias, they require insight to complete, > specific aspects of fatigue may be difficult to distinguish from one > another, and fatigue may combine state with trait for those persons with > long-standing fatigue. > > Performance-based measures are more objective and are defined as the > inability to sustain the expected power output. In studies of MS, > performance and self-report measures showed little correlation and neither > alone provided sufficient information on the experience of fatigue. For > example, one study used a neuropsychological test as a performance measure > of cognitive fatigue in a situation in which there were multiple and > repetitive tests. When healthy controls and persons with MS were compared, > the healthy subjects had a positive practice learning effect, whereas MS > patients did worse on repeated testing. However, both sets of participants > felt exhausted, thus > demonstrating the lack of concordance between self-report and > performance-based measures. > > It is therefore important to include both types of measures in assessing > fatigue. Impairment of activity is a measure of fatigue. Increased activity > is seen as a desired outcome for fatigued patients and as an outcome > measure for intervention studies. Actigraphy is a general term for the > quantification of activity. It is a behavioral, rather than > performance-based, measurement of energy expensive movements, which allows > the natural behavior of persons to > be assessed in natural settings. A record of activities can be documented > around the clock for weeks or months; thus, difficult-to-assess factors, > such as restlessness at night, can be measured. > > Actigraphy allows an assessment of behavior before and after treatment, > allows for comparison between subjects, and provides a visual > representation to patients of impairments, such as sleep disruption, or of > improvements, such as increased activities. Given the cyclic nature of CFS, > measurements throughout the day and night and over extended periods of time > would provide an important repeated- measures method to assess changes in > activity that could be correlated with other biological markers as well as > with subjective measures. > > Functional status is a subject measure of health status. It may be generic > or disease specific. Impairment is a physical or cognitive condition that > alters lifestyle. Disability is a state in which impairment precludes a > specific function. Thus, a person may be disabled in one area but not in > another or may have an impairment that is not disabling. Quality-of-life > measures put a value or utility on particular aspects of life. Thus, there > is a need to assess fatigue, functional status, and impairment both > uniformly and consistently. Part of the estimate of CFS disability is that > in the United States about 50 percent of persons with CFS are unemployed. > Studies in Seattle of persons with CFS and with FMS showed a degree of > disability beyond that which is measured by the SF-36. > > Many persons have lost jobs, friends, and significant others and have > suffered a decline of standard in their standard of living. Persons with > CFS have about twice the average annual per capita medical expenses and > have a mean number of 20 medical visits per year. > > Fatigue research in cancer may provide insights into research approaches > for CFS. Fatigue is a frequent and significant side effect of cancer and > cancer treatment, with about two-thirds of patients reporting fatigue. In > some cases, fatigue may persist for months or years. It is equally common > in men and women and has no age boundaries. The main focus of oncologists > has been in relieving pain; however, in response to a survey, cancer > patients indicated that fatigue was more important than pain in their daily > life. Fatigue is often not reported because it is not asked about or > because patients assume that it is part of the illness. > > Many factors contribute to fatigue in cancer patients, including the tumor > itself, pre-existing medical conditions, treatment modalities, infection, > depression, pain, sleep problems, and inactivity. Domains of psychosocial > functioning are adversely affected by fatigue on a 0 to 10 scale at levels > above 5.5. Beyond that level of intensity, virtually every domain of > functioning is negatively affected from mood, to ambulation, work, > enjoyment of life etc. Below the midpoint of the scale, fatigue has little > effect. > > This circumstance is different than pain, where impairments pile up more > gradually. Most patients are given advice on energy conservation such as > prioritizing activities, delegating responsibilities, and getting rest and > sleep. However, only two categories of intervention have been shown to > reduce cancer-related fatigue: moderate exercise and epoetin-alpha therapy. > > Thus, a walking program was shown to reduce chemotherapy side effects and > fatigue. Epoetin-alpha increases hemoglobin levels; with each incremental > increase in hemoglobin level, an increased quality-of-life was observed. > > Rehabilitation medicine is an area that could provide much assistance and > treatment to persons with CFS. It is an area that many physicians are not > aware of as a treatment modality; moreover, many therapists are not > knowledgeable in the unique needs of CFS patients. Among the rehabilitation > medicine specialties, occupational therapy has a key role to play. There > are several evaluation instruments, such as the Canadian Occupational > Performance Measure, the Role Checklist, the NIH Activity Record, and the > NIH Energy Conservation Workbook, that can allow the patient and therapist > to identify roles that are important to the patient, and then to prioritize > goals and devise strategies to allow patients to achieve the goals most > important to them. Speech pathologists may be able to help persons with CFS > deal with cognitive problems such as word finding and reading. Physical > therapists can assess physical capacity and endurance and can provide > interventions to increase these. Rehabilitation professionals can make > recommendations for balance of the home and work tasks and for the use of > adaptive equipment. There is a need for increased recognition of > rehabilitation medicine and for training of professionals in the specific > needs of persons with CFS. In addition, research studies are needed to > document the effectiveness of rehabilitation medicine as a therapeutic > approach. > > Issues for Future Research and Consideration in Study Design > > There were a number of crosscutting themes throughout the meeting. > > CFS patients are heterogeneous. This is recognized by the current case > definition, which also encourages the subgrouping and stratification of > patients in studies. Patient populations need to be carefully selected and > described and indications given in research papers about how the 1994 Case > Definition was applied to the study population. The panelists emphasized > the need to design studies around specific subgroups of patients. > > Need for Longitudinal Studies. CFS symptoms are not static and can change > during a day, as well as over days, months, and years. Longitudinal studies > and studies considering multiple sampling points are therefore critical. > Measurement or characterization of a patient at a single time point is > inadequate. > > Sampling Methodologies. Sampling points and processing of samples need to > be consistent within studies and carefully chosen based on the variables > under study. Samples need to be carefully and consistently processed. It is > important to consider that samples taken from peripheral blood may not > reflect the levels of modulators at their active sites (e.g., in the brain > or > lymph nodes). > > Measurement Methodologies. Measurements of complex functions, such as > cognition, need to consider the components of that function (e.g., learning > versus recall) and the nature of the impairment (e.g., speed versus > accuracy). New technologies, (such as actigraphy) and new analytical tools > (such as neuroplots and neural networks) may provide important ways to > gather > and analyze the complex data that will be needed to study disease > mechanisms and pathogenesis. > > Potential Importance of Cytokines and Related Neurohormones. While medicine > and research studies of necessity divide the body into individual > physiological systems, there are in fact many common mediators and cross > talk between and among the various bodily systems. For example, IL-1 is > named after its immunomodulating functions; however, it plays a role in > stimulation of sleep and is involved in stress pathways in that it affects > and is affected by CRH. > > Many of the signs and symptoms of CFS could be attributable to the actions > of cytokines; CFS-like symptoms are seen in persons with malignancies who > are receiving immunotherapies with cytokines. Pain could explain a number > of the symptoms seen in CFS. Studies of the physiology of pain irrespective > of cause may provide important insights for understanding pain occurring in > specific contexts. Many of the symptoms of CFS could also be caused by > disrupted sleep. The role of cardiovascular system > dysregulation/dysfunction in CFS symptomatology and pathology needs further > investigation. > > Dysregulation of control processes/systems was another common theme of the > meeting. The consequences of long-term stimulation, aberrant processing of > signals, and conditioning of responses were also noted as processes that > could provide a mechanistic understanding of the diversity of patient > symptomatology, as well as the lack of concordance between subjective > symptom report and objective functional measurement. Thus, studies in which > animals were subjected to both stress and cytokine administration resulted > in changes in the magnitude and duration of the immediate corticosteroid > response, as well as alterations to the same stimuli given at a subsequent > time. Biphasic responses to modulators and mediators in which the response, > inhibition, or stimulation was dependent on the dose administered were also > noted. > > Sex and Gender Differences. There are a number of mechanistic clues that > might explain the sex and gender differences seen in pain syndromes. These > include differences in HPA axis regulation, differences in neural > processing, differences in sleep architecture, and differences in clinical > responses to drugs. > > Overlapping Syndromes. There are a number of syndromes that overlap with > CFS, such as IBS, FMS, and MCS. Knowledge gained about one may provide > insights for the others; in addition, further research may determine > whether these syndromes represent a continuum of related human illnesses > rather than being individual entities. Conversely, there are a finite > number of symptoms that can occur in an affected organ or organ system; > thus, sharing of symptoms may not imply sharing of mechanisms. > > Interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary studies are needed to address the > complex mechanisms that cross physiological systems and research > disciplines. > > SUMMARY > > CFS is a complex multisystemic, multifactorial illness. Its unique aspects > and pathogenesis need further investigation and illumination; studies of > overlapping symptoms and pathogenic mechanisms from other > diseases/disorders may provide insights into the biological basis for this > illness. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.