Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 I don't think a 10% increase in the minimum wage would lose all those jobs. No one is advocating doubling the minimum wage. As far as I know, in this area, there are jobs that students get at less than the minimum wage.They just raised the minimum wage, and it looks like you are attributing the big layoffs to that. I'd say that more than 90% (just my estimate) of the people laid off were making way over the minimum wage, so the little increase had nothing to do with them. In fact, companies tend to keep the lower paid employees in hard times except for a couple of key employees that can lead the rest. If the raise in minimum wage were the problem, you would be seeing reporting of that all over the place. I'd like to ask if you could work for less than $8.00 an hour in these times, and if you did, what could you afford, food, gas, shelter, medical expenses, dental expenses, telephone, pet food, auto repair, utilities, insurance, clothing? The list goes on, but the money doesn't. $320 used to be a living wage in the 50s and before, but not now. Roni <>Just because something isn't seen doesn't mean it's not there<> > Roni, it is precisely because I've been in the poverty class when minimum wage was increased; it resulted in a 'net loss' for me as well as everyone else I knew who was also in that same 'income bracket'...my husband lost his job, as did many others...I've also been just a little over the newly increased minimum wage, along with all of my co-workers when it's happened; I again, saw what happened to all of us! We all suddenly became 'poverty level'. It became more difficult to keep up with living costs and we had to cut every thing in our lives that weren't essential...we ate a lot of beans and rice! > > > >>>> One: The free market system works, in that it provides the most >>>> benefits for the most people than any system in history. >>>> >>>> Two: Minimum wage is a total perversion of the free market system. >>>> >>>> Three: If it works why don't we just set the minimum wage at $20 or $30 >>>> per hour. That should REALLY help those whose actual output is about $3 >>>> per hour. >>>> >>>> NOTE: If you can follow the logic of why this last suggestion is pretty >>>> stupid you will then understand why minimum wage laws in general are >>>> pretty stupid. >>>> >>>> >>>> . >>>> . >>>> >>>>> Posted by: " Roni Molin " matchermaam@ >>>>> <mailto:matchermaam@ >>> ?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Cows%2C%20Geopolitics%2C%20and%20Big%20Business%20Re%3A%2 >>> %5Bhypothyroidism%5D%20Re%3A%20Thy> >>>>> matchermaam <matchermaam> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thu Apr 9, 2009 10:36 am (PDT) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I agree about illegal aliens. As far as the minimum wage is concerned, >>>>> how much does it cost you to feed your family per person per week? Why >>>>> do you think it's all right for you to be able to feed yourself and >>>>> your family, but you don't support fair treatment of all Americans to >>>>> get a decent wage (not that minimum wage is decent, but it's a start). >>>>> With homes being what they cost, food up in price every week, gas >>>>> going crazy, heat and electric being ridiculous, why do you object to >>>>> people who are WORKING and not sponging off the government (which I >>>>> know you don't like) being able to house, clothe and feed their >>> families? >>>>> Roni -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Roni, It's a continuous scale. If you raised the minimum wages to $100/hour, a lot of people would get laid off, most of them. $50/hour would also result in mostly layoffs. Keep decreasing it and you get less and less layoffs. There is no magic point where employment stops increasing as the minimum wage decreases except at 0, and there are people that even work for that in volunteer organizations. At $6.55/hour there are less workers than there would be at $5.15 - the only question is how many workers were sacrificed on the alter of minimum wage laws for the last increase. Personally, I usually only hire people for piece work so the law doesn't affect me. When I hire someone to do unskilled work in the yard, I pay between $10 and $12 per hour. When I hired a moving company (they drove only, did not pack or load) many years ago to move my goods across country and then hired local labor to load the truck, our agreement in about 1995 was $10/hour and I paid $20/hour at completion, something that I didn't intend when I made the deal for the hourly rate. Those guys didn't take breaks and didn't screw around. I got excellent workers at both ends of my trip and I always negotiated the $10 rate and paid $20/hour at completion. Those guys were happy campers. I paid those rates because I was pleased with the work, it was worth $20/hour in my opinion, and I paid them EVEN though I had been out of work for 8 months and wouldn't get my first paycheck for at least 3 more weeks AND I would likely never ever see them again. Four years ago I needed a 6100/sq ft home worked on. It needed a lot of painting, not the whole thing, but quite a bit. I was in Utah and the home I was trying to sell was in Las Vegas. After getting some painting done via a company in Utah, I made a deal with the guys on the side to drive down to Las Vegas and work on my house there. I would supply the paint, they would provide the other supplies, and I would pay the whole lot $15/hour each. The house was still decorated and furnished for top showings and they each got a bedroom to stay in while they did the work and I bought dinners. They worked all day and " spent " their earnings every night. I got a $15,000 job done for about $1400 and they got to party in Vegas. We were all happy with the price and the results. The theory that the lower the minimum wage are, the less employers pay for all labor is completely wrong. None of business people I've been associated with has ever paid minimum wages to my knowledge. When you get good workers, you pay good prices because you want to keep them or of they are contract or piece type workers, you may want their efforts again in the future. Treating people poorly is not a good competitive strategy as happy employees will out compete the scrooges of the world every bloody time. The scrooges use regulation and government influence to level the playing field instead of doing quality work and paying quality rates. Raising the minimum wages levels the playing field to some degree between the quality employers and the scrooges, and thats not the results desired. As to what kind of work would I do for lower wages? I will do WHATEVER it takes to advance my circumstances. If I couldn't get any other work, I would shovel shit for $2/hour if necessary but you can be darned sure that I would be scheming to figure out a more efficient way to shovel sh*t and be scheming to become the lead sh*t shoveler and the manager of all the leads, or be looking to do something else. When I did unskilled work in my younger years from busboy to toilet cleaning and janitorial work, I never got paid minimum wages. They always started people higher than that AND gave a raise in the first month or two. At least that's how it worked for me at all the places I worked. I remember one day during a rush at the restaurant where I was the busboy who got and loaded all the dirty dishes, the other worker that was assigned to that time period was slow and just kept getting in my way. I went to the manager and said " Get that guy out of here so I can get the job done. " The manager sent him packing right then and I did the work of two and still had time to waste. Some people however barely get the job done if that no matter how much they are paid. I never moved up in life because I did the job I was hired to do. I moved up in life because I my goal was always to get the work done at a level two pay grades above where I was. As a result, I was always UNDERPAID and yet I was always paid more than everyone with the same job title as me. I didn't hang out with the people who bitched about their pay or the work. Steve Roni Molin wrote: > I don't think a 10% increase in the minimum wage would lose all those jobs. > No one is advocating doubling the minimum wage. As far as I know, in this > area, there are jobs that students get at less than the minimum wage.They > just raised the minimum wage, and it looks like you are attributing the big > layoffs to that. I'd say that more than 90% (just my estimate) of the people > laid off were making way over the minimum wage, so the little increase had > nothing to do with them. In fact, companies tend to keep the lower paid > employees in hard times except for a couple of key employees that can lead > the rest. If the raise in minimum wage were the problem, you would be seeing > reporting of that all over the place. > > I'd like to ask if you could work for less than $8.00 an hour in these times, > and if you did, what could you afford, food, gas, shelter, medical expenses, > dental expenses, telephone, pet food, auto repair, utilities, insurance, clothing? > > The list goes on, but the money doesn't. $320 used to be a living wage in the 50s and before, but not now. > > > Roni > <>Just because something > isn't seen doesn't mean it's > not there<> > > >> Roni, it is precisely because I've been in the poverty class when minimum wage was increased; it resulted in a 'net loss' for me as well as everyone else I knew who was also in that same 'income bracket'...my husband lost his job, as did many others...I've also been just a little over the newly increased minimum wage, along with all of my co-workers when it's happened; I again, saw what happened to all of us! We all suddenly became 'poverty level'. It became more difficult to keep up with living costs and we had to cut every thing in our lives that weren't essential...we ate a lot of beans and rice! >> >> >> >>>>> One: The free market system works, in that it provides the most >>>>> benefits for the most people than any system in history. >>>>> >>>>> Two: Minimum wage is a total perversion of the free market system. >>>>> >>>>> Three: If it works why don't we just set the minimum wage at $20 or $30 >>>>> per hour. That should REALLY help those whose actual output is about $3 >>>>> per hour. >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: If you can follow the logic of why this last suggestion is pretty >>>>> stupid you will then understand why minimum wage laws in general are >>>>> pretty stupid. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> . >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>>> Posted by: " Roni Molin " matchermaam@ >>>>>> <mailto:matchermaam@ >>>> ?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Cows%2C%20Geopolitics%2C%20and%20Big%20Business%20Re%3A%2 >>>> %5Bhypothyroidism%5D%20Re%3A%20Thy> >>>>>> matchermaam <matchermaam> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thu Apr 9, 2009 10:36 am (PDT) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree about illegal aliens. As far as the minimum wage is concerned, >>>>>> how much does it cost you to feed your family per person per week? Why >>>>>> do you think it's all right for you to be able to feed yourself and >>>>>> your family, but you don't support fair treatment of all Americans to >>>>>> get a decent wage (not that minimum wage is decent, but it's a start). >>>>>> With homes being what they cost, food up in price every week, gas >>>>>> going crazy, heat and electric being ridiculous, why do you object to >>>>>> people who are WORKING and not sponging off the government (which I >>>>>> know you don't like) being able to house, clothe and feed their >>>> families? >>>>>> Roni > -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 I totally agree that paying people well for doing a good job is beneficial to the boss as well as the worker. I just don't understand how this entire economy breakdown seems to be blamed by some people on minimum wage. I don't think anyone should not be able to get a decent paying job, and then provide good work for it. If they don't then I have no qualms about letting them go. I don't wish to be cheated any more than I wish to cheat any one else. Roni <>Just because something isn't seen doesn't mean it's not there<> >> Roni, it is precisely because I've been in the poverty class when minimum wage was increased; it resulted in a 'net loss' for me as well as everyone else I knew who was also in that same 'income bracket'...my husband lost his job, as did many others...I've also been just a little over the newly increased minimum wage, along with all of my co-workers when it's happened; I again, saw what happened to all of us! We all suddenly became 'poverty level'. It became more difficult to keep up with living costs and we had to cut every thing in our lives that weren't essential...we ate a lot of beans and rice! >> >> >> >>>>> One: The free market system works, in that it provides the most >>>>> benefits for the most people than any system in history. >>>>> >>>>> Two: Minimum wage is a total perversion of the free market system. >>>>> >>>>> Three: If it works why don't we just set the minimum wage at $20 or $30 >>>>> per hour. That should REALLY help those whose actual output is about $3 >>>>> per hour. >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: If you can follow the logic of why this last suggestion is pretty >>>>> stupid you will then understand why minimum wage laws in general are >>>>> pretty stupid. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> . >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>>> Posted by: " Roni Molin " matchermaam@ >>>>>> <mailto:matchermaam@ >>>> ?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Cows%2C%20Geopolitics%2C%20and%20Big%20Business%20Re%3A%2 >>>> %5Bhypothyroidism%5D%20Re%3A%20Thy> >>>>>> matchermaam <matchermaam> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thu Apr 9, 2009 10:36 am (PDT) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree about illegal aliens. As far as the minimum wage is concerned, >>>>>> how much does it cost you to feed your family per person per week? Why >>>>>> do you think it's all right for you to be able to feed yourself and >>>>>> your family, but you don't support fair treatment of all Americans to >>>>>> get a decent wage (not that minimum wage is decent, but it's a start). >>>>>> With homes being what they cost, food up in price every week, gas >>>>>> going crazy, heat and electric being ridiculous, why do you object to >>>>>> people who are WORKING and not sponging off the government (which I >>>>>> know you don't like) being able to house, clothe and feed their >>>> families? >>>>>> Roni > -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 I TOLD YOU THAT WAS WHAT WAS TOLD TO ME BY MY TAX ADVISOR, ASSHOLE -- Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: >> Thy >> >> >> >> >> The IRS cannot change the law. Don't make up sh*t. >> >> Steve -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 I TOLD YOU THAT WAS WHAT WAS TOLD TO ME BY MY TAX ADVISOR, -- Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: >> Thy >> >> >> >> >> The IRS cannot change the law. Don't make up sh*t. >> >> Steve -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 THEY CAN USE A LITTLE THING CALLED A " VETO " , ever heard of that? What YOu CAN'T SEEM TO GRASP, CINDY IS THAT THE DEMOCRATS DID NOT GET THE MAJORITY UNTIL 2007. UP UNTIL THAT TIME THE REPUBLICANS WERE IN THE MAJORITY, ERGO THEY WERE THE ONES PASSING THE BILLS. MAYBE YOU NEED TO STUDY UP WITH STEVE. GRADUATING FROM ONLY HIGH SCHOOL IS NOT WORKING FOR YOU. -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: Thy Government/Economics 101 For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... ... > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Really. I searched the archives for " tax adviser, asshole " and only your last post showed up! What I quoted below was accurate, you were making st*ff up. Steve Nancie Barnett wrote: > I TOLD YOU THAT WAS WHAT WAS TOLD TO ME BY MY TAX ADVISOR, ASSHOLE > > -- Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: >>> Thy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The IRS cannot change the law. Don't make up sh*t. >>> >>> Steve > -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 THEY CAN USE A LITTLE THING CALLED A " VETO " , ever heard of that? What YOu CAN'T SEEM TO GRASP, CINDY IS THAT THE DEMOCRATS DID NOT GET THE MAJORITY UNTIL 2007. UP UNTIL THAT TIME THE REPUBLICANS WERE IN THE MAJORITY, ERGO THEY WERE THE ONES PASSING THE BILLS. -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: Thy Government/Economics 101 For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... ... > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Do you really think a " veto " is how laws are made? Steve Nancie Barnett wrote: > THEY CAN USE A LITTLE THING CALLED A " VETO " , ever heard of that? > -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > Re: Thy > > > > > Government/Economics 101 > > For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... > > > > .. >> Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US >> Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? >> >> Steve -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Nancie, The Republican bill to limit the out of controlled wild lending by the GSE's never reached President Bush's desk....it was crushed and held in committee by Barney and other democrats and not put out on the floor to vote on. The president is not a king, he cannot sign things not actually on his desk! Understand??? The GSE's (Freddie and Fannie) started their wild lending by mandate under the Clinton administration. It was called " BANK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION " and started around 1998. You can trace the beginning of the housing bubble back to there.... Neil Nancie Barnett wrote: > > > THEY CAN USE A LITTLE THING CALLED A " VETO " , ever heard of that? > What YOu CAN'T SEEM TO GRASP, CINDY IS THAT THE DEMOCRATS DID NOT GET THE > MAJORITY UNTIL 2007. UP UNTIL THAT TIME THE REPUBLICANS WERE IN THE > MAJORITY, ERGO THEY WERE THE ONES PASSING THE BILLS. > MAYBE YOU NEED TO STUDY UP WITH STEVE. GRADUATING FROM ONLY HIGH SCHOOL IS > NOT WORKING FOR YOU. > > -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > Re: Thy > > > > > Government/Economics 101 > > For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... > > > > .. > > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > > > Steve > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Neil- i know that. That bill was held into committee because it had other items in it that were not part of the original package. The democrats held it there because they wanted all the pork crap be taken out of the bill by the republicans before they would let it out. BUT the republicans refused to take out that crap so the bill died. -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > Re: Thy > > > > > Government/Economics 101 > > For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... > > > > .. > > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > > > Steve > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Actually it did exist but only for a short time. I stand corrected on that. Here is the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_Item_Veto_Act_of_1996 -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: Thy It would be nice if that line item veto actually existed...Clinton wanted it ...didn't get it...Bush wanted it...didn't get it...hmmm...wonder if Obama will get it... > > .. > >> Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > >> Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > >> > >> Steve > > -- > > Steve - dudescholar4@... > > Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at > http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html > > " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march > to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 So you don't know how to search the archives OR you searched the archives and found you " remember " incorrectly. Note, the archives have posting dates and posting numbers so therefore a time line of the he said/she said can be established. When you make st*ff up, you cannot " creatively " remember when the record is being kept and archived. You accused me of being a liar without knowing how the archives work. I established from your OWN WORDS that you were being " creative " again and making st*ff up as, apparently, you are prone to do. What I find massively incongruent is that you apparently have some relationship with Buddhism and yet exhibit none of the calm in control mindfulness behavior that they are known for. Steve Nancie Barnett wrote: > Piss off loser > > -- Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > Re: >>>> Thy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The IRS cannot change the law. Don't make up sh*t. >>>> >>>> Steve > -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Steve wrote: > My son-in-law makes quite a bit less that 12/hour, is working full time > stocking shelves at a baby store, and goes to the local university full > time. His wife, my daughter is a full time stay-at-home-mom who takes > care of three children all under the age of 4. They did get a student When I say " takes care of three children " , these are her own children. She doesn't do at home day care. > loan to make up the difference when he quit his second job to go to > school full time. Technically, they are quite poor but that is only a > temporary condition since they are just getting started in the world. > We all start somewhere and almost 100% of us have an ability to further > ourselves. > > My father who worked hard all his life could never figure out how the > people on welfare in his day used to always drive Cadillacs, a brand he > didn't feel he could afford. However, he did have his spending > priorities correctly in order. > > Steve > > Nancie Barnett wrote: >> cindy- >> the last time I checked it still COST MONEY to go to any college, >> including community college. So, unless the schools provide child care and >> educational grants most poor people are not going to be able to go there. >> They have to be able to still work, pay bills, pay for child care; and also >> pay for school. Hmm I wonder how that can be accomplished on say 12.00/hr at >> walmart when one only makes AGAIN 23,040 BEFORE taxes. >> Plus, ALL higher education institutions are having drastic budget problems >> and they are limiting the number of classes offered and actually firing >> teachers and professors. >> You never did answer my question about your daughter working at walmart and >> making that " huge " salary ;} and being able to pay for all living related >> expenses... Maybe because you realized that 12.00/hr is not a living wage >> for most people in this country who live in cities. >> >> -- Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: Thy >> >> >> >> >> Last I knew it was unemployment 'insurance', paid for by the employer, >> managed by the government (much like SS)...after a certain period of time, >> if the employee doesn't use those benefits (the employer doesn't lay the >> employee off), the benefits are returned to the employer (incentive to >> retain the employee)...when the government steps in and extends those >> benefits, then it does become a form of 'welfare', something I do support >> under circumstances like this...also happened back in the early 80s. >> >> Regarding 'less fortunate' who 'don't have the education to get into >> university level in the first place', that's what community colleges are for >> ..they offer courses that allow one to get a GED or even a high school >> diploma if they wish...they offer courses to raise the language, math and >> reading skills to a level where they can be successful in college...they >> offer specialized training in any number of fields as well as 2 year >> associate degrees, many of which will transfer to a university (usually in >> the same state, however)...and all of it can be at the government's expense >> (our tax payer dollars)...and this I also support...why? Because it teaches >> them to fish rather than just throwing them a fish... >> >> >> >> .. >>> What about unemployment benefits?? They are governmental assistance. Want >> to >> .. >> many other people are less fortunate and don't have the education >>> to get into univeresity level in the first place. > -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Taking it off list -- Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: Thy > > > > > Last I knew it was unemployment 'insurance', paid for by the employer, > managed by the government (much like SS)...after a certain period of time, > if the employee doesn't use those benefits (the employer doesn't lay the > employee off), the benefits are returned to the employer (incentive to > retain the employee)...when the government steps in and extends those > benefits, then it does become a form of 'welfare', something I do support > under circumstances like this...also happened back in the early 80s. > > Regarding 'less fortunate' who 'don't have the education to get into > university level in the first place', that's what community colleges are for > ..they offer courses that allow one to get a GED or even a high school > diploma if they wish...they offer courses to raise the language, math and > reading skills to a level where they can be successful in college...they > offer specialized training in any number of fields as well as 2 year > associate degrees, many of which will transfer to a university (usually in > the same state, however)...and all of it can be at the government's expense > (our tax payer dollars)...and this I also support...why? Because it teaches > them to fish rather than just throwing them a fish... > > > > .. >> What about unemployment benefits?? They are governmental assistance. Want > to > .. > many other people are less fortunate and don't have the education >> to get into univeresity level in the first place. -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Remember off list -- Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > Re: >>>> Thy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The IRS cannot change the law. Don't make up sh*t. >>>> >>>> Steve > -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Nope. I started adding OFF_TOPIC to all my replies lately so that any one and everyone could easily make it disappear from the list for them. I've offered to help anyone with my technical skills in this area in the same way I offered to give away books for free a while back. I do what I say. Steve Nancie Barnett wrote: > Remember off list > > -- Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: >> Re: >>>>> Thy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The IRS cannot change the law. Don't make up sh*t. >>>>> >>>>> Steve > -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Too bad for you I guess you will be debating with yourself -- Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: >> Re: >>>>> Thy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The IRS cannot change the law. Don't make up sh*t. >>>>> >>>>> Steve > -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 She didn't say that. Roni <>Just because something isn't seen doesn't mean it's not there<> From: cindy.seeley <cindy.seeley@...> Subject: OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: Thy hypothyroidism Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 12:38 AM Government/Economics 101 For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... .... > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > Steve ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Nancie, Steve is right....you do make sh!t up! Here is a copy of the bill that Republicans tried to pass, there is no pork that I can find. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-190 And how fitting that Obama has surrounded himself with people like lin Raines and Jim as actual advisers!!! Change we can believe in??? OMG Neil Nancie Barnett wrote: > > > Neil- > i know that. That bill was held into committee because it had other items > in it that were not part of the original package. The democrats held it > there because they wanted all the pork crap be taken out of the bill > by the > republicans before they would let it out. BUT the republicans refused to > take out that crap so the bill died. > > -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > > Re: Thy > > > > > > > > > > Government/Economics 101 > > > > For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... > > > > > > > > .. > > > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > > > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 So from 2001 to 2007, why wasn't a bill put before the president and signed by him to stop this? The democrats didn't have the ability to stop everything now did they, considering that bills got to Bush's desk and got signed. Roni <>Just because something isn't seen doesn't mean it's not there<> > > > THEY CAN USE A LITTLE THING CALLED A " VETO " , ever heard of that? > What YOu CAN'T SEEM TO GRASP, CINDY IS THAT THE DEMOCRATS DID NOT GET THE > MAJORITY UNTIL 2007. UP UNTIL THAT TIME THE REPUBLICANS WERE IN THE > MAJORITY, ERGO THEY WERE THE ONES PASSING THE BILLS. > MAYBE YOU NEED TO STUDY UP WITH STEVE. GRADUATING FROM ONLY HIGH SCHOOL IS > NOT WORKING FOR YOU. > > -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > Re: Thy > > > > > Government/Economics 101 > > For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... > > > > .. > > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > > > Steve > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Democrat Barney chairs the extremely powerful committee that oversees the housing and banking industries, this is the committee where it all happens. He is responsible for moving bills to the floor that he likes, and sitting on other bills until the end of the term, at that point the bills die. Repeatedly the Republicans have sponsored bills to put more controls on Fannie and Freddie (I can post You Tube videos where you can watch the actual hearings). Republicans were attacked as racists, alarmists, and were told they were trying to whip up hysteria. In all cases the bills never reached the President to sign. There is a video on You Tube where Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan is telling the committee that something has to be done, that there was extreme risk. All ignored. Yes, the democrats did have the ability to stop everything. Now they are crying that poor people are being hurt, and that we taxpayers have to step up and bail them out! Neil Roni Molin wrote: > > > So from 2001 to 2007, why wasn't a bill put before the president and > signed by him to stop this? The democrats didn't have the ability to > stop everything now did they, considering that bills got to Bush's > desk and got signed. > > Roni > <>Just because something > isn't seen doesn't mean it's > not there<> > > > > > > > > THEY CAN USE A LITTLE THING CALLED A " VETO " , ever heard of that? > > What YOu CAN'T SEEM TO GRASP, CINDY IS THAT THE DEMOCRATS DID NOT > GET THE > > MAJORITY UNTIL 2007. UP UNTIL THAT TIME THE REPUBLICANS WERE IN THE > > MAJORITY, ERGO THEY WERE THE ONES PASSING THE BILLS. > > MAYBE YOU NEED TO STUDY UP WITH STEVE. GRADUATING FROM ONLY HIGH > SCHOOL IS > > NOT WORKING FOR YOU. > > > > -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > > Re: Thy > > > > > > > > > > Government/Economics 101 > > > > For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... > > > > > > > > .. > > > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > > > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 I have no problem with them perse, but keeps saying that these programs are ruining the country. When she or her family gets a chance to use them or others, they have no qualms about making use of them. To me this is fine, but I would never say any one else is not entitled to live well aside from me. Roni <>Just because something isn't seen doesn't mean it's not there<> > > > From: cindy.seeley <cindy.seeley@...> > Subject: Re:Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: Re: Thy > hypothyroidism > Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 12:42 AM > > > My Mom got 600 too...I filled out the form for her. > > > >>>> cindy >>>> I made 100,000.00 dollars last year and I got 300.00 dollars. My >>> friend made >>>> 50,000 and still only got 300.00 and my other friend made 40,000 and >>> also >>>> only got 300.00. The only people who got more were Married or joint >>> filers. -- Steve - dudescholar4@... Take World's Smallest Political Quiz at http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html " If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march on. " --Stopford ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 I know how it works. They " negotiate " with each other. If a bill doesn't get to the floor, it's because one side or the other stood flatfooted and refused to cooperate in any manner. This time, with the budget, the dems had enough votes to pass it even without the repubs. Maybe they'll start to figure out that cooperation will get them something and no cooperation will get them what they got, nothing. Roni <>Just because something isn't seen doesn't mean it's not there<> > > > > > > THEY CAN USE A LITTLE THING CALLED A " VETO " , ever heard of that? > > What YOu CAN'T SEEM TO GRASP, CINDY IS THAT THE DEMOCRATS DID NOT > GET THE > > MAJORITY UNTIL 2007. UP UNTIL THAT TIME THE REPUBLICANS WERE IN THE > > MAJORITY, ERGO THEY WERE THE ONES PASSING THE BILLS. > > MAYBE YOU NEED TO STUDY UP WITH STEVE. GRADUATING FROM ONLY HIGH > SCHOOL IS > > NOT WORKING FOR YOU. > > > > -- OFF_TOPIC Re: Cows, Geopolitics, and Big Business Re: > > Re: Thy > > > > > > > > > > Government/Economics 101 > > > > For some reason she even thinks the President makes the laws... > > > > > > > > .. > > > Did the school systems you went to not teach any courses on the US > > > Constitution and how it works with respect to making laws? > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 I guess if you wish to repeatedly demonstrate a lack of intelligence, that's your prerogative! > > > > Piss off condescending wench Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.