Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Fw: [WmnsHormones] Insurers Ceasing Coverage of Bioidentical Hor

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Yes - it's true. We have blue cross (federal plan) and several months ago I was

prescribed a compounded estriol cream - $23 a month and they don't pay for it.

I will soon be on other bioidentical hormones and I guess will be stuck paying

for that too. It's disgusting. Most of the things we have been doing to get

and stay healthy and really be cured they don't pay for. But they will pay for

garbage that makes you sicker in the long run. I'm surprised they even pay for

my Armour thyroid but they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yikes, I can't believe it! I'm losing my health coverage in a couple of

years, but maybe the insurance will have gotten so bad by then, I will be less

heartbroken from losing it (on the strange, sorta bright side?). What are we

all

going to do? Oh I know! How about form our own colony until the rest of the

country gets it's sh*t together! We'll have great thyroid docs there and

everything :-) I know that's not allowed, but still, it's funny to think about.

;-)

In a message dated 9/10/07 7:38:34 AM, alexis@... writes:

>

> Yes - it's true. We have blue cross (federal plan) and several months ago I

> was prescribed a compounded estriol cream - $23 a month and they don't pay

> for it. I will soon be on other bioidentical hormones and I guess will be

stuck

> paying for that too. It's disgusting. Most of the things we have been doing

> to get and stay healthy and really be cured they don't pay for. But they will

> pay for garbage that makes you sicker in the long run. I'm surprised they

> even pay for my Armour thyroid but they do.

>

>

>

**************************************

See what's new at http://www.aol.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the ARE in it to make money then why wouldn't they want people to have

things that will not cause more side effects and will make them healthier in the

long run? This is what is so ridiculous. They make more money by keeping us

sick - that's what I've read - but it doesn't really make a lot of sense! The

explanation seems to be that the drug companies give them big kickbacks if they

help them sell their poisons!

When I decided to stop getting yearly mammograms they sent me a " reminder " a

couple of times. My integrative doctor says there are studies that show low

dose radiation can cause cancer. Now I get thermography, which is just as good

at finding cancer as mammograms without any risk. There is a lot of evidence to

support this but how often does mainstream medicine even admit it exists. They

have to pay for all those mammogram machines! They won't pay for that either!

And the list goes on! I'm starting to wonder if the premiums are even worth it

but just can't risk not having it in case of an injury or something requiring

surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is-

By keeping people sick,?they will, as you said, get sicker.?That equals more

symptoms, more problems and therefore?they would end up needing 5 medications

from big pharma instead of just one.?And then they make more money with each new

problem.??They exist because people are sick, they get richer when people get

sicker.? It's strange that there is motivation for them to keep people sick and

get them sicker, but it's true.??For example,?with hypoT, many doctors refuse to

do the tests necessary for a persons diagnose so?instead of giving a?person just

one medication (Armour :-) they prescribe?anti-depresssants, cholesteral

medications, maybe weight loss pills, etc, and suggest many other visits,

doctors, and copays to try and figure out what " actually might be wrong " . It'a

all about money.?

Since the ARE in it to make money then why wouldn't they want people to have

things that will not cause more side effects and will make them healthier in the

long run? This is what is so ridiculous. They make more money by keeping us sick

- that's what I've read - but it doesn't really make a lot of sense! The

explanation seems to be that the drug companies give them big kickbacks if they

help them sell their poisons!

When I decided to stop getting yearly mammograms they sent me a " reminder " a

couple of times. My integrative doctor says there are studies that show low dose

radiation can cause cancer. Now I get thermography, which is just as good at

finding cancer as mammograms without any risk. There is a lot of evidence to

support this but how often does mainstream medicine even admit it exists. They

have to pay for all those mammogram machines! They won't pay for that either!

And the list goes on! I'm starting to wonder if the premiums are even worth it

but just can't risk not having it in case of an injury or something requiring

surgery.

Re: Fw: [WmnsHormones] Insurers Ceasing Coverage of

Bioidentical Hor

Since the ARE in it to make money then why wouldn't they want people to have

things that will not cause more side effects and will make them healthier in the

long run? This is what is so ridiculous. They make more money by keeping us sick

- that's what I've read - but it doesn't really make a lot of sense! The

explanation seems to be that the drug companies give them big kickbacks if they

help them sell their poisons!

When I decided to stop getting yearly mammograms they sent me a " reminder " a

couple of times. My integrative doctor says there are studies that show low dose

radiation can cause cancer. Now I get thermography, which is just as good at

finding cancer as mammograms without any risk. There is a lot of evidence to

support this but how often does mainstream medicine even admit it exists. They

have to pay for all those mammogram machines! They won't pay for that either!

And the list goes on! I'm starting to wonder if the premiums are even worth it

but just can't risk not having it in case of an injury or something requiring

surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

I couldn't have said it better.....I totally agree with you.

Venizia

>

>

> is-

>

>

>

> By keeping people sick,?they will, as you said, get sicker.?That equals more

symptoms,

more problems and therefore?they would end up needing 5 medications from big

pharma

instead of just one.?And then they make more money with each new problem.??They

exist

because people are sick, they get richer when people get sicker.? It's strange

that there is

motivation for them to keep people sick and get them sicker, but it's true.??For

example,?

with hypoT, many doctors refuse to do the tests necessary for a persons diagnose

so?

instead of giving a?person just one medication (Armour :-) they prescribe?anti-

depresssants, cholesteral medications, maybe weight loss pills, etc, and suggest

many

other visits, doctors, and copays to try and figure out what " actually might be

wrong " . It'a

all about money.?

>

>

>

> Since the ARE in it to make money then why wouldn't they want people to have

things

that will not cause more side effects and will make them healthier in the long

run? This is

what is so ridiculous. They make more money by keeping us sick - that's what

I've read -

but it doesn't really make a lot of sense! The explanation seems to be that the

drug

companies give them big kickbacks if they help them sell their poisons!

>

> When I decided to stop getting yearly mammograms they sent me a " reminder " a

couple

of times. My integrative doctor says there are studies that show low dose

radiation can

cause cancer. Now I get thermography, which is just as good at finding cancer as

mammograms without any risk. There is a lot of evidence to support this but how

often

does mainstream medicine even admit it exists. They have to pay for all those

mammogram machines! They won't pay for that either! And the list goes on! I'm

starting to

wonder if the premiums are even worth it but just can't risk not having it in

case of an

injury or something requiring surgery.

>

>

>

> Re: Fw: [WmnsHormones] Insurers Ceasing Coverage of

Bioidentical Hor

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Since the ARE in it to make money then why wouldn't they want people to have

things

that will not cause more side effects and will make them healthier in the long

run? This is

what is so ridiculous. They make more money by keeping us sick - that's what

I've read -

but it doesn't really make a lot of sense! The explanation seems to be that the

drug

companies give them big kickbacks if they help them sell their poisons!

>

> When I decided to stop getting yearly mammograms they sent me a " reminder " a

couple

of times. My integrative doctor says there are studies that show low dose

radiation can

cause cancer. Now I get thermography, which is just as good at finding cancer as

mammograms without any risk. There is a lot of evidence to support this but how

often

does mainstream medicine even admit it exists. They have to pay for all those

mammogram machines! They won't pay for that either! And the list goes on! I'm

starting to

wonder if the premiums are even worth it but just can't risk not having it in

case of an

injury or something requiring surgery.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just it - I know the drug companies make more money from keeping us sick

and I've read a number of books that point out all the reasons. They are

killing us for money! But apparently the insurance companies make more money

from paying out all the claims for the drugs and then more drugs then they would

by paying for a few simple things that CURE us. And that is what is really mind

blowing! Drug companies must give them big kickbacks for doing this to make it

worthwhile. In some cases they are paying over $1000 a month for the drugs for

one person plus all the doctor's visits involved. Then there are also the

cancer surgeries, heart bypass and such that results from all the stupidity!

It's hard to imagine how that could be better for the insurance company than

properly diagnosing and treating thyroid disease or other things such as

chelation, detox, nutrition, etc. that could solve so many problems.

It is absolutely disgusting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for asking . Well, I feel very good. However, with my pulse rate

usually at

80, Chuck thinks I may be hyperT. Although I don't have any other hyperT

symptoms. My

face is not at all puffy ( a hypoT symptom) It has been two years since I have

been able to

say that. So I am a little confused as to what to do. I have a appointment

next week with

my doctor. So I will see what he has to say. I really do not want to lower my

meds. I was

hoping he would raise it just a little......constipation is a real problem.

Sorry, probably too

much info. :)

Venizia

>

> Thanks, Venizia. How have you been feeling?

>

> :-)

>

> In a message dated 9/11/07 11:49:06 AM, nelsonck@... writes:

> >

> > ,

> >

> > I couldn't have said it better.....I totally agree with you.

> >

> > Venizia

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

> **************************************

> See what's new at http://www.aol.com

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Venizia-

Not to keep preaching to the choir but maybe you need adrenal support? If

other than that you are feeling great/want more meds I think no one else is more

in tune with that than you! In terms of too much info, not at all .... that's

what this place is for! Keep us posted on your Dr's visit!

In a message dated 9/13/07 4:06:11 PM, nelsonck@... writes:

>

> Thanks for asking . Well, I feel very good. However, with my pulse

> rate usually at

> 80, Chuck thinks I may be hyperT. Although I don't have any other hyperT

> symptoms. My

> face is not at all puffy ( a hypoT symptom) It has been two years since I

> have been able to

> say that. So I am a little confused as to what to do. I have a appointment

> next week with

> my doctor. So I will see what he has to say. I really do not want to lower

> my meds. I was

> hoping he would raise it just a little...... hoping he would raise it just a

> little......<wbr>con

> much info. :)

>

> Venizia

>

> --- In hypothyroidism@hypothyroidihyp, bear339@, be

> >

> > Thanks, Venizia. How have you been feeling?

> >

> > :-)

> >

> > In a message dated 9/11/07 11:49:06 AM, nelsonck@... writes:

> > >

> > > ,

> > >

> > > I couldn't have said it better.....I totally agree with you.

> > >

> > > Venizia

> > >

>

>

>

**************************************

See what's new at http://www.aol.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...