Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

[Guest guest]

Gracia,

You wrote:

> ... Many fine physicians are wondering why the

> RDA for iodine would be set so low,...

Yes, and all four of them work for Optimox.

> Dr. H. Duffy uses some very harsh but deserved words while asking

> some clear questions about iodine. " Isn't it odd that the government

> dispenses Iodine to protect against radioactive iodine resulting from a

> nuclear disaster when the medical quacks are dumping the same type of

> radioactive iodine into patients with thyroid problems in a stupid

> attempt to " cure " thyroid " disease " caused by a lack of elemental iodine

> in its natural state found in nature?...

Dr. Duffy is a doctor of chiropractic.

The dose of potassium iodide recommended for protection from radioactive

fallout or a reactor accident is 130 mg taken in a single large dose.

They sell it in 65 mg tablets, so you take two and then quit. That is

very different from the Lugol's regimen. It is also KI, not the iodine

by itself.

The activity used for an RAI treatment for Grave's disease is between 3

and 12 millicuries, resulting in an absorbed dose of 10-100 Gray in the

thyroid.

Nuclear accidents typically have released many tens of curies of iodine,

at a minimum. Three Mile Island released about 20 curies (20,000 mCi).

Chernobyl released 50,000,000 curies. The total world wide release in

any one year is about 24,000,000,000 curies. Do you perceive a difference?

I don't think the protective KI dose is odd at all, even though I would

also suggest a second opinion about the RAI ablation technique.

Chuck

[Guest guest]

dinner is still gonna be on you Chuck. you should join iodine group.

Gracia

iodized, armourized

Gracia,

You wrote:

> ... Many fine physicians are wondering why the

> RDA for iodine would be set so low,...

Yes, and all four of them work for Optimox.

> Dr. H. Duffy uses some very harsh but deserved words while asking

> some clear questions about iodine. " Isn't it odd that the government

> dispenses Iodine to protect against radioactive iodine resulting from a

> nuclear disaster when the medical quacks are dumping the same type of

> radioactive iodine into patients with thyroid problems in a stupid

> attempt to " cure " thyroid " disease " caused by a lack of elemental iodine

> in its natural state found in nature?...

Dr. Duffy is a doctor of chiropractic.

The dose of potassium iodide recommended for protection from radioactive

fallout or a reactor accident is 130 mg taken in a single large dose.

They sell it in 65 mg tablets, so you take two and then quit. That is

very different from the Lugol's regimen. It is also KI, not the iodine

by itself.

The activity used for an RAI treatment for Grave's disease is between 3

and 12 millicuries, resulting in an absorbed dose of 10-100 Gray in the

thyroid.

Nuclear accidents typically have released many tens of curies of iodine,

at a minimum. Three Mile Island released about 20 curies (20,000 mCi).

Chernobyl released 50,000,000 curies. The total world wide release in

any one year is about 24,000,000,000 curies. Do you perceive a difference?

I don't think the protective KI dose is odd at all, even though I would

also suggest a second opinion about the RAI ablation technique.

Chuck

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1085 - Release Date: 10/22/2007

10:35 AM

[Guest guest]

Do you really think Chuck's opinions would be welcome on the Iodine group???

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

<hypothyroidism/message/31956;_ylc=X3oDMTJxNDQwajg\

5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzE5NTYEc2V\

jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MzEzMDkxNw-->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Gracia " circe@...

>

<mailto:circe@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20the%20Universal%20Nutrient%20b\

y%20Mark%20Sricus>

> graciabee <graciabee>

>

>

> Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:53 pm (PST)

>

>

> dinner is still gonna be on you Chuck. you should join iodine group.

> Gracia

> iodized, armourized

>

> Gracia,

>

> You wrote:

>

> > ... Many fine physicians are wondering why the

> > RDA for iodine would be set so low,...

>

> Yes, and all four of them work for Optimox.

[Guest guest]

You know what? I bet it would broaden his knowledge about iodine

a lot more than he would ever have expected.

Sam :-D

>

> Do you really think Chuck's opinions would be welcome on the Iodine

group???

>

>

[Guest guest]

of course. I think Chuck is intellectually honest. On iodine group you can

see what iodine is actually doing and how it is being used.

Gracia

Do you really think Chuck's opinions would be welcome on the Iodine group???

>

Recent Activity

a.. 6New Members

Visit Your Group

Get cancer support

Connect w/ others

find help & share

Healthy Eating

A Group

for families on

how to eat healthy.

Sitebuilder

Build a web site

quickly & easily

with Sitebuilder.

.

[Guest guest]

It seems to me that painfully few [if any] here even have a concept of

the depth of his knowledge of iodine already. I'm afraid that on the

iodine list it would be like k0jo47e trying to educate Einstein.

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

<hypothyroidism/message/31969;_ylc=X3oDMTJxZTk5aTN\

1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzE5NjkEc2V\

jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MzIxNzQwMw-->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Sam " k9gang@...

>

<mailto:k9gang@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20the%20Universal%20Nutr\

ient%20by%20Mark%20Sricus>

> stealthwind <stealthwind>

>

>

> Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:51 am (PST)

>

> You know what? I bet it would broaden his knowledge about iodine

> a lot more than he would ever have expected.

>

> Sam :-D

>

>

> >

> > Do you really think Chuck's opinions would be welcome on the Iodine

> group???

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Ah; but Chuck is not only well educated, he's far smarter than some

[any?] of us. You don't see him getting sucked into a discussion of

Hulda , do you? Something I can't say...

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

<hypothyroidism/message/31974;_ylc=X3oDMTJxbTdwNnF\

oBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzE5NzQEc2V\

jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MzIxNzQwMw-->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Gracia " circe@...

>

<mailto:circe@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20the%20Universal%20Nutrient%20b\

y%20Mark%20Sricus>

> graciabee <graciabee>

>

>

> Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:19 pm (PST)

>

>

> of course. I think Chuck is intellectually honest. On iodine group you

> can see what iodine is actually doing and how it is being used.

> Gracia

>

> Do you really think Chuck's opinions would be welcome on the Iodine

> group???

>

>

[Guest guest]

Einstein never stopped learning, and wasn't he just the most adorbale

little thing? I hope I never stop learning, either. There are so many

things in this world, that no one can ever know them all. And I hope

none of you ever stop learning, being curious, discovering new things.

Sam :-D

(thyroidless sone 1990)

>

It seems to me that painfully few [if any] here even have a concept of

the depth of his knowledge of iodine already. I'm afraid that on the

iodine list it would be like k0jo47e trying to educate Einstein.

[Guest guest]

(Sorry if this is a duplicate)

Einstein never stopped learning, and wasn't he just the most adorbale

little thing? I hope I never stop learning, either. There are so many

things in this world, that no one can ever know them all. And I hope

none of you ever stop learning, being curious, discovering new things.

Sam :-D

(thyroidless sone 1990)

>

It seems to me that painfully few [if any] here even have a concept of

the depth of his knowledge of iodine already. I'm afraid that on the

iodine list it would be like k0jo47e

[Guest guest]

,

You wrote:

> ...I'm afraid that on the

> iodine list it would be like k0jo47e trying to educate Einstein.

You flatter me!

My approach to posting is based on triage logic. I figure that people

that cannot themselves refute complete nonsense will not pay any

attention to anything I have to say. Those who can, don't need my

confirmation. Consequently, I tend to post only when there is likely to

be a group that can't tell the difference.

Chuck

[Guest guest]

Actually, while Einstein was utterly brilliant he was also an utter

@$$hole. Check out how he [mis]treated his graduate student who he

married. She was herself brilliant, but he totally destroyed her. I

just wish she could have had some of your spunk when he started pulling

all that $hit; I know you would have sent him packing. And probably

with a knot on his head!

And as for always learning, he never accepted Quantum theory [which he

helped to establish]. His EPR paradox [which he developed with Podolsky

and Rosen] was sublimely brilliant; HOWEVER, Einstein himself did not

understand or accept its implications.

Regards,

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

<hypothyroidism/message/31985;_ylc=X3oDMTJxZnJzbm1\

iBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzE5ODUEc2V\

jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MzMwMzg2Mg-->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Sam " k9gang@...

>

<mailto:k9gang@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20the%20Universal%20Nutr\

ient%20by%20Mark%20Sricus>

> stealthwind <stealthwind>

>

>

> Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:09 pm (PST)

>

> (Sorry if this is a duplicate)

>

> Einstein never stopped learning, and wasn't he just the most adorbale

> little thing? I hope I never stop learning, either. There are so many

> things in this world, that no one can ever know them all. And I hope

> none of you ever stop learning, being curious, discovering new things.

>

> Sam :-D

> (thyroidless sone 1990)

>

>

> >

> It seems to me that painfully few [if any] here even have a concept of

> the depth of his knowledge of iodine already. I'm afraid that on the

> iodine list it would be like k0jo47e

[Guest guest]

How do you profess to know so much about the inner thinking of

this great scientist? Even if he was alive today, you would still not

be privy to his, or for that matter, anyone else's inner thoughts.

Also, though I am not a defender of men mistreating women, under

any circumstances, I also wonder at how you feel that you know so

much about what went on inside their marriage?

Roni

Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

Actually, while Einstein was utterly brilliant he was also an utter

@$$hole. Check out how he [mis]treated his graduate student who he

married. She was herself brilliant, but he totally destroyed her. I

just wish she could have had some of your spunk when he started pulling

all that $hit; I know you would have sent him packing. And probably

with a knot on his head!

And as for always learning, he never accepted Quantum theory [which he

helped to establish]. His EPR paradox [which he developed with Podolsky

and Rosen] was sublimely brilliant; HOWEVER, Einstein himself did not

understand or accept its implications.

Regards,

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

> <http://groups. / group/hypothyroi dism/message/ 31985;_ylc=

X3oDMTJxZnJzbm1i BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1 BGdycElkAzE0NTY2 NARncnBzcElkAzE3

MDkyNTEwODIEbXNn SWQDMzE5ODUEc2Vj A2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Zt c2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5 MzMwMzg2Mg-

->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Sam " k9gangopenaccess (DOT) org

> <mailto:k9gangopenaccess (DOT) org?Subject=%20Re% 3A%20Iodine% 20the%20Universa

l%20Nutrient% 20by%20Mark% 20Sricus>

> stealthwind <http://profiles. / stealthwind>

>

>

> Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:09 pm (PST)

>

> (Sorry if this is a duplicate)

>

> Einstein never stopped learning, and wasn't he just the most adorbale

> little thing? I hope I never stop learning, either. There are so many

> things in this world, that no one can ever know them all. And I hope

> none of you ever stop learning, being curious, discovering new things.

>

> Sam :-D

> (thyroidless sone 1990)

>

>

> >

> It seems to me that painfully few [if any] here even have a concept of

> the depth of his knowledge of iodine already. I'm afraid that on the

> iodine list it would be like k0jo47e

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

I don't know that " strong personality " is the correct term. Too often

it seems that those lacking in empathy for the suffering of others too

easily dominate.

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

<hypothyroidism/message/32005;_ylc=X3oDMTJxYWp1aGd\

sBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzIwMDUEc2V\

jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MzM5MDIxOQ-->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Sam " k9gang@...

>

<mailto:k9gang@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20the%20Universal%20Nutr\

ient%20by%20Mark%20Sricus>

> stealthwind <stealthwind>

>

>

> Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:32 pm (PST)

>

> heh...heh...

> heh... YOu " know " I would have had that BadBoy on his

> knees, . <wink>

>

> Does it not seem that, brilliant or not, people with stong

> personalities have the ability to dominate (et al) those with weaker

> personalities, if they have the urge to do so?

>

> Sam

> (godzilla was a whimp)

>

>

> >

> > Actually, while Einstein was utterly brilliant he was also an utter

> > @$$hole. Check out how he [mis]treated his graduate student who he

> > married. She was herself brilliant, but he totally destroyed her.

> I

> > just wish she could have had some of your spunk when he started

> pulling

> > all that $hit; I know you would have sent him packing. And

> probably

> > with a knot on his head!

> >

> > And as for always learning, he never accepted Quantum theory [which

> he

> > helped to establish]. His EPR paradox [which he developed with

> Podolsky

> > and Rosen] was sublimely brilliant; HOWEVER, Einstein himself did

> not

> > understand or accept its implications.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

[Guest guest]

Maybe so, maybe not. <grin>

Sam :-D

>

> I don't know that " strong personality " is the correct term. Too

often

> it seems that those lacking in empathy for the suffering of others

too

> easily dominate.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Unfortunately very much of it is well documented; however, due to his

status perhaps it has not been as widely disseminated as it should have

been. If you do a bit of research on his private life you will not

admire him quite as much for his personality. While he was truly

brilliant [at least in his early years] in science, he sorely lacked in

some areas.

I believe his second wife was a cousin. She had to cook his meals

EXACTLY as he ordered; and was not allowed to even speak to him without

permission. Much of the evidence was destroyed when the executors of

his estate burned vast quantities of his personal papers to protect his

reputation; but word still got out.

If you want another disappointment, check out the private life of Newton.

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

<hypothyroidism/message/32006;_ylc=X3oDMTJxaHVvcW9\

1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzIwMDYEc2V\

jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MzM5MDIxOQ-->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Roni Molin " matchermaam@...

>

<mailto:matchermaam@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20the%20Universal%20Nutr\

ient%20by%20Mark%20Sricus>

> matchermaam <matchermaam>

>

>

> Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:55 pm (PST)

>

> How do you profess to know so much about the inner thinking of

> this great scientist? Even if he was alive today, you would still not

> be privy to his, or for that matter, anyone else's inner thoughts.

> Also, though I am not a defender of men mistreating women, under

> any circumstances, I also wonder at how you feel that you know so

> much about what went on inside their marriage?

>

> Roni

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

> Actually, while Einstein was utterly brilliant he was also an utter

> @$$hole. Check out how he [mis]treated his graduate student who he

> married. She was herself brilliant, but he totally destroyed her. I

> just wish she could have had some of your spunk when he started pulling

> all that $hit; I know you would have sent him packing. And probably

> with a knot on his head!

>

> And as for always learning, he never accepted Quantum theory [which he

> helped to establish]. His EPR paradox [which he developed with Podolsky

> and Rosen] was sublimely brilliant; HOWEVER, Einstein himself did not

> understand or accept its implications.

>

> Regards,

>

[Guest guest]

I don't believe anyone can " document " what goes on inside anyone's marriage.

Obviously, this kind of reporting is not firsthand, and even when told to

someone by the subjects themselves, the stories are subjective. I think it is

presumptuous to think we can ever know what someone is thinking.

Roni

Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

> Actually, while Einstein was utterly brilliant he was also an utter

> @$$hole. Check out how he [mis]treated his graduate student who he

> married. She was herself brilliant, but he totally destroyed her. I

> just wish she could have had some of your spunk when he started pulling

> all that $hit; I know you would have sent him packing. And probably

> with a knot on his head!

>

> And as for always learning, he never accepted Quantum theory [which he

> helped to establish]. His EPR paradox [which he developed with Podolsky

> and Rosen] was sublimely brilliant; HOWEVER, Einstein himself did not

> understand or accept its implications.

>

> Regards,

>

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

If you're accused of murder then the testimony of live witnesses will be

allowed both for and against you in your fight for your life. As would

anything you have written. I've examined a bit of the evidence and

arrived at my own conclusions; and I would suggest you do the same.

There is no reason to accept mine; especially if you can come up with

any rebuttal evidence [which I doubt].

ly, I have very little respect for the personality of anyone who

treats a woman the way the clear evidence shows he treated his second

wife. Or his first, for that matter...

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

<hypothyroidism/message/32037;_ylc=X3oDMTJxZTVwc2h\

zBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzIwMzcEc2V\

jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MzQ2MDIxMg-->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Roni Molin " matchermaam@...

>

<mailto:matchermaam@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20the%20Universal%20Nutr\

ient%20by%20Mark%20Sricus>

> matchermaam <matchermaam>

>

>

> Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:55 pm (PST)

>

> I don't believe anyone can " document " what goes on inside anyone's

> marriage. Obviously, this kind of reporting is not firsthand, and even

> when told to someone by the subjects themselves, the stories are

> subjective. I think it is presumptuous to think we can ever know what

> someone is thinking.

>

> Roni

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark

> Sricus

> >

> > Actually, while Einstein was utterly brilliant he was also an utter

> > @$$hole. Check out how he [mis]treated his graduate student who he

> > married. She was herself brilliant, but he totally destroyed her. I

> > just wish she could have had some of your spunk when he started pulling

> > all that $hit; I know you would have sent him packing. And probably

> > with a knot on his head!

> >

> > And as for always learning, he never accepted Quantum theory [which he

> > helped to establish]. His EPR paradox [which he developed with Podolsky

> > and Rosen] was sublimely brilliant; HOWEVER, Einstein himself did not

> > understand or accept its implications.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

[Guest guest]

Ha, ha, you are right that witnesses will be allowed to testify

at your trial. However, they will not be allowed to testify to

hearsay, that means anything that is told to them by someone

about someone else. That's a good thing.

Roni

Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark

> Sricus

> >

> > Actually, while Einstein was utterly brilliant he was also an utter

> > @$$hole. Check out how he [mis]treated his graduate student who he

> > married. She was herself brilliant, but he totally destroyed her. I

> > just wish she could have had some of your spunk when he started pulling

> > all that $hit; I know you would have sent him packing. And probably

> > with a knot on his head!

> >

> > And as for always learning, he never accepted Quantum theory [which he

> > helped to establish]. His EPR paradox [which he developed with Podolsky

> > and Rosen] was sublimely brilliant; HOWEVER, Einstein himself did not

> > understand or accept its implications.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

If you commit a murder and tell others about it and go to trial then

those who heard you say you committed the crime will be allowed to

testify as to what you said. Stool pigeons do it frequently in hopes of

receiving lenient treatment.

That doesn't necessarily mean the testimony is valid... But in

Einstein's case the numerous reports of his friends and acquaintances

are very persuasive. It wasn't something he sought to hide; either in

speaking or writing. But much of the written evidence was destroyed by

the executors of his estate; in order to try to protect his reputation.

> .

>

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

>

<hypothyroidism/message/32061;_ylc=X3oDMTJxNDczMjg\

0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzIwNjEEc2V\

jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MzU2Mjg2MA-->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Roni Molin " matchermaam@...

>

<mailto:matchermaam@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%20the%20Universal%20Nutr\

ient%20by%20Mark%20Sricus>

> matchermaam <matchermaam>

>

>

> Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:54 pm (PST)

>

> Ha, ha, you are right that witnesses will be allowed to testify

> at your trial. However, they will not be allowed to testify to

> hearsay, that means anything that is told to them by someone

> about someone else. That's a good thing.

>

> Roni

[Guest guest]

You are right . If I told you something directly

you would be able to testify to that in court. But hearsay

is something else. Please reread my explanation below

However, they will not be allowed to testify to

> hearsay, that means anything that is told to them by someone

> about someone else.

Check it out, . I worked for attorneys, and the rules are the

rules. (so far)

Roni

Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

If you commit a murder and tell others about it and go to trial then

those who heard you say you committed the crime will be allowed to

testify as to what you said. Stool pigeons do it frequently in hopes of

receiving lenient treatment.

That doesn't necessarily mean the testimony is valid... But in

Einstein's case the numerous reports of his friends and acquaintances

are very persuasive. It wasn't something he sought to hide; either in

speaking or writing. But much of the written evidence was destroyed by

the executors of his estate; in order to try to protect his reputation.

> .

>

>

> Re: Iodine the Universal Nutrient by Mark Sricus

> <http://groups. / group/hypothyroi dism/message/ 32061;_ylc=

X3oDMTJxNDczMjg0 BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1 BGdycElkAzE0NTY2 NARncnBzcElkAzE3

MDkyNTEwODIEbXNn SWQDMzIwNjEEc2Vj A2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Zt c2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5 MzU2Mjg2MA-

->

>

>

>

> Posted by: " Roni Molin " matchermaam

> <mailto:matchermaam?Subject=%20Re% 3A%20Iodine% 20the%20Universa

l%20Nutrient% 20by%20Mark% 20Sricus>

> matchermaam <http://profiles. / matchermaam>

>

>

> Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:54 pm (PST)

>

> Ha, ha, you are right that witnesses will be allowed to testify

> at your trial. However, they will not be allowed to testify to

> hearsay, that means anything that is told to them by someone

> about someone else. That's a good thing.

>

> Roni

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

What a guy he was, tho...heh heh heh

Read on:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13804030/

Sam :-D

>

> If you're accused of murder then the testimony of live witnesses

will be

> allowed both for and against you in your fight for your life. As

would

> anything you have written. I've examined a bit of the evidence and

> arrived at my own conclusions; and I would suggest you do the

same.

> There is no reason to accept mine; especially if you can come up

with

> any rebuttal evidence [which I doubt].

>

> ly, I have very little respect for the personality of anyone

who

> treats a woman the way the clear evidence shows he treated his

second

> wife. Or his first, for that matter...

>

>