Guest guest Posted December 31, 2007 Report Share Posted December 31, 2007 I do not understand the debunking of the germ theory of disease. I read here that one doesn't get lyme disease from ticks because " not everyone who gets bit by a tick gets lyme disease. " Now that is certainly true. But has anyone ever contracted lyme disease WITHOUT being bitten by a tick? Not everybody who gets bitten by a tick gets lyme, but everyone with lyme was bitten by a tick. Can someone enlighten me? Thanks! Brecht Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2008 Report Share Posted January 1, 2008 I really wonder what the (other) people here think of the germ theory of disease. How do you see all this? Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2008 Report Share Posted January 1, 2008 > > I really wonder what the (other) people here think of the germ theory of disease. > > How do you see all this? > > Thanks! > I think it's as good a theory as any but right now I and others are juggling more pressing matters & don't have the energy to debate with you. Perhaps there's a germ theory group you could join. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Hi, I read both links to the germ theory, and I understand the concept, but I just don't understand the " spreading / catching " of disease part. I hope I don't confuse you with my question, as I am utterly confused myself. For example, at my daughter's high school, lots of kids had come down with a nasty cough around the month of February. My daughter was hoping she'd be spared, but eventually started this gawd awful hacking and cold type symptoms. Almost bronchitis-like. After she had had it for about 2 weeks, my husband started coughing. (It's worth noting this hasn't happened to either of them in at least a decade and both are pretty healthy. Very rare if they are sick, so for both of them to get the same cough within 2 weeks of each other is very very rare ). Then there is me. The sickest of the bunch. Been sick for going on 4 years. Completely debilitated and rarely, if ever, go anywhere. However, a cough was never a symptom of mine. But I did get one for the first time a few days after my husband did, only mine was much milder and shorter lasting than theirs. They were both hit hard! So, if I am the sicky here in this household, and both of them are generally well 99.9% of the time, how is it I was mildly hit with this cough and they were somewhat brutally hit? You would think I have far more dead cells, toxic junk in me that would create all kinds of viruses, bacteria and fungus and make me feel way worse than they did with this thing. I don't understand how we all ended up with this cough pretty much at the same time, and after reading the germ theory, why I was not hit harder or worse than they were if I am in much poorer health than they are. I am also comfused at how this " started " at my daughter's school and ended up in our home. There is absolutely not one thing shared foodwise, toxin-wise by my husband and myself and anything at this school ( that I am aware of ). I hope someone isn't too terribly frustrated with my confusion and can explain it to me ( and has the time to ) because I am genuinly interested and fascinated by this germ theory and want to understand it clearer...the spreading/catching part, that is. That's the part that most confuses me. Hope my question isn't too long and too confusing. If it is, don't worry about it. Thank you!!! Pam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 > > Hi, > > I read both links to the germ theory, and I understand the concept, but I just don't understand the " spreading / catching " of disease part. > > I hope I don't confuse you with my question, as I am utterly confused myself. > > For example, at my daughter's high school, lots of kids had come down with a nasty cough around the month of February. My daughter was hoping she'd be spared, but eventually started this gawd awful hacking and cold type symptoms. Almost bronchitis-like. After she had had it for about 2 weeks, my husband started coughing. > (It's worth noting this hasn't happened to either of them in at least a decade and both are pretty healthy. Very rare if they are sick, so for both of them to get the same cough within 2 weeks of each other is very very rare ). > > Then there is me. The sickest of the bunch. Been sick for going on 4 years. Completely debilitated and rarely, if ever, go anywhere. However, a cough was never a symptom of mine. But I did get one for the first time a few days after my husband did, only mine was much milder and shorter lasting than theirs. They were both hit hard! > > So, if I am the sicky here in this household, and both of them are generally well 99.9% of the time, how is it I was mildly hit with this cough and they were somewhat brutally hit? You would think I have far more dead cells, toxic junk in me that would create all kinds of viruses, bacteria and fungus and make me feel way worse than they did with this thing. I don't understand how we all ended up with this cough pretty much at the same time, and after reading the germ theory, why I was not hit harder or worse than they were if I am in much poorer health than they are. > > I am also comfused at how this " started " at my daughter's school and ended up in our home. There is absolutely not one thing shared foodwise, toxin-wise by my husband and myself and anything at this school ( that I am aware of ). +++Coughing, colds, flus, etc. are the way the body detoxifies itself, and most people are getting such detoxifying symptoms since they are lacking Vitamin D from the sun at this time of year. I'm sorry I can't explain it any better, but IF we all " could catch " bugs we would all be sick with all of those bugs all of the time because they are " supposedly " everywhere. All I can suggest is to read more about the Germ Theory. Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2009 Report Share Posted March 12, 2009 My daughter came home from school last week and had a stomach virus with vomiting. The next day my son had the stomach virus it appears. He threw up as well. So somehow, I believe my son did catch the virus from my daughter. I know that not everyone is vulnerable because my husband and I both felt some pain in our tummies the next day but did not vomit. Wouldn't you think that people can catch " bugs " if their immune systems are vulnerable? That's how it appears to me. Kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 the way I understand it is that yes, your son did catch the bug from your daughter....but if his immune system was strong, he wouldn't have. The germ theory is false in that it convinces people that getting sick is out of their hands; that there are bugs just waiting to attack us and if it wasn't for these " invaders " we'd be otherwise healthy people. But as studies have shown, a virus put into a petri dish with healthy tissue will not survive because there is nothing bad for it to devour...nothing for it to feed on. Yes viruses and bacterias are passed around, (more so in the winter because of the lack of vitamin d); but they would have little effect on strong systems. I agree that this discussion is fascinating and I agree that we understand very little. rachael > > My daughter came home from school last week and had a stomach virus > with vomiting. The next day my son had the stomach virus it appears. > He threw up as well. So somehow, I believe my son did catch the virus > from my daughter. I know that not everyone is vulnerable because my > husband and I both felt some pain in our tummies the next day but did > not vomit. Wouldn't you think that people can catch " bugs " if their > immune systems are vulnerable? That's how it appears to me. > > Kathy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 > > Hi Bee, > > I understand the germ theory but what about STD? aren't the sexual disease transmitted from one partner to another? > +++Hi Hala. No, they are also caused by the poor condition of the body. The best, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 > > > > Hi Bee, > > > > I understand the germ theory but what about STD? aren't the sexual disease transmitted from one partner to another? > > > +++Hi Hala. No, they are also caused by the poor condition of the body. > > The best, Bee >Bee, you said also, so we can't catch STDs from someone through sexual contact. Is this a hoax aswell? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 > >Bee, you said also, so we can't catch STDs from someone through sexual contact. Is this a hoax aswell? +++Yes, that's what I wrote to Hala. Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 Hi Bee, So how would you explain how someone catches (for e.g Gonorhea, syphillis, herpes, clamydia)Â Â by having unprotected sexual intercourse with an infected person? Are you saying that someone isn't infected shouldn't be concerned if they have sex with an infected person? Just wondering about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 > > Hi Bee, > > So how would you explain how someone catches (for e.g Gonorhea, syphillis, herpes, clamydia)Â Â by having unprotected sexual intercourse with an infected person? > > Are you saying that someone isn't infected shouldn't be concerned if they have sex with an infected person? > > Just wondering about it +++Hi . I cannot explain everything, since there is so much false information about bugs. However IF a person is healthy their body will not have the need to create any bugs to clean itself up - see this article: http://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/articles/germ12.php No one " has to " believe this and it may be beyond someone's comfort level, so anyone who isn't sure should still use protection during intercourse with someone who could be, or may be infected. Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 > > > > Hi Bee, > > > > I understand the germ theory but what about STD? aren't the sexual disease transmitted from one partner to another? > > > +++Hi Hala. No, they are also caused by the poor condition of the body. > > The best, Bee > News to all those worried about " catching " HIV or other STD's, you don't have to use that condom after all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 I really think that something is missing from this discussion about how or whether germs are transferred person to person. I just don't believe that my son didn't get chicken pox from all the children in the room that had it. He would not have manifested chicken pox without exposure to it. Same as my exposure to HPV. If I had not had intercourse with a person with active genital warts, then I would not have them. I do believe however that a healthy body can deal with these exposures without manifesting the disease but the healthy immune system is the missing information. You must have this to resist disease. Not an expert on anything but common sense tells me that not wearing a condom would be a mistake!!! On 29-Apr-09, at 12:25 PM, Roy Mahoney wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Bee, > > > > > > I understand the germ theory but what about STD? aren't the > sexual disease transmitted from one partner to another? > > > > > +++Hi Hala. No, they are also caused by the poor condition of the > body. > > > > The best, Bee > > > > News to all those worried about " catching " HIV or other STD's, > you don't have to use that condom after all? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.