Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 If sunbeds were banned on the grounds they cause cancer, there were no randomized controlled trials, the gold standard of causality, to substantiate this. If these studies exist, I'd like to see them. The cancer charities who publicize this information do not have them. I've already asked them. david kenna schrieb: > > > weren't tanning beds banned? People developing skin cancer? > > > > > > */bruce@...>/* wrote: > > > From: Bruce <bruce@...> > Subject: Re: Re: mercola > iodine > Date: Thursday, 22 October, 2009, 21:40 > > > Todays newsletter had an article on vitamin d. > There he says supplimenting isn't good, one should instead use a > tanning bed, supplied by him of course! > quote: " In case you didn't know, the best way to regulate your > body's vitamin D levels is NOT to take vitamin supplements. " > > So I suspect his article on iodine as well.. > > Bruce > > > > * Re: mercola > > > Is that right? So of course, his first step is to denigrate > all the competition. Not too obvious! > > Cyndi > > > > I would say you are spot on. He just recently publish details > of his kelp shopping trip to Norway.... .. > > > > > > Call me cynical, but i would bet any amount of money this is > all leading up > > to Mercola selling his own kelp/seaweed supplement. > > > > Cyndi > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 10/22/09 08:51:00 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 What then might be causing the skin cancer? There is according to reports in the news of almost epidemic of skin cancers? I know Australians who are very wary of sun bathing of any sort. One is a professor of chemistry? From: JULIE GRIFFITHS <moppett1@...>Subject: Re: Re: mercolaiodine Date: Thursday, 22 October, 2009, 22:18 If sunbeds were banned on the grounds they cause cancer, there were no randomized controlled trials, the gold standard of causality, to substantiate this. If these studies exist, I'd like to see them. The cancer charities who publicize this information do not have them. I've already asked them.david kenna schrieb:> >> weren't tanning beds banned? People developing skin cancer?> > > >>> */brucebkdesign (DOT) ca>/* wrote:>>> From: Bruce <brucebkdesign (DOT) ca>> Subject: Re: Re: mercola> iodinegroups (DOT) com> Date: Thursday, 22 October, 2009, 21:40>> > Todays newsletter had an article on vitamin d.> There he says supplimenting isn't good, one should instead use a> tanning bed, supplied by him of course!> quote: "In case you didn't know, the best way to regulate your> body's vitamin D levels is NOT to take vitamin supplements. "> > So I suspect his article on iodine as well..> > Bruce> > >> * Re: mercola>> > Is that right? So of course, his first step is to denigrate> all the competition. Not too obvious!> > Cyndi> >>> I would say you are spot on. He just recently publish details> of his kelp shopping trip to Norway.... .. >> > >> > Call me cynical, but i would bet any amount of money this is> all leading up> > to Mercola selling his own kelp/seaweed supplement.> >> > Cyndi>>> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ->>> No virus found in this incoming message.> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 10/22/09 08:51:00>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 They should be banned but they are everywhere. The salon I go to has two and a steady clientel consisting of college coeds. A little sun is certainly ok, but the intensity of the radiation from tanning beds is not good for the skin and I am not convinced that it is able to help the body synthesize D. The sun is not our only source of D, we get it from foods too, like raw whole milk from happy cows. And sticking your arm out the car window for 15 minutes while driving down the road will not bring your levels up to par either. Pamela david kenna wrote: > > > weren't tanning beds banned? People developing skin cancer? > > > > > > *//* > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 I am tested twice a year for my D levels and was very deficient at one time. We own a farm and raise horses, so I am outside a lot and in all weather. I take a daily supplement now, drink raw whole milk from our jersey cow, and would consider cod liver oil if needed. I do take fish oil for the Omega 3s, so that probably helps too. Pamela Dr. Loretta Lanphier wrote: > > Clinically, we have had great response to liquid Vitamin D-3 > supplementation and less so with only sun exposure. However, we test > first to make sure there is a deficiency – we don’t just guess. Not > everyone seems manufacturers Vitamin D-3 in the amount that is > supposed. I do think that the safer tanning beds are good options if > one has the time and money. One of the best places for Vitamin D-3 > information is http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/ > <http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/> There is research information on the > site, too. > > Be Well > Dr.L > > - > > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 he may be wanting to push a product but it is a reality that vitamin d being a fat soluble vitamin can be taken to excess and so the idea of using the sun or tanning bed would eliminate the possibility of taking too much through supplements....and of course he has created a source for us in case we want one for our own use..what is so bad about that really?? he does provide for the most part a good amount of information that is useful....now his idea of lugols was way off so i think we should all comment and send him dr. brownstein book!From: Bruce <bruce@...>iodine Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:40:35 PMSubject: Re: Re: mercola Todays newsletter had an article on vitamin d. There he says supplimenting isn't good, one should instead use a tanning bed, supplied by him of course! quote: "In case you didn't know, the best way to regulate your body's vitamin D levels is NOT to take vitamin supplements. " So I suspect his article on iodine as well. Bruce Re: mercola Is that right? So of course, his first step is to denigrate all the competition. Not too obvious! Cyndi I would say you are spot on. He just recently publish details of his kelp shopping trip to Norway.... .. >> Call me cynical, but i would bet any amount of money this is all leading up > to Mercola selling his own kelp/seaweed supplement.> > Cyndi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 What I have heard about tanning beds is that the intensity of the radiation is many times stronger than from natural sunlight and it penetrates the skin more deeply than just sunbathing, causing tumors deep in the tissues. I don't know if this is true or not but it does sound plausible. Pamela david kenna wrote: > > > What then might be causing the skin cancer? There is according to > reports in the news > of almost epidemic of skin cancers? I know Australians who are very > wary of sun bathing > of any sort. One is a professor of chemistry? > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 Definitely. D deficiency is rampant, and the recommended dose is way too low. Another great site on this is http://www.grassrootshealth.net/ Her story is awesome, as is what they are doing. Bruce RE: Re: mercola Clinically, we have had great response to liquid Vitamin D-3 supplementation and less so with only sun exposure. However, we test first to make sure there is a deficiency – we don’t just guess. Not everyone seems manufacturers Vitamin D-3 in the amount that is supposed. I do think that the safer tanning beds are good options if one has the time and money. One of the best places for Vitamin D-3 information is http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/ There is research information on the site, too. Be WellDr.L -----Original Message-----From: iodine [mailto:iodine ] On Behalf Of JULIE GRIFFITHSSent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:50 PMiodine Subject: Re: Re: mercola So maybe go to the research literature as well and find out what the best source of Vitamin D is..... It's probably VERY important for the thyroid so it's worth pursuing. I couldn't find studies on humans but in experimaetal lab animals, Vitamin D is important in the rate limiting enzyme precursor to Tyrosine, an important constituent in the conversion of Free t4 to Free t3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 Actually it was blamed on the sun, so an explosion of sunblock, making the vit d deficiency even more critical. Intentional? It helps the pharma co's make a lot more money keeping ppl d deficient... Many studies show that the sun doesn't cause skin cancer. In some perhaps, who are sensitive to it or burn too often. Skin cancer doesn't as a rule appear where one tans...it seems another result of poor science. Since so many are now scared of the sun, and use of sunscreen has increases, skin cancer should have definitely fallen. That's not the case though, it is rising. Bruce * Re: mercola>> > Is that right? So of course, his first step is to denigrate> all the competition. Not too obvious!> > Cyndi> >>> I would say you are spot on. He just recently publish details> of his kelp shopping trip to Norway.... .. >> > >> > Call me cynical, but i would bet any amount of money this is> all leading up> > to Mercola selling his own kelp/seaweed supplement.> >> > Cyndi>>> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ->>> No virus found in this incoming message.> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 10/22/09 08:51:00>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 I was leery of the sales aspect of his site until I read his " apologist " article which I now can't locate explaining among other things the history of the site, cost of the lawsuits he has/is/will fight due to the information he presents on the site, COST OF RESEARCHING each of the topics etc... At that point I didn't see a problem with supporting them through purchases (even though I could find a better price on a similar product elsewhere) AS LONG AS HIS PRODUCT SOURCING/MANUFACTURE AND RESEARCH WERE CREDIBLE. The Lugol's issue pretty much flies in the face good research and his rudeness to someone alarmed by that statement was just poor form. If he is such a coward as to not be able to admit he was rude, take responsibility and move on I have to question his character...and from there his work ethic and the information he presents. I'd have been fine if he just said...Hey! I'm creating a great new product that I recommend you use instead of XXXX for the following reasons. It supports our site and it's a good alternative to XXXX instead of vilifying a credible product based on the position/word of whoever. > Re: Re: mercola > > >Todays newsletter had an article on vitamin >d. >There he says supplimenting isn't good, one should >instead use a tanning bed, supplied by him of course! >quote: " In case >you didn't know, the best way to regulate your body's vitamin D levels is NOT to >take vitamin supplements. " > >So I suspect his article on iodine as >well. > >Bruce > > > Re: mercola >> >> >>Is that right? So of course, >> his first step is to denigrate all the competition. Not too >> obvious! >> >>Cyndi >> >> >> >>I would say you are spot on. He just recently publish details of >> his kelp shopping trip to Norway.... .. >> >> >>> >>> Call me cynical, but i would bet >> any amount of money this is all leading up >>> to Mercola selling his own >> kelp/seaweed supplement. >>> >>> Cyndi >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 Good video by grassroots health and university; Vit d, sun, sunscreen, and cancer; http://www.ucsd.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=15770 Bruce * Re: mercola>> > Is that right? So of course, his first step is to denigrate> all the competition. Not too obvious!> > Cyndi> >>> I would say you are spot on. He just recently publish details> of his kelp shopping trip to Norway.... .. >> > >> > Call me cynical, but i would bet any amount of money this is> all leading up> > to Mercola selling his own kelp/seaweed supplement.> >> > Cyndi>>> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ->>> No virus found in this incoming message.> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 10/22/09 08:51:00>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 " They " also tell us not to drink milk, especially raw milk and that only children need D. Rickets is once again a disease that doctors are seeing and no wonder as so many kids are allowed to drink soft drinks with their meals. For years I kept myself protected from the sun for fear of skin cancer and ended up with D deficiency! Now I no longer worry about it and feel much better. As for the cause of skin cancer, my first guess would be a genetic disposition and my second would be aggravating this predisposition with all the nasty chemicals we are daily exposed to in our food and environment. Pamela Bruce wrote: > > > Actually it was blamed on the sun, so an explosion of sunblock, making > the vit d deficiency even more critical. > Intentional? It helps the pharma co's make a lot more money keeping > ppl d deficient... > > Many studies show that the sun doesn't cause skin cancer. In some > perhaps, who are sensitive to it or burn too often. > Skin cancer doesn't as a rule appear where one tans...it seems another > result of poor science. > Since so many are now scared of the sun, and use of sunscreen has > increases, skin cancer should have definitely fallen. > That's not the case though, it is rising. > > Bruce > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 part of that is th application of the sunscreen. The values are lab based. While in the real world people are not so precise. >>> From: Bruce <brucebkdesign (DOT) ca>> Subject: Re: Re: mercola> iodinegroups (DOT) com> Date: Thursday, 22 October, 2009, 21:40>> > Todays newsletter had an article on vitamin d.> There he says supplimenting isn't good, one should instead use a> tanning bed, supplied by him of course!> quote: "In case you didn't know, the best way to regulate your> body's vitamin D levels is NOT to take vitamin supplements. "> > So I suspect his article on iodine as well..> > Bruce> > >> * Re: mercola>> > Is that right? So of course, his first step is to denigrate> all the competition. Not too obvious!> > Cyndi> >>> I would say you are spot on. He just recently publish details> of his kelp shopping trip to Norway.... .. >> > >> > Call me cynical, but i would bet any amount of money this is> all leading up> > to Mercola selling his own kelp/seaweed supplement.> >> > Cyndi>>> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ->>> No virus found in this incoming message.> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 10/22/09 08:51:00>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 and he is human. maybe he was having a bad hair day. By and large he is doing a good job. From: michael@... <michael@...>Subject: Re: Re: mercolaiodine Date: Thursday, 22 October, 2009, 23:32 I was leery of the sales aspect of his site until I read his "apologist" article which I now can't locate explaining among other things the history of the site, cost of the lawsuits he has/is/will fight due to the information he presents on the site, COST OF RESEARCHING each of the topics etc.... At that point I didn't see a problem with supporting them through purchases (even though I could find a better price on a similar product elsewhere) AS LONG AS HIS PRODUCT SOURCING/MANUFACTUR E AND RESEARCH WERE CREDIBLE. The Lugol's issue pretty much flies in the face good research and his rudeness to someone alarmed by that statement was just poor form. If he is such a coward as to not be able to admit he was rude, take responsibility and move on I have to question his character... and from there his work ethic and the information he presents.I'd have been fine if he just said...Hey! I'm creating a great new product that I recommend you use instead of XXXX for the following reasons. It supports our site and it's a good alternative to XXXX instead of vilifying a credible product based on the position/word of whoever.> Re: Re: mercola>> >Todays newsletter had an article on vitamin >d.>There he says supplimenting isn't good, one should >instead use a tanning bed, supplied by him of course!>quote: "In case >you didn't know, the best way to regulate your body's vitamin D levels is NOT to >take vitamin supplements. "> >So I suspect his article on iodine as >well.> >Bruce> > > Re: mercola>>>> >>Is that right? So of course, >> his first step is to denigrate all the competition. Not too >> obvious!>> >>Cyndi>> >>>>>>I would say you are spot on. He just recently publish details of >> his kelp shopping trip to Norway.... .. >>>>>>>>>> Call me cynical, but i would bet >> any amount of money this is all leading up >>> to Mercola selling his own >> kelp/seaweed supplement.>>> >>> Cyndi>> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 Your cows are dependent on the sun also. Therefore if you are living at higher latitudes, your source of milk, supposing it is local, will be deficient in D also. > > > weren't tanning beds banned? People developing skin cancer? > > > > > > *//* > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 At about 100iu/glass, 20-40 glasses a day should do it... Bruce Re: mercola Vitamin D is added to milk, fortified with vit D. Do a search for "vitamin d added to milk" and see. ~ > > > > > >> > > weren't tanning beds banned? People developing skin cancer?> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > *//*> > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 It's not added everywhere and certainly not at any level that would help. Bruce schrieb: > > > At about 100iu/glass, 20-40 glasses a day should do it... > > Bruce > > > > * Re: mercola > > > > Vitamin D is added to milk, fortified with vit D. Do a search for > " vitamin d added to milk " and see. ~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > weren't tanning beds banned? People developing skin cancer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *//* > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 10/22/09 08:51:00 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 I was jokingly referring to amounts, and not to depend on food sources Bruce * Re: mercola>> >> Vitamin D is added to milk, fortified with vit D. Do a search for> "vitamin d added to milk" and see. ~ >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > weren't tanning beds banned? People developing skin cancer?> >> > > > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > *//*> >> > >> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------->>> No virus found in this incoming message.> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 10/22/09 08:51:00>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 My issue with Mercola is that he implies and often states outright that the ONLY safe alternative is the ones he is selling. Seriously, making a buck is one thing but fear mongering to wring a buck out of people is another entirely. I've pretty much lost respect for him. I do check out his citations but I take anything he writes with a grain of salt and I just do not listen to the videos. I'd rather read it.... Tressler Healthy Transitions Life Coaching 541-791-1464 Help raise funds for Legacy Land Conservancy by searching the internet or shoping online with GoodSearch (www.goodsearch.com). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Yes, he pushes his products, but his articles on many different topics are very very good, current and in depth and he's takes a very strong stand against the conventional medical establishment and advocates natural living. I find these article extremely valuable and informative. Also I think he does offer good products or I often use his product listing as a reference when comparing with other products - are they organic? and such... before deciding what to buy. He is no different from everyone else - Natural News, Wellness Resources, Juice Plus, Melaleuca, Organic Divas, etc... Everybody's got to make money somehow. The most important thing is are they selling good whole food organic products compared to Amway, Walmart, Costco? Hands down, I believe so... Expensive - apples and oranges aside - yes, but if you shop around, watch for deals and such, you can get a deal. Just make sure it's organic, whole food, etc. > > My issue with Mercola is that he implies and often states outright that the ONLY safe alternative is the ones he is selling.  Seriously, making a buck is one thing but fear mongering to wring a buck out of people is another entirely.  I've pretty much lost respect for him. I do check out his citations but I take anything he writes with a grain of salt and I just do not listen to the videos. I'd rather read it.... >  Tressler > Healthy Transitions Life Coaching > 541-791-1464 > > Help raise funds for Legacy Land Conservancy by searching the internet or shoping online with GoodSearch (www.goodsearch.com). > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 , My theory is that an excessive amount of fungus in the environment is causing cancer, primarily in processed corn and wheat products, but also in peanuts. These foods are prone to fungus, especially corn. The fungus forms inside the corn kernels. The link of fungus to cancer was established by Dr. Simoncini. www.cancerfungus.com. from Israel > > > > > > Call me cynical, but i would bet any amount of money this is > > all leading up > > > to Mercola selling his own kelp/seaweed supplement. > > > > > > Cyndi > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 10/22/09 08:51:00 > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Cows don't use sun block or wear clothing. They are out in the sun all the time. Pamela JULIE GRIFFITHS wrote: > > > Your cows are dependent on the sun also. Therefore if you are living > at higher latitudes, your source of milk, supposing it is local, will > be deficient in D also. > > > > > > > > > > weren't tanning beds banned? People developing skin cancer? > > > > > > > > > > > > *//* > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Once upon a time the Western Diet included many foods that are now considered " bad " for us. We no longer drink milk throughout our lifetimes, people shun real cheese and butter for fear of fat and cholesterol, our consumption of fish is down, we already know that this has caused us to be iodine deficient as well as D deficient. Just because we can synthesize D in our bodies from sun exposure does not mean that all our D came from that source. As a child I was given cod liver oil daily. This would have contained both iodine and D. Iodine and D should be present is some quantity in all our foods because the iodine comes from the soil and the D is synthesized by living things. No one should have to rely on any one source for vitamins and micro-minerals, but that is what we are now doing, thanks to the Western Diet that the government devised to help us. Pamela JULIE GRIFFITHS wrote: > > > It's not added everywhere and certainly not at any level that would help. > > > > Bruce schrieb: > > > > > > At about 100iu/glass, 20-40 glasses a day should do it... > > > > Bruce > > > > > > > > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 The Videos! Argh! I agree... There are two things that Congress should pass without hesitation. Make it a crime punishable by waterboarding, fines and imprisonment: 1) to autostart video/audio on web pages. For instance, when web browsing in the middle of the night (or whenever) and earlier you were rocking out so the volume on your speakers is rather high....then BAM! You hit a page that autostarts audio/video and it is LOUD. 2) for ANY commercial to be LOUDER than the previous content you were watching...TV and web...anywhere. And I'm only sort of joking the punishments =) > Re: mercola > >My issue with Mercola is that he implies and often states outright that the ONLY safe alternative is the ones he is selling.  Seriously, making a buck is one thing but fear mongering to wring a buck out of people is another entirely.  I've pretty much lost respect for him. I do check out his citations but I take anything he writes with a grain of salt and I just do not listen to the videos. I'd rather read it.... > Tressler >Healthy Transitions Life Coaching >541-791-1464 > >Help raise funds for Legacy Land Conservancy by searching the internet or shoping online with GoodSearch (www.goodsearch.com). > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 if cod liver oil gave iodine and vit d. wouldn't omega's do the same thing? just curious. diane, near philly, pa On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Pamela Klein wrote:Once upon a time the Western Diet included many foods that are now considered "bad" for us. We no longer drink milk throughout our lifetimes, people shun real cheese and butter for fear of fat and cholesterol, our consumption of fish is down, we already know that this has caused us to be iodine deficient as well as D deficient. Just because we can synthesize D in our bodies from sun exposure does not mean that all our D came from that source. As a child I was given cod liver oil daily. This would have contained both iodine and D. Iodine and D should be present is some quantity in all our foods because the iodine comes from the soil and the D is synthesized by living things.No one should have to rely on any one source for vitamins and micro-minerals, but that is what we are now doing, thanks to the Western Diet that the government devised to help us.PamelaJULIE GRIFFITHS wrote:> >> It's not added everywhere and certainly not at any level that would help.>> >> Bruce schrieb:> >> >> > At about 100iu/glass, 20-40 glasses a day should do it...> >> > Bruce> >> >> >>> .>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 didn't mercola reckon fish oils were unsafe? <pameladragon@...> wrote: From: Pamela Klein <pameladragon@...>Subject: Re: Re: mercolaiodine Date: Friday, 23 October, 2009, 22:09 I am curious about that myself. I take a lot of fish oil daily for triglyceride control and just went to read the label. It says it contains oil from cod, anchovies, and SOY! Now I need to find another Omega 3 source as I don't want to take any soy, even though I am sure it is a very tiny amount. The label did not say anything about D or iodine, but it stands to reason that there should be some. A short Google search did reveal that there are combination fish oils that have D and iodine but they are expensive and not in capsules. Pameladiane gaul wrote:> >> if cod liver oil gave iodine and vit d. wouldn't omega's do the same > thing? just curious. >> diane, near philly, pa>>>>>> .>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.