Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 In a message dated 12/28/2003 9:34:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, candidiasis writes: Hi Kari, Have you tried Prune juice instead of the dried prunes? Chris Juice has all the fiber removed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 In a message dated 12/28/2003 9:34:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, candidiasis writes: I have read that these organisms are very smart. They are constantly trying to figure out ways to stay alive and repopulate. I don't think it was a scientific document, but I did see that it could possibly only take them 7 days to figure out a way to essentially disarm the natural yeast killer. I am thinking there must be something to this as I have seen many people talk of rotating the natural killers to kind of keep the yeast off guard and not give them the ability to become desensitized to it. Can't vouch by all of this, but the theory does seem to be consistent to the protocols I am seeing out there. Kari They are not " smart " in the conventional sense, just adaptive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 In a message dated 12/28/2003 9:34:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, candidiasis writes: Ta, We rotate the antifungals every four to seven days because I was told that it can build up immunity to them since it is a living breathing organism that lives in the body......I can not say for absolute positive if this is an actual fact or not but we do it for safety sake......just mho.... Angie It also does not " breate " in the standard matter. You guys are anthromophizing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 In a message dated 12/29/2003 6:15:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, TWISTEDFOOL@... writes: > > Angie > It also does not " breate " in the standard matter. You guys are > anthromophizing > , I do not understand this.....can u define " anthromophizing " please? Angie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 , Could you translate that to english? LOL. What is " breate " and what does anthromophizing mean? Are you saying we shouldn't rotate antifungals?? Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 Hi Angie, > I do not understand this.....can u define " anthromophizing " please? > Anthromophizing is attributing human characteristics to non-human things. I deal alot with it in my dog training business, " He did it out of spite " , " He's jealous. " etc... It is inaccurate, meaningless and tends to cloud the issue. I've found people tend to do this to try to help explain a situation. They use human terms because that is what we all understand. The problem is there are connotations associated with it that are not accurate and can not be generalized to other objects. Like they say, just the facts ma'am. -- " My dog isn't stubborn, he's just smarter than me! " - maf Marni Fowler, CPDT Jester, NJC (finally got some letters!) 4, CGC Gainesville, FL APDT #5372P exp. 12/03 http://www.classactfordogs.com BARF Shirts! => http://www.nicasdreams.freeservers.com Ask me about health food for pets http://www.raw4dogs.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2006 Report Share Posted May 30, 2006 I would love to see Tony Attwood. When is he coming?autism wrote: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Hi all, Do a google and see who finances WIKI...then you will know why vco is bashed. --- Coconut Oil wrote:(PST) I just looked at the link you gave for CO on Wikipedia. You do know that all content on Wikipedia is coming from just anyone who wants to write it? It is NOT necessarily the TRUTH. NOT necessarily ACCURATE. That page on Wikipedia is full of SO many UNTRUTHS, I could hardly believe my eyes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.