Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 > > And yes, everyone has an immune suppressant (anti-inflammatory) effect > from their own cortisol. > > One of the cornerstones of the immune system, by the way, is its > ability to suppress itself. Suppression of the immune system per se > is not a bad thing. It's only a bad thing if it exceeds or fails to > meet the physiological requirement for the immune system's regulation > at any given moment. Suppression and stimulation are part of a > natural balance. Hi Chris Thanks for that just the same, it really helps my understanding. So, would I be correct then in saying that physiolgical dose cortisone is not more likely to suppress the immune response than our natural cortisol? Thanks. Mo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 Hi Mo, > Thanks for that > just the same, it really helps my understanding. > So, would I be correct then in saying that physiolgical dose cortisone > is not more likely to suppress the immune response than our natural > cortisol? Honestly, I don't know. I would guess they are roughly equivalent. I don't think it's a matter of liklihood, though, but degree. Any amount of either will suppress parts of the immune response to some degree --- not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself -- and small doses will do so a little and large doses a lot, and there is some optimum dose in between. I'm not anything close to an expert, but that's my impression at this point. Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.