Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Animal protein

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

This is of course off topic:

The statement below does reflect one view, but it is only one of many

possible and existing views.

For myself, I see (and experience) that humans belong to the Earth, not the

other way around. All life has value and meaning, no matter through which

form (or species) it is expressed through - and no one more than any other.

Also, if we look at the evolution of the Universe and the Earth, humans as we

exist today is only part of ONE PHASE of this grand process. We are not the

" pinnacle " nor the " end " result. We belong and are part of this vast and

beautiful process - together with all other phenomenon, all other expressions

of God and this Universe - all other ways God and this Universe expresses

itself.

No one view is " right " or " wrong " - they only serve as (temporary) guidelines

for our experience of the Universe and for our actions. We ourselves choose

one that makes sense with our experiences, and that seem to lead to actions

beneficial for ourselves and the larger whole.

What this has to do with bowel cleanse I do not know, but I do sense that

there is a connection. The cosmology of each one of us does in a very real

way influence our daily actions - how we live our lives from day to day.

Let me know if I should shut up!

Be well,

Per

<<Animal protein was created in the first place for us to use as food by God

who created us. I don't think this general principle has changed. What I

think has become the problem is that by trying to improve on this, mankind

has actually made a situation that does not work as well because he/we do

not fully understand all of the biochemical inter-relations that come into

play when foreign biochemical entities are introduced into the system (i.e.,

animal to human biochemical physiology).>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/21/99 16:52:47, cmarcus@... writes:

<< Now, I will agree that some people (the blood type O's for example) do much

better on a diet that includes animal proteins, but I believe that they

could do much better on one that consisted of a large quantity of high

quality amino acids from the vegetable kingdom...enter the green superfoods.

>>

Yes, let's not forget to allow for individual differences. Several years ago

my former husband and I both went to a holistic doctor. I had a protein

deficiency (which manifested itself in herpes and chronic fatigue) while he

had gout (an accumulation of excess uric acid often mainly due to meat

consumption). The funny thing is, he ate less meat than I did.

The question of an INTELLIGENT vegetarian diet (based on the high amino acid

superfoods) as per vs. an INTELLIGENT meat based diet (low in carbs

and based on organic meat) is an intriguing one and one that I doubt will be

solved on this list. But it is worth talking about. Although I reintroduced

meat into my diet in greater proportion after my months long bout with

herpes, which was really HORRIFIC (I have never gotten it again), I have

often suspected that a " superfoods " based diet would be even better.

However, for me the problem with this has always been honestly in the

preparation. I haven't had the time to sprout and juice to the extent

necessary, but I am curious to try it. One thing I am reasonably sure of--if

you can't do a vegetarian diet really right, you're asking for trouble.

Especially those " O " types, or people who are immune-suppressed (like me--I

was subjected to intensive antibiotics as a child and it nearly did me in)

shouldn't even consider a vegetarian diet without the " superfoods " . They

just won't get enough protein. This is something vegans fail to understand

although they were coming to my holistic doctor with herpes in droves. Now

my ex-husband on the other hand could get amino acids out of anything without

even bothering to think of food combinations. He could probably get protein

out of a soggy iceberg lettuce and yellow tomato salad in a diner.

The so-called " paleo " or caveman diet is very popular now and brings up

a point I think we should not lose sight of--that what is " bad " for us in our

artificial twentieth century environment was not necessarily always " bad " .

This echoes the viewpoint of modern physics--phenoma do not exist as such,

but rather in context. You cannot say what something IS, but only how it

exists in relationship. (cf " good " bacteria converting necrotic tissue).

Obviously the meat and yogurt in the stomach of the Abkhasians living fully

active lives to one hundred twenty years old in the Caucasus is something

different from what it is in ours. I understand they are very big on lamb

and goat. (I think Bernard Jensen's Hunza were similar).

This brings up the point of the " Garden of Eden " brought up by . I am

not religious in any specific sense and I definitely don't want to get

involved in any religious debate, but I do think that there is a type of

truth encapsulated in holy books. The Garden of Eden no doubt represents a

memory of a purer time when people lived as vegans. (This does not however

deny the fact that " cavemen " or " paleolithic " men lived largely by hunting,

as we know from their art). But again, what other factors come into play?

For example, weather. I have noticed that my body tends to eschew meat in

the summer and crave it in the winter. Since I live in New York I am subject

to great extremes of weather. Presumably the " Garden of Eden " was in a hot

climate all year around. What bearing if any does that have on the protein

debate? Could one follow such a diet say year round in Alaska? What about

you Bob? You live in Yukon. Any ideas?

Robin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Russ, Everybody,

> But I tend to lean towards meat, eggs, fish ad fowl (not as much dairy

> products) that, insofar as I can determine, have been raised in a 'range

> run' fashion, as opposed to being raised in a confined area, been given

> drugs to keep them healthy and foods tomake them grow fats.

>

> Animal protein was created in the first place for us to use as food by God

> who created us. I don't think this general principle has changed. What I

> think has become the problem is that by trying to improve on this, mankind

> has actually made a situation that does not work as well because he/we do

> not fully understand all of the biochemical inter-relations that come into

> play when foreign biochemical entities are introduced into the

> system (i.e.,

> animal to human biochemical physiology).

>

I agree with you. The debate on vegetarianism vs not is one of these

never-ending ones and when contrasting the viewpoints and experiences of

people like , vs. many successful 'Paleodieters' who have reversed

their health problems by eating lots of high-quality meat (while stopping

the grains), I doubt there will ever be any consensus. I eat fish, eggs,

foul or meat on a daily basis and it is very good food for me.

I feel that it is only because many of us are so clogged and deformed from

bodies built by decades of junk and refined foods that people find that even

moderate amounts of meat can sometimes be a problem when trying to detoxify,

and that sometimes a total or near-vegetarian program can help get things

moving because of the higher fiber content. And, yes, meat 'DOES' putrefy

quickly in a stagnant colon, and I do believe the link between red meat and

colon cancer has some basis in the context of the modern diet as a whole,

but I think the real problem is the stagnant colon, and low stomach acid

levels that can allow parasites to proliferate, not the meat.

Who knows, maybe we can get all the protein and other nutrients like B-12 we

need from green superfoods and combined grains/beans, for awhile anyway (I

admit to not having made a serious attempt to try to do this), but even if

we can I still think that the animal protein foods, from healthy animals,

are good foods for people who choose them - it is the refined and processed

junk, and to some extent unhealthy commercial and luncheon meats and

commercial dairy, that are killing us.

Essential Reading: 'Nutrition and Physical Degeneration' - Weston Price, DDS

(available from Amazon.com).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/21/99 8:32 AM, rcrosby at rcrosby@... wrote:

> From: " rcrosby " <rcrosby@...>

>

> I have a bit of a problem with this statement. I understand and know that

> there are some good quality plant proteins from which amino acids can be

> gotten.

>

> And I understand the potential problems with the various drugs and toxins

> that may be found in meat.

>

> But I tend to lean towards meat, eggs, fish ad fowl (not as much dairy

> products) that, insofar as I can determine, have been raised in a 'range

> run' fashion, as opposed to being raised in a confined area, been given

> drugs to keep them healthy and foods tomake them grow fats.

>

> Animal protein was created in the first place for us to use as food by God

> who created us. I don't think this general principle has changed. What I

> think has become the problem is that by trying to improve on this, mankind

> has actually made a situation that does not work as well because he/we do

> not fully understand all of the biochemical inter-relations that come into

> play when foreign biochemical entities are introduced into the system (i.e.,

> animal to human biochemical physiology).

>

> Russ

The original 'genesis' diet made no mention of animal flesh. Fruit was to be

our meat, and the leaf was to be our medicine. I do not have any desire to

enter into a religious debate, and I am not a 'radical' vegetarian and do

not condemn people for eating meat, but there is no question that an

intelligently applied vegetarian diet is vastly superior to one that

consists of eating animal proteins.

Now, I will agree that some people (the blood type O's for example) do much

better on a diet that includes animal proteins, but I believe that they

could do much better on one that consisted of a large quantity of high

quality amino acids from the vegetable kingdom...enter the green superfoods.

In the vegetable kingdom (nuts excepted), proteins come in the form of amino

acids - in other words, they do not need to be broken down, because they are

already broken down. ALL animal protein is highly concentrated and in long

chain form, which means they must be broken down

--

Marcus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

I have never said that eating meat in and of itself was 'bad' for you,

either physically or morally. I do believe that if you are going to eat

meat, you should go out and acquire it yourself, not buy it off a grocery

shelf (the same for eggs, chickens, etc). The reasons for this are

twofold...you are EARNING it, and you know where it came from.

It is not even debateable whether or not you can get all the protein you

need from grasses. Horses and elephants are two of the strongest land

mammals, and that's all they eat. The strongest land mammal, the silver back

gorilla, eats a diet consisting mainly of fresh fruit, and some occasional

nuts and seeds and berries, and even the occasional bug. These are facts,

and because our digestive system is so similar to that of the gorilla, his

diet is what is best suited for us. Of course, since we don't have two or

more stomachs and don't chew our cud, we cannot 'eat' grass, but we can grow

it and juice it, which is far better than spending all day chewing the pulp.

If you want to eat animal proteins, then by all means...

On 11/21/99 11:05 AM, Reynolds at preynolds@... wrote:

> I agree with you. The debate on vegetarianism vs not is one of these

> never-ending ones and when contrasting the viewpoints and experiences of

> people like , vs. many successful 'Paleodieters' who have reversed

> their health problems by eating lots of high-quality meat (while stopping

> the grains), I doubt there will ever be any consensus. I eat fish, eggs,

> foul or meat on a daily basis and it is very good food for me.

>

> I feel that it is only because many of us are so clogged and deformed from

> bodies built by decades of junk and refined foods that people find that even

> moderate amounts of meat can sometimes be a problem when trying to detoxify,

> and that sometimes a total or near-vegetarian program can help get things

> moving because of the higher fiber content. And, yes, meat 'DOES' putrefy

> quickly in a stagnant colon, and I do believe the link between red meat and

> colon cancer has some basis in the context of the modern diet as a whole,

> but I think the real problem is the stagnant colon, and low stomach acid

> levels that can allow parasites to proliferate, not the meat.

>

> Who knows, maybe we can get all the protein and other nutrients like B-12 we

> need from green superfoods and combined grains/beans, for awhile anyway (I

> admit to not having made a serious attempt to try to do this), but even if

> we can I still think that the animal protein foods, from healthy animals,

> are good foods for people who choose them - it is the refined and processed

> junk, and to some extent unhealthy commercial and luncheon meats and

> commercial dairy, that are killing us.

>

> Essential Reading: 'Nutrition and Physical Degeneration' - Weston Price, DDS

> (available from Amazon.com).

>

>

--

Marcus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

> The strongest land mammal, the

> silver back

> gorilla, eats a diet consisting mainly of fresh fruit, and some occasional

> nuts and seeds and berries, and even the occasional bug. These are facts,

> and because our digestive system is so similar to that of the gorilla, his

> diet is what is best suited for us.

Their bug consumption can be quite significant. Also the following reference

shows that chimps, who are known to be at least occasional predators, are

closer to us in terms of DNA sequence than gorillas:

http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat/comp-anat-2b.shtml#other

> Of course, since we don't have two or

> more stomachs and don't chew our cud, we cannot 'eat' grass, but

> we can grow

> it and juice it, which is far better than spending all day

> chewing the pulp.

And humans were designed to get all their protein from juices and plants?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

> but there is no question that an

> intelligently applied vegetarian diet is vastly superior to one that

> consists of eating animal proteins.

I would almost say the reverse myself (at least comparing the long-term

effects of a diet with low to moderate amounts of animal protein to diets

with +zero+ animal protein), but don't because there are individuals like

yourself who do well without the animal nutrients, at least for awhile.

In any case, the Weston Price studies prove to me that humans can be strong,

properly-structured and free from degeneration on diets high in meat or

other animal-source foods.

None of the traditional peoples he studied ate strict vegetarian diets; in

fact the peoples he studied whose diets were restricted to smaller amounts

of meat but were otherwise natural were smaller in frame, and suffered more

tooth decay.

The diet recommendations of EV Irons I was just reading were of interest to

me also, as he allows some fish, eggs and even occasional beef in the

maintenance diet following bowel cleansing. I just read that after arthritis

at 40 he lived until 98 so it worked well for him. Other long-lived 'nature

cure' types like Jensen and also relied on some non-vegetarian foods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 03:20 PM 99-11-21 EST, you wrote:

>From: RJGoldsmit@...

>This brings up the point of the " Garden of Eden " brought up by . I

am

>not religious in any specific sense and I definitely don't want to get

>involved in any religious debate, but I do think that there is a type of

>truth encapsulated in holy books. The Garden of Eden no doubt represents a

>memory of a purer time when people lived as vegans. (This does not however

>deny the fact that " cavemen " or " paleolithic " men lived largely by hunting,

>as we know from their art). But again, what other factors come into play?

>For example, weather. I have noticed that my body tends to eschew meat in

>the summer and crave it in the winter. Since I live in New York I am

subject

>to great extremes of weather. Presumably the " Garden of Eden " was in a hot

>climate all year around. What bearing if any does that have on the protein

>debate? Could one follow such a diet say year round in Alaska? What about

>you Bob? You live in Yukon. Any ideas?

>Robin

The climate and geographic location has a great influence on where people

get their protein. In the Yukon (northen Canada) before contact with the

Europeans (approx. 1840) the native people got their protein from meat.

Caribou, moose, rabbit, squirrel, gopher and bear would be some of the

species. Meat was eaten year round when it could be found.

Another staple of the diet was fish, salmon being important. Migrating

salmon from the Pacific travel inland over 1500 miles up the Yukon River to

the central and southern Yukon. The salmon were caught in slow moving water

from late July to October, depending on the species. Salmon were smoked,

and this enabled them to keep over the winter. Salmon were, and still are,

a very important food for the first nations people. Fresh water lake trout,

whitefish and grayling were also plentiful.

Berries were harvested in the late summer and fall. Large quantities were

collected and kept over winter. As for vegetables, there were none as we

know them today ie.) potatoes, carrots etc. Plants and vegetables eaten

were native to the area. We have a type of plant that is similar to spinach

and one to onions, as well as many other edible plants and mushrooms. Some

of you may be familiar with the morel mushroom, it is harvested here

extensively during the first and second year after a forest fire.

The climate was difficult for the peolple. Snow from October to April and

temperature extremes from -50C (-60F) to +30C (+90F). So life was not easy

and life expectancy was short.

What did effect the health of the native peolple negatively was their

introduction to foods that the white man brought into the territory, sugar

being one.

Eskimos and Inuit that eat a high protein diet from sea mammals and fish

and also a diet high in calcium have a high rate of osteoporosis. These

people would be living on the coasts of the Arctic and Pacific Oceans.

This is from my general knowledge and more detailed information can be found.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" The average risk of heart disease for a man eating meat, eggs and dairy

products is 50% The risk for a man who leaves off meat is 15% However the

coronary risk of a vegetarian who leaves off meat, eggs and dairy products

drops to only 4%.

The risk for cancer of the prostrate, breast and colon is three to four

times higher for people who consume meat, eggs and dairy products on a

daily basis when compared to those who eat them sparingly or not at all. In

addition, vegetarian women have stronger bones and fewer fractures, and

they lose less bone when they age.

Studies of long-lived vegetarian people like the Hunzas, who are healthy

and active into advanced age, contrast sharply with the short lifespans and

increased disease rates of Alaskan Eskimos, who depend largely on what they

catch from the sea. "

from Dynamic Living, Aileen Ludington and Hans Diehl.

-------------------

Where you get the protein from is one thing, but what comes with it is

another.

If you get your protein from meat, eggs and dairy, you will also be getting

saturated fat and cholesterol and a higher risk for heart disease, cancer

and stroke (on average).

If you get your protein from vegetables, grains and legumes you will be

getting unsaturated fat, no cholesterol and high fiber.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> >From: Putali@...

> >

> >This is my understanding too. Meat is definitely NOT the best source of

> >proteins - as any nutritionist will tell you.

Has anyone read " Protein Power " by Dr.s Eades?

Aq

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/21/99 3:48 PM, rcrosby at rcrosby@... wrote:

> From: " rcrosby " <rcrosby@...>

>

> " The original 'genesis' diet " was designed to keep people healthy under the

> original genesis environment.

>

> What you say would probably still apply if the original genesis environement

> still existed - a greenhouse like atmosphere over the entire universe, an

> atmospheric pressure that was greater than it is today, an atmospheric

> oxygen content that was higher than it is today, freedom from all of the

> toxins and pollutants, and the greater protection from cosmic radiation that

> was there from the water that was " above the firmament " .

>

> These conditions under which people lived to be almost 1000 years old

> doesn't prevail now.

>

> Russ

You are correct, though I fail to see how you draw the conclusion that less

favorable conditions require a more toxic diet.

There is no question that the digestion of animal proteins produces far more

toxic by-products than does eating high quality vegetable matter.

Again, I am not criticizing those who eat meat (indeed, at the moment I am

in one of my less-than-healthy modes, and eat lots of meat), I am simply

stating facts.

--

Marcus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/21/99 2:54 PM, Reynolds at preynolds@... wrote:

> From: " Reynolds " <preynolds@...>

>

> ,

>

>> The strongest land mammal, the

>> silver back

>> gorilla, eats a diet consisting mainly of fresh fruit, and some occasional

>> nuts and seeds and berries, and even the occasional bug. These are facts,

>> and because our digestive system is so similar to that of the gorilla, his

>> diet is what is best suited for us.

>

> Their bug consumption can be quite significant.

Maybe...maybe not. I am not an 'expert' on such matters.

> Also the following reference

> shows that chimps, who are known to be at least occasional predators, are

> closer to us in terms of DNA sequence than gorillas:

> http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat/comp-anat-2b.shtml#other

I wasn't talking about DNA sequence, I was talking about digestive systems.

>> Of course, since we don't have two or more stomachs and don't chew our cud,

>> we cannot 'eat' grass, but we can grow it and juice it, which is far better

>> than spending all day chewing the pulp.

>

> And humans were designed to get all their protein from juices and plants?

>

>

Yes. Compare the digestive system of the silver back gorilla (a KNOWN strict

vegetarian, with an occasional foray into the insect kingdom) with that of a

known strict animal protein eater like a lion. The lions is short and simple

with a very short transit time, and is designed to excrete primarily

hydrochloric acid in very large quantities, ideal for breaking down animal

protein. They spend their time either hunting, or sleeping. The silver back

gorillas (and us), on the other hand, have very long and complex digestive

systems, ideal for breaking down fruit and other vegetable matter, and NOT

very efficient for breaking down animal protein. Yes, we can do it, and yes,

we can even maintain relatively good health while doing so. This does not

make it an 'ideal' food, merely one that can sustain life when nothing else

is available.

--

Marcus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, there is abundant evidence that a high animal protein, low

carbohydrate diet is heart healthy...but it does cause other problems.

I don't pretend to have all the answers. I simply try to use my head.

I am a blood type O, supposedly requiring meat, but I feel WONDERFUL when I

maintain a strict, raw food vegetarian diet (high in the superfoods, of

course). This is a fact.

On 11/21/99 9:54 PM, Bob Stirling at gdraft@... wrote:

> From: Bob Stirling <gdraft@...>

>

> " The average risk of heart disease for a man eating meat, eggs and dairy

> products is 50% The risk for a man who leaves off meat is 15% However the

> coronary risk of a vegetarian who leaves off meat, eggs and dairy products

> drops to only 4%.

>

> The risk for cancer of the prostrate, breast and colon is three to four

> times higher for people who consume meat, eggs and dairy products on a

> daily basis when compared to those who eat them sparingly or not at all. In

> addition, vegetarian women have stronger bones and fewer fractures, and

> they lose less bone when they age.

>

> Studies of long-lived vegetarian people like the Hunzas, who are healthy

> and active into advanced age, contrast sharply with the short lifespans and

> increased disease rates of Alaskan Eskimos, who depend largely on what they

> catch from the sea. "

>

> from Dynamic Living, Aileen Ludington and Hans Diehl.

> -------------------

>

> Where you get the protein from is one thing, but what comes with it is

> another.

>

> If you get your protein from meat, eggs and dairy, you will also be getting

> saturated fat and cholesterol and a higher risk for heart disease, cancer

> and stroke (on average).

>

> If you get your protein from vegetables, grains and legumes you will be

> getting unsaturated fat, no cholesterol and high fiber.

>

> Bob

--

Marcus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob,

> " The average risk of heart disease for a man eating meat, eggs and dairy

> products is 50% The risk for a man who leaves off meat is 15% However the

> coronary risk of a vegetarian who leaves off meat, eggs and dairy products

> drops to only 4%.

It does not indicate what the risks are from eating an organic diet

including small to moderate amounts of meat from mostly grass-fed animals

not fed hormones and antibiotics, some deep-sea fish, lots of vegetables and

a few fruits, perhaps some whole grains, and no junk. This type of diet is

different from the meat-based (or, rather, meat, starch, junk and no fiber

diets) that cause heart disease.

> The risk for cancer of the prostrate, breast and colon is three to four

> times higher for people who consume meat, eggs and dairy products on a

> daily basis when compared to those who eat them sparingly or not

> at all.

The overall diet and quality of meat make a difference. But I do see the

potential link between red meat and cancer, yet for some people red meat

also provides real benefits depending on their metabolism.

> Studies of long-lived vegetarian people like the Hunzas, who are healthy

> and active into advanced age, contrast sharply with the short

> lifespans and

> increased disease rates of Alaskan Eskimos, who depend largely on

> what they

> catch from the sea. "

First, the Hunzas were not vegetarian, according to Bernard Jensen - they

had some meat once or twice a week - which means 50 - 100 times a year

(quite a lot of meat). Second, I question whether the Eskimos studied were

still eating their native diets. The Eskimos Price visited were very healthy

with excellent dental arches and no tooth decay (which would also point to

low incidence of osteoporosis though he does not specifically report on

that). In any case the natural-food diets eaten these days by people who

are eating some meat for health generally do not have that quantity of meat

(though I'm seeing an exception from a fellow on a raw foods list reporting

that an 'all meat' diet is the way for him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/22/99 12:07:40 AM Central Standard Time,

cmarcus@... writes:

<< From: Marcus <cmarcus@...>

Actually, there is abundant evidence that a high animal protein, low

carbohydrate diet is heart healthy...but it does cause other problems.

I don't pretend to have all the answers. I simply try to use my head.

I am a blood type O, supposedly requiring meat, but I feel WONDERFUL when I

maintain a strict, raw food vegetarian diet (high in the superfoods, of

course). This is a fact.

>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I am also type O and have been a vegetarian for many yrs. If I even try to

eat something that has meat in it I feel lousy...not sick or anything, just

lousy until it is fianally gone

out of my body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reynolds et al wrote:

> I agree with you. The debate on vegetarianism vs not is one of these

> never-ending ones and when contrasting the viewpoints and experiences of

> people like , vs. many successful 'Paleodieters' who have reversed

> their health problems by eating lots of high-quality meat (while stopping

> the grains), I doubt there will ever be any consensus. I eat fish, eggs,

> foul or meat on a daily basis and it is very good food for me.

Yes! After, being a veggie for 7 years, I learned the error of my ways. The meat

*has* to quality, hormone,

antibiotic, gene-dicing, & c *FREE*. During this time, my teeth were wrecked and

I gained weight. If I keep good

bowel habits and I do, it is the right way for my heritage. My bloodline lived

at the 40th parallel and higher.

If my ancestors lived closer to the equator, I'd probably be happier as a near

veggie (just a supposition

here). Today, I thrive on buckwheat, rye, and millet, but not rice or wheat. I

like barley, qinua, and amaranth

but I don't eat enough to judge. Most of the food we eat is meat, veggies, and

some little grain.

I have read somewhere that if you are caucasian, you should never eat wheat. I

have no other reference at all

other than a impassim reference. Does anyone know anything of this at all.

K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marcus wrote:

> I have never said that eating meat in and of itself was 'bad' for you,

> either physically or morally. I do believe that if you are going to eat

> meat, you should go out and acquire it yourself, not buy it off a grocery

> shelf (the same for eggs, chickens, etc). The reasons for this are

> twofold...you are EARNING it, and you know where it came from.

My teacher Sri Swami Satchidananda, a vegetatarian, made it very clear that the

main problem with meat eating

was the production of chemicals that interferred with meditation and spiritual

pursuits. There is some violence

that " lingers " around as well, but it was a choice for you to make. Some people

require meat. Blindly embracing

vegitarianism is neither wise nor holy. I did not initially understand this; I

should have never became a

veggie. As for earning it, pick up the sickle as well and harvest your own

grain.

> It is not even debateable whether or not you can get all the protein you

> need from grasses. Horses and elephants are two of the strongest land

> mammals, and that's all they eat. The strongest land mammal, the silver back

> gorilla, eats a diet consisting mainly of fresh fruit, and some occasional

> nuts and seeds and berries, and even the occasional bug.

OK, I'll debate it with you in 6 months if you change your diet to grasses. It

is a big, obvious non sequitir

to assume that your body and those of cattle, horses, and elephants are similar

enough to have similar diets.

The fact is that plants do not provide all the essential amino acids for your

continued survival. To not have

all of them is to invite certain physiological damage and death. Apes such as

chimps and gorillas dine upon

meat when available and occassionally enjoy a wee bit of cannibalism.

> These are facts,

> and because our digestive system is so similar to that of the gorilla, his

> diet is what is best suited for us. Of course, since we don't have two or

> more stomachs and don't chew our cud, we cannot 'eat' grass, but we can grow

> it and juice it, which is far better than spending all day chewing the pulp.

We are not intended to eat nothing but grasses.

I'll agree with you, with some variance, on the imitation of the gorilla's diet.

They do eat some meat with a

predominance of fruit, veggies, nuts and seeds. They do not eat rice an wheat.

K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RJGoldsmit@... wrote:

> << Now, I will agree that some people (the blood type O's for example) do much

> better on a diet that includes animal proteins, but I believe that they

> could do much better on one that consisted of a large quantity of high

> quality amino acids from the vegetable kingdom...enter the green superfoods.

> >>

Do you have a reference on the type O " diet " .

Thanks,

K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/23/99 02:54:10, preynolds@... writes:

<< he body over time will detoxify and heal

itself itself on the right raw foods including raw meat, while all cooked

food diets are destined to fail and only cause more disease. >>

I have heard of similar beliefs. How can it be, ? How can raw meat not

be filled with parasites? I understand that free-range chickens and other

animals would have less parasites than the chemically raised ones, but how

could they be parasite free? Almost all living creatures seem to harbor

parasites. Why would anyone want to put themselves at such a risk by eating

them wrong? Even sushi, if I understand it, is supposed to be frozen a

certain way to kill fish parasites. Raw meat....?

Robin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>what raw foods list are you talking about

Take a look at:

http://www.odomnet.com/live-food/list_information.htm

Even beyond the vegetarian or not debate, the philospophy and beliefs of

Aajonus are quite a bit at odds with this 'bowel cleanse' list philosophy, as

he does not believe in harmful parasites and specific bowel cleanses or

colonics, but rather believes that the body over time will detoxify and heal

itself itself on the right raw foods including raw meat, while all cooked

food diets are destined to fail and only cause more disease.

I question a lot of it but it is quite radical and fascinating. Aajonus'

book 'We Want To Live' will strike a chord with anyone who has been damaged

by modern medicine and has decided to wholly reject it for dealing with our

ills.

I'm just a lurker on the list right now - I don't specifically follow the

'Aajonus' plan but I eat similarly in some ways with about an 80% raw-food

diet (and do bowel cleanses as well). I do eat a lot of raw eggs (easily

over 1000 raw Country Hen Omega-3 eggs during the past year with definite

benefits) and raw meat occasionally - though I find nothing especially toxic

about cooking meat myself and generally prefer to as long as the meat is not

dried out or charred (the big issue as far as its effect on me rather is

meat quality and presence or absense of drugs in the animal feed). I like to

take raw eggs in smoothies and mix in some green superfoods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> << he body over time will detoxify and heal

>

> itself itself on the right raw foods including raw meat, while all cooked

>

> food diets are destined to fail and only cause more disease. >>

>

> I have heard of similar beliefs. How can it be, ? How can

> raw meat not

> be filled with parasites? I understand that free-range chickens

> and other

> animals would have less parasites than the chemically raised

> ones, but how

> could they be parasite free? Almost all living creatures seem to harbor

> parasites. Why would anyone want to put themselves at such a

> risk by eating

> them wrong? Even sushi, if I understand it, is supposed to be frozen a

> certain way to kill fish parasites. Raw meat....?

> Robin

Don't have an answer for you, Robin, but many people find raw meat very

digestible and strengthening, and helpful in keeping the diet low in carbs

(as carbo intolerance is common in chronic disease). As I said I'm not an

Aajonus disciple (or anyone's disciple except the good Lord) myself, but he

has many followers who have eaten raw meat on a daily basis for months and

years and swear by the results and have not run into problems. Whatever one

thinks of his ideas as a whole Aajonus himself by all accounts is a

remarkable example of health regeneration.

I have eaten some raw meat but not lately, and while everything has risk I

really don't fear raw or undercooked meat myself from decent sources - for

example I can pick up some organic Icelandic lamb at the HFS, and eat it raw

if I want and be quite sure to not have any problems with it. I have yet to

develop a desire in any way for raw or near-raw chicken though.

There was a fellow on another raw-food list known as 'Zephyr' who practiced

something called 'instinctive nutrition', and did get very sick and almost

die from parasitosis from wild raw meat (caribou or something or other, I

forget the details). Anyone interested in that list, which includes a lot of

excellent scientific debate, heres the FAQ:

http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~tu/raw-food/faq.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/99 2:06 PM, tehuti at tehuti@... wrote:

> From: tehuti <tehuti@...>

>

>

>

> Marcus wrote:

>

>> I have never said that eating meat in and of itself was 'bad' for you,

>> either physically or morally. I do believe that if you are going to eat

>> meat, you should go out and acquire it yourself, not buy it off a grocery

>> shelf (the same for eggs, chickens, etc). The reasons for this are

>> twofold...you are EARNING it, and you know where it came from.

>

> My teacher Sri Swami Satchidananda, a vegetatarian, made it very clear that

> the main problem with meat eating was the production of chemicals that

> interferred with meditation and spiritual pursuits.

As well as the toxins generated by metabolizing animal protein...it is a

biochemical fact, whether it is free range meat or not. In small quantities,

it is hardly noticeable.

> There is some violence

> that " lingers " around as well, but it was a choice for you to make. Some

> people require meat. Blindly embracing vegitarianism is neither wise nor holy.

Neither is denying reality. Just because you made an unsuccessful attempt to

practice vegetarianism doesn't invalidate it, even for you. There are many

different kinds of plant foods that you may have never eaten that would have

made the difference.

> I did not initially understand this; I should have never became a veggie. As

> for earning it, pick up the sickle as well and harvest your own grain.

I'm working on that...

>> It is not even debateable whether or not you can get all the protein you

>> need from grasses. Horses and elephants are two of the strongest land

>> mammals, and that's all they eat. The strongest land mammal, the silver back

>> gorilla, eats a diet consisting mainly of fresh fruit, and some occasional

>> nuts and seeds and berries, and even the occasional bug.

>

> OK, I'll debate it with you in 6 months if you change your diet to grasses. It

> is a big, obvious non sequitir to assume that your body and those of cattle,

> horses, and elephants are similar enough to have similar diets.

I never said they were. I was using these as an example of how grass juices

are perfectly capable of producing extremely good quality bone, sinew,

muscle, skin and hair.

> The fact is that plants do not provide all the essential amino acids for your

> continued survival.

This is a ludicrous statement. WHAT plants? Sure, there are many plants that

don't, but the green superfoods, not only contain all of them, but in enough

quantity to produce a horse.

> To not have all of them is to invite certain physiological

> damage and death. Apes such as chimps and gorillas dine upon meat when

> available and occassionally enjoy a wee bit of cannibalism.

Chimps do, and I didn't use them as an example. Gorillas certainly do

NOT...though it is very probable that there is the occasional exception (as

there almost always is).

>> These are facts,

>> and because our digestive system is so similar to that of the gorilla, his

>> diet is what is best suited for us. Of course, since we don't have two or

>> more stomachs and don't chew our cud, we cannot 'eat' grass, but we can grow

>> it and juice it, which is far better than spending all day chewing the pulp.

>

> We are not intended to eat nothing but grasses.

I never said we were...stop putting words in my mouth, if you please.

--

Marcus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>There was a fellow on another raw-food list known as 'Zephyr' who practiced

>something called 'instinctive nutrition', and did get very sick and almost

>die from parasitosis from wild raw meat (caribou or something or other, I

>forget the details). Anyone interested in that list, which includes a lot of

>excellent scientific debate, heres the FAQ:

>

>http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~tu/raw-food/faq.html

>

>

Personally I would avoid raw meat like the plauge. Living in the north we

have access to wild meat, moose and caribou. This meat when raw does

harbour parasites. Our dog, a husky, loves this meat whenever he can get it

and has gotten into trouble quite a few times from it. When it happened we

were not aware that is was parasites (10 years ago). But eventually figured

it out, he would get better after he had a worm treatment from the vet. A

few months after eating this raw meat, his health declined considerably,

very poor coat, lost weight, lethargic. At one point a friend who is a

nurse thought he had cancer.

When we started our cleanse program at home, we started him on a parasite

cleanse also. His improvement has been amazing. I think his system is very

sensitive to parasites.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/21/99 21:45:21, gdraft@... writes:

<< Eskimos and Inuit that eat a high protein diet from sea mammals and fish

and also a diet high in calcium have a high rate of osteoporosis. >>

Is this because the amount of animal protein they eat impacts negatively on

calcium absorption?

Robin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 06:07 PM 99-11-26 EST, you wrote:

>From: RJGoldsmit@...

>

>

>In a message dated 11/21/99 21:45:21, gdraft@... writes:

>

><< Eskimos and Inuit that eat a high protein diet from sea mammals and fish

>and also a diet high in calcium have a high rate of osteoporosis. >>

>

>Is this because the amount of animal protein they eat impacts negatively on

>calcium absorption?

>Robin

It it is due to an excess of protein in the diet.

" The body uses calcium in it's metabolism of excess protein and flushes the

calcium out the kidneys. Studies show that calcium is always lost from

bones when protein intake is too high, regardless of how many calcium-rich

foods one eats or how many calcium supplements one swallows. "

Dynamic Living, by Ludington and Diehl

The text also says that North Americans are eating 2- 3 times more protein

than they need and recommends 50-60 grams / day.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...