Guest guest Posted September 27, 2000 Report Share Posted September 27, 2000 ----- Original Message ----- From: <CPR4WandF@...> Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 12:03 PM Subject: New study shows reconstruction doesn't improve mental health Dear Friends, Here is a press release from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, describing a new study. The results show that women with reconstruction after mastectomy are not less depressed or more satisfied than women with mastectomy without reconstruction. In fact, the women with reconstruction are less satisfied with their sex lives. These findings are inconsistent with the claims of implant manufacturers and plastic surgeons, who have stated to the FDA and to patients that implants will make mastectomy patients " feel whole again. " We will include information about this new study on our website, and will provide more details about the type of reconstruction as soon as I can. Best wishes, Zuckerman Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 92, No. 17, 1365, September 6, 2000 © 2000 Oxford University Press MEMORANDUM FOR: Science Writers and Editors on the Journal Press List Type of Breast Cancer Surgery Has Little Impact on Quality of Life August 31, 2000 (EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE 4 P.M. EDT September 5) Arnold, Deputy News Editor, Dan Eckstein, (301) 986-1891, ext. 112 A new study reports that women whose breast cancer was treated by mastectomy or mastectomy with reconstruction complained of more physical symptoms after surgery than women treated by lumpectomy, but the groups did not differ in their self-assessments of emotional, social, or role functioning. Study leader Rowland, Ph.D., of the National Cancer Institute, and colleagues, present their results in the Sept. 6 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. They conclude that a woman’s quality of life after breast cancer surgery is more likely influenced by her age or exposure to adjuvant therapy than what type of surgery she had. However, women who had reconstructive surgery after mastectomy were most likely to report that treatment had a negative impact on their sex lives (45.4% versus 29.8% for lumpectomy and 41.3% for mastectomy alone). The study involved detailed surveys of breast cancer survivors in Los Angeles, Calif., and Washington, D.C. Women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer from 1 to 5 years before study entry were identified through a variety of mechanisms, including local tumor registries, physician practices, and treatment clinic logs or charts. More than 6000 breast cancer survivors were invited to participate in the study, about 60% responded to the invitation, and a total of 1957 women completed questionnaires. The questionnaire included a number of standardized measures of health-related quality of life, body image, and physical and sexual functioning. More than one half (57%) of the women who completed the survey underwent lumpectomy, 26% had mastectomy alone, and 17% had mastectomy with reconstruction. Women in the mastectomy with reconstruction group were younger than those in the lumpectomy or mastectomy-alone groups (mean ages = 50.3, 55.9, and 58.9, respectively); they were also more likely to have a partner and to be college educated, affluent, and white. Reconstructive surgery was of less benefit to body image than anticipated, since scores on the body-image scale for the mastectomy with reconstruction group were closer to those for the mastectomy-alone group than scores for the lumpectomy group. As expected, women in the lumpectomy group reported fewer problems with their body image and feelings of sexual attractiveness than women in either the mastectomy with reconstruction or the mastectomy-alone groups. Mastectomy patients, with or without reconstruction, experienced more physical symptoms and more discomfort around the surgical site than women who had a lumpectomy. These symptoms included the sensation of pins and needles (reported as often in 13% of mastectomy-alone women) and numbness (a common problem for 52% of the women who underwent breast reconstruction). Almost twice as many mastectomy-alone (46.6%), as lumpectomy (24.0%), or mastectomy with reconstruction (25.8%) group members reported problems with arm swelling. The authors conclude that studies such as theirs can provide a benchmark against which to measure progress toward improving not only women’s survival from breast cancer but also their quality of life after breast cancer. Contact: NCI Press Office, (301) 496-6641. (Note: The media contact for this paper is the NCI Press Office because the author is on the NCI staff.) Note: This memo to reporters is from the Journal staff and is not an official release of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) or Oxford University Press (OUP) nor does it reflect NCI or OUP policy. In addition, unless otherwise stated, all articles and items published in the Journal reflect the individual views of the authors and not necessarily the official points of view held by NCI, any other component of the U.S. government, OUP, or the organizations with which the authors are affiliated. Neither NCI nor any other component of the U.S. government nor OUP assumes any responsibility for the completeness of the articles or other items or the accuracy of the conclusions reached therein. ----------- Zuckerman, Ph.D. Executive Director National Center for Policy Research for Women and Families 1444 Eye Street, NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 202 216-9507 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.